Roe versus Wade is a historic case in history as it legalized abortion in the United States at a time when most states would not permit a woman to have an abortion. To best understand this case, one should start at the beginning. It all started in March of 1970 with an unmarried, pregnant woman from Texas, named Norma McCorvey, who wanted to have an abortion. However, state law only allowed an abortion in a case where the mother’s life was at risk. This was not the case with Norma McCorvey. For many personal reasons, she did not want to have a baby at this time, but she did not have the money to travel across state lines to a state that permitted abortions. She felt she should have the right to get an abortion in a ‘safe environment’. (pbs.org) …show more content…
Unknown to Norma McCorvey, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington (University of Texas Law School graduates) had already agreed to join forces and began looking for potential plaintiffs to help them argue their case to have the abortion laws overturned in our country (nytimes.com).
McCorvey’s case provided them this opportunity. McCorvey, later identified as Jane Roe in the case to protect her identity, alleged the abortion law in Texas violated her constitutional rights and the rights of other women. The case was brought against the defendant, the district attorney of Dallas County, Henry B. Wade. John Tolle, Jay Floyd, and Robert Flowers were the defendants’ lawyers. Roe, the plaintiff, was represented by Weddington and Coffee. (http://womenshistory.about.com/od/abortionuslegal/p/roe_v_wade.htm)
The case was argued before the Supreme Court on December 13, 1971, but a decision was not reached until January 22, 1973. Chief Justice Warren Burger, announced the 7-2 decision was in favor of Roe. This was because the court argued that the Texas statue violated Jane Roe’s constitutional right to privacy. (PBS.org) The ruling allowed for legal abortions during the entire pregnancy, but set up conditions to allow states to regulate abortion during the second and third trimesters (Cnn.com). The ruling affected laws in 46
…show more content…
states. The topic of abortion brings more passion and controversy around the subject than any other feminist movement.
In the 1960s, there was no federal law regulating abortions, and many states had banned the practice entirely, except when the life of the mother was endangered. Since 1973, the battle has raged. Pro-life groups began to lobby their Senators and Representatives to propose a Right-to-Life Amendment to the Constitution. Although introduced in Congress, the measure has never received the necessary support. Pro-choice groups such as the National ABORTION RIGHTS ACTION LEAGUE fear that a slow erosion of abortion rights has taken place since Roe v. Wade. Planned Parenthood clinics have become local battlegrounds over the abortion argument. Since Planned Parenthood is known for trying to provide safe, inexpensive abortions, protesters regularly picket outside their offices. Planned Parenthood sites have even been bombed by antiabortion followers. http://www.ushistory.org/us/57d.asp) The topic today continues to bring up much emotion as evident in our recent presidential
election. Though the Roe vs. Wade case is easily the most ‘known supreme court case’ in history, there are some follow up facts that are not so known, and quite interesting. In case you were wondering, McCorvey did not have an abortion – as the case had not yet been decided when her baby was born. She gave it up for adoption. In 1995, McCorvey met a man whose Christian beliefs heavily influenced her. She surprised the world by going on national television to say abortion was wrong. Then in 1997, McCorvey even started Roe No More, a pro-life outreach organization that was dissolved in 2008. In June of 2003, Norma McCorvey filed a motion with the U.S. district Court in Dallas to have the case overturned and asked the court to consider new evidence that abortion hurts women. Included are 1,000 affidavits from women who say they regret their abortions. (CNN.com) Though a pro-life state politically, Tennessee is one of only sixteen states with a state constitutional right to abortion, and the only state in the entire Southeast without at least an informed consent law or a waiting period law prior to having the abortion. In Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee et al. v. Sundquist, the Tennessee Supreme Court agreed with the right to privacy found in the Tennessee Constitution. In a momentous decision, the Court, for the first time in its history, considered the issue of abortion under the State Constitution. The Court held that the Tennessee Constitution provides an independent right to privacy and greater protections for reproductive freedom than the United States Constitution (http://www.aclu-tn.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/TN-Abortion-Statute-Challenge-TSC-Decision-2000.pdf) The Planned Parenthood case was our own states war against the unborn, finding in our state Constitution a “fundamental right” to abortion that is even broader than Roe v. Wade.
Her family moved around a lot as she grew up in a military family. McCorvey was rebellious and did not do well in school. Her parents got a divorce when she was young and she had to live with her mom whom she did not like. She became a high school dropout by the time she was a sophomore. Norma Nelson McCorvey a.k.a Jane Roe was just twenty-one years old and she had already been married and divorced. She was pregnant with her third child. McCorvey gave up custody of her first child to her mother and she gave up custody of her second child to the father. She wanted to get an abortion, but at that time it was illegal in the state of Texas. She could not afford, nor did she have the means to travel to other states where was legal. She did not have the money to pay for it anyway. Her only other option that remained was adoption. Her doctor referred her to an adoption lawyer Henry McCluskey. McCluskey ended up introducing McCorvey to Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington. Coffee filed suit against Henry Wade who was the district attorney of Dallas County. (Cushman
The laws surrounding Abortion, particularly the efforts to ban abortion and overturn Roe Vs. Wade are one of the most significant social problems we are facing in 2017. Roe v. wade is a landmark decision that was made by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion back in 1973. Abortion has been a prevalent social problem throughout history and continues to be very much a part of the social and political debate today. In fact, abortion has been one of the biggest controversies of all time. Both sides of the argument, pro-choice and pro-life, have many valid points to back their opinion and that is partly why this continues to be such a big debate. The other part is that it is very much a political issue. I stand firmly on the
The alias "Jane Roe" was used for Norma McCorvey, on whose behalf the suit was originally filed, alleging that the abortion law in Texas violated her constitutional rights and the rights of other women. The defendant was the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, Henry B. Wade. Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee were the plaintiff's lawyers. John Tolle, Jay Floyd and Robert Flowers were the defendant's lawyers. Those on the Supreme Court in support of the Roe vs. Wade decision were: Harry Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Chief Justice Warren Burger, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis Powell and Potter Stewart. Those in the dissent were William Rehnquist and Byron White.
In 1971, Norma McCorvey or Jane Roe, filled a case against the district attorney of Dallas County, Henry Wade, because he enforced a Texas law that prohibited abortion unless the abortion was needed medically, to save the mother’s life. Being a single, pregnant woman , Roe did not have the choice to have an abortion because the pregnancy was not endangering her life. Plus, Roe could not afford to travel to have the operation done safely. As a result, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, two lawyers that graduated from the University of Texas Law School, claimed a lawsuit against the abortion laws in Texas because they violated Roe’s constitutional rights. Besides Roe’s two laywers, Hallford, a licensed physician, and a childless married couple known as the Does supported Roe’s case. The lawsuit against Wade was filed in a Texas Federal Court. The Texas Federal Court heard the case on December 13th, 1971 and again, on October 11th, 1972. After the examination of Weddington and Coffee’s argument against Jay Floyd’s, the lawyer for Wade during the first argument, and Robert C. Flower’s, the lawyer for Texas in the second argument, the court ruled in Roe’s favor by claiming that the law did violate the Constitution. Consequently, Wade appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
because the right to abort, whatever one thinks of it, is not found in the
The Roe v. Wade case originated in the state of Texas in 1970 at the suggestion of Sarah Weddington an Austin attorney. Norma McCorvey otherwise known as "Jane Roe" was an unmarried pregnant woman seeking to overturn the anti-abortion law in the state of Texas. The lawsuit claimed that the statue was unconstitutionally vague and abridged privacy rights of pregnant women guaranteed by the first, fourth, fifth, ninth, and fourteenth amendments to the constitution. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade)
The facts of this case show that Roe, who at the time was a single woman, decided to challenge the State of Texas’s abortions laws. The law in that state stated that it was a felony to obtain or attempt an abortion except on medical advice to save the life of the mother (Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 1973). At the time many illegal abortions were being performed in back alleys and in very unsanitary conditions. Therefore, some states began to loosen up on abortion restrictions, in which some women found it easy to travel to another state where the abortion laws were less restrictive and they could find a doctor was willing to endorse the medical requirement for an abortion. Unfortunately, less fortunate or poor women could seldom travel outside their own state to get the treatment, which started to raise questions of fairness. Also, many of the laws were vague; therefore many doctors really didn’t know whether they were committing ...
Before abortions became legal, women felt the need to turn to someone for an abortion that was not sanitary or performed the correct way, many either died or left extremely ill. One specific woman felt the need to bring to everyone’s attention, that she should have the right to abort her baby if she wanted to. She fought for her right and many stood behind her and supported her. The case Roe v. Wade legalized abortions in 1973. Norma McCorvey, known as Jane Roe, fought for women’s rights against the state of Texas on two different occasions. Roe v. Wade made a huge impact to women around the country, by legalizing safe and reliable abortions.
Roe v. Wade and Morality. Michael Pearce Pfeifer in "Abandoning Error: Self-Correction by the Supreme Court," states the impact of Roe v. Wade on morals. Seldom, if ever, has a single Supreme Court decision so decisively transformed American constitutional history or so altered the relationship between law and morals - both public and private. Roe v. Wade established within the Constitution a doctrine that has entirely legitimized what had previously been almost universally condemned: the practice of abortion on demand throughout the nine months of pregnancy.
No other element of the Women’s Rights Movement has generated as much controversy as the debate over reproductive rights. As the movement gained momentum so did the demand for birth control, sex education, family planning and the repeal of all abortion laws. On January 22, 1973 the Supreme Court handed down the Roe v. Wade decision which declared abortion "fundamental right.” The ruling recognized the right of the individual “to be free from unwanted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (US Supreme Court, 1973) This federal-level ruling took effect, legalizing abortion for all women nationwide.
Wade by NEH Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer they state “thus before abortion because the object of law it was a subject of everyday life” (Hull & Hoffer 12). Meaning that any female that found out she was pregnant was able to get an abortion but then suffered the consequences of something going wrong. In the United States around eighteen hundred abortions became illegal, due to the lack of medical education, procedures and surgeries because they were very dangerous. As time came later medical advancements were made but women still had to rely on the back alley abortions which resulted in harming thousands of women. Abortion or premature termination of pregnancy can be accidental or on purpose. Both types of abortions can be legal or illegal. If the ongoing pregnancy becomes a medical threat, abortion is not illegal. Legal developments along with health care services are intertwined with each other. The American Medical Association stated that abortions were wrong and unsafe which made the National Abortion Federation make abortion into a “physicians- only” practice because they could be performed legally in order to save a women’s life. (National Abortion Federation NAF) It wasn’t until 1973 that abortions were made legal in the United States due to the “Supreme Court’s decision in Roe vs. Wade ruling that Americans’ right to privacy included the right of a woman to decide whether to have children, and the right of a woman and her doctor to make that decision without state interference” (NAF). In 1965, almost 300 deaths occurred due to illegal abortions, and of all pregnancy-related complications in New York and California, 20% were due to abortions. “If the US Supreme Court found constitutional grounds to extend the birth control cases’ logic that women’s bodies belonged to the women themselves, the concept of choice would become a core value in constitutional law.” (Hull & Hoffer
Three Works Cited Many people believe abortion is only a moral issue, but it is also a constitutional issue. It is a woman's right to choose what she does with her body, and it should not be altered or influenced by anyone else. This right is guaranteed by the ninth amendment, which contains the right to privacy. The ninth amendment states: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This right guarantees the right to women, if they so choose, to have an abortion, up to the end of the first trimester.
Abortion cannot be discussed unless you know the origin of the debate. In December 13, 1971, the argument of abortion surfaced (“Roe v. wade,”). The class action suit was brought by a pregnant single woman who challenged the constitutionality of the Texas criminal abortion laws, which proscribe or attempting an abortion except on medical advice for the purpose of saving the mother’s life (“Roe v. wade,”). Proceeding Roe v. Wade, abortion was illegal in almost every State. In 1973, the courts ruled and abortion became legal again.
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
The permissibility of abortion has been a crucial topic for debates for many years. People have yet to agree upon a stance on whether abortion is morally just. This country is divided into two groups, believers in a woman’s choice to have an abortion and those who stand for the fetus’s right to live. More commonly these stances are labeled as pro-choice and pro-life. The traditional argument for each side is based upon whether a fetus has a right to life. Complications occur because the qualifications of what gives something a right to life is not agreed upon. The pro-choice argument asserts that only people, not fetuses, have a right to life. The pro-life argument claims that fetuses are human beings and therefore they have a right to life. Philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, rejects this traditional reasoning because the right of the mother is not brought into consideration. Thomson prepares two theses to explain her reasoning for being pro-choice; “A right to life does not entail the right to use your body to stay alive” and “In the majority of cases it is not morally required that you carry a fetus to term.”