Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil Disobedience by Thoreau
The government is best which governs least
The effect of the civil war in the USA
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Civil Disobedience by Thoreau
Something that is least needed, small or not as important may be something, huge, life-saving and a gift sent from above. Now the government is probably not a gift sent from our father unless it's from our forefathers, but it is rather a system that very well needed in this country. In Henry David Thoreau's famous essay "Civil Disobedience" he writes one of his very well-known verse "government is best which governs least." He talks about how unjust and wrong the government is and how he can't seem to follow his "conscience" during his experiences from going to jail to being a citizen who stopped paying taxes. However, what one forgets to realize is when and why Thoreau had written that quote. During his time, the Mexican-American War had just gone on, and slavery was still prevalent in the south. The government then seemed …show more content…
like nothing but a network show that many had loved and supported or had detested and ignored, like Thoreau. It is because of government's immaturity then that it has grown well to do its job right and serve a country like how America is now. Although government then should've lessened its impact, its enormous impact now is a very much essential and significant aspect vital for this country's safety, the well-being of its people, and is the only system that could resolve many of the nation's social and political issues. For example, many of the problems that do occur in this free land are the threats from various terrorist groups, ISIS, and communist countries like North Korea. These threats are what makes America unsafe, and the only way to keep citizens safe is through a higher system of power. Government systems like the Homeland Security, made after the tragic 9/11 incident, reserves this nation as a haven for many people, including immigrants and refugees. For it is also our men and women who go out day and night to fight off horrid, endless battles for the safety of the country they love. However, Thoreau goes on the mention how "mass of men serve the state thus, not as men mainly but as machines with their bodies" which is nothing but foul words for the men and women who serve our country now. A man or woman's duty to serving their country is a choice and could never be compared to a machine; which is incapable of making any choice of their own. Thoreau displays these men who go on to battle as puppets or something that the "American government can make." Without these brave soldier that were trained by government officers and trainers, there wouldn't even be a country that filled with the many opportunities and blessings one has now. Even though it is hard to grasp the opportunities and benefits for many immigrants in their beginning days living in America, it is not impossible due to the variety of ways the government intervenes. Through welfare, WIC, Medicaid and Medicare, unemployment benefits and social security the number of opportunities to live a stable, healthy life is some of the blessings offered by the government. However, the government just doesn't obtain or create free money to assemble systems that help people in need. The government governs us so that this nation can benefit everyone equally. Even though taxes may seem unfair for an individual, it helps the government to assist in providing a salary to others who do not receive an actual salary from a company or through consumers. However, Thoreau, who didn't "see why the schoolmaster should be taxed to support the priest" probably, didn't see that the priest's free service of providing theological and emotional support to his people didn't receive a salary like he did. Back then the priest usually worked for the State, and their only support was through the government. However, Thoreau, a man who haven't "paid no poll taxes in six years" not only made it harder for others to compensate what he isn't doing but made it harder for other individuals to live stably. Government taxes all go forth helping the unemployed, the unemployed, the newly registered immigrant, or may be the salary for a single mother who works for a government owned hospital. The taxes or any other implementation is not there to cause controversies or problems but is rather used to help the nation's individuals. However, it is true that the government does initiate many national disputes and controversial matters that ransacks the whole country's time and effort of concentrating on more important matters.
For Thoreau mentions how many southern government and men "cease to hold slaves" and how many people in his state's government wanted "to make war on Mexico" which was all unnecessary and morally wrong. Though, citizens then connected war to violence the government then saw a possible future for the states that obtained after the Mexican-American War. Just like children who have parents who want best for their sons and daughters, the government and its leaders saw what was best for the nation in the future. With slavery as well, if it weren't for the government's intervention the civil war would've never occurred and the abolishment of slavery would've never happened. Many think that it was the government who approved the slavery, but it was wrong citizens then. Outbursts of political issues even today such as the approval of gay marriages and talks of gun laws for protection are all brought up from the government and resolved by them for the
better. So the appreciation of the American government is very much needed, considering it has brought the country this far. Safety and the government's intervention of pleasing the people's needs for the American dream show the importance of how the government is essential in any country. This country is a free nation because of the government governing its people the right way
In 1848, David Thoreau addressed and lectured civil disobedience to the Concord Lyceum in response to his jail time related to his protest of slavery and the Mexican War. In his lecture, Thoreau expresses in the beginning “That government is best which governs least,” which sets the topic for the rest of the lecture, and is arguably the overall theme of his speech. He chastises American institutions and policies, attempting to expand his views to others. In addition, he advances his views to his audience by way of urgency, analyzing the misdeeds of the government while stressing the time-critical importance of civil disobedience. Thoreau addresses civil disobedience to apprise the people the need for a civil protest to the unjust laws created
Without any government intervention, the state would be in shambles with no regulations on food, drugs, or the workforce. As for government based on conscience, Thoreau’s argument falls flat when he fails to recognize that majority rule is the only fair rule. Thoreau needed to learn that when friction takes over a machine, the machine is to be fixed, not thrown away. Evidently, Henry David Thoreau’s argument against organized government in America is much too flawed to be
In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau stated that government should be expedient and conscientious. He started off his essay with his motto, “That government is best which governs least” and “That government is best which governs not at all.” He meant that we did not need a government that made rules and that the government should let the people do whatever they wanted to do. He believed that government should be expedient, not inexpedient. “Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient.” He used a lot of examples to justify the inexpedient government. One of them was the Mexican-American war. “Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure…” It was inexpedient because war was just a tool for a few powerful individuals and did not have consent of the multitude. He believed that the government should help most of the people, not just a few rich people. In addition, the minority rule, in w...
As I've studied Henry David Thoreau's essay "Resistance to Civil Government," I've identified the persuasive elements and analyzed a specific portion of the text to create my own argument. In this essay, I will discuss the strengths and weaknesses found throughout both responses through the lens of persuasive analysis in order to prove my ability to utilize rhetorical strategies.
In Thoreau’s view, he felt that the government was insufficient. At times such as these, government may not always be the best way to turn, yet it provides guidelines. This theme in his essay is just another opinion. Justice cannot be fully defined in one sentence by every person. It depends on the background and the experiences one has had.
Persuasion Throughout history there have been many struggles for freedom and equality. There was the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King Jr. There was the fight against government censorship in Argentina, spoken against by Luisa Valenzuela. And there was the struggle for women's equality in politics, aided by First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt.
Martin Luther King’s initial purpose of using non-violent strategy was against American despotism regime for segregating African Americans. On December 5th 1955, King gave an address for being the president of MIA (Montgomery Improvement Association) during the days of Montgomery Bus Boycott at the Holt Street Baptist Church (Carson, 13). The main reason of this speech is to discuss the Montgomery bus boycott whether it should be continue or not. On December 1st 1955, a woman called Rosa Parks was arrested and asked to pay for the fine because she refused to give up her seat at the front of the bus when black section was full after she got off from work (Sanders, 3). In the speech, he described how African Americans were mistreated
According to the American heritage dictionary “Civil Disobedience” is refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation, characterized by the use of passive resistance or other nonviolent means. In “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau stated “That government is best which governs least, and I would like to see it acted up more rapidly and systematically” (pg227). Thoreau did not believe that the government should have the final say on everything. The citizens of this country should have rights in the decision making process and the opportunity to think for themselves also. Thoreau says that government does not, in fact, achieve that with which we credit it: it does not keep the country free, settle the West, or educate. Rather, these achievements come from the character of the American people, and they would have been even more successful in these endeavors had government been even less involved.
Would everyone like to see how the community is affected ? The community and neighborhood is facing some major consequences. According to “Excerpts Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau described how this one person refused to pay the taxes to the government he decides to say something but his saying resulted to him being sent to prison for trying to stand up to the government. The government has not been telling us the actual issues . Based on the excerpt from the “Civil Disobedience” there are exactly three main points to the story. The first main idea is the people have been using their own ideas to try to get a way to end the government way for all of us to live because we need to see the point for all of us to live a life in
In Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience”, he writes about why citizens should disobey government’s unjust laws. The American government was established to execute people’s wills, and this should not be forgotten. Citizens who totally rely on government believe that government symbolizes honesty, justice, rights and protection. In this way, citizens will comply with all the laws which the government formulates without thinking whether they are right or not. However, while the time is changing, government has been changing its morality principal. For example, some high level governors might misuse government’s right for individual interest. Also, Henry David Thoreau argues that the American government uses the excuse of benefiting
Thoreau was a very dedicated abolitionist. Majority of his works was for the abolishment of slavery. Thoreau even defended Captain John Brown, who was charged with treason for the uprising against slavery in Virginia. Thoreau expressed his feelings in a way that is still relevant in society today. His most radical work is his writing on “Civil Disobedience” in his essay Thoreau states, “government is best which governs not at all”(1).This powerful statement means that government is too corrupt to lead people in the right way so they need to take a step back and let society govern itself. Thoreau also explains, how without change society itself will always be the government 's machine (6). His statement iterates that government will always have power over people that do not rebel to make change; due to the fact that laws will be followed because people are often ignorant of the situation. Individuals have to understand that society can not just vote for a law and expect chang. Thoreau believed that explains to vote against their government, a simple vote is not enough(Civil Disobedience). People that rebel need to back up their vote with their actions to make a difference in
Why partake in civil disobedience? Oscar Wilde, an influential author, has an opinion on utilization of civil disobedience. “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion. Meaning, if a person wants to change society and its actions, they must rebel against the governing body in order to create effective alterations. Many situations exist where civil disobedience advocates change. In those situations, people have rights for disobedience, but must realize consequences may result from their disobedient actions.
In Thoreau’s essay “Resistance to Civil Government”, Henry David Thoreau outlines a utopian society in which each individual would be responsible for governing himself. His opposition to a centralized government is an effort to disassociate with the American government, which at the time was supporting slavery and unjustly invading Mexico. While the individual rule would work well for Thoreau who is a man of conscience, it does not account for the immoral, dishonest or overly ambitious people in the nation.
Civil Disobedience is a deliberate violation against the law in order to invoke change against a government policy. Civil disobedience can come in the form of running a red light or j-walking, or in more noticeable methods such as riots. Coined by American author and poet Henry David Thoreau, the term has developed to define the act of disobeying a law one sees as unfit or unjust. Usually the purpose of civil disobedience is to gain public attention to a perceived injustice and appeal to or gain support from the public in a non-violent way. The idea is to force the government to negotiate or else continue with the unwanted behavior; or in simpler terms, to “clog the machine” (“Civil Disobedience”). It is believed by many that the act of civil disobedience is justifiable in a democratic government like that of the United States. A Democracy is defined as a form of government controlled by elected representatives or by the people themselves. However, in order to have a stable government, it must be built on a stable society. Societal welfare is the general good for the public and how its members take action to provide opportunities and minimum standards. According to societal welfare, which is the sake of the emotional and physical well-being of the community, the laws must be abided and civil disobedience is morally unjust in our society. Once any member of the society questions the affairs of the state, the state may be given up for lost (“Jean Jacques Rousseau”).
While Thoreau claims that our number one priority is to do the things that we think is right, and then our second priority is to do what the government thinks is right, in actuality through my understanding on the world around me his statement is protestable. Certainly doing what we think is right first is good but the benefits that doing what the government wants has a greater impact on many of those around us making it important to expedite our obligations to the government.