Right To Bear Arms

503 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The moral argument to bear arms

Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defense of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime. I picked this right because I was strongly against guns thanks to all the shootings that I have been hearing about especially now in 2018. I do not like the guns themselves I just wish the process was a little more complicated. It takes years for people with no citizenship to get one but why is it so easy for someone to quickly pick up a gun at a store that sells them. The process could be more technical, and it should not be so easy for someone to get one. I know guns and being able to have one is such a big topic these days and the discussions that involve them can get really heated sometimes because of how they can be used if put in the wrong hands and idea of being able to protect myself and my family overshadows the tragedy of what is going on around the world that involves guns but …show more content…

Heller, Dick Anthony Heller, who was a D.C. police officer applied for a one-year license to get a gun that he wanted to get for his house, but he was denied to do so. He sued the District of Columbia and argued that they violated his second amendment. The district court payed no attention but the U.S. Court agreed that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep firearms in your home for the purpose of self-defense only. I don’t know if the right was expanded nor contracted but it was decided that we as people have the right to keep our guns in our home to protect ourselves and to not kill unlawfully and that banning firearms in your own home violates the Second Amendment. After the Heller case D.C. started to change their gun laws, there were several hurdles to jump for gun registration and there were lots of “unsafe” guns that could not be registered. It was affirmed that there are many regulations consisting with the Second

Show More
Related

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Use and Permit of Handguns

    1536 Words  | 4 Pages

    With many recent incidents that involve guns between 2012 and 2013, gun control laws have become a hot topic in America. On one hand, after the horrific incident like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting at Newtown in 2012, most people wanting to limit guns from getting into the wrong by setting up a rigorous system that control who can and cannot obtain a gun. On the other hand, we have the people who believe that with such rigorous system in place is violated the individual rights that granted and protected by the United States Constitution. They believe that the rigorous system will prevent people from defending themselves and could be a violation of their privacy. Regardless of which side is right, if we want to understand more about our current conflict, we have to look back on how this hold debate started. The District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court case in 2008 that found the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 unconstitutional, which influence the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense by questioning the Second Amendment and laws that restrict a person from acquire guns.

    Read More

  • Gun Ownership and the Second Amendment of the Constitution

    1611 Words  | 4 Pages

    Over the centuries, the Supreme Court has always ruled that the 2nd Amendment protects the states' militia's rights to bear arms, and that this protection does not extend to individuals. In fact, legal scholars consider the issue "settled law." For this reason, the gun lobby does not fight for its perceived constitutional right to keep and bear arms before the Supreme Court, but in Congress. Interestingly, even interpreting an individual right in the 2nd Amendment presents the gun lobby with some thorny problems, like the right to keep and bear nuclear weapons.

    Read More

  • Gun Control and the Second Ammendment to the Constitution

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment says people have the right to carry concealed handguns. Judge Richard Posner said “must be interpreted to include a right to have a concealed gun in public, to have it ready for use, and have it for self defense”. The Second Amendment also says “a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. The Supreme Court has made a landmark that states ruling upholding the right of people to bear arms for hunting and self defense. The NRA argue that law bringing citizens who have gun can decrease the numbers of crimes, rates, and are safer from criminals. Since Virginia passed a right-to-carry law, more than 50,000 permits have been issued, not one crime had been dropped. Criminals are less likely to attack someone if they believe the...

    Read More

  • Why Is The Second Amendment Important

    778 Words  | 2 Pages

    Heller,” the United States Supreme Court revealed what the Second Amendment is really about. In June 2008, a S.W.A.T. officer with the Washington, D.C., Police Department sued in the District of Columbia District Court for the right to carry a handgun while off duty. The Supreme Court ruled that he had the right to carry a weapon for a lawful purpose, and the District Court's opinion was reversed from the decision in 1939 when the Second Amendment was last interpreted. It also ruled that two District of Columbia laws, one that banned handguns and the other one that required firearms kept in the home to be disassembled or trigger-locked, violated the Second Amendment

    Read More

  • Liberals LOVE Gun Control

    1123 Words  | 3 Pages

    State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment - The Right To Bear Arms

    2184 Words  | 5 Pages

    A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Amendment II 1791)

    Read More

  • The Second Amendment

    1716 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...o militias, and dismissed his lawsuit. Heller perused his lawsuit; the matter was appealed and sent to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Court of Appeals reversed the lowers court decision based on reasons the Second Amendment clearly mentions an individual may bear arms while serving in the militia, and the same individual has a right protect himself and his family as sacrosanct. The court concludes that the city’s ban on handguns and its requirement that firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional violated that right. In other words, an individual need not be in a militia to own a firearm, it is an individual’s right to own a firearm in self -defense. Heller concluded his defense by saying, “self-defense is a basic right recognized by ancient legal system to present, and it is the central component of the Second Amendment”

    Read More

  • The Effects and Consequences of Gun Control

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    United States. Committee on the Judiciary . Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Washington: GPO, 1982. Web. 30 Nov. 2015.

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. A vast majority of citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would quickly reduce the threat of crime. Many innocent people feel they have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting. Americans have a constitutional right to own hand guns and stricter laws and licensing will not affectively save lives.

    Read More

  • Right To Bear Arms Argumentative Essay

    1420 Words  | 3 Pages

    In current day society, it is frequently promoted as self-defense and our “duty” as Americans to own a gun of some sort. The second amendment to the constitution declares that “We the People” are allowed to bear arms because we live in a free State. Although these statements are true, at what cost? The question, “at what cost,” arises due to the recent push for an extension and enforcement of the second amendment. The people of the States have been pushing for desired concealed carry at public areas, such as schools. Statements and questions of concern have been on the as to whether or not this idea is “smart”. Contrary of it allowing some people to feel safe, the idea should be imposed. Guns are weapons and they have the history behind them

    Read More

  • Gun Control: The Right To Self Control

    1850 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nelson Lund, JD, PhD, Professor at George Mason University School of Law once stated, "The right to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a basic natural right that grows out of the right to life …. many [gun control laws] interfere with the ability of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves against violent criminals”. When we 're born, we are born with the right of life, and with the right of life came the right to self protection. There has been many laws that contradict the right of life just as the right of self protection. Justice Stevens once stated that “The Second Amendment’s structure was notable for its omission of any statement of purpose related to the right to use firearms for hunting or personal self-defense”. Justice steven noted that the second right amendment covers us from self defence and hunting. Self defence is a really big topic because of the fact that most people die on the hands of others because they have nothing to defend themselves with. A report from New York Times once said that Wayne Lapierre, N.R.A executive vice president once stated that “The only only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun”. Reports were found that in Newtown connecticut in a public school, none of the school employees were armed and they had no defence when it came down to a school shooting. People were harmed and

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: American Have the Right To Bear Arms

    1502 Words  | 4 Pages

    Like every other good ol' boy, I am concerned about being the victim of a random shooting, but at the same time, I want to be able to take down a nice10-point buck during hunting season. Guns effect every one of us every day. They fill us with fear or they make us feel protected. My point is this: guns are a problem, but using gun control to abolish them isn't necessarily the best solution. In gun control I mean laws that keep firearms off the street by preventing their purchase. I agree that some form of gun control is needed, butwhat we really need to concentrate on is gun licensing and more gun safety. I believe in my constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and I don't feel that legislators should be allowed to take away that right. Gun control can be a good thing, but if it leads to gun prohibition I will fight it until the day I die.

    Read More

  • The Right to Bear Arms

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    How many of us want the U.S. government to have the right to tell us what to do, and when w can do it. There are probably not many who would agree that the government should have that right. Though having gun control laws is not to that extreme, some would say it is the first step. Growing up in a small town, and also growing up with guns my whole life I was one of those people who did not want gun control laws. Then after reading two articles that discussed this topic I found that I have been ignorant about this subject.

    Read More

  • The Right to Own a Gun

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    Are you willing to sit back and become a victim of violent crime or allow the government to tamper with your civil liberties? In recent years, anti-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention this is an assault on the Second Amendment rights of US citizens . The Second Amendment states, “ A well regulated Militia being necessary to the Security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Not only did our Founding Fathers focus their debate on the right of people to keep and bear arms, they devoted energy to encouraging future generations to defend theses freedoms. In defense of gun ownership, Alexander Hamilton said, “If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens.” During our country’s development hundreds of law-abiding citizens were able to take up arms against lawless mobs to defend themselves, their family, their homes, and their businesses. They did the job law enforcement simply could not do. Lives were saved. Robberies were prevented. Homes and businesses were defended and left intact, all thanks to the Second Amendment to our constitutional, the right to keep and bear arms.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: Against Gun Control

    679 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants, they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."

    Read More

More about Right To Bear Arms

Open Document