Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leaders are born not made discuss this assessment in relation to the trait theory of leadership
Evolution of Leadership Theories
Is leadership born or made
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leaders are born not made discuss this assessment in relation to the trait theory of leadership
“The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born-that there is a genetic factor to leadership. That’s nonsense; in fact, the opposite is true. Leaders are made rather than born.” —Warren Bennis
Narendra Modi has become a household name after the Lok Sabha Elections, which were enough to prove the faith the citizens of the largest democracy of the world happen to have put in this man. Narendra Modi posses a certain personal appeal which India definitely approves of in their leader after being led by an almost invisible Prime Minister for years. With almost 65% of the enfranchised citizens below 35 years of age, India was desperate for a strong leader upon whose shoulders the nation could build development and social stability. Here are four reasons why the youth thinks Narendra Modi is a people’s person and a man of non-protocol methods :
Public Speaking Skills
Time and again Mr. Narendra Modi has shown his excellent oratorical skills by captivating his audience and making heads turn with talks of development in terms of pressing issues like foreign policy, social stability, national security etc. Mind you, no one writes his speeches, they are mostly impromptu without reading from a script, tailor made for the type of people he is addressing,
…show more content…
Narendra Modi’s journey began in the by-lanes of Vadnagar, a small and nondescript town in North Gujarat’s Mehsana district. His father sold tea at the tea stall he set up in the local railway station. In his early years, Narendra Modi too lent a hand to his father at the tea stall. Even though now he is the Prime Minister of world's largest democracy, he has not let his position go to his head. He comes across as a very humble human being and this is evident by the way he addresses media personnels while answering their questions. He dresses plainly and goes in unmarked cars with no beacon where ever he has to go. Why wouldn’t our nation look up to such a
Throughout 2016, many different people will claim they can lead America to greatness again just as they do each election year. This directs attention towards leadership, and most Americans simply trust that these potential candidates display leadership characteristics. Unfortunately, politicians don’t always exemplify leadership, and many Americans experience poor leaders daily such as dreadful bosses. Because of these commonplace experiences, leadership may not appear as a direct character trait. Adaptable communication, the ability to inspire, a clear passion, and professional attitudes all characterize a true leader.
Many would argue that President Obama is one of the most effective speakers in the decade. With his amazing speeches, he captivates his audience with his emotion and official tone.
...e people of his country can characterize him as a poor leader for the electorate of his country. Although he claims to be fighting for the betterment of the nation and its stability, what can he possibly know about its condition if he fails to recognize the struggles and problems of the underclass majority of the population?
In what could have been a simple eulogy, Justin Trudeau transforms the political legacy of his father, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, into a budding revolution based on love, and inspires Canadians to follow Trudeau’s example, not necessarily in political leanings, but in developing their own character. Through Justin’s words, a father’s love turns into a national love, spreading from coast to coast to
“Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm”- Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill achieved success from failures, and he also achieved success through his speeches. His speeches are what contributed to his success during World War 2. His speeches follow the criteria of an effective speech. The criteria to critique a speech are to find the speech objectives, the audience and context of the speech, the speech content and structure, and analyzing the delivery skills and techniques. The speech objectives are to “educate, to motivate, to persuade, or to entertain” (Dlugan 1). The audience and context of a speech show “where and when the speech is being delivered” (Dlugan 1), and the features of the
President Barack H. Obama has always used rhetorical strategies in his political speeches. He used these strategies to present important points and views of his in front of the public. Delivering points and views properly and logically got him to be the president in the first place. President Obama used mostly ethos and pathos, yet some logos, to deliver his inaugural and the state of union speeches. Being that, he was able to reach the audience emotionally and make the speech flow efficiently while preserving his credibility.
In James G. Clawson case study A Leader’s Guide To Why People Behave The Way They Do we learned how the mentality of leaders is deeply influenced by their parents. One of the key things to take away from Clawson article is how parents can potentially have a lasting effect in the outlooks of a child that can affect them later on in life as adults. As babies are born they are born without any type perceptions created on their own, instead their perceptions and impressions are things that children pick up along the way from their parents. This in return can cause most adults to interpret situations differently from one another.
The vision of leadership that leaders are born made, and not learn to be leaders is still considered but not popular among researchers (Avolio et al, 2013).
This opens the floodgates to leadership development, as opposed to simple psychometric assessment that sorts those with leadership potential from those who will never have the chance.” This theory does not seek inborn traits or capabilities; rather they look at what leaders actually do.(Changing minds). Behavioural theory suggests that leadership requires a strong personality with a well-developed positive ego; self-confidence is essential.(Boundless,
Mahatma Gandhi, a nationalist and spiritual leader was perceptive and objectively so, perhaps most eminently when he instructed his zealots, “First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win” (Mahatma). Gandhi has a remarkable sagacity at a young age and strengthened it throughout the succession of his life. Although the aforementioned quote merely previews the extent of his intellect, it effectively summarizes his political approach. After becoming a member of the Indian National Congress Gandhi had the potential to become a most influential leader for the Indian people, and he did. Gandhi committed his political title towards fighting against the unlawful oppression of British rule. His method of fighting, however, was a politically innovative, mental type of fight. As a firm believer in the value of Pacifism, Gandhi developed the theory of non-violent civil protest and vowed to prevent his followers from succumbing to the allure of bloodshed. The irenic nature of Gandhi’s leadership won him the admiration of many Indian people, and is now considered to have political genius prestigious enough to be studied today (Mahatma 2). In some instances, studying Gandhi’s political strategy demonstrates the benefits of an actively participating governed majority. In today’s society, many people tend to make uneducated political decisions and sometimes even refrain from making one completely. In a variety of circumstances, related to any category of politics, from the election of a new president to the enactment of new laws, a group of Americans remain unrepresented because of their refusal to exercise their right to vote. A topic such as gun control would be a fitting example of a subject that while put ...
This is not only having an extensive vocabulary, but also being able to speak in a manner that inspires and encourages. Being able to command attention from your audience is very important. When Mr. Trump speaks people listen. He is able to articulate and sell his ideas to you. He has had to do a lot of wheeling and dealing trying to acquire real estate, thus being able to persuade people by simply speaking is essential.
Warren Bennis’s leadership theories from On Becoming a Leader serve as a guide to understanding the qualities sand strategies that great leaders often exemplify. Classic leaders like Hillary Clinton have vision, passion, and integrity. These three things are the basic ingredients that Bennis proposes that most great leaders have in common. These are all aspects of leadership that allow people to better understand themselves and the world around them. In Hillary’s case, it is because of her determination to take the lead on different social issues around the world as a prominent figurehead that has allow me to take a closer...
As Yukl (2010) indicates, such factors (e.g. personality, values and capacities) attributed to a leader. Normally it is widespread acknowledged that someone is born to be a lead...
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
Some people were born to be great leaders and some were born to be great learners. I ask myself this question, “How was I created?” Was I born a leader or was I molded to lead. As I explain my philosophy on how I want to lead, I will first dive into my past to recognize and pin point my creator. October 27th 2004 I raise my right hand in order to serve and protect the United State against all enemies, foreign and domestic. At this moment in my young personal leadership journey, I get my first glimpse of a leadership style, “shut up and listen.”