Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to the second amendment
Introduction to the second amendment
The rise of mass shootings in the us
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to the second amendment
The recent tragedy in Orlando has resonated throughout the world rapidly. Despite this, Omar Mateen, a radicalised young adult was only repeating a fatal pattern, a pattern in which the world recognises, a pattern that clearly needs to come to a stop. Although being tragic, US soil and the US’ worldly reputation has been stained once again, and to no extent does it surprise anyone.
Generally speaking, the one question that plays on everyone’s mind is ‘how?’.
It’s called an amendment. Specifically speaking, the second amendment – ‘the right to bear arms’.
Omar Mateen knew about the second amendment, Omar knew that he had a right to bear arms, and lastly Omar knew that there was nothing preventing him from doing so. Not only did Omar take
…show more content…
advantage of this “Constitutional Amendment” but it was prevalent on that day that he had abused it. There are close to no gun laws that exist within the American Law system.
The right to own a firearm or ‘bear arms’ on US soil is clearly too accessible. All Omar had to do was walk into the general store down the road and pay an honest workers wage in order to purchase a gun. That is all it takes. A small arms survey taken suggested that 42 percent of all guns owned in the world were indeed owned by American civilians.
Where are the Laws? Where is the legislation?
On account of the horrific mass murder of Port Arthur, the Australian government conclusively and successfully banned firearms as depicted within John Howard’s ‘National Firearms Agreement’ in 1988. This undoubtedly prevented the possible deadly pattern that plagues the US from occurring on Australian soil.
Laws that reduce the accessibility of purchasing guns need to be enacted if the US want to stop the constant tragedies from occurring.
If you’re a wise person, you would understand that guns kill. With no bans against guns, the murders and shootings that seem to be omnipresent in the US will not rest. According to a statistical analysis recorded by the American Gun Violence Archive, there are approximately 10,000 people killed by guns each year on average. This absolutely staggering figure purely displays the necessity for the banning of guns in the
US. Ask yourself, would you feel safe knowing that nearly everyone you pass when walking down the street possessed some form of a firearm? Another major issue of gun ownership is the medical consequences that it brings about. The tragic misuse of guns has to lead the AMA or the American Medical association to announce that America is officially facing a ‘public health crisis’. In today’s modern day society, we are unquestionably aware and cautious of ever-present psychological illnesses. The ill use of illegal and legal guns consequently causes honest civilians and innocent people to spend a larger sum of money on unnecessary bills in order to try and fix those who were either directly or indirectly affected by these tragedies. Statistically, taxpayers in the US pay up to $12.8 million per day just to repair the impairment caused by firearms alone. Although many are for the legislation of guns, there are certainly a number of individuals and groups who employ the excuse of ‘self-protection’ when talking about arms. Not only is this pretext to carry firearms violent, it is illogical and is statistically proven to be only futile. It has been confirmed by the AMA that there is a ratio of one justifiable homicide for every 896 guns put in the hands of criminals. Although guns may be abused by certain individuals to harm others, we should not fail to recall the issue of suicide due to firearms. Research by the Military Suicide Research Consortium (MSRC) states that a person who wants to commit suicide is unlikely to commit suicide with poison or a knife when a gun is available. Not only is this alarming, but it disturbingly displays the imminent dangers of unlegislated firearms. The proper and necessary legislation of firearms on US soil is absolutely necessary in order to preserve the country’s reputation and safety. Massacres and deaths caused by guns in the US such as the recent Orlando shooting are completely unacceptable. It’s time to cut the down the tree itself instead of poorly cutting off the branches.
... the Second Amendment provides a collective right to bear arms for individuals associated with an organized military force. This court’s ruling was the first to ever favor the right to bear arms for an individual and has changed how states regulate gun ownership.
The right to bear arms protects “The Individual” rights from owing a firearm. The modern federal government easily accepted the 2nd Amendment with a widespread agreement that power of the federal government to infringe the Amendment that gives people the right to bear arms. If the government should not have the power to abbreviate from the free right to exercise of religion, than the government should not have the power to abridge the 2nd Amendment right (Lund & Winkler, n.d.). Over the past century, many restriction were supported to prevent criminal from possessing firearms as the law also limits the law-abiding people who respect the law also known as “Honest
not be permitted to declare who would or would not be able to bear arms on the
According to www.archives.gov, the second amendment of the United States Constitution reads that: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment is
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution (in the Bill of Rights) specifically grants U.S. citizens the right to keep and bear arms. The founding fathers saw the power of firearms and knew that they would be disputed. But the firearms of our forefathers weren't nearly as powerful as what we face today. Black powder rifles have a repeat rate of approximately one shot per 45 seconds. They are deadly, indeed, but not nearly as deadly as a repeating semi-automatic handgun with a 17-round clip that can pump 17 rounds into another humans chest in mere seconds. Arguably, these modern weapons are more power than one human ought to be able to wield. The power that one firearm gives to one man is, in certain circumstances, supreme power. The argument here is not to ...
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation or individuals.
In current day society, it is frequently promoted as self-defense and our “duty” as Americans to own a gun of some sort. The second amendment to the constitution declares that “We the People” are allowed to bear arms because we live in a free State. Although these statements are true, at what cost? The question, “at what cost,” arises due to the recent push for an extension and enforcement of the second amendment. The people of the States have been pushing for desired concealed carry at public areas, such as schools. Statements and questions of concern have been on the as to whether or not this idea is “smart”. Contrary of it allowing some people to feel safe, the idea should be imposed. Guns are weapons and they have the history behind them
We are not safe at work better yet we are not safe at home and the individual right to keep and bear arms does not help. By definition, the right to keep and bear arms often referred to as the right to bear arms or to have arms is the Constitution’s second amendment, which allows one to possess arms for own defense. This means anyone in America has the right to bear arms. However, society is less safe when everyone is allowed to carry guns. The question is who should have the right to bear arms. The right to people to keep and bear arms should be further restricted.
Being a young American I have witnessed many problems with growing up in this great country of ours. We have homeless people who can't find work, rising inflation rates, an unbalanced budget, and more importantly, a problem with guns.
If a person don’t carry a concealed weapon, how will they be able to protect themselves and their precious family from vicious criminals? Shall issue states are states that citizens may apply and be considered by the state for a gun permit which is also known as concealed carry. John R. Lott, is an economist and has received his Ph.D. in economics from UCLA. He claimed "shall-issue" concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robbery by 3%, according to a 2000 analysis of FBI crime data” (Lott, John R.) This refers to how concealed carry reduces crime and information was reported by the FBI compared to the other states that don’t allow concealed carry. This quote shows real evidence on how guns
Gun control is a highly controversial topic in today’s world where the fight is between the liberal and the conservatives. Many people believe that guns should be banned due to many recent massacres that have happened whereas others are wanting people to have background checks done before owning a gun. I am against gun control because banning handguns in the United States should not be allowed because handguns fail to protect the people and it is ineffective.
“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not infringed.” Many people will recognize this as the 2nd amendment to the United States Constitution. What the people may not know is that it is under attack. Those that oppose the right of the citizens to own firearms are trying to eradicate the 2nd amendment because it guarantees that right to the American people. Liberals believe guns are evil devices that go around and shoot people. They conclude that by restricting and eventually banning guns, gun violence will resolve into nothing. The left tries to use the 2nd amendment to argue their point, but they pick
In this email, I will be addressing a few issues that we discussed today in class. The first argument you made was that the right to bear arms only applies to militias. Well to address that I want to quote the entire second amendment. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” When the founding fathers created the constitution they made sure they were so very precise down to the comma. In the second amendment, it says a well-regulated militia but there is a comma after militia. Then it goes on to say being necessary to the security of a free state with a comma after that. Finally, it states that it's the right of the people to bear
To begin with, owning a firearm presents you with two options, use it for protection, fun, and away from innocent civilians, or use it for violence. A class handout titled “The 2nd Amendment,” provides a section of statistics about gun violence. It states that “In 1998, 3,792 American children and teenagers died by gunfire.” Also, from 1998-1999, 3,500 students were expelled for bringing firearms to school. This shows how firearms are used for violence, and makes our Second Amendment look very bad. In the same hand out, a section titled “District of Columbia v. Heller,” provides us with information about how the right to bear arms is a right which we should not lose, do to the fact that it’s in our constitution. When it comes to owning a firearm, we need to be smart about how we use it and what for.
“In our everyday lives we are constantly endangered with violence rather than be from gangs, robbers, or rapist; it is rightfully just to believe that all methods of protecting ourselves is morally right”(qtd.by NRA). In this modern society we can no longer use swords and arrows to keep the peace of our great civilization. We the people of the Unites States must stand up for our 2nd Amendment “rights of the people to keep and bear arms” to better protect ourselves by allowing mankind the full opportunity to carry a concealed handgun.