Rhetorical Analysis On Sojourner Truth

652 Words2 Pages

Emma Patrick DC-6 Ms. Klassen 4-12-24 Sojourner Truth’s View on Women’s Rights. Sojourner Truth was a women’s activist and suffragist; in other words, a feminist. She continually spoke of the urgent need to change the way our culture perceives women. I want to highlight the speech she delivered at the Women’s Convention in Akron, Ohio, in 1851. Sojourner Truth firmly believed that women deserve equal rights with men, she used slang and stereotypical language to allow the audience to visualize her background, and understand the battle for women’s rights that she and other women had fought in previous years. In order for Truth to build on her point, she used a variety of language and diction to convey her perspective on equal rights and gender identity. …show more content…

Given that she has an accent, her first language was, ironically, Dutch. Truth spoke of words such as “ain’t”, “cause”, “twixt”, and “ought”. On the other hand, Truth grew up in New York, where most people have an accent, so it was not abnormal to hear a woman speak with this type of vocabulary. Nevertheless, hearing these words in a somewhat public and formal event could have hashed around negative opinions. Her audience must have understood that she did not attend this conference to impress the people that surrounded her, but rather to show them her true self and to prove her point that no matter how you speak, or what you look like, or even how wealthy you are, everyone deserves basic human rights. Truth uses symbolism, imagery, idioms, and other figurative languages to provide a connection between what she’s saying and a state of mind. For example, in lines 13-14 she said, “If my cup won’t hold but a pint, and yours holds a quart, wouldn’t you mean not to let me have my little half measure full”. Whereas men were granted twice the amount of rights that women had. Men supposedly were meant to have twice as much power as

Open Document