Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient romes military issues
Military problems in ancient rome
Essay military of ancient rome
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ancient romes military issues
Ancient Rome was one of the greatest empires of the ancient world. Like previous empires, what enabled Rome to expand its borders successfully and become such a great empire was its military power. Rome’s army was like no army the world had ever seen. However, Rome’s army wasn’t always that powerful. The Romans were originally a tribal group of three tribes. During the 7th century BC they would come to be dominated by the Etruscans, their more advanced northern neighbors. The Etruscan kings would rule Rome for 200 years as military dictators. Around 510 BC the Romans expelled the kings and set up a new republic government. They copied the Etruscans hoplite tactics, who had learned them from the Greeks and organized annual armies of citizen …show more content…
Therefore something more flexible was needed to combat such foes than the unwieldy, slow-moving phalanx. The abandonment of the Greek phalanx brought an important change to the Roman army. Instead of fighting in phalanx formation as a single large mass like the Early Roman army did. The Romans where now drawn up in three lines which consisting of small units called maniples. These units or maniples consisted of 120 men. Skirmishers could then fall back through the gaps in the checker board formation. The first two rows of maniples would form a single line when confronting enemy heavy infantry. The Roman army was organized so that three of these battle lines could be formed to face the enemy. The front two maniple rows and the first battle line, were made up of new recruits called hastati, who would absorb charges and battle the enemy until exhausted. Then they could fall back through the gaps in the maniples behind them. The next two rows of maniples called the principes, would then face the enemy for the battle, these were the experienced warriors. They were expected to finish off their tired and battered opponents. However, if this line were for some reason to fail, then the final two rows of maniples called the Triarii would then form the final line of defense. These would be the …show more content…
The weapons used by Rome’s army had also changed. Now they were arming the first Hastati and Principes with short thrusting swords and only the Triarii had spears. Legionaries were also given two javelins called pilas, which was another adaptation from the Samnites. Faced with a better Roman army and no military advantage, the lands of the Samnites where colonized. The Samnites lost their freedom and were forced under roman rule. Soon after securing victory the Romans consolidated their hold over Italy bringing them into conflict with Pyrrhus of Epirus and Macedonia who was a leading general in the Hellenistic world. The Pyrrhic War which lasted from 280–275 BC was a complex struggle for control of Italy, Sicily and the western Greek cities. The phalanx formation used by Pyrrhus was developed by Phillip of Macedonia and used by Alexander the Great to conquer the known world. Spear lengths had been doubled presenting an almost impenetrable wall of spear heads. Although their shields had been reduced in order to allow hoplites to use two hands to hold the longer spears, this formation had become dominate in the Hellenistic world. Pyrrhus also brought war elephants to Italy, something the Romans had never faced before. In several bloody battles Pyrrhus managed to score narrow victories against the roman legions but the heavy losses caused him to with draw from Italy. After one particular bloody battle Pyrrhus is
Rome was the greatest empire of all times and it impacted the society in many ways. It impacted society by the creation of laws, government practices, language, literature, and art.
“This account I have given the reader, not so much with the intention of commending the Romans, as of comforting those that have been conquered by them, and for the deterring others from attempting innovations under their government. This discourse of the Roman military conduct may also perhaps be of use to such of the curious as are ignorant of it, and yet have a mind to know it.” –excerpt from “Description of the Roman Army,” by Josephus
The Roman military was arguably the most important factor in Rome’s illustrious history. Using your knowledge of Rome’s military from the video, text, and the document provided, make an argument for why the Roman military was so successful.
During his reign, Augustus made a number of changes how the Roman military operated. As Rome shifted from a Republic to Empire and the ideas of what Rome was to be was carefully being crafted by Augustus to fit his own narrative, the army went through a number of changes to support the new dynamic of Empire and Emperor. These changes to the army allowed the army to grow to fit its new role, and helped Rome to become a true military power.
Rome could not have succeeded without the personal freedom and individuality granted to its citizens. This nurtured a creative and inventive mind, which would not be hindered by the limitations of oppressive monarchies. People lived for their own greater good more than the government, as in America. America and Rome both produced technologies that made their economies dominate over their neighbors, appreciating the value of their currencies. A strong sense of peace and order helped each country thrive, as the fear of trading and making money dissipated. The Roman military was the most advanced of its day. Soldiers were more equipped and armed than any other army, and the best methods of siege craft were employed in battle. The American military shares the sam...
Rome was one of the greatest empires of the ancient world. The early Roman state was founded in 509 B.C. after the Romans drove out the hated Etruscan king. By this time Rome had already grown from a cluster of small villages to a small city. Little did the settlers know that this was the beginning of one of the greatest and largest empires ever known.
According to the brainpop it says that the Roman army was paid to be loyal and fight. Even though the Roman army would have been loyal even if they did not pay them. So they were just wasting money on the army when they would not even wear their armor. Also, according to Vegetius, it says that the Roman soldiers became very lazy so the armor became too heavy for the soldiers to wear. Therefore, since the army did not wear any armor when they fought in the Goths they had no body armor to protect themselves. So, they were often beaten by archers in the head and other military weapons.Without any armor the soldiers would instead of fighting the battle, just run away from the
The strength of the Roman military was the string that held the Roman Empire together for as long as it lasted. The military was made up of strictly disciplined men whom were ready and willing to serve their emperor.
The empire that the Roman’s built can be argued to have been the greatest in world history. The Roman Empire controlled the largest land area in European history and influenced a huge region, acting as a cultural center for the entire continent of Europe. Their strength derived from their prowess and skill on the battlefield. The Roman Army was extremely effective and became the basis of our military structure today by utilizing technological advances in strategy and weaponry, and simply having more discipline.
Brand argues that the Roman military system was successful due to the fact that there was an internal hierarchy, as well as laws and rules that were in place. Based on laws, and ancient Roman historians and leaders, like Polybius, Brand solely argues the Roman army’s power was based off the political leadership and strict organization. He analyzes the oath each soldier was required to take, no matter their rank, and how even the leader of each legion “...swore ‘to be obedient and to execute the orders of his officer to the best of his ability’” (Brand 47). Brand discusses the legions and how each was broken down into four lines of specific troops, while having a set hierarchy and specific code to follow, but only touches on the idea that success of these legions was due to their sheer size. He asserts that discipline, used by the higher ranks such as the commanding general, was strong and a major motivating factor for each soldier. He agrees with Theodor Mommsen and the idea that politics was the main factor to why the Roman army was victorious. Brand shortsightedly focuses solely on the political aspects of why the Roman armies were successful, arguing the leaders were responsible for the empire’s
There are many political, economic, sociological causes to the growth and expansion of the Roman republic and later the Roman Empire, but one major factor of expansion that the Romans are most famous for is there Army. There Army was famous for their harsh discipline amongst their own ranks and there mercifulness brutality amongst their enemies. According to our text Roman warfare was characterized by great ferocity and the Roman pursuit of victory was relentless. The Romans had a pragmatic view towards atrocity and massacre that viewed almost any act as justifiable if it eased the path of victory (Goldsworthy 2000) p. 24. The hoplite phalanx which originated by the Greeks and later adopted by the Roman army, demanded great discipline and adherence to orders in order for this group of soldiers...
Although, many might say that the Roman Empire was already very successful even without the Greek influence, the Romans were already known for their very great army. The Romans were able to conquer so many lands and keep a great structure to the point where other communities feared them because of their army. It is true, Rome was already very successful they had conquered many lands before the Hellenistic period, and were already known to be a very rich and powerful community. Just as Chris Truman states on the website the History learning site where du...
The military might of Rome was second to none in its prime. Victorious battle after battle did nothing but increase Rome’s population of young men suited for combat, increase Rome’s borders, and increase Rome’s influence over its people and the surrounding people. With such great generals as Alexander the Great, Pompey the Great, and Julius Caesar Rome won many decisive battles. At its largest times, Rome controlled most of the Middle East, Asia Minor, present day Europe, and Egypt. It’s is hard to state that conquering and controlling all of the surrounding territory didn’t help aid in Rome’s great success. But would they have been so successful militarily if they didn’t have the trade routes or the technology?
Throughout history, no other era was more significant than that of the Roman Empire. The power and influence of the Roman government and it=s rule over the world was accomplished by the Roman Army. The Roman army was the ultimate weapon of war because of the well trained men, their effective weapons and their brilliant battle tactics.
The Greeks basic soldier was a foot soldier that was trained for close combat. The basic combat soldier in Rome was a horse rider and an expert bowman. This was also due in part to the increase in technology as well. The Grecian hoplite would also carry a spear that compared to the Roman pilum as a predecessor. The pilum was much longer and could be thrown a lot further.