Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
7 Persuasion Techniques
Barack Obama last speech analysis
Barack Obama last speech analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“The Audacity of Hope” means to make bold decisions in order to inspire hope in the eyes of others. Reflecting on the title, Obama successfully explains this idea of the audacity of hope to the citizens of the United States in a unique style by using syntax and rhetorical devices. In order to convince the audience to vote for John Kerry, he appeals to them with a story of how America has offered opportunity to his parents and the nation should unite as one regardless of different beliefs and ideas. Throughout the paragraphs discussing America’s opportunities, his speech begins to give the audience a feeling of sympathy and inspiration through different points. Throughout Obama’s speech he uses anaphora, segregating styles, convoluted sentences, …show more content…
and pathos to persuade people to vote for John Kerry as president. Obama’s use of repetition through anaphora not only helps his appeal to the audience, but strengthens his ability to emphasize his points.
Throughout most of his paragraphs, he utilizes this technique to the fullest so people will understand and feel the need to vote for John Kerry. For example when Obama starts off his sentences with, “John Kerry believes in…”, Obama emphasizes the actions and ideas Kerry has to improve the nation, such as better health care and taking care of issues through other methods besides war. The use of anaphora enhances Kerry’s ideas of improved health care and Constitutional freedoms, which causes the democrats to consider supporting John Kerry because they may agree with his ideas. When Obama states Kerry’s promises as president, he considers the votes of the citizens because they are affected by his plans toward the future of the …show more content…
nation. By using the style of segregated sentences, Obama has no issues emphasizing reasons why citizens should vote for John Kerry. His sentence structure and organization throughout parts of his speech play a significant role in his ability to persuade the audience because it allows listeners to quickly understand why Kerry is a better leader for the country. Along with anaphora, Obama combines this segregated style to make sentences that stand out and show passion. For instance, when he talks about the threats of the nation and terrorism, he states,”They must be pursued. And they must be defeated. John Kerry knows this.” Obama uses very short sentences to emphasize how Kerry wants to rid any threats as swift as possible. Aside from talking about America’s enemies, he also alludes to how Kerry served in Vietnam to protect the country he loves. By mentioning enemies, the audience would feel concerned but comforted to know that a man who served the military plans to protect the country even more as president. His use of diction helps convince others that Kerry will take care of the nation’s issues, from poverty to war. To show credibility and transition information between ideas, Obama uses convoluted sentences to improve upon his ideas.
Obama’s credibility is recognized with convoluted sentences because he tends to reference his own opinions or make allusions to the history of the United States. To catch the attention of the audience, he mentions the issues John Kerry plans to fix to improve the future of the nation. To convince democrats to vote for Kerry, Obama wants the people to unite with one common idea by saying, “We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.” The use of a convoluted sentence helps everyone understand that being an American means being one regardless of what you believe in or how you see the world. Describing how “we are one people” to the nation
is important in persuading the audience to vote because Obama makes people feel they should stay together with those who consider themselves American. If everyone votes for Kerry, then the idea that citizens are one as a nation are willing to protect each other will become true because they feel a strong leader will take actions that the nation will agree with. Pathos plays an important role when persuading the people to vote because they would feel sympathy and want someone who believes in their ideas. One example of his appeal to the audience is when he talks about how he cares for each individual by stating, “If there is a child on the south side of Chicago who can’t read, that matters to me, even if it’s not my child.” By saying, “that matters to me,” he gives an example of an individual and includes his own opinion of the matter. By including his own opinion, people who have hope for the future of the nation are able to believe in Obama, who in turns believes in John Kerry to take care of the nation’s future. In order to inspire and persuade the audience, Obama utilizes structural and repetitional techniques to convey the idea that John Kerry should be president. Rather than talking all about one person, he mentions his own stories and his own thoughts on the nation, to appeal to them in ways that no ordinary speech can do. As he gives a speech to the democrats at the convention, he gives a speech to the nation.
The tone during the whole plot of in Brave New World changes when advancing throughout the plot, but it often contains a dark and satiric aspect. Since the novel was originally planned to be written as a satire, the tone is ironic and sarcastic. Huxley's sarcastic tone is most noticeable in the conversations between characters. For instance, when the director was educating the students about the past history, he states that "most facts about the past do sound incredible (Huxley 45)." Through the exaggeration of words in the statement of the director, Huxley's sarcastic tone obviously is portrayed. As a result of this, the satirical tone puts the mood to be carefree.
Roy Peter Clark, author of “A More Perfect Union”: Why It Worked, takes a stance on President Barack Obama’s speech while analyzing it. President Barack Obama delivered a speech titled “A More Perfect Union.” His speech focused on the prominent issue of racism in America. In this article, Clark talks about President Obama’s known power and brilliance. Clark makes references and comparisons to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and W.EB. DuBois. “A More Perfect Union” features writing techniques that makes the message more defined and effective. President Obama utilizes four closely related rhetorical strategies. Clark broadly explains the purpose of the rhetorical strategies. Allusion, parallelism, two-ness, and autobiography helped to shape President Obama’s speech that that was meant to create
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans—people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people; that the American people have the power to control their fate.
In his “State of the Union” speech, President Barack Obama effectively uses the rhetorical devices of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to convey a more convincing message to the citizens of the United States to urge them to follow the example of the many people that have made their nation greater.
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that described a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation. Swift hoped to reach not only the people of Ireland who he was calling to action, but the British, who were oppressing the poor. He writes with contempt for those who are oppressing the Irish and also dissatisfaction with the people in Ireland themselves to be oppressed.
President Obama’s memorial speech following the Tuscan shooting carefully utilized the Aristotelian appeal of pathos, or emotional appeals through his word choice, which aligned him with the American people while still conveying a sense of authority, and his use of biblical allusions, which drew his audience together on the basis of shared ideologies.
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
Hope, by definition means to look forward to something with reasonable desire and confidence. Hope also means a person or thing in which expectations are centered. When discussing the word hope, one must consider the core values by which the word works around. You could hope for financial success, world peace, or simply hope for some good out of your day. In 2006, Barack Obama wrote the political biography The Audacity of Hope to outline his core political and spiritual beliefs, as well as his opinions on different aspects of American culture. The Illinois senator divided the book into nine chapters, each concentrating on both his own and the United States’ successes and failures in local and state politics. While revealing great leadership attributes, life experiences, personal qualities and hard facts, largely in anecdotal method, Barack Obama offers realistic, wide and thoughtful responses to today’s current domestic controversies using artistic appeals, such as ethos, pathos and logos. Senator Obama also gives the audience an in-depth analysis of the key policies that need to be changed for both Democrats and Republicans, and delivers an inherent message to offer hope to anyone, regardless of background or experiences. In the prologue, he discusses in great detail virtually every major political issue facing the American electorate today, offering his opinions and possible strategies for reform. “My motivation in entering politics was to cut through decades of polarizing partisanship and develop a moderate, effective approach to our government.” (Barackopedia.org). Obama notes that this same impulse, an impulse of a secure, functional and sustainable administration, prompted him to write The Audacity of Hope.
He makes sure his audience connects with him directly by making them feel at his level, and at hiss. This way he connects to the audience, and in exchange, helps his statement of unity. Using various examples of parallelism, anaphora and refrain, Obama brands the theme of equality and togetherness in our country throughout the speech, vital to gaining the respect of his audience. Obama recalls the ‘enduring strength of the constitution’ by delving into the past alluding to America’s allegiance to the Declaration of Independence by quoting “we hold these truths. that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.
The movie trailer “Rio 2”, shows a great deal of pathos, ethos, and logos. These rhetorical appeals are hidden throughout the movie trailer; however, they can be recognized if paying attention to the details and montage of the video. I am attracted to this type of movies due to the positive life messages and the innocent, but funny personifications from the characters; therefore, the following rhetorical analysis will give a brief explanation of the scenes, point out the characteristics of persuasive appeals and how people can be easily persuaded by using this technique, and my own interpretation of the message presented in the trailer.
Much of Obama’s speech applies repetition devices, principally anaphora and epistrophe, which imply emphasis on certain socially
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
He appeals to logos by making statements that attribute Kerry to these ideals. He uses anaphora by stating “John Kerry believes in” (2) multiple times. With the anaphora, Obama is able to show Kerry’s stance on important issues that rose to prominence in the 2004 election like health coverage, rights, wars and the dwindling economy, allowing him to further appeal to logos. This effectively portrays what Kerry wants to achieve in his presidency. Obamauses Kerry’s situated ethos by sharing anecdotes about Kerry’s experiences such as his military experience and previous offices that he held. This shows his virtue and his values and portrays Kerry in a common and positive light to all voters for his hard