Rogue Lawyer Essay

1043 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The client by john grisham research

Throughout the Thanksgiving vacation I started and completed, Rogue Lawyer, within three days. Rogue Lawyer written by John Grisham, is a legal thriller theme novel that gives realistic views of life and the justice system. Instead of chapters, the book is divided in six parts that are numbered with 20 scenes. Sebastian Rudd, the protagonist, is an attorney whose office is a bulletproof van because his previous real office was firebombed. He’s a gun carrier because he’s attracts lots of attention and lives alone in a small apartment at top floor, for it’s the safest. He has no firm, no employees, no partners, no associates, only a heavily armed driver, who is also his bodyguard, confidant, paralegal and caddie and only friend. Moreover, Rudd takes cases other lawyers would avoid: an eight …show more content…

There are courtroom 310 people, excluding Gardy mother and sister, awaiting his convince along with prosecutor Huver and a grand jury of 14 people. The selection process of a grand jury explained in chapter 8, states that jurors are randomly selected then examined by voir dire to create a twelve member jury plus a couple of alternative pair in case something goes wrong. The purpose of voir dire is to deliver a fair verdict, where the jury should be unbiased in a case. However, the jury is nothing but bias, for they made their decision even before hearing, thus Rudd wants them removed. Furthermore, there is no evidence it was Gardy which lead to the state forcibly creating some. There are various testimonies. The first one is from a prison inmate known as Smut the jailhouse snitch, who stated Gardy confessed his actions to him. I believe Smut had been intimidation by the cops. Next were church member who testified as direct witnesses, I’m convinced bribery took place. Lastly, there was a bargain within the government because the pathologist gave unclear data and State’s hair analysis expert gave faults test

Show More
Related

  • Stages Of The Criminal Trial Scott Peterson

    1322 Words  | 3 Pages

    This stage is an examination of potential jurors to ensure a fair trial for the defendant. Ideally, voir dire will result in an impartial jury for the trial of the accused. On March 4, 2004 jury selection began for the trial of Scott Peterson. Nearly 100 potential jurors began answering questionnaires about their views on the death penalty and their opinions on extramarital affairs. The nearly 30-page questionnaire given to prospective jurors also included questions as whether they read Field and Stream, what stickers grace their car bumpers and whether they have lost a child. On April 14, 2004 Judge Alfred A. Delucchi dismissed an unidentified Redwood City woman after a brief meeting in his chambers. Defense attorney Mark Geragos two weeks early had accused the retired secretary of bragging to her friends on a bus trip to Reno, Nevada, that she has "passed the test" to get on Peterson's jury and that Peterson was "guilty as hell" and would "get what's due him." May 28, 2004 six men and six women were selected for Scott Peterson's murder trial all said they would be willing to sentence him to death if they convict him of killing his wife and the couple's fetus.

    Read More

  • Jury Tampering In The Runaway Jury

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    After this happens, both sides of the trial select which jurors they want to represent their side with the hopes that their picks will help win the case. Voir dire occurred towards the beginning of the movie. About fifty jurors were selected to appear at the questioning but only twelve were selected to participate in the trial. The prosecuting side wanted jurors who were against gun violence, had families, and had lost a family member. The defense wanted jurors who believed in the second amendment and were all for guns. Before the questioning of the potential jurors, both sides did research on them all in order to see if they fit the criteria of what they were looking

    Read More

  • Confessions Of A Jury Sparknotes

    1696 Words  | 4 Pages

    This chapter is mainly devoted to the jury selection process and how it is taken care

    Read More

  • “Bordertown”

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    Johnny’s experience as an attorney falls far short of being the legal crusader that he envisioned for himself. Rather, it is quite short-lived . His legal career ends abruptly when his unpreparedness for an easy trial against a wealthy white woman causes him to lose the case for his client. Upon his hu...

    Read More

  • Theodoro Boone: Kid Lawyer, by John Grisham

    1237 Words  | 3 Pages

    Grisham, John. Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer. First ed. Vol. 1. New York, New York: Penguin Young Readers Group, 2010. Print. The Boone Ser.

    Read More

  • Jurors on a Death Penalty Case

    956 Words  | 2 Pages

    As one of the seven jury deliberations documented and recorded in the ABC News television series In the Jury Room the discussions of the jurors were able to be seen throughout the United States. A transcript was also created by ABC News for the public as well. The emotions and interactions of the jurors were now capable of being portrayed to anyone interested in the interworkings of jury deliberations. The first task,...

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Persuasive Essay

    445 Words  | 1 Pages

    The jury was locked in the room to deliberate because they don't want them to leave until they have come to a decision. If the jury was allowed to leave, they might just go when they want and not return. Also, the accused could try to come in to convince the jury that he is innocent.

    Read More

  • The History of Juries

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the United States, jury trials are an important part of our court system. We rely heavily on the jury to decide the fate of the accused. We don’t give a second thought to having a jury trial now, but they were not always the ‘norm’.

    Read More

  • Prosecutorial Misconduct Essay

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    Reaching epidemic proportions and spreading like a disease, prosecutorial misconduct has cut across geographic and socio-economic areas with the effect of infecting the criminal justice system (Lawless, 2008). Prosecutorial misconduct takes place when a prosecutor breaks the law or code of professional ethics during the prosecution stage. Legal and ethical violations can weaken the conformity to the law and rules that are to be followed within the criminal justice system (Cromwell, P. F., Dunham, R. G., & Palacios, W. R., 1997). In this paper, existing research focused on factors related to prosecutorial misconduct will be presented. This paper will also examine potential remedies that exist to confront prosecutorial misconduct.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    A jury is a panel of citizens, selected randomly from the electoral role, whose job it is to determine guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented. The Jury Act 1977 (NSW) stipulates the purpose of juries and some of the legal aspects, such as verdicts and the right of the defence and prosecution to challenge jurors. The jury system is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society as members of the community ultimately decide whether the person is guilty or innocent. The creation of the Jury Amendment Act 2006 (NSW) enabled the criminal trial process to better represent the standards of society as it allowed majority verdicts of 11-1 or 10-2, which also allowed the courts to be more resource efficient. Majority verdicts still ensure that a just outcome is reached as they are only used if there is a hung jury and there has been considerable deliberation. However, the role of the media is often criticized in relation to ensuring that the jurors remain unbiased as highlighted in the media article “Independent Juries” (SMH, 2001), and the wide reporting of R v Gittany 2013 supports the arguments raised in the media article. Hence, the jury system is moderately effective in reflecting the moral and ethical standards of society, as it resource efficient and achieves just outcomes, but the influence of the media reduces the effectiveness.

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1065 Words  | 3 Pages

    They are the impartial third-party whose responsibility is to deliver a verdict for the accused based on the evidence presented during trial. They balance the rights of society to a great extent as members of the community are involved. This links the legal system with the community and ensures that the system is operating fairly and reflecting the standards and values of society. A trial by jury also ensures the victim’s rights to a fair trial. However, they do not balance the rights of the offender as they can be biased or not under. In the News.com.au article ‘Judge or jury? Your life depends on this decision’ (14 November 2013), Ian Lloyd, QC, revealed that “juries are swayed by many different factors.” These factors include race, ethnicity, physical appearance and religious beliefs. A recent study also found that juries are influenced by where the accused sits in the courtroom. They found that a jury is most likely to give a “guilty” verdict if the accused sits behind a glass dock (ABC News, 5 November 2014). Juries also tend to be influenced by their emotions; hence preventing them from having an objective view. According to the Sydney Morning Herald article ‘Court verdicts: More found innocent if no jury involved’ (23 November 2013), 55.4 per cent of defendants in judge-alone trials were acquitted of all charges compared with 29 per cent in jury trials between 1993 and 2011. Professor Mark Findlay from the University of Sydney said that this is because “judges were less likely to be guided by their emotions.” Juries balance the rights of victims and society to a great extent. However, they are ineffective in balancing the rights of the offender as juries can be biased which violate the offender’s rights to have a fair

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men: Conflict in the Courtroom

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    The jurors had several conflicts in disagreeing with each other and it didn't help that they would shout over one another. The very first conflict is when juror 8 voted not guilty against the 11 guilty votes. The other 11 jurors don't seem to want to hear this man out; they don't want to hear why he has voted not guilty. Some of these men, jurors 3 and 7, just want to get this case over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't think it is imperative enough to look over the evidence and put themselves in the place of the defendant. They get upset with this man and try to get him to vote guilty.

    Read More

  • The Jury and Its Role in the Courts of Trial

    1507 Words  | 4 Pages

    The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely determining the issues in dispute” (Ellis 2013, p. 133). In this essay I will be discussing the role of the jury system and how some believe the jury is one of the most important institutions in ensuring that Australia has an effective legal system, while others disagree. I will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of a jury system.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Criminal Justice System In Twelve Angry Men

    1091 Words  | 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men brings up a few issues the criminal justice system has. The jury selection is where issue number one arises. “A jury of one’s peer’s acts as an important check in cases where a defendant fears that the local justice system may have a prejudice against him, or in corruption cases in which the judiciary itself may be implicated” (Ryan). Deciding one 's future or even fate, in this case, is no easy task, as depicted by the 8th juror.

    Read More

  • Harvey Robber Case

    1489 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two weeks before he was supposed to start at a firm in Boston, Harvey’s best friend was in an accident in Virginia. Harvey broke land speed records getting to the hospital in Staunton. His friend was okay, banged up, bruised, and suffering two broken ribs, a concussion, and a sprained wrist. His wife was sore and bruised, as were his two young daughters that had gratefully been asleep at the time of the wreck and hadn’t processed what happened until much later. Pacing about the hospital waiting area, Harvey had seen five attorneys all waiting for his friend to be released so they could begin a lawsuit against the tractor trailer driver who had nicked them and sent them into the guardrail. That’s when Harvey had decided not to be a lawyer.

    Read More

More about Rogue Lawyer Essay

Open Document