Rhetorical Devices In A Modest Proposal

1115 Words3 Pages

Jonathan Swift lived during a grave era in Ireland’s history. David Oakleaf’s A Political Biography of Jonathan Swift examines Swift’s pamphleteering and his political leanings. His aim was to relate Swift’s most important writings to the cultural background around when they were produced. According to Oakleaf, Swift’s rhetoric “displayed an extremism that did not always reflect what appears to have been his actual, more conservative political position satire”. Swift called himself an Old Whig. The claim to be an Old Whig, Oakleaf suggests, was a rhetorical device Swift used to present himself as a man of principle, standing above factional politics. In Oakleaf’s account of A Modest Proposal, he believes that Swift’s piece is an expression of “his horror at human oppression” (201).
In a critique of Oakleaf’s views regarding …show more content…

He understood his audience, and employed language that was profanely appropriate among the troops he was addressing. His most used words within the section I analyzed were “man” and “all”. I think this is telling because he sought to unify his men throughout his speech. Patton’s speaking style was very deliberate, contrary to what some of his peers thought when he used profane language. He swears 17 times over the course of 676 words. The starkest difference between Swift and Patton can be seen here. Swift’s time in the 18th century would not allow for such language. He would not only have been severely reprimanded as a man of higher learning, but he would have also angered the people he was trying to communicate with. The cultural norms of the period reserved vulgarity for uneducated people that had no place in academia. Swift was a man living during the Enlightenment period of rhetoric. According to James A. Herrick, “Enlightenment rhetorical theory turned away from traditional concerns such as memory and invention systems, and toward aesthetic matters such as style and good delivery”

Open Document