Right To Work Laws

Right to work laws have been around since 1935. These laws are little tricky and require some research because the name has little to with the laws. Right to Work laws was first seen as the National Labor Relations Acts in 1935. This bill was signed and became law by President Franklin Roosevelt on July 5, 1935. This law established the National Relations Labor Board and addressed relations between unions and employers in the private sector ( ). This law was intended to guarantee employees the right to self- organization to form, join, or assist labor organizations to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or the other mutual aid

They had to pay dues for monopolized representation that they did not vote for or have choice. This is unconstitutional and it takes away the individual’s right to choose. These individuals would also have to join the union even though they may not agree with the unions political or economical beliefs. The right to work laws stepped in on the behalf of the employees to say they had rights according to the U.S. constitution and their rights would be upheld. Right to work laws were necessary and needed they ensure that employees are not taking advantage by employers or by unions. Right to work laws places some power in the hands of the employee where it should be after all they are the ones being affected the most. If the employer is treating them unfairly they have a union they can count on to bargain and negotiate for them. If they feel they are being treated fairly by their employer they can choose not to be a part of the unions and not have to pay dues to get a service they don’t want in the first

One reasons is minority rights and due process. This means that without right to work laws if an individual went to work for a company where the majority of the individuals were a part of a union this individual would be obligated to join the union as well. Thanks to right to work laws this is not case and this individual would have a choice. Without right to work there would be no freedom of association in non-right to work stated employees must financially support the union if the majority of a company is unionized. Under non-right to work states individuals are forced to join and pay dues to a union whether they want to or not as a condition of employment. This is not fair and should not be a requirement for employment. Another argument posed by those who support right to work laws state that outside of representation fees employees should not have to pay for any other expenses of the union. This includes political expenses all money that comes from union members should be used strictly for representation. There is another side of this argument. There are some who are against right to work