Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rome vs carthage COMPARE AND CONTRAST
Governance in Rome and Carthage
Carthage rome differences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rome vs carthage COMPARE AND CONTRAST
Learning Journal
Valerie Garske
Briefly discuss how the governments of Rome and Carthage differed.
Carthage and Rome Governments
In the mid-200s, B.C., Rome and Carthage were wealthy, sophisticated, powerful civilizations and their governments were both republics ("Phoenician Civilization - New World Encyclopedia," n.d.). Originally, Rome and Carthage were governed by kingships, but they eventually moved away from monarchies and developed into aristocratic republics. Rome continued to adapt and developed into a democratic republic, while the Carthage aristocracy was not willing to change or share for that matter.
According to Morey, the two governments were similar in structure. Carthage had two chief magistrates that would equate to
…show more content…
the Roman Counsel. Carthage also had a council of elders that Morey compared to the Roman Senate (Morey, 1901). In Carthage, political power did not extend beyond the few noble families. In contrast, the Roman patricians and plebeians eventually put their differences aside and established a government of citizen equality under the law. Carthage was an aristocratic oligarchy.
Carthage was an economic powerhouse with lucrative trade routes throughout the Mediterranean (Morey, 1901). The aristocracy controlled the trade and held the public offices. The aristocrats lived in palaces and were wealthy merchants. Tariffs and taxes were paid to the nobles and the aristocrats paid mercenaries to defend their interests. The Carthaginians would often end up in disputes with their mercenary army refusing to appropriately support the war effort (Mark, 2011). The greed of the Carthaginian Aristocracy resulted in disputes on wages and ultimately undermined the Carthaginian military.
Rome was a democratic Republic. Many of the soldiers were Roman Citizens and they shared in the spoils of war. The Roman Army depended on the loyalty and discipline of the army as well as the strategy of great generals. The Roman army had better support. They depended on the Roman Senate to provide the support and to supply the military.
The Roman republic integrated and assimilated her conquests and therefore knew how to develop loyalties and build trust. When things went bad for the Romans during battles with the Carthaginians and they often did, the Romans were resilient to say the least. The Roman military had support of the Senate and loyalty of the citizens and always found a way to learn from their mistakes and
adapt. Wealth was not enough for Carthage. They lacked the cohesiveness of a democratic republic and their soldiers lacked the spirit and the same drive that seemingly the Romans could muster in face of insurmountable odds. When Scipio defeated Hannibal and he retreated to Carthage, the city immediately surrendered (Mark, 2011). In my opinion, Carthage surrendered much sooner then Rome ever would have. Carthage lacked a steadfastness that is likely due to the ungenerous attitude the aristocracy had for the common people of Carthage and so they surrendered rather than fight to the bitter end. References: 424 Carthage - New World Encyclopedia. (2013, April 16). Retrieved December 11, 2015, from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Carthage Mark, J. (2011, April 28). Carthage - Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 11, 2015 from http://www.ancient.eu/carthage/ Mark, J. (2011, December 19). Scipio Africanus the Elder - Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 11, 2015, from http://www.ancient.eu/Scipio_Africanus_the_Elder/ Morey, W. (1901). Outlines of Roman History, Chapter 15. Retrieved December 11, 2015, from http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey15.html Phoenician Civilization - New World Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Phoenician_Civilization
“A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots.” –Marcus Garvey. The U.S. is a combination of many cultures and influences over the centuries and because of this we are alike to many of them. We could name many of these influences: the Greeks, the Chinese Dynasties but the Romans were particularly like us. We might see them as barbaric is some ways but the reality is that the U.S. takes pages from many areas of the Romans, and comparisons could be drawn between both of us. Examples include government, our religions, and in some ways entertainment. The U.S. is much like the old Roman Empire was more than a millennium ago
The Roman Republic was an extraordinary civilization with an exceptionally complex political system that still impact governments today. The Roman Republic comprised of three sections. The most astounding being the Consul that was made up of two male individuals who are chosen every year. Furthermore, there was the Senate made up of elder statesmen that exhorted the Consul and lastly there was the Assemblies where people voted by groups on issues. A couple of their strengths of the political system was its citizen association, in spite of the fact that plebeians really didn't have much power. Another strength of the political system was that it was administered and in view of well spelt out laws to maintain a strategic distance from cases of dictatorship.
The Romans have had almost every type of government there is. They've had a kingdom, a republic, a dictatorship, and an empire. Their democracy would be the basis for most modern democracies. The people have always been involved with and loved their government, no matter what kind it was. They loved being involved in the government, and making decisions concerning everyone. In general, the Romans were very power-hungry. This might be explained by the myth that they are descended from Romulus, who's father was Mars, the god of war. Their government loving tendencies have caused many, many civil wars. After type of government, the change has been made with a civil war. There have also been many civil wars between rulers. But it all boils
The Roman Republic had an upstanding infrastructure, a stable social system, and a balanced constitution that solidified Rome’s greatness. Regardless of its achievements, however, the Roman Republic owes much of its success to classical Greek cultures. These cultures, in conjunction with the fundamental values of Roman society, certified Rome as one of the most significant powers the world has ever seen.
Over the span of five-hundred years, the Roman Republic grew to be the most dominant force in the early Western world. As the Republic continued to grow around the year 47 B.C it began to go through some changes with the rise of Julius Caesar and the degeneration of the first triumvirate. Caesar sought to bring Rome to an even greater glory but many in the Senate believed that he had abused his power, viewing his rule more as a dictatorship. The Senate desired that Rome continued to run as a republic. Though Rome continued to be glorified, the rule of Caesar Octavian Augustus finally converted Rome to an Empire after many years of civil war. Examining a few selections from a few ancient authors, insight is provided as to how the republic fell and what the result was because of this.
There were several strengths of the Roman Empire which enabled it to survive for more than four hundred years. These strengths included a strong foundation, having been built off of the Roman Republic; the standardization across the empire of many aspects of life, such as language, law, and especially the extension of citizenship, which made the empire more cohesive and easier to rule; and strong leaders, who were able to utilize the manipulation of the upper class and Senate, and the management of the military.
Since the beginning of time, man has waged war on his neighbors, his friends and his enemies. In many cases these wars were caused by power-hungry nations that were in the process of expanding their empire and ended up stepping on the toes of another superpower or ally of a superpower. In the case of the first Punic War between Rome and Carthage, Carthage was extending its empire and they stepped on Rome’s toes. During the course of this war the winner was unclear but at times victory seemed eminent for both sides until Rome finally won. The Romans had control in the first part of the war but this would not last. After the Romans first win they decided that they needed a victory over the city of Carthage but this would turn the tides in favor of the Carthaginians. For some 15 years after this defeat of Rome the tides went back and forth between the two but would eventually lead to the Romans victory. After the victory, Rome made some very harsh demands and Carthage filled those demands even though some of them were very extreme.
There are many political, economic, sociological causes to the growth and expansion of the Roman republic and later the Roman Empire, but one major factor of expansion that the Romans are most famous for is there Army. There Army was famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and there mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. According to our text Roman warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the Roman pursuit of victory was relentless. The Romans had a pragmatic view towards atrocity and massacre that viewed almost any act as justifiable if it eased the path of victory (Goldsworthy 2000) p. 24. The hoplite phalanx which originated by the Greeks and later adopted by the Roman army, demanded great discipline and adherence to orders in order for this group of soldiers...
The Punic wars between Rome and Carthage were as inevitable as the winter. An analogy for these wars could be an ancient cold war where the two superpowers of the Mediterranean namely Rome and Carthage fought for supremacy in an area that was not large enough for them both. Carthage had become Rome's natural enemy by 300 BC. As Rome expanded taking Italy Rome came into contact with the naval city of Carthage and it's empire. The Carthaginians were a people renowned for their seafaring ability and ruthlessness. Having established colonies across the Mediterranean many became famous merchants. To support their growing empire Carthage had to employ mercenary soldiers and conscription to keep their territories well defended. The officers of the armies were all Carthaginian nobles.
The military might of Rome was second to none in its prime. Victorious battle after battle did nothing but increase Rome’s population of young men suited for combat, increase Rome’s borders, and increase Rome’s influence over its people and the surrounding people. With such great generals as Alexander the Great, Pompey the Great, and Julius Caesar Rome won many decisive battles. At its largest times, Rome controlled most of the Middle East, Asia Minor, present day Europe, and Egypt. It’s is hard to state that conquering and controlling all of the surrounding territory didn’t help aid in Rome’s great success. But would they have been so successful militarily if they didn’t have the trade routes or the technology?
The Roman Republic began approximately around 509 B.C. when the nobles drove the King and his family out of Rome. This monumental incident helped shape the start to the transformation of the monarchy into a republican governmental system. This is known to have begun by that of the Roman nobles trying to hold their power that they had gained. The Republic was “[a] city-state [which] was the foundation of Greek society in the Hellenic Age; in the Hellenistic Age, Greek cities became subordinate to kingdoms, larder political units ruled by autocratic monarchs” (Perry 105)
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC after the ruling Tarquins abused their extensive power as monarchs and were overthrown. The goal of the Roman Republic was to have a strong government, governed equally by the patricians and the plebians, and to avoid another Roman Monarchy. For years Rome was guided by great men, such as Cincinnatus and Scipio Africanus, who led the Republic through hard times, conquering such enemies as the Etruscans and the Carthaginians. Large-scale war united Roman society in its common goals. However, after Scipio’s victory at Zama in 202 BC, a new Roman world began to take shape. Roman soldiers returned home from their victory to find that they could not pay for their farms, becoming “squatters” on their own lands after having to sell them to richer men. The Senate became corrupted, and despite the Gracchi brothers’ best efforts, the rich patricians soon monopolized nearly all aspects of the Republic, from trading and “farming” to governing the people. After marching on Rome, Sulla became dictator in 82 BC. After Sulla, the First Triumvirate: Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar, owned virtually all power in Rome, yet each had his own desire to defeat the other two and become Emperor. When Crassus died in battle, Caesar had his chance. He defeated Pompey and marched on Rome, victorious. After declaring himself Dictator for Life, Caesar was assassinated, and another Civ...
In order for the Romans to invade and conquer other provinces, they had to spend heavily on their legions. The Roman armies and supply lines became over-stretched resulting in thousands of soldiers being recruited and deployed from Rome into other territories as invaders or defenders. They also depended on soldiers to defend the borders of the lands they had conquered from barbarian attacks which resulted in the increased manufacturing of weapons and more money being spent on soldiers. High military spending left the Romans with very limited resources for other essential government projects such as the building of more public houses and the development of roads and aqueducts as well as leading to inflation. The over-expenditure on the military led the citizens of Rome to refuse the policies and laws enforced by the government and riots were commonplace in Rome during its last century.... ...
The political system of both Roman empires was based on virtue and the republic was founded with the Senate as the center. The magistrates were elected annually and also had control of the armies. The key to Roman superiority was the patriotism and training and drills.
Carthage was founded about 100years earlier than Rome and had very fertile lands and an excellent harbor. It grew economically and politically through trading Gold from Spain, Ivory, Linen, precious stones, and other valuable minerals from different states. They had a very large number of trading vessels to load these products and carry them from pot to pot. They also had a powerful navy of warships. Like the Roman empire the Carthagean empire acquired dominion over the native races of Africa, the Lydians and the Numidians. These two great states had controls over the small states they made their allies, or members of their confederations. They were almost equal in many ways, and even their economies