Right To Be Forgotten

2100 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Privacy right

Has anyone ever posted lies about you on the internet? Did you want some way to remove them? The problem is who decides what is true and what is not. Who decides what about your personal life is relevant to the world? America protects freedom of speech in the Bill of Rights, but what about websites on the internet? Are they protected by American law, or should those freedoms be determined by international consensus? These are the kind of issues facing the internet world today and freedom of speech groups today. The Right to be Forgotten will not affect freedom of speech in America, but it will affect those who use local websites that serve internationals, thus international consensus needs to be reached on internet policy.
The Right to Be …show more content…

Because the internet is stored in so many places, how could one be sure that every instance of something that should be forgotten is, in fact, forgotten? Data can leave trails that can be hard to trace. Certain websites such as politiwoops store already-deleted information (Landau 11). What if someone decides to save a picture of that web page to his hard-drive, and then decides to publish it on social media in the future? This kind of problem illustrates the flaws in the Right to Be Forgotten. In article 12 of the Data Protection Regulation is says that every individual has the right to erase or block data that is inaccurate or incomplete. It must be done unless it is wholly impractical (DG Communication 2) While the right to be forgotten specifically protects again unpractical deletions there are still some issues with this. “Wholly Impractical” could be assigned to almost any kind of request for information deletion because of the perpetual nature of the Internet. The task of deciding case-by-case whether links should be taken down or not seems daunting. For example, should a sketchy politician be able to remove his information from the web? (Grossman 17) The whole idea of having something forgotten about another person on the internet sounds, frankly, frightening. What if historical revisionists decide that articles that oppose their viewpoint should be forgotten. A government could even …show more content…

Can consensus be reached between countries, or should we keep the same system that we have, disjointed but more or less free? In the past, control of the internet has been very US centric.(Benny) The US helps to run the internet by assignment and management of domain names. Some countries have their own, and some just end in .com. All of this is run by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which is part of the US government. (Benny) Even though this is a somewhat small part of running the internet, it illustrated how much the internet is US-centric. Every website that one visits will have had some sort of involvement by the US Government. However, ICANN's contract is ending soon and many wonder who will take over. Some have advocated that the U.N should take over for such responsibilities and, perhaps, other responsibilities as

Show More
Related

  • Annotated Bibliography Should A Person's Freedom Of Speech Be Limited In Any Way?

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    This source supplies my paper with more evidence of how freedom of speech is in a dangerous place. American has always stood by freedom of speech, and to see how social media platforms try to manipulate and take off as the choose to increase slight bias is unpleasant. The article establishes a worry to the fellow readers that hold freedom of speech so high and that it is at risk. The article manages to explain why freedom of speech is in danger, and why there should be no limits to free speech.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Why Privacy Matters Even If You Have Nothing To Hide

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide

    Read More

  • Hate Groups on the Internet

    3661 Words  | 8 Pages

    Technology has provided our society with numerous innovations that have been created to improve the quality of life on a daily basis. One such innovation is the Internet. The access to a wide variety of information is perhaps the most valuable tool, as well as the most important tool, that we have entering the twenty-first century. There are virtually no limits on how much can be achieved through the use of the Internet. This is not, however, necessarily a good thing. Most people find that offensive material such as child pornography and hate-related propaganda can be viewed by people too easily via the Internet. While child pornography is a detestable subject, it does not have the sort of appeal that a hate group website does in that there are stricter guidelines preventing individuals from attaining child pornography material from the Internet. These stricter guidelines include the Communications Decency Act (1995), which forbids the use of the Internet for such purposes as attaining material of a child pornographic nature (Wolf, 2000). This law can also be used to monitor the hate group websites, but since the law is too broad, it is rarely held up in court. The hate group websites do, however, have a large enough following that there is legislation being formed to specifically target the material on the sites. Despite the highly offensive nature of hate group websites, the sites should not be censored because the right to free speech must be preserved. In this paper we will define what is considered to be hateful content; why this hateful content should be protected; what else can be done to monitor this material on the Internet; and when are the people cr...

    Read More

  • Privacy vs. Security

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ever since day one, people have been developing and creating all sorts of new methods and machines to help better everyday life in one way or another. Who can forget the invention of the ever-wondrous telephone? And we can’t forget how innovative and life-changing computers have been. However, while all machines have their positive uses, there can also be many negatives depending on how one uses said machines, wiretapping in on phone conversations, using spyware to quietly survey every keystroke and click one makes, and many other methods of unwanted snooping have arisen. As a result, laws have been made to make sure these negative uses are not taken advantage of by anyone. But because of how often technology changes, how can it be known that the laws made so long ago can still uphold proper justice? With the laws that are in place now, it’s a constant struggle to balance security with privacy. Privacy laws should be revised completely in order to create a better happy medium between security and privacy. A common misconception of most is that a happy medium of privacy and security is impossible to achieve. However, as well-said by Daniel Solove, “Protecting privacy doesn’t need to mean scuttling a security measure. Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place.”(“5 Myths about Privacy”)

    Read More

  • Social Media Social Strain Essay

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    Millions of people resent the government for being somewhat of a Big Brother, making accusations of spyware programs and hacking, supposedly regulating our every move, yet freely share exceedingly personal information publicly. It has become common practice to post about your family members, location, phone number, email address, workplace, political affiliations and so much more, reaching far beyond the simple question “what are you doing now?”. Although many sites like Twitter and Instagram have a delete button, your postings are in actuality never erased permanently, but instead are gone from your so-called timeline. Daum notes in her essay that, “in a world without boundaries… privacy as a cultural or even personal value has been going out of style for quite some time now” (233). It is almost hypocritical in a way how our society pretends to value secrecy and discretion, yet people of all walks of life exhibit very little self restraint when it comes to filtering the kinds of information they post about

    Read More

  • Privacy: Security, Confidentiality, or Convenience?

    3152 Words  | 7 Pages

    The evolution of the Internet started from the department of defense's project, and rapidly distributed to world wide. With the rise of the Internet age comes with the benefits and the concerns. Because of the easeness to communicate information and displaying data, the first amendment needs to be applied to this communication channel. How are we using and communicating information without offending and harm others? Since the evolution of the Internet, there has been acts from Congress to regulate the use the Internet such as the Communications Decency Act in 1996 and the Child Online Protection Act in 1998. These acts aim to forbid Internet users from displaying offensive speech to users or exposing children of indecent materials. The Internet raises other issues that people might have. The biggest and most debatable topic is the privacy issue. Is the Internet a safe place to protect personal information such as financial information, medical data, etc…? Some people who are computer literate or at least with some experience in software and technology would not trust to release the information on the web or at random sites . As a matter of fact, any unknown or small vendor on the web would have difficulty getting many customers to do business online. Big vendors such as Amazon would want to secure their network infrastructure to protect the users information, so that their server would not be hacked. However, even this style of protecting personal information is not enough. The users demand further protection such as ensuring their information is not being sold to other vendors for misuse, or spam the users mailbox with soliticing.

    Read More

  • The Right To Be Forgotten Essay

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even if some else post their information without their knowledge. People tend to forget the internet is a public domain where anyone can post information about them self or other people even if it not morally right. However, the internet in a tool for sharing information and access that information for whatever people need. I, personally, think that for every day people who have a problem with the information that is out on the web they should rethink things that they posted and should learn a lesson how the real world works and thinks by not being able to have the right to be forgotten or have an access to a tool where they can erase information that they put online in order for to be more in inclined on what kinds of information that they want society to see and know.

    Read More

  • Indiviual Privacy vs National Security

    1175 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Madison once said “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” To gain a better understanding of a society, one must gain knowledge of the needs and wants the citizens’ demand from the country’s representatives. In every country the needed to protect its citizens is the same. In some nations, security is a higher priority which causes sacrifices to be made to obtain an indefinite protection against all rivals. In Peter Singer’s essay titled “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” he states that there is a way that governments can collect information by using technology; to allow more ‘openness’ and exposure as an increase of unknown surveillance that the public is not aware of. Singer’s essay also talks about how also with the rise of secrecy within politics; organizations such as ‘WikiLeaks’ and ‘Anonymous’ reveal to the world what is really going on within their privacy. Benefits come from both sides in a world where surveillance exists to the highest priority with or without privacy.

    Read More

  • Right To Be Forgotten Essay

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    After a recent court ruling in Europe, Europeans now have protection against, well, being stupid. Any user under the age of 18 can erase posts that they made on social media. After these posts are erased the user will no longer be held accountable for them. Documents withholding details and names about old court cases and convictions also have to be deleted from search engines. Several states are adopting their own version of the “Right to be Forgotten” ruling.

    Read More

  • Internet Regulation

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Internet is a global network connecting millions of personal, institutional and company computers. The number of computers used by the internet is growing rapidly. The United States is connected with over 100 countries worldwide and linked together to exchange of data, news and opinions. The Internet is decentralized design. This means that there isn't just one computer that stores all of the information from the Internet. There are many independent host servers located throughout the US and the world that store the information made available to the global Internet community.

    Read More

  • Right To Be Forgotten

    1637 Words  | 4 Pages

    The right to privacy is defined to be “assured that information disclosed in the course of a commercial transaction, such as health conditions, financial status, or identity, is not shared with others unless authorized” (Lawrence & Weber, 2017, p.304). The case puts forward the idea “the right to be forgotten”, which means everyone has the right to control their personal data. The right to be forgotten can be understood as people's’ right to request that information be removed from the Internet or other repositories because it violated their privacy or was no longer relevant (Lawrence & Weber, 2017, p.454). Regulators for Facebook and Google say that “people should have the 'right to be forgotten' when their data is no longer needed or they want their data to be deleted"(Crovitz, 2010). There are two reasons for that: Personal data belongs to themselves and everyone should have the right to control their own data and information.

    Read More

  • Privacy on the Internet

    2274 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this new era of the Internet, most people use the Internet to acquire information of one kind or other. But what these people are not aware of is that the Internet is collecting information about them. Every time we get onto the Internet there might be a compromise of privacy of our personal information. The information flows both ways. With every clock of the mouse on a hyperlink, or an addition to the mailing list, someone out there might be gathering information about us. This raises the seriousness of privacy of our information on the Internet.

    Read More

  • Threat to Internet Privacy

    2650 Words  | 6 Pages

    Computers can also tie information together in an impersonal and systematic way that can lead to invasions of privacy. Take for example the situation wh...

    Read More

  • Right To Be Forgotten?

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    The ‘right to be forgotten,’ an integral component of the proposed reforms to the European Union data protection legislation, asserts an individual’s right to have personal information removed from the Internet. Mario Consteja Gonzalez, a Spanish national who ran into financial difficulties, brought the issue of the right to be forgotten on Internet searches to awareness. Gonzalez sold his property to resolve this predicament, and news of his economic state surfaced on the Internet. This damaged his reputation, decreased his job opportunities and led to loss of credibility. By demanding Google and other search engines to remove these links, Gonzalez ignited the debate about the importance of privacy in our digital era.

    Read More

  • Right To Be Forgotten Essay

    462 Words  | 1 Pages

    ‘Right to be forgotten’ is a recently made right that was introduced in the draft proposal for general data protection regulation of 2012. The case refers specifically to search engines and their duty to remove links to webpages from their lists of results. This essay will address the implications of the rule on individuals, discuss how the ruling is being received and enforced by search engines and news publications, and look at differences in international levels of enforcement. It will also look at various academic level studies and case studies available on the subject Implications of this ruling to private individuals, politicians, businesses, and those with criminal records remain hugely felt. The right to be forgotten is different from

    Read More

More about Right To Be Forgotten

Open Document