Many unemployed individuals aren’t willing to sacrifice their lifestyles and possible health for a “dirty job”. Americans have had a stigma for only wanting to work a good job and not wanting a hard-work, intense, “dirty” job. A “dirty job” is conceived to be a job that has working conditions that might be less than clean. It is also a job that might have inconsistent wages and a more stressful environment. The Dirty Job phenomenon is a result of the combination of the lack of good working conditions, lack of living wages, and the psychological repercussions of a so-called “dirty job”. In his December 2008 presentation for Ted Talks at EG, Dirty Jobs star Mike Rowe explains his insights and observations of the nature of hard work, and how …show more content…
Reich established the idea in “The Broken Basic Bargain”, an excerpt from Beyond Outrage, that ever since the last recession, the United States’ job market has returned but the pay hasn’t. Robert B Reich is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California of Berkeley. “He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century.” Reich is the founding editor of the American Prospect magazine along with being involved in countless other organizations. Robert Reich is a very vocal liberal democrat; and, he posts many articles on his website about his distaste for President Donald J. Trump. In his piece The Broken Basic Bargain, Reich doesn’t fail to bash the conservative theories about the economy. He states, “...conservative economists have blamed high unemployment on the purported fact that many Americans have priced themselves out of the global/high-tech jobs market.” Reich goes on to imply that he thinks conservative economists are wrong for saying that people will have to settle for lower-wages and lower benefits if they want a job. He claims that the American people haven’t priced themselves out of the global/high-tech jobs market, but have rather started receiving a smaller piece of the American pie. Robert B. Reich believes that it is our nation’s job to provide people with everything they need to live a …show more content…
Mike Rowe has a totally different viewpoint than Robert B. Reich, being that he believes hard work will get you where you want to go. Robert B. Reich believes that every person is entitled to a grand life, no matter how hard they work or don’t work. They Ted Talk video was by far more engaging than the Reich’s article. Robert Reich had a more biased way of telling his story, whereas Mike Rowe was more objective in getting his point
Skyrms’ book, Evolution of the Social Contract, offers a compelling explanation as to why individuals, when placed with one-shot prisoner’s dilemmas, will often cooperate, or choose the equilibrium that will benefit both parties equally. He uses examples to outline how individuals of certain environments frequently engage in activities that benefit the group at their own personal expense. Using both game theory and decision theory, Skyrms explores problems with the social contract when it is applied to evolutionary dynamics. In the chapters of the book, he offers new insights into concepts such as sex and justice, commitment, and mutual aid.
Leading up to the year 1981, America had fallen into a period of “stagflation”, a portmanteau for ‘stagnant economy’ and ‘high inflation’. Characterized by high taxes, high unemployment, high interest rates, and low national spirit, America needed to look to something other than Keynesian economics to pull itself out of this low. During the election of 1980, Ronald Reagan’s campaign focused on a new stream of economic policy. His objective was to turn the economy into “a healthy, vigorous, growing economy [which would provide] equal opportunities for all Americans, with no barriers born of bigotry or discrimination.” Reagan’s policy, later known as ‘Reaganomics’, entailed a four-point plan which cut taxes, reduced government spending, created anti-inflationary policy, and deregulated certain products. Though ‘Reaganomics’ was successful both at controlling “stagflation” and promoting economic growth, it has and always will be an extremely controversial topic regarding the redistribution of wealth.
A key to victory this November is the unemployment rate. According to a Bloomberg National Poll conducted in March 8-11, 42% of Americans consider unemployment and jobs as “the most important issue facing the country right now” (Priorities). Although there has been 24 consecutive months of private sector employment growth, the Federal Reserve suggests that the numbers could fade in the coming months. The importance of creating more jobs cannot be stressed enough. No President in the recent era has been reelected with the unemployment rate above 7.2% (Roth). To paint a picture, in late 1982, the unemployment rate topped 10.8 under Ronald Reagan. However, about 36 months later, the rate dropped to 7.2% percent. The drastic drop in the n...
The gap in wealth between the rich and the poor continues to grow larger, as productivity increases but wages remain the same. There were changes in the tax structure that gave the wealthy tax breaks, such as only taxing for social security within the first $113,700 of income in a year. For CEOs this tax was paid off almost immediately. Free trade treaties broke barriers to trade and resulted in outsourcing and lower wages for workers. In “Job on the Line” by William Adler, a worker named Mollie James lost her job when the factory moved to Mexico. “The job in which Mollie James once took great pride, the job that both fostered and repaid her loyalty by enabling her to rise above humble beginnings and provide for her family – that job does not now pay Balbina Duque a wage sufficient to live on” (489). When Balbina started working she was only making 65 cents an hour. Another huge issue lies in the minimum wage. In 2007, the minimum wage was only 51% of the living wage in America. How can a person live 51% of a life? Especially when cuts were being made in anti-poverty and welfare programs that were intended to get people on their feet. Now, it seems that the system keeps people down, as they try to earn more but their benefits are taken away faster than they can earn. Even when workers tried to get together to help themselves they were thrown
In the documentary “inequality for all”, Robert Reich examines the overall state of inequality in America, and explains the intricate processes involved in the economy, which determines the distribution of wealth, and how both the middle and upper classes utilize it. During the introduction of the documentary, Reich states “I like having a Mini Cooper. I sort of identify with it…. We are sort of together, facing the rest of the world”. Although Reich is making a comparison between the size of his car and himself, the overall inference of this quote refers to the immense scale of the American economy. In this sense, Reich acknowledges that he, and many other Americans, are unequal to upper class residents; although, the inequality itself isn’t labeled as a negative consequence. In fact, Reich acknowledges that “some inequality is just inevitable”, meaning that inequality within an economy is an intended consequence of American capitalism which, if done correctly, can create prosperity for any economic class. Instead of seeing inequality as either black or white, Reich examines the different effects of inequality at different magnitudes, and asks whether inequality can be a problem, and if so, when it becomes one. To do
I did not want to have a biased view on the subject. After watching Inequality for All, I returned to my dorm in search of reasonable opposition to Professor Reich’s data and claims. Most comments agreed this documentary is truthful and well done. While other comments stated Reich knew nothing about the economy and it is all just rubbish, these comments had no events or reason to back them up. Lastly, rare.us uniquely takes some of the key points in Reich’s argument and combats them one-by-one.
In the poem “Let America be America Again” by Langston Hughes, he states “The millions who have nothing for our pay--Except the dream that’s almost dead”. This means that people have been working hard all their lives to be successful and to live the “American Dream”, but it's all fake. This also shows that the American Dream really doesn’t exist. The documentary “Inequality For All” by Robert Reich has showed us that America really isn’t equal. Robert Reich states “The middle class is struggling”. This means that the middle is having to work ten times harder than the upper class to make a living and it's just not fair. This shows that everyone is just “indifferent”. This also shows that no one seems to care about making America the real “Dream”. I’m starting to question, who is actually looking out for the American workers? And to be honest, it’s NOBODY!! Mr. Reich also states “400 people have the most money in the U.S”. This is just showing Americans that the rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. Economic Indifference is just making things harder and harder for Americans to make this dream into a
Capitalism is an economic system where a country’s production, distribution of goods and services, for profit are controlled by private owners in a competitive free market. Capitalism is the economic system that the United States has always been using and is commonly associated with the American Dream; where anyone can become rich and successful regardless of background and environment. In Joseph Heller’s satire, Catch-22, Heller satirizes multiple vice and follies that exists in the United States such as religion and bureaucracy of the U.S government. One of Heller’s criticism of society, capitalism, is still a prevalent issue to this day. In Catch-22, the squadron’s mess officer of the U.S Army Air corps in Pianosa, Milo Minderbinder, is a satire of a modern businessman and a character that Heller uses to expose how dangerous the profit-mentality of capitalism can be. Heller’s text in challenging a specific vice or folly through satire proved to be exceptionally effective as today’s current issues continue to mimic those in Catch-22.
In the 1930s, the economy was in turmoil due to the stock market crash in 1929. The United States unemployment rate was at its high of twenty-five percent between 1932 and 1933. It was very hard for Pete to find a job.1 More than ten million citizens were out of work. In verse after verse, ”Talking Union” described how to start a union: pass out leaflets, call meetings, resist the attempts of the boss to derail those efforts, for “he’s a bastard-unfair-slave driver-Bet he beats his own wife.”2 March of 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt took power and he pledged to save the economy from danger using a plan called the New Deal. The New Deal was a plan to boost the economy back up to its normal state. He pledged to use federal power to ensure a more equitable distribution of income and promised “bold experimentation” in pursuit of what he called a “New Deal” for Americans.3 Roosevelt later stated, “when Americans suffered, h...
Economics of Reich “Why the Rich are getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer” written by Robert Reich, describes as the title says, why the rich are getting richer and the poor, poorer. In Reich’s essay, he delves into numerous reasons and gives examples of each. It makes one wonder if the world will continue on the path of complete economic separation between the rich and the poor. One very important factor Reich examines in his essay is that large corporations are always trying to find the edge, whether that is new technology or cheaper wages. One may ask, how does that affect me?