In ancient Rome, gladiators fought in amphitheaters with huge crowds of spectators as a form of entertainment. Even though, Hollywood may portray Roman gladiatorial contests as a fight to the death, in reality the end of the battle usually didn't end up with someone killed. In order for the game to be more exciting to watch, gladiators had to be professionally trained. From a business standpoint, it is not logical nor economical for athletes to be killing each other. Most of the time, brawls ended with a decisive outcome, meaning one of the contestants got badly wounded or lost endurance. Successful gladiators became major stars of the Roman world, similar to wrestlers and boxers today. Most gladiators were prisoners of war, criminals and or slaves, despite the fact Hadrian made it …show more content…
illegal to sell slaves to gladiator trainers. Nevertheless, the practice of selling slaves still continued. Slaves had an opportunity to become free if they were able to conquer their grim fate ahead and survive. Additionally, free men also became gladiators if they wanted to choose to participate in this dangerous activity. Gladiators and combat has changed as well as progresse; different gladiators types depend on their armor and fighting technique. Origins The violent sport began in 264 BC in Rome for the funeral of a of a distinguished aristocrat named Junius Brutus Pera (Riley 158). As a result of this, gladiators were also referred to as bustuarii, which translates to funeral men (Jenkins 57). As gladiatorial fights became popular,eventually politicians and candidates used them to gain public attention. These high power figures endeavored to out compete each other to see who could host the greatest and the grandest show(Jenkins 58) Wealthy men also hosted these event to display the power and influence they had as well as gain public attention. For instance, emperor's spend extraordinary amounts of money on these tournaments. For example, Trajan spent millions of sestertii(an ancient Roman coin) which provided 4,941 pairs of gladiators and 10,000 beasts both tame and wild. The event, sponsored by Trajan lasted over one hundred twenty days (Riley 161). Watching people fight each other may seem horrible ,nevertheless, it became a prominent form of entertainment in antiquity. Fighting Styles and armor/weapons Fighting styles started developing as gladiatorial fights became a mainstream form of entertainment.
From the third and second centuries BC, gladiator started being equipped with spears and lances, and they fought in a tunic or linen loincloth. Additionally, the brawlers also held large circular shields and bronze helmets to protect themselves. Within the first century AD, specific types of combat began to emerge. Now there were different adaptations of helmets, shields, and swords. There were also breastplates and leather straps worn around the gladiator’s right arm. Most importantly, now gladiators were equipped with various swords, and daggers. All these changes made the games more thrilling; thus, it was more difficult to predict who would win . Gladiators started being distinguished by their ethnic names, for example, galli, thraeces and samnites, which were tribes that once fought against Rome (Meijer 86-90) . All the different variations have their own origin of how they started. Each body type would also impact what the style in which they perform. Generally, once a gladiator knows their fighting style they do not switch and train to become the best they can.(Meijer
88). Gladiators were armed in many various configurations, each combination having it’s own fighting style.There were variations of gladiators and they would group against had an opponent with opposing fighting style. Pairs were matched to make the fights fair and one gladiator's advantage was the other's disadvantage. An example of a common match were the thraex and murmillones together. A thraex was unique because he carried and a curved sword (sica) with a small shield(parma). A parma could be either either square or round. The murmillones had a long shield(scutum) and a narrow sword(gladius). A gladius is was anywhere from 40-50 centimeters in length. The nurmillones was also commonly put up against hoplomachus since the hoplomachus had many similarities to the thraex. The hoplomachus was special because he wore a Boeotic helmet and a small round bronze shield. One of the most obscure types and well known was the retiarius because he had no helmet, no sword, and little armor. All he had was a wide-mesh throwing net about 3 meters across and a trident. If the retiarius caught his challenger then it would be almost impossible him to escape, and then he could the retiarius would use his trigent. Although, if the retiarius missed the net, then he is vulnerable and attacked. A modification of the retiarius was a laquearius who used a lasso(laqueus) opposed to a net. The most common foe of the retiarius was the secutor. A secutor carried a short sword or dagger and had a shield. His right arm and left leg were protected with armor. His helmet had really small small eye holes. He had to win the fight fast because of the lack of oxygen the helmet permitted.Most of the gladiators fought on foot, but the equites was permitted to fight on a horse, however, they dressed in loose knee-length tunis and had medium sized shields(Riley 93). There is speculation around dimachaerus because it was only mentioned twice in inscription, but there are images of him. The name literally means “man with two swords”. Having two swords would not allow him to have a shield. It is predicted that a dimachaerus would have fought against another dimachaerus(Riley 94). There are so many more different types of gladiators, and it is fascinating to see how each one focused on a separate component of fighting. Armor Even though a lot of armor available, most gladiators fought bare-chested or in sleeveless tunics. It is peculiar how the head, legs, and arms were all protected, yet not the chest area. Wearing less armor allowed the gladiators to be more mobile and move around easier. Another possible explanation is that having more skin exposed and showing more muscle made the games appealing. Also since the gladiators originally started as part of a ceremony the slaves and prisoners were forced to bare their bodies as a sign of subjugation and a means of punishment. Most of the time, legs were covered with metal armor, and arms with leather or studded leather(Baas 38).
Consus where the opening sacrifices took place was located in the center of the Circus Maximus where the racing took place. Like racing, gladiators probably originated as funeral games, with religious significance attached to what in affect was the ritual sacrifice of the gladiators themselves. The first recorded gladiator fight was in 264BC, when 3 pairs of gladiators fought to the death during the funeral of Junius Brutus. The gladiator fights were known as munera as they were originally 'duties' paid to dead ancestors. They gradually lost their connection to funerals under the Roman Empire and became an important stage for emperors and leaders to put on spectacles for their own reasons.
The story of Gladiator takes place in Ancient Rome and contains intense action, great acting, and fantastic storytelling. Although most of this action drama is mostly fictitious, some certain events and characters appear in the history books.
The gladiators competed against one another for the sake of public entertainment at festival games. Although some gladiators fought wild animals, the combats usually featured a pair of male human contenders. They fought in diverse styles depending on their background and how much training they had endured. Originally as captured soldiers, they were made to fight with their own weopons.
A gladiators life was far from easy. Most were slaves, prisoners of war, or hardened criminals, therefore they were not free men. Often times they were trained and forced to take part in the events, hoping for their freedom if they were to conquer their grim fate and survived for a few years (wik). This was depicted in the most recent movie GLADIATOR. In this film Russel Crowe Maximus' starts out as an army general under Marcus Aurelius, until Commudus murders his own father out of spite for his fathers loyalty to Maximus and not him. He then inherits the title of king, and condemns Maximus to a gruesome fate as a slave/gladiator. Though this doesn't sound like the ideal life, to some at the time is was an appealing, so much so that some free men degraded themselves so they could battle in the games. Was it for basic living? Possibly but more than likely it was for the Fame and Prestige of a Gladiator. These free men were known as Professional gladiators.
Have you ever sat and wondered, how did Spartacus rebel against Italy? Stated here is everything you need to know about the great warrior Spartacus!
After its debut in America on May 5th of 2000, the movie Gladiator has been a nationwide symbol of heroism(Imdb). The film was directed by Ridley Scott and the lead roles of the film were carried out by Russell Crowe as Maximus and Joaquin Phoenix as Commodus(Imdb). The movie takes place during the reign of the Holy Roman Empire in the year 180 A.D. The Emperor, Marcus Aurelius, is dying and wishes to leave the Roman Empire under the control of Roman General Maximus Meridius. The Emperor’s son Commodus betrays Maximus, kills his father, and takes control of Rome. In betraying Maximus, Commodus has his family killed. Maximus knowing this returns to Rome as a gladiator under the alias “Spaniard” in search of revenge(Imdb). According to Aristotle, “Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude”(Kwheeler). In order for someone to be considered a tragic hero, the person must meet the criteria of high social status, suffer from a hamartia, face a catastrophe, invoke catharsis, and experience anagnorisis and peripeteia(Kwheeler).
Throughout the history of the Republic, there was a difference between the gladiatorial contests and other forms of spectacular entertainment. The Romans did not invent the concept of gladiatorial fighting; there is some uncertainty as to the exact source. One ancient source says it was the Etruscans, a non-Indo-European people who lived directly north of the Romans.
The first known gladiatorial combat in Rome took place at the funeral of a nobleman named Junius Brutus in 264 B.C.2 His sons Marcus and Decimus revived an ancient Etruscan custom of having slaves fight at the funeral of a great leader in the belief that such a sacrifice would please the gods. During the ceremony, three pairs of slaves were forced to fight to the death. In 216 B.C., twenty-two pairs of slaves fought at the funeral of a man named Marcus Lepidus. Sixty pairs of slaves fought when Publicus Licinius died in 183 B.C. These slave fighters were now known as bustiarii, or funeral men.3 By the time of Julius Caesar, any direct association with funerals and religion was gone, and these fighters, now known as gladiators, meaning swordsmen, were a powerful force in Roman politics. He bought the affection of the people with magnificent banquets and spectacles that were open and free to the public. Caesar then estab...
In the private gladiator schools, gladiators trained every day and received medical attention and three meals a day to keep them healthy. They were allowed to pick the weapons and armor that best suited him or her. Different types of weapons resulted in different types of gladiators. The types of gladiators are: Andabatae, who wore helmets without eye holes, Catervarii, who fought not in pairs, but
The Gladiators – History’s Most Deadly Sport. New York: St. Martin’s Press/Thomas Dunne Books, 2003. Potter, David S. and David J. Mattingly, eds. Life, Death and Entertainment in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1998.
Much like today’s athletes gladiators competed with one another to decide a victor and is a form of entertainment for people spectating. But Gladiators competed much different than professional athletes do today. Gladiators were forced to fight for the entertainment of others and were considered slaves (“ The Roman Gladiator”). Gladiators did not just fight for friendly sport either they had to fight to the death. This made the gladiatorial games so exciting for the people watching. The people loved to watch others fight and the gore that they would see while the gladiators were fighting. It may sound horrible in today’s society but back then it was the most prominent form of entertainment. Different from today’s athletes and entertainers, gladiators were slaves and were told what to do against their will. Much of the gladiators were slaves, criminals, and prisoners of war. Gladiatorial games were mostly held by the Roman Republic and forced there enemy’s to fight for their lives in the...
To become a gladiator, one must either be a slave, a volunteer, or forced by the emperor to fight. Many slaves who were gladiators were well-fed with a high protein diet, well trained and were attended by expert physicians. Those who were not slaves basically had to essentially become slaves, however, if they remained successful fight after fight, they could easily become rich.
Gladiators were combatants equipped for arena battles. These battles were against other soldiers, conquered enemies, slaves, and criminals. Even wild beasts were added to be part of the bloody spectacle. Gladiators were a source of entertainment for Roman crowds, politicians and nobility at the Coliseum. It was the Roman equivalent to a Packer game at Lambeau field. A few gladiators were volunteers, but most were detested as slaves. Regardless of where they came from, gladiators allowed spectators to see an example of Rome 's military principles and, how to die an honorable death. The origin of gladiator combat is unclear, evidence supports that it became an important attribute of politics
The Roman army was unbeatable for approximately 300 years, so they must have perfected the art of war at the time. The Roman army’s skill, effective chain of command, discipline, organization, and extensive training enabled it to fight its way to victory. As a matter of a fact, the Roman army’s tactics were so brilliant that they are similar to modern military tactics today. The organization of the Roman army was imperative to its success as a whole.
Every living creature fights to survive. It is an inbred instinct for a living thing to do what is necessary to continue its life and ensure its individual and species survival, whether that means tearing apart its prey or its enemies. Not till the modern human, however, has there been a creature able and willing to innovate upon this part of its base animal nature, to create the art of warfare out of necessity. This art, however, is like any other in that it is both reflective of and dependent on the society it is created by. Physical and economic resources, education of creative minds, and a climate of necessity are all fundamental components for any technological innovation, and it is for this reason that advances in weaponry can tell us