Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The last night of the world thesis
Essay the last night of the world
The literary theme of loss
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The last night of the world thesis
In his short story, “The Last Night of the World”, Ray Bradbury explores the rhetorical question by asking, “What would you do if you knew that this was the last night of the world?” (Bradbury 1). Wondering why or how it could possibly be the last night of the world, the wife presumes to ask if it is due to a war, a hydrogen, or an atomic bomb or because of the germ warfare. Nevertheless, it was simply due to the fact that, that night was “the closing of a book” (Bradbury 1). Through the characters thoughts and actions Bradbury is able to express the ability of acceptance in things that cannot be changed and accepting and overcoming the thought and feeling of fear. Bradbury presents endless thoughts yet understandings within the characters. …show more content…
The most important question that sparked up countless of thoughts to the married couple, was asked by the husband to the wife. The married couple were casually conversing in their household as their two daughters, “were playing blocks on the parlor rug in the light of the green hurricane lamps” (Bradbury 1). The laughter of their two daughters in the background embraced a home filled with life and love. With such an absurd question the husband asked and the two remained calm. Bradbury was able to describe a setting and a background at peace and relaxation to the characters despite the situation presented. This simple yet thoughtful question began with a dream, a dream multiple adults were having including the husband himself, the wife, employees at the husbands office and a woman that lived on their block. Yet, the people throughout the town were not talking about it, nor was it published in the newspaper. Both in confusion and in shock wondered why the people were so careless about that night being the last night of the world. The wife tells her husband, “I don’t know, you don’t get too excited when you feel things are logical. This is logical. Nothing else but this could have happened from the way we’ve lived” (Bradbury 3). Here, the wife confessed that in reality there is nothing extraordinary that will be occurring that night and because of their actions committed, there is valid point for what will occur that night. Furthermore, Bradbury expressed the feeling of carelessness, regardless of their knowledge upon the world ending that night. Through this, Bradbury was able to convey irony because although the characters knew the world was ending they continued to remain calm and not “screaming in the streets” (Bradbury 3). Moreover, Bradbury was able to incorporate the feelings and thoughts of the married couple. Bradbury made it clear that the husband had mixed feelings towards the situation and the idea of the world coming to an end. He confesses to his wife, “Sometimes it frightens me; sometimes I’m not frightened at all but at peace” (Bradbury 1). On the other hand, the husband also realized that the wife did not argue and questioned why. He asks his wife, “Are you afraid?” (Bradbury 3), the wife in response tells him, “No. I always thought I would be, but I’m not” (Bradbury 3). Through the wife’s confession, Bradbury was able to portray and express the acceptance of fear in the world coming to an end. The couple accepted their fears together as one. As the married couple continued to understand and accept the idea that death was upon them, questions began to arise about the good and the bad presented throughout their lives. The husband asks, “We haven’t been too bad, have we?” (Bradbury 2). The wife thought they were not too bad nor too good, but “a big part of the world was busy being lots of quite awful things” (Bradbury 2). The wife admits that although they have been good but they have also been bad. Through this Bradbury was also able to express the idea that the married couple could have done things differently and prevented certain situations and outcomes. Yet, Bradbury was able to portray the understatements of the married couple, which also allowed the two characters to accept their doings and the bad doings of the rest of the universe. Trying to find further reasonings and justifications for what was about to occur that night, Bradbury allowed the married couple to express their true feelings to one another.
The husband proceeded to tell his wife, “Do you know, I won’t miss anything but you and the girls. I never liked the cities or my work or anything except you three. I won’t miss a thing except perhaps the change in the weather, and a glass of water when it’s hot, and I might miss sleeping” (Bradbury 3). The husband admits to the wife that he never liked his life or his surroundings. He admits to her that the only three things that kept him going were herself and their two daughters. Within this he also expresses his appreciation for the little and simple things in life, such as a glass of water when he is thirsty. Bradbury allowed the husband to think that the end of the world was not too bad …show more content…
afterall. As time continued to elapse, the married couple thought about how they should spend their last few hours.
They also thought about how others surrounding them were spending their time as the late night arrived and the world came to an end. However, Bradbury allowed the married couple to continue their day and their normal routine. The married couple proceeded to wash the dishes and put their two daughters to bed. As the two girls were put to bed and kissed goodnight, “the little lights by their beds turned on and the door left open just a trifle” (Bradbury 3). Acting as if nothing was about to change that night, the thought of their daughters arose. The married couple worried that their daughters had the slightest clue of what would change and end their lives. The wife tells the husband, “I wonder if the children know” (Bradbury 3). On the other hand, the husband assured the wife that they were clueless and tells her “No, of course not” (Bradbury 3). Bradbury displayed the dream to be symbolic to adults and not to
children. With all the wondering and unanswered questions, one thing that was certain was that that night was October 19, 1969. To the married couple there was something different about the date. “This date means more than any other date ever meant; because it’s the year when things are as they are all over the world and that’s why it’s the end” (Bradbury 3). Bradbury’s theme throughout the short story was long-standing in regards of acceptance. The married couple tried to find a justification for it being the last night of the world, but they did not argue against it. That night, the married couple spent their last few hours together. The husband asked, “Do you want to cry?” (Bradbury 4), the wife answered, “I don’t think so” (Bradbury 4). Through this, Bradbury was able to portray certainty that both characters knew and understood that fear was not presented upon the last night of the world. Bradbury also allowed the married couple to understand that although the world was ending the two have been good to each other. Bradbury gave the married couple comfort, as they kissed each other goodnight on their last night of the world. All the events Bradbury incorporated throughout the short story allowed the married couple to accept they could not change the outcome, nor include their feelings into the last night of the world. Throughout the story, there were various of the questions and ‘what ifs’ presented to the characters. The couple thought about their doings to the universe, along with the doings of others. They also thought their daughters and how they should spend their last few moments on earth. However, nothing was done to prevent the situation from occurring. Through the characters feelings, thoughts and actions Bradbury was able to express the ability of acceptance, both being with accepting things that cannot be changed and accepting and overcoming their fears. Through his short, story Bradbury had the capability of portraying that some things are better left unsaid and untouched despite the situation and obstacles presented.
This is the summary of the book Night, by Elie Wiesel. The subject matter of the book takes place during World War II. In this summary you, the reader, will be given a brief overview of the memoir and it will be discussed why the piece is so effective. Secondly, there will be a brief discussion about the power of one voice versus the listing of statistics. The impact of reading about individuals struggling to survive with the barest of means, will be the third and final point covered in this summary, with the authors feelings as commentary. The author’s own experience with the book is recommending you to read this summary of Night, and hopefully convince you to read the book itself.
From the beginning, the reader is confronted with the idea of a home that cares for its inhabitants, as opposed to the other way around. “They walked down the hall of their soundproofed Happylife Home, which had cost them thirty thousand dollars installed, this house which clothed and fed and rocked them to sleep and played and sang and was good to them” (Bradbury “The Veldt”). This portion of the text creates images we are accustomed to, but instead of a mother or father taking care of these needs, it is their house. It is an unsettling image. The story proceeds with the parents inspecting the children’s nursery; yet this is no ordinary nursery. This nursery fulfills the children's wishes and shows them that which they would like to see. The nursery shows them an African grassland where death is in the air. Bradbury foreshadows their end when the wife suggests they lock the nursery for a few days and George responds with “You know how difficult Peter is about that. When I punished him a month ago by locking the nursery for even a few hours - the tantrum he threw! And Wendy too. They live for the nursery”(Bradbury “The Veldt”). With this statement alone, we know George and Lydia are already losing control of their children, and it is only a matter of time before they lose their control entirely. The days of picture perfect
The novel Night demonstrates that the human spirit can be affected by the power of false hope, by religion, and that one will do whatever it will take to survive for oneself and family.
Every man, woman, and child has his or her breaking point, no matter how hard they try to hold it back. In Night by Elie Wiesel the main theme of the entire book is the human living condition. The quality of human life is overwhelming because humans have the potential to make amazing discoveries that help all humans. Elie Wiesel endures some of the most cruel living conditions known to mankind. This essay describes the themes of faith, survival, and conformity in Night by Elie Wiesel.
... to find his wife..as characters find what they are looking for they leave the boarding house..thus the audience can predict what's going to happen as they read.." ( Ross 37).
The word “night” can be defined literally as ten hours of a 24-hour day that is dark, or metaphorically connoted as a time of evil and sadness. In the memoir Night, composed by Elie Wiesel, readers learn about a negative correlation to the period of time when light no longer appears. Wiesel leaves “a legacy of words” (vii) to ensure the past will never occur again. He explains the story without emoting and describes the events experienced by hundreds of Jews during the Holocaust. Night is a metaphor which refers to the darkness in lives, minds, and souls, and symbolizes lost hope, isolation, and transformation.
Can you imagine people hating you so much that they would develop a plan to kill you, and everyone like you, just because of your religion? That is exactly what happened when the Nazis decided that they were the “Master Race,” and all others were to be eliminated. This Final Solution is not just documented in the history books, but also in the novel Night by Elie Wiesel. The Final Solution was one of the most horrific events in our world’s history, and Elie Wiesel survived to tell his story. Elie Wiesel writes about surviving the Holocaust as a young teenager. Through his writing, he not only includes all the horrible details that happened, but also the emotion that lets the reader begin to feel more than just facts. Reading the novel is able
Many different responses have occurred to readers after their perusal of this novel. Those that doubt the stories of the holocaust’s reality see Night as lies and propaganda designed to further the myth of the holocaust. Yet, for those people believing in the reality, the feelings proffered by the book are quite different. Many feel outrage at the extent of human maliciousness towards other humans. Others experience pity for the loss of family, friends, and self that is felt by the Holocaust victims.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Looking back at my rhetorical analysis in writing 150, to sum it up, it was horrendous. It became exceedingly obvious that I had skipped the prewriting step. Forgoing this step caused choppy sentences, multiple grammatical errors, and horrendous flow. The rough draft ended up looking like a collection of jumbled up words. The first attempted felt so bad, I started over entirely. After the review in class, I used the examples to focus my ideas and build off what other people had done. For example, the review helped me to clarify my knowledge and use of Kairos. Once done, it was peer reviewed by my group again. All the other group members commented that I had good ideas, but bad flow and grammatical errors. After revising their respective points and
Studying a university degree is one of the biggest achievements of many individuals around the world. But, according to Mark Edmunson, a diploma in America does not mean necessarily studying and working hard. Getting a diploma in the United States implies managing with external factors that go in the opposite direction with the real purpose of education. The welcome speech that most of us listen to when we started college, is the initial prank used by the author to state the American education system is not converging in a well-shaped society. Relating events in a sarcastic way is the tone that the author uses to explain many of his arguments. Mark Edmunson uses emotional appeals to deliver an essay to the people that have attended College any time in their life or those who have been involved with the American education system.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
As a college student, there are several important things that we need to think about when we read an article. Also, the writer have to be careful to not be a biased, because that can be subjective to others rather than objective. For example, in South Korea, whole politics government are in trouble right now because of corruption. Korean president, Geon-Hye Park, and she had helper on her back, Sun-Sil Choi but actually whole speech of president and politics issue were came from Mrs. Choi, not from the real president. Now everyone called Korean president is a puppet of psychic, because citizen well known Mrs. Choi is a psychic. To make a deal, President Park gave all national secret to Mrs. Choi and she got menace to a major company so she
In his short story, The Last Night of the World, Ray Bradbury explores the rhetorical question by asking, “What would you do if you knew that this was the last night of the world?” (1). The question is presented to a married couple as they casually converse with one another. Wondering why or how it could possibly be the last night of the world, the wife presumes to ask if it is due to a war, a hydrogen, an atomic bomb or because of the germ warfare. Nonetheless, it was simply due to the fact that, that night was “the closing of a book” (1). Through the characters thoughts and actions, Bradbury is able to express the ability of acceptance of fear and being able to accept things that cannot be changed. Bradbury presents everlasting thinking questions
It is made apparent to the audience that the world will soon cease to exist, but there is no closure as to why that is. The wife inquiries about that mystery, asking is it “a war?” “The hydrogen or atom bomb?” “Or germ warfare?” (Bradbury 2) in which the husband confirms it isn’t any of these things and that instead it should be viewed as “just the closing of a book” (Bradbury 2). It is interesting that a story about the end of the world, one whose writing is focused on small details, has the actual threat missing from the text. This is intentional, because it is a detail that simply doesn’t matter. It is not end that is a concern, but rather the realization of what matters when faced with it that is