Richard Nixon’s Letter of Resignation Rhetorical Analysis Entering the 1970s, the United States, led by President Richard Nixon, was in the midst of the Cold War—a proxy war between capitalist powers (primarily the U.S.) and communist powers (primarily the Soviet Union). Along with foreign turmoil, domestic turmoil also plagued the nation: civil rights dissension was polarizing. In addition to this, Republican–Democrat animosity was at an all-time high—eventually reaching its peak with the Watergate scandal, led by Nixon. Pressured by Congress and the media, Nixon knew that impeachment was inevitable. Not wanting to risk his reputation, Nixon decided to remove himself from office. On August 8th, 1974, Richard Nixon publicly announced his resignation. In his remorseful yet …show more content…
Nixon asserts that he always believed that “the interests of the nation must always come before any personal considerations” and that “America needs a full-time President.” (Nixon). This assertion aims to grow the audience’s understanding of Nixon’s intentions by attempting to draw in their sense of national pride. By reaching for a sense of national pride, the audience is more likely to empathize with Nixon, thus protecting his reputation as a man of good intention. Shortly after, Nixon notes that continuing to try and save his reputation in the coming months would unnecessarily “absorb the time and attention of both the President and the Congress.” This concession furthers Nixon’s position that he is acting out of the Nation’s best interest—not his own. Hearing this as an American citizen during this time of distrust would attempt to mend the wound of presidential betrayal that Nixon initiated. When he points out how rebuilding his reputation would hinder governmental progress, he evokes a sense of patriotism in the audience because it stresses growth as a whole
“People who had incurred the displeasure of the party simply disappeared and were never heard of again.
Scientists are constantly forced to test their work and beliefs. Thus they need the ability to embrace the uncertainty that science is based on. This is a point John M. Barry uses throughout the passage to characterize scientific research, and by using rhetorical devices such as, comparison, specific diction, and contrast he is able show the way he views and characterizes scientific research.
The chapter, Church, has the troop hold up in a church for a few days. In the church, the monks take an immediately likely to the troop help with food and weapon cleaning. A few of the soldiers discuss what they wanted to do before the war. The troops learn more about each other and insight into what faith can be to them.
“He say Mr. Parris must be kill! Mr. Parris no goodly man, Mr. Parris mean man and no gentle man and he bid me rise out of bed and cut your throat!” (Miller 47).
A single word, a single phrase can change someone’s life forever. A speech given with meaning can change a country’s path. In 1974, President Nixon resigned from his presidency from a speech given from the White House, presumably in his office. He declared that his Vice President Gerald Ford take office in his place. Ford then decided to pardon Nixon of all charges placed against him because of the Watergate scandal. They express and get their points across in two different ways, by sharing confident, personal views or through emotion.
20 were executed” (Blumberg). The Crucible setting is based on The Salem Witch trials, but the plot is based on The Red Scare. The author employs strict tone and rhetorical questions to convey power. This connects to the purpose of how a occurring can devastate a whole community and the people in it. Arthur Miller, the author of The Crucible, employs empowerment by expressing the challenges within each character and their influence on the trial through the characters John Proctor, Abigail, and Danforth.
Nixon’s run as an international crook finally caught up to him in 1972, when burglars were caught and arrested inside of the Democratic national headquarters at the Watergate hotel complex in Washington. Nixon attempted to cover it up, but eventually he was found caught in his own web of lies, and was forced to resign in 1974 (Lecture 30, December 12). Nixon’s promises of a return to normalcy were shattered with these revelations. The confidence in the Presidency that he had hoped to restore was even lower than it was when he entered office. If the 1960’s were defined by political and social instability, then Richard Nixon did nothing but further the sixties into the 1970’s. The 1960’s truly ended with the pardon of Richard Nixon by President Ford in 1974. After doing so, Ford declared: “our long national nightmare is over”.
“My Fellow Americans, I come before you tonight as a candidate for the Vice Presidency and as a man whose honesty and integrity has been questioned.” New York Post had printed an article condemning Richard Nixon of stealing money from his campaign for his own personal use of spendings. Luckily Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon’s fellow Presidential candidate, allowed and advised Nixon to explain himself to the American people who wanted to throw him off. Providing a speech on television, Nixon did something no one else had done before and he summarized the history of all the money he had spent and received since starting his career in politics. What Nixon had thought as an unsuccessful speech, triumphed and moved the American citizens knowing he spoke
In 1796, George Washington presented to the public people, his friends, his family, and his neighbors, his farewell address. He was a remarkable man who lead a courageous journey and left a progressive impact to thrive through the following years. In such speech, he aimed to explain the reasoning for his retirement and to give thanks to the American people that he had formerly lead in turn for their support and cooperation in standing strong together as a whole, as a country and as a family.
Imagine the world we are living in today, now imagine a world where we are told who to marry, where to work, who to hate and not to love. It is hard to imagine right, some people even today are living in the world actually have governments that are controlling their everyday life. In literature many writers have given us a view of how life may be like if our rights as citizen and our rights simply as human beings. One day the government may actually find a way to control and brainwash people into beings with no emotions like they have in the book 1984 where they express only hate, because that’s what they have been taught by the party.
When Barack Obama ran for presidency, there were a lot of questions about his race, color, and whether he was born in the U.S.. The comments from his pastor Jeremiah Wright put him in an awkward situation, so he decided to give this speech to prove the point that we are all the same and live in the same country, so there shouldn’t be any discrimination among anyone. In his speech, Obama uses rhetorical devices to explain how race discrimination is affecting our country and us in every way possible. The use of rhetorical devices in this speech has strong effects on the audience. The use of allusion, symbolism, optimistic tone, and repetition of words gives the speech a strong argumentative tone. He argues the fact that to be able to achieve such big goals and how out country was supposed to be from the beginning, we need to stay united and rely on younger
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that described a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation. Swift hoped to reach not only the people of Ireland who he was calling to action, but the British, who were oppressing the poor. He writes with contempt for those who are oppressing the Irish and also dissatisfaction with the people in Ireland themselves to be oppressed.
We Shall Overcome Rhetorical Analyses Throughout the history of the United States, racial discrimination has always been around our society. Many civil rights movements and laws have helped to minimize the amount of discrimination towards every single citizen, but discrimination is something that will not ever disappear. On March 15, 1965, Lyndon Baines Johnson gave a speech that pointed out the racial injustice and human rights problems of America in Washington D.C. He wanted every citizen of the United States to support his ideas to overcome and solve the racial injustice problems as a nation. Throughout the speech, Lyndon Johnson used several rhetorical concepts to persuade the audience.
The years leading up to the 1972 election were filled with new political tactics. Going into the election year, President Nixon seemed like he could never lose the second term election after successfully negotiating with Vietnam, Beijing, and Russia to improve international relations (Emery 4). Raising international toughness made Nixon seem like the most worthy person to stay president. Fred Emery analyses in his novel Watergate: The Corruption of American Politics and the Fall of Richard Nixon, the president was also setting up the first summit meeting in history with Soviet Union Presidents (3). There seemed to be nothing capable of holding the seemingly responsible man back. However, this assurance came with massive consequences. The absolute certainty that Nixon would be reelected fueled the lies and abuse of power by the Nixon government (Emery 195). As the outlook of landslide winnings took over the White House, the moral reasoning, “the end justifies the means” became more prevalent. Nixon was obsessed with winning and being successful. Under his command his staff did whatever possible to ...
Director Steven Spielberg and auther Markus Zusak, in their intriguing production, movie Saving Private Ryan and book The Book Thief, both taking place during World War II. However , in Saving Private Ryan Spielberg focus on a lot of complications that occur during war , but guilt was one difficulty that stood out to me. Zusak, on the other hand , showas that having courage during war can be a advantage and also an disadvantage depending on the situation. Both director and author grabed the audience attention with emotional and logical appeal.