Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Good and evil in literature
Good and evil in literature
Good versus evil in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with the swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed" (Adams 43). In the creation of the secondary world of the novel, Richard Adams utilizes mythos to enrich the rabbit culture. Through these stories, the rabbits learn how to make up for their shortcomings by taking advantage of their assets. The series of myths in the novel discuss the rabbits’ reliance on trickery, emphasis on selflessness, and views on mortality and enhances the novel by providing a set of underlying morals that aids in understand rabbit behavior. …show more content…
The stories of El-ahrairah reveal trickery as a central theme in rabbit culture and a necessity for survival.
For example, in the story of the King’s Lettuce, El-ahrairah deceive King Darzin when he sets “to work to disguise himself” as a doctor sent to discover the issues concerning Darzin’s lettuce (110). By tricking King Darzin, El-ahrairah is able to get his people out of Kelfazin and display the advantages associated with trickery to all of the rabbits listening to the story. This shows that in order to get out of trouble, the first method rabbits should turn to is trickery. In the Story of the Trial of El-ahrairah, Hufsa is sent to spy on El-ahrairah because of his tendency to trick and steal. El-ahrairah is able to deceive him by recruiting other animals to perform unusual actions, causing Hufsa to give a nearly unbelievable account to the jury of animals. By doing this, El-ahrairah saves his own life and is thus able to escape danger through use of wit. In this way, Adams depicts deception as an innate rabbit virtue that gets them both into and out of …show more content…
trouble. Perhaps the most blatant use of trickery occurs in the story of Rowsby Woof, when El-ahrairah and Rabscuttle decide to “chance Rowsby Woof for once” just to procure more desirable food, even though it is “dangerous, because the man had a gun” (403-404). The success of this risky mission clearly displays the positives in using trickery to the rabbits, and the cause of the mission displays how the rabbits use trickery for its own sake. Even though El-ahrairah did not desperately need to conduct the raid, he did it to amuse himself and to enjoy better food. In these ways, rabbit culture adopts its emphasis of trickery through the use of mythos in which trickery always pays off. As supported by the mythos in the novel, rabbits rely on selflessness to overcome their obstacles.
Through the stories of El-ahrairah, selflessness is portrayed as being an admirable trait in a chief rabbit. Rabbits are relatively weak creatures, and they need to utilize the strengths of each member of the group in order to thrive. For example, he risks his life (along with Rabscuttle’s) by conducting a raid on King Darzin’s garden, a very dangerous garden in the second world of the novel. His motivation to save his people is meant to be conveyed to the rabbits listening to the story. It is through his selflessness that his people are saved, thus making it evident that the wellbeing of the warren depends on the selflessness of the chief
rabbit. This selflessness is most apparent through the story of The Black Rabbit of Inlé. At the beginning of the story, it is said that El-ahrairah “had been risking his life again and again to bring down a few mouthfuls of grass for a doe and her family whose father had been killed the day before” (279). Although it may seem counterintuitive for a chief rabbit to risk his life for a relatively petty cause, this sort of generosity is a keystone in rabbit society. As the story progresses, so does El-ahrairah’s selflessness. When King Darzin traps his people, El-ahrairah decides to first entreat the help of Lord Frith, stating that he would do anything to save my [his] people” (280). When Frith declines his request, El-ahrairah selflessly requests the help of the Black Rabbit of Inlé, the rabbit personification of death, to save his people. In essence, El-ahrairah decides that meeting death is worth saving his people. After failing several times to win the support of the Black Rabbit, El-ahrairah resigns to self-sacrifice by plunging “ into the nearest hole faster than a raindrop into the ground” in order to catch the white blindness and infect King Darzin’s army (288). This is the ultimate demonstration of El-ahrairah’s self-abnegation, and he is rewarded when the Black Rabbit decides to save his people anyway. In this way, Adams uses the myth to display how rabbit culture relies on self-sacrifice and how selflessness is the only path to survival. The mythos in the novel depict the rabbits’ views on immortality and the afterlife, which is central to their culture. The rabbits use stories of immortal beings to explain the world around them, attributing their creation to an almighty being called Frith, whom they use to make sense of their position in life and their assets. When El-ahrairah is blessed by Lord Frith, “his back legs grew long and powerful and he thumped the hillside” (43). This phenomenon instills pride in the rabbits and aids them in making sense of their powerful legs. This also establishes the rabbits’ tendency to run away and hide from their enemies. Since rabbits are weak and have many predators, they also need a way to sustain hope for survival. Lord Frith provides them with this hope by promising El-ahrairah that his “people shall never be destroyed” (43). This statement comforts the rabbits, providing them with a feeling that a powerful being is watching out for them. Similarly, the rabbits use mythos to attempt to understand death as well. The story of the Black Rabbit of Inlé describes The Black Rabbit, the rabbits’ personification of death, as “fear and everlasting darkness… he is that cold, bad dream from which we can only entreat Lord Frith to save us” (280). In coordination with Lord Frith, the Black Rabbit summons the rabbits to die, thus making him a feared figure. In order to come to terms with death, the rabbit tales portray the Black Rabbit as an all-powerful being whose will is law. When rabbits are killed by elil, “their foolishness comes from the Black Rabbit, for it is by his will that they do not smell the dog or see the gun” (280). This assures the rabbits that they will only die when they are called, and when they are called, there is no way to evade death. Fortunately for the rabbits, the Black Rabbit “serves Lord Frith,” who assures them that their species will not die out (280). In this way, the rabbits are prompted to pray to Frith if they want to elude death and suffering. The mythological tales in the novel provide the audience with a set of underlying morals that explain rabbit behavior. In the story of the King’s Lettuce, El-ahrairah acts as a selfless negotiator for his warren. He notices his people are suffering in Kelfazin and addresses his people’s needs to Prince Rainbow. Similarly, when the Watership Down warren discovers Efrafan officers hiding around the down, Hazel attempts to negotiate with General Woundwart. Hazel demonstrates his selfishness by allowing the dog from Nuthanger Farm to chase after him in order to save his warren. Also, El-ahrairah demonstrates his trust in his fellow rabbits by trusting Rabscuttle to perform the difficult mission of going undercover into King Darzin’s garden. This demonstrates the trust that chief rabbits have in their fellow rabbits, and the ability of the chief rabbit to step back and allow another rabbit to perform a job he/she is better suited for. Similarly, Hazel trusts his fellow rabbits in the creation of the new warren. For example, he trusts Strawberry to head the construction of the honeycomb, and this turns “out to be something of a triumph for Strawberry” (156). In this way, Hazel’s ability to trust his followers parallels the stories of El-ahrairah. Moreover, Rabscuttle is the example of a perfect Owsla officer (follower in general). He is loyal and obedient to El-ahrairah and sneaks into King Darzin’s garden as he is told. This explains the emphasis on loyalty for the rabbits in the novel. Just like Rabscuttle, Bigwig listens to Hazel when he is given the dangerous task of entering Efrafa. In Efrafa, Captain Campion is obedient to General Woundwart and was one of the only rabbits “for whom Woundwort felt a genuine respect” (320). This obedience and loyalty was even admired by Bigwig, who “could feel only what a pity it was that the two of them should be enemies” (367). This affinity for Captain Campion is due to the fact that Campion fits the attributes of a loyal rabbit that is well regarded in the stories of El-ahrairah. Lastly, Rabscuttle demonstrated trickery by deceiving the animals in King Darzin’s garden into thinking he was one of them. This not only promotes rabbit dishonesty, but also promotes going incognito to accomplish a task. Bigwig demonstrated the same traits by tricking the people of Efrafa into thinking he was on their side. In this way, the rabbits in the novel drew on the knowledge acquired from the myths of El-ahrairah to overcome their obstacles.
Richard Adams novel, Watership Down, is the account of a group of rabbits trip to search out a new location to inhabit. After escaping the Sandleford Warren because of one rabbit’s instincts, nearly a dozen rabbits cross virgin country. Along the way, they run across a few other warrens. These places exhibit a completely different way of living to the fleeing group. What they learn is vital when they develop their own warren. From these places they manage to collect some rabbits to increase their size once they reach a resting point at their final destination. Each of the places they encounter is set up differently. These warrens contain a distinct and unique social system, belief and leadership role.
In this story, Richard Adams' creates an interesting part of the story when eleven rabbits unite to form a group and flee from their warren, in hopes of avoiding a great tragedy. These rabbits leave their warren without knowledge of why they need to leave their homes. The one thing the rabbits have in common is their faith in Fiver's dreams and visions. Together these rabbits will have to put aside their differences in order to face the danger ahead of them.
All of these types of stories survived by being “performed in Africa, the West Indies, and the American South.” These tricksters cause disharmony, which is part of the audience’s enjoyment. The main characteristic of the trickster in these tales is “signifying,” the “ability to use cunning words to turn the powerful into dupes.” Usually, a trickster makes a contract with a dupe, but betrays him. He does this because he gets his strength by violating social boundaries. Other times, the trickster plays tricks and is caught, which leads to humiliation. Some of the stories in this section are “Why the Hare Runs Away,” “The Ant’s Burden,” and “Tricking All the Kings” In “Why the Hare Runs Away,” we know the trickster makes a contract when “it was decided” was said, and we know the trickster breaks that contract when we see “he refused.” The trickster is punished for breaking the contract by being captured by the other animals. In the story “The Ant’s Burden,” we see Anansi trying to make Kweku his dupe when “he wondered how he could fix the blame on someone else.” This tale also takes on the characteristic of a trickster’s contest because Anansi loses and, in return, is made the dupe, for which he “was condemned.” “Tricking All the Kings” is about outwitting a plantation master. Although the king seems to dominate at the beginning of the story, he is later made to be the dupe. We see him becoming the tricksters first dupe when Buh Nansi says “oh, Massa King, you mean to pitch me in that blue, blue sea…,” and we see the contract being made when the king says, “No, I wouldn’t, I’ll have you drowned.” In this story the trickster beats the dupe because the king couldn’t have done him a “better favor”
As Mark Twain once stated, “The more I know about people, the better I like my dog.” This sentiment is often echoed by general society; people seem to have lost faith in humanity. However, John Steinbeck illustrates his more optimistic opinion about “the perfectibility of man” by suggesting how man can improve. In his novel, Of Mice and Men, two tenants called George and Lennie go through many hardships all while chasing their dream of possessing their own farm. While they work at a farm, they meet an old swamper called Candy who offers to help them achieve their dream; he does so to ensure that he will have a future after he is fired for being too old. On page 60, Candy discusses the recent death of his dog and asks to join in on George and Lennie’s dream. Through this passage, Steinbeck proves that humans have an animalistic tendency of eliminating those who are weaker than them. This is depicted through the details connecting Candy to his dog as well as Candy’s diction when describing his potential future life. Steinbeck’s negative attitude towards man’s predatory nature implies that society needs to improve and prevent such oppressive behavior from occurring.
This week we read about Picture books and we were assigned to read The Tale of Peter Rabbit by Beatrice Potter and Where The Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak. I really enjoyed reading these children’s books because I do not remember reading The Tale of Peter Rabbit, but reading it now I really got to appreciate the story, enjoy the illustrations and the story. I vaguely remember reading Where The Wild Things Are, so I am glad that I was able to reread it because I think that it is a very cute and enjoyable story for younger children While reading Chapter 3 from the textbook, “The Tale of Peter Rabbit,” and “Where The Wild Things Are” I formed several different observations. The first observation that I formed while reading this week
The best example of deception is Hamlet’s antic disposition fooling most characters throughout the play. By fooling everyone Hamlet could accomplish a great deal more with ease without Claudius suspecting any of his deeds. After ghost of Hamlet’s father tells him of Claudius’s heinous deed he uses this madness to avenge him as wells as save Denmark from him. To do this Hamlet had to deceive almost the entirety of the kingdom to plot his revenge against Claudius. This makes deception the most important theme in Hamlet. While Claudius is busy speculating the origin of this madness Hamlet was covertly planning the mousetrap play. Which only worked because Claudius wasn’t expecting it. Without deception there was a good chance that Claudius would realize that Hamlet learned of the murder and was actively plotting how to prove to his mother and the kingdom that he killed Hamlet’s father. When Hamlet feigned madness it also had an unexpected effect on Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, many people were speculating on the source of his madness and this led them to underestimate him. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were two of them, on their way to England they gave Hamlet the chance to change the letter for the English monarch and bring about their own deaths. Hamlet’s deception made it possible for him to plot against Claudius without
Growth is inevitable and the most anticipated quest of man. It is a never-ending quest to evolve, fuelled by the constant hope for survival. Once natural growth halts, man’s focus shifts to the growth within. The coming of age, associates itself with this transformation from child to man, the step of letting go of childish ways and moving on to more mature things. The need for such a dramatic transformation is questioned by Miguel de Cervantes and Lewis Carroll in their texts, Don Quixote and Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. While the texts follow two contrasting characters, they are brought together by the theme of fantasy. Cervantes’ Don Quixote is an old gentleman of noble lineage who becomes tired of the monotony and the lack of meaning in his life. Through his maddening and compulsive taste in books of chivalry, he concludes that the ideal life is that which is undertaken by a knight-errant. He chooses to leave his home and ensue the path of knight-errantry. Carroll’s Alice, on the other hand, is a young girl who cannot fully comprehend the world of adults but still adheres to the etiquette drawn out by society. She is transported to the land of Wonderland where the surreal is real, and where whatever she thought she knew, now becomes nothing at all. The importance of fantasy in the lives of their protagonists is shown by Cervantes and Carroll through the impact it has on the growth of the protagonists. This becomes evident through their placement in phantasmagorical settings, their interactions with the surrounding characters, and their final detachment from fantasy.
Thus, Alice in Wonderland is a good illustration of a Hero’s Journey. This story allows us to see how Alice overcomes the three main phases, and most of the stages identified by Campbell in her journey-transformation from an undisciplined child to a wise young adult. Throughout the story, Alice overcomes the nonsense of the young and the old before she truly understands what adulthood is all about. All through her adventures in Wonderland, she encounters numerous new situations and meets different archetypes that are necessary for her to be considered a Hero.
Potter’s book is, beneath its didactic Victorian narrative, remarkably subtle and subversive in its attitudes towards childhood, and its message to its child readers. Browne’s Voices in the Park, on the other hand, dispenses with any textual narrative; by his use of the devices of postmodernism, visual intertextuality and metaphor, he creates a work of infinite interpretation, in which the active involvement of the reader is key. Although The Tale of Peter Rabbit is not a ‘modern’ picturebook, and was written to a different concept of childhood than Voices in the Park, it certainly falls within Bader’s description.... ... middle of paper ...
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is a story about a little girl who comes into contact with unpredictable, illogical, basically mad world of Wonderland by following the White Rabbit into a huge rabbit – hole. Everything she experiences there challenges her perception and questions common sense. This extraordinary world is inhabited with peculiar, mystical and anthropomorphic creatures that constantly assault Alice which makes her to question her fundamental beliefs and suffer an identity crisis. Nevertheless, as she woke up from “such a curious dream” she could not help but think “as well she might, what a wonderful dream it had been ”.
Although the novel is notorious for its satire and parodies, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland main theme is the transition between childhood and adulthood. Moreover, Alice’s adventures illustrate the perplexing struggle between child and adult mentalities as she explores the curious world of development know as Wonderland. From the beginning in the hallway of doors, Alice stands at an awkward disposition. The hallway contains dozens of doors that are all locked. Alice’s pre-adolescent stage parallels with her position in the hallway. Alice’s position in the hallway represents that she is at a stage stuck between being a child and a young woman. She posses a small golden key to ...
As Alice makes her way through Wonderland , she is faced with many pompous personalities that have their own ways of thinking and do not understand why Alice does not agree with their views. Alice takes into consideration what each character says. After becoming quite confused and disgruntled she learns that everyone in Wonderland is in fact m...
What this means is by tricking and deceiving people is how the characters got what they wanted, even if it was a dirty way of doing it. This book is a unique book because trickery and deceit leads to many unexpected surprises such as romance. Deception is used in this story in many ways. It’s used to deceive others to hate, to hurt, and to fall in love.
SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.” SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. 2005. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland follows the story of young Alice trapped in the world of Wonderland after falling down through a rabbit-hole. The rabbit-hole which is filled with bookshelves, maps, and other objects foreshadows the set of rules, the ones Alice is normally accustomed to, will be defied in Wonderland. This conflict between her world and Wonderland becomes evident shortly after her arrival as evinced by chaos in “Pool of Tears” and Alice brings up the main theme of the book “was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I am not the same, the next question is who am I?” (Carroll 18). After Alice fails to resolve her identity crisis using her friends, Alice says “Who am I, then? Tell me that first, and then, if I like being that person, I’ll come up: if not, I’ll stay down here til I’m somebody else” (Carroll 19). Hence in the beginning, Alice is showing her dependency on others to define her identity. Nevertheless when her name is called as a witness in chapter 12, Alice replies “HERE!” without any signs of hesitation (Carroll 103). Close examination of the plot in Alice in Wonderland reveals that experiential learning involving sizes leads Alice to think logically and rationally. Alice then attempts to explore Wonderland analytically and becomes more independent as the outcome. With these qualities, Alice resolves her identity crisis by recognizing Wonderland is nothing but a dream created by her mind.