Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
9-11 rhetorical analysis speech
Utopia versus dystopia
9-11 rhetorical analysis speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 9-11 rhetorical analysis speech
British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, in his speech Following September 11, 2001, describes terrorism. Blair’s purpose is to persuade the reader that our nation should work together. Blair’s speech was effective in persuading American citizens to unite as an American nation because connotation, pathos, and anaphora. To begin with, Blair effectively uses connotation throughout his speech. For example, in Blair’s speech, he states connotation which says,”But alongside the values we know we need a hard headed pragmatism- a realpolitik- required to give us any chance of translating those values into the practical world we live in”(1). Blair uses words such as “need”, “required”, and “any chance” to give the reader a sense of urgency. Blair uses these words so that his solution appears necessary. Blair’s use of connotation is just one use of a rhetorical device out of many more. …show more content…
For example, Blair states pathos in his speech which says,”One is utilitarian: each nation maximises its own self interest. The other is Utopian: we try to create a better world. Today I want to suggest that more than ever before those two views are merging”(2). Blair states words such as “create a better world”, and “those two views are merging” to give the reader a sense of emotion. Blair states these words in order for American citizens to become emotionally connected with his speech. Blair uses pathos many times throughout his speech to create emotion to the American citizens, but there are more rhetorical devices he uses in his
Politicians frequently receive negative publicity at the hand of their own use of language. Their uses of words as they relate to persuasion typically fall within one of the three dimensions of language functions, semantic or thematic. Often their persuasive language can be found to closely resemble any of these three categories simultaneously. There are many tools for analyzing persuasive symbols, many of which should be utilized when analyzing great communicators such as President Ronald Reagan. In response to the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion on January 28th, 1986 where seven brave American’s gave their lives. President Ronald Reagan made history with his famous speech, which didn’t only serve to address the great tragedy, but served as a focal point of comfort for the grieving nation. He commemorated the seven heroes who had fallen that morning in route to outer space; he expressed gratitude to NASA for their past developments and encouraged further explorations. Ronald Reagan was a great communicator, a charismatic persuader whose words delivered focus of the message through utilization of persuasive symbols. This paper aims not to be an all-inclusive guide for analyzing persuasive symbols, but will sufficiently guide the reader to be a more perceptive of persuasive language.
Wilson, T. W. (n.d.). "This is War" American Rhetoric: The Power of Oratory in the United States. Retrieved April 14, 2011, from http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/wilsonwarmessage.htm
Effectively communicating an idea or opinion requires several language techniques. In his study of rhetoric, Aristotle found that persuasion was established through three fundamental tools. One is logos, which is used to support an argument through hard data and statistics. Another is ethos, which is the credibility of an author or speaker that allows an audience to conclude from background information and language selection a sense of knowledge and expertise of the person presenting the argument. The impact of pathos, however, is the most effective tool in persuasion due to the link between emotions and decisions. Although each of these tools can be effective individually, a combination of rhetorical devices when used appropriately has the ability to sway an audience toward the writer’s point of view.
To apply this rhetorical strategy, she incorporates several crucial phrases and words to which one can appertain. One example of Thatcher’s use of diction occurs in line twenty-three of her eulogy when she refers to Reagan as “Ronnie.” While to the reader, this name is but a sobriquet Thatcher uses for Reagan, one must identify her use of diction to understand her intention for using this name. After analyzing the word’s connotation instead of its denotation, the reader can discover that she incorporates this word into her eulogy to give the reader a thorough comprehension of the friendship they shared. For the reader, this diction permits him or her to identify Thatcher’s credibility, and for Thatcher, she strengthens her claim by validating her relation with Reagan. Thatcher, however, goes beyond reinforcing her claim through credibility; upon analysis of her eulogy, one can recognize her use of diction to depict historical occurrences surrounding Reagan’s presidency. The reader can identify an example of this tactic when Thatcher states in lines five and six, “[Reagan] sought to mend America’s wounded spirit” (Thatcher). On a superficial level, this
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair delivered speeches shortly after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York and the Pentagon in Virginia, which occurred on September 11, 2001. The Former President George W Bush utilized pathos, anaphora, and personification in his speech to convey an optimistic tone. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, addressing the same topic, utilized mild invective and parallel structure to express an affirmative tone.
Giving a successful speech, in any language, is a difficult yet gratifying skill. Great speeches can be inspiring, compelling, and even revolutionary – indeed, these speeches are deliberate, succinct, engaging, and unforgettable. Two examples of such great speeches in both literature and in history are Mark Antony’s eulogy in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Robert F. Kennedy’s On the Death of Martin Luther King. Through the speakers’ use of parallel structure, caesuras, and personal references – three stylistic devices and techniques – not only were both speakers able to embellish their speeches; it also allowed each speaker to deliver an even more powerful speech. In these speeches, the use of repetition through the anaphoral and epiphoral structure in both speeches accentuates the purpose of the speech, while the use of caesuras adds texture and tone to the speech, and the use of personal references engages and stimulates the audience.
George W. Bush’s “9/11 Address to the Nation” is a speech in which he talks about the catastrophic event on September eleventh, 2001. Two airplanes crash into the Twin Towers in New York City on this day, shocking the entire world. He addresses this speech to the people of America on the night of the disastrous event, to let the people of the United States know what is going on. This speech explains how the United States is a strong country, the motives behind the event, as well as to bring the United States together and stronger.
King uses in his speech is Pathos, which is the appeal to someone 's emotions or beliefs. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. presented a strong feeling towards African-American people about how they were treated as equal individuals “But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination” (King par. 3). Another example of pathos that Dr. King used was when he uses vocabulary and phrases, such as “I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream” (King par. 12). He uses the appeal of emotion, especially the word of choice and diction to let his audience’s know what he would like to see in the
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
Lloyd Bitzer helps one to understand that a rhetorical situation is an important event that needs to be addressed by someone in a position of power (2). Knowing this one can deduce that the situation surrounding the speech Ich bin Ein Berliner is a rhetorical event because only someone with Kennedy’s power and charisma could have handled the possible rise of communism as smoothly as he did.
For instance, in his speech he states, “…and you’ve got a recipe for a national nightmare… (LaPierre, 1)”. In this quote, he uses alliteration because he is trying to show the nation just how serious this topic is. Placing this device like he did really get’s the audience to focus their full attention on this speech. It attracts them. Simultaneously, he is trying to produce a frightening or worried effect, considering he is talking about how violent crime is increasing again for the first time in 19 years. Furthermore, Barack Obama uses rhetorical question again and again, as his central rhetorical device. An example of that would be when he says, “Can we honestly say that we’re doing enough to keep our children, all of them, safe from harm? (Obama, 2)”. Here, Obama uses rhetorical question for the soul purpose of getting the nation thinking, to get the nation to realize, what is really going on in the world we live in? Everything considered Barack Obama uses rhetorical question in his speech because he wants to infuse the audience with empathy. It is an empathetic tone. He wants the audience to think. In contrast, LaPierre uses alliteration for the purpose of injecting a fearful vibe into the audience. He wants audience to act, and act
Thatcher thought of Reagan as a strong leader of the American country. In her essay she clearly emphasizes the extent to how positive Reagan’s persona was. The parallel rhetoric was used to show how “great” he was. She repeated it three times in one sentence and each time showing the greater position he took and that from every angle he was simply “great.” This anaphora in the first sentence connects to the whole population listening and then referencing herself and how she was impacted as well.
This is done by using symbols such as flags or symbols that are religious in nature that an audience can identify with. Enfolding oneself with an icon such as a flag can make this person feel that they are in a position of power or have achieved a certain status. When this has been achieved people tend to become excited and captivated by the fallacy the speaker is manipulating them into believing. Therefore, Beveridge sways his audience with symbols of the flag, God, and the love they feel for their country. By doing this, he hopes that his audience will feel that the citizens of smaller countries would benefit from our form of democracy and welcome it with open
Bush uses several powerful languages. An example include parallelism. In his speech, there is a point in time where Bush uses a repetition of structure to effectively explain his plans of restoring the financial system. President Bush repeats “it should” in paragraph 17. In this paragraph, Bush analyzes the plan stating that it should be established quickly as possible in order for it to benefit the public and business. Another source of language is Bush addressing significant questions. In the beginning of his speech, Bush creates three questions the public is probably wanting to know. He describes them as “good” questions that need to be clearly answered. Throughout his speech, Bush clarifies them. He answers them individually in order for his listeners to fully comprehend each situation in the question. This provides a use of powerful language in his speech. A third language structure is the emotion brought from a reputation Bush considers that America has. This concluding paragraph addresses what the real expectation is in America. He describes America’s reputation as a nation able to successfully conquer and solve difficult problems. Additionally, describing the U.S. where leaders unite together to overcome obstacles and for every background citizens have to work hard as well as developing talents and reaching their