More handpicked essays just for you.
Characters and characterisation of the crucible
The Crucible Essay character analysis
The Crucible Essay character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Needless to say through a series of grammatical errors and yelling Julian eventually just tells him to drink some liquor to counter the weed. You may be wondering how in the world I’m going to connect weed drinks and alcohol to what we have learned in class. Well ill tell you. To analyze this scene we must first break down the argument taking place between Ricky and Cory. A good place to start is Ricky’s perceived Ethos. His credibility is often times tested by the group because, well, lets face it Rickey isn’t really the smartest one in the group. When it comes to weed however, he seems to know a lot. This is primarily why Cory drank the drink in the first place. As there all sitting in Julian’s bar the first line that comes out of Ricky’s …show more content…
mouth is a series of curs words followed by him asking Cory how he is feeling after having that drink.
This is a display of the Pathos within the scene. This is because Ricky is stirring the emotions within the scene by yelling at Cory in a seemingly serious situation. Despite this the scene is meant to be taken as a comical one by the audience given the topic of discussion. After Rickys question Cory replies, “It feels like I got spiders and ants all over me.” This is where the scene gets interesting. Bubbles, obvious to the audience but not the main characters, is the smart one of the group. He joins the conversation and begins his display of Logos by adding much needed logic to the argument. Cory, when asked by Rickey “1-10 how tired are you?” He replies with ”34” Bubbles then joins in again and offers more logos by saying Cory you cant go right to 34, that doesn’t even give you a …show more content…
relative, you know…” This is the point in the scene where all hope is lost for any type of logic and it just goes down hill from here for Corey. As if the rhetorical analysis wasn’t enough the semiotic analysis might actually provide more detail into the situation. To start things off lets take a look at the opening shot. It’s a mid shot of the main characters are in a dimly lit bar with sketchy wood paneling on the walls and a curtain that provides a yellowish tint to the room. This would be the sign of the overall scene, providing for a curious setting leaving the viewers wondering “oh no, what are they doing now?” also the way in which the scene is filmed makes you feel almost like your in the room whit them. The majority of the shots in general, including this one, are shot without a tripod leaving the cameraman free to move around from wide shot to close up as the argument progresses. When Ricky is yelling at Cory, for example, the shot goes from a relatively stationary wide shot to a somewhat shaky close up on Cory’s face. Then like a brick wall you start to notice the signifiers of the situation.
For example throughout the whole shot there are two open bottles of liquor on the table. This perpetuates the ongoing theme of drunkenness throughout the whole episode. Next you will notice that Ricky is taking notes on a dry erase clipboard meant for writing down hockey plays. This could be taken as Ricky’s general stupidity or just the sear fact that he could be to broke to afford a tablet. This takes us into the next most noticeable object in the scene. Ricky’s big Silver necklace and watch, which imply that he has money to afford jewelry so why not a tablet or anything else for that
mater? Lastly the signified areas of the scene are what eventually bring the group together and take them out of the argument and into the next borderline adventure. This is done by Julian, the groups somewhat intelligent ring leader. After Ricky writes down his notes on the makeshift notepad he starts to mention some of the things he can put into the drink, like Sudafed. Then Bubbles and Julian’s Logos and Ethos come out and take control of the situation. After bubbles attempts to make a comment about the Sudafed and how it wont give you energy, Julian tells everyone to shut up and begins to pour a liquor drink for Cory. This action takes the scene to chaos to a short-lived feeling of community. Cory begins to take a sip thinking this will fix his problems. He quickly realizes that all this is, is a cup of warm whiskey and tequila mixed. After Cory gags on the concoction, Julian begins to yell at him and tells him to just gulp it down. This scene ender signifies a lot, for example, community, general stupidity, trust and even research of you look at it from a strange angel. You may be asking what does all of this mean? Why should I care about a rhetorical and semiotic analysis of a bunch of bums on a TV show? This is relevant because it is not just a TV show about a group of degenerates; it’s a well written/organized TV show that has so many various intelligently orchestrated scenes that go un noticed.
Danforth and Hale are involved in an argument over the Salem witch trials now that the court is now in session. Danforth gets angered and fiercely tries to imply (without proof) that the “fear” in the county is being caused by the witches and nothing more. According to Danforth, the goal of the witches is to overthrow the belief of Christ in Salem. Danforth’s use of words was a combination of all rhetorical devices. Logos was used to structure his argument, the vivid language led to the use of pathos, and lastly ethos was associated with his authority and confidence in yelling out the true “problem” in Salem. Danforth clearly states that he thinks the daughter was the “villain” and in his mind he is the hero for realizing that the use of witchcraft
“No one man can terrorize a whole nation unless we are all his accomplices.” In the case of The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Edward Murrow is uncannily accurate. The Crucible, set in Salem, Massachusetts during the Salem Witch Trials, proves that when one antagonist has accomplices, they can destroy the lives of many. In this story, Abigail destroys the lives of everyone in Salem. That being said, in times of stress or panic, people's’ true traits and personalities can be discovered, as shown in the cases of John Proctor and his damning indiscretion, Rev. Hale’s panicked realization, and Mary Warren’s naive and fearful indecision; all of which develop throughout the play in response to different stimuli.
Is there any idea worth more than a human life? In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor decides that he has nothing left to live for, and therefore becomes a martyr. The question for him or one in his position would be whether or not there exist causes worth dying for and if his position is one such case. There is no principle worth more than a person’s life and therefore principles worth dying for, only principles worth living for.
A crucible refers to a harsh test, and in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, each person is challenged in a severe test of his or her character or morals. Many more people fail than pass, but three notable characters stand out. Reverend John Hale, Elizabeth Proctor, and John Proctor all significantly change over the course of the play.
Arthur Miller’s political allegory of McCarthyism, in the form of The Crucible, has been adapted into a faithful companion to the play that is able to incorporate the emotions and atmosphere that may not have been available to some in the play. Miller’s screenplay is very faithful to the book, having many of the same lines and situations the character in the play experience. Because of this, we are able to make an active connection to the play, thus expanding our understanding of the play. Lead by Daniel Day-Lewis, The Crucible’s plot is portrayed by a solid cast, who, for the most part, are able to engross the viewer into the story. The film contains many captivating scenes that exemplify hysteria meant to be depicted in the play, that demands the viewers attention while also immersing them in emotions. The film adaptation of The Crucible is a well produced version of the play that not only serves as a companion to the play, but an entertaining and though provoking experience.
David Sheff starts the story of his family with Nic’s birth and goes all the way long to the present days when his son had survived several years of drug abuse, rehabilitations and relapses. Sheff confesses that his son started to use different kinds of drugs when he was very young. At the age of 11 he would try alcohol and some pot. “In early May, I pick Nic up after school one day …When he climbs into a car I smell cigarette smoke. I lecture him and he promises not to do it again. Next Friday after school…I am packing an overnight bag for him and look for a sweater in his backpack. I do not find a sweater, but instead discover a small bag of marijuana.” (Sheff, 200...
Arthur Miller’s 1953 play The Crucible and Alfonso Cuarón’s 2006 dystopian science-fiction film Children of Men both represent people and politics through an exploration of the concept of justice and conformity and non-conformity. Both texts represent people and politics in a unique and evocative way through their differing textual forms, contexts and techniques.
with what you feel are the main themes of the play that you want to
Great events, whether they are beneficial or tragic ones, bring change in a person. These scenarios can give one an entirely new perspective on life, and turn around his way of thinking. Events such as the Salem Witch Trials show the people involved what they could not see before. In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, Elizabeth Proctor, Reverend Hale, and John Proctor gain valuable insight into themselves, as well as others.
When faced with a problem, humans usually try to find the easiest, fastest, and most convenient way out of the issue. In order to overcome problems, motivation is needed. However, motivation comes from different places within a person based on the individual’s desires. When looking back to 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts the problem during this time period was witchcraft, and "to be accused was to be assumed guilty, to accuse was to avoid punishment" (Jimerson 37). Fear of punishment causes people to accuse the innocent, and the innocent has no redemption for they were automatically guilty. No one was safe at this time as the cycle continued on and on. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Mary Warren is motivated by fear that transitions from Abigail
Salem in the 1600s was a textbook example of an extremist society with sexist norms and no separation of church and state. Because it had no laws, only people considered authorities on law, it was always a society based on norms laid down by the first settlers and severity on the verge of madness. The power was imbalanced, focused subjectively in the people who had means to control others. Some people attempted to right the wrongs of the powerful, as people are wont to do eventually. Because of them, change indeed came to Salem, slowly and after excessive ruin and death. Before the rebels’ impact took hold, Salem’s Puritan society was a religious dystopian disaster, a fact illustrated excellently by Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible. This religious dystopian disaster carried many flaws and conflicts that can be seen in other societies, both historical and modern.
“Smoke.smoke,” and “Drink.good,” are a couple of the comments he makes.
The Crucible is a famous play written by Arthur Miller in the Early 1950’s. It was written during the “Red scare, when McCarthyism was established. Many anti-communists wanted to prevent communism from spreading just like in The Crucible many wanted to get rid of witchcraft. Many would accuse others of witchcraft in order to not be accused just like many would accuse people of communism. In The Crucible witchcraft would be punishable by death. Many were scared to be accused; therefore many would admit practicing witchcraft in order to save their lives. The Crucible is considered a good play because it is based on real life events during the Salem witch Trials and shows how fear played a role in the individual’s life just like during the “Red” scare.
The Crucible is an incredibly influential play no only in the fact that it displays many important themes, but it also portrays how a theocracy impacts societal actions. The Salem witch trials were the culmination of the problems with theocracy. The actions of society, not only are impacted by their personal thoughts, but also in religious undertones affect them. Act two in the play portrays not only all of these themes, but also some important events leading towards the witchcraft hysteria. Act two in the play portrays how theocracy ultimately leads to chaos.
The use of drugs and mind-alternating substances has been a part of society for decades. The ‘high’ that people attain from the use of such substances is very attractive and exciting however, the effects of this use are minimized. Particularly for youth, a group of individuals who are seeking independence and experimentation, drug use represents the balance between taking risks and taking responsibility for one’s actions. However, the developmental processes of adolescents are known to not encompass the maturity required to fully think through such decisions. As such, the use of a ‘smaller-scale’ drug like marijuana is even more minimized. The purpose of this paper is to discuss what the risks of using marijuana are for youths, why they are the most affected, how this problem has progressed over the last three decades, and what preventative measures and treatment options are in place. It will also discuss what schools, parents, and government agencies could be doing to help improve the issue, and the impact that this issue is having on society.