Rhetorical Analysis Of War On Drugs

262 Words1 Page

The rhetorical affection of “’War on Drugs…the nation has enjoyed a drug-free past, and that with renewed efforts to stop the use of heroin, cocaine, marijuana, and other illicit substances there may be a drug-free future…would be ‘remarkable naïve and historically myopic.’” Controlling the addictive substances that deprives upon today’s society is arguable that deals with the cultural values. With the questionable addictiveness, marijuana is the sole factor of illegal statues. Compared to cigarette whose factors of being labeled as “addictive” is based “more in the history of attitudes toward smoking.” As to alcohol medically prescribed as “a disease and that predisposition to addiction exists in ethnic, racial….” Making the use of legality.

Open Document