Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society influence on gender roles
The influence of society on gender
How to perform a rhetorical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Gender Blur: Rhetorical Analysis
At first glance, The Gender Blur by author Deborah Blum, appears to be written over various aspects which contribute to several differences in gender. Upon further investigation, the true intention of the passage reveals to be an evocation of possibilities of the existence of having gender equality among the society of Blum’s readers.
At one point in the article, Marc Breedlove, a behavioral endocrinologist at the University of California at Berkeley, notes that there exist a lot of opportunities to influence gender difference in the society and everyone is born with certain predispositions but ultimately it is the societal impacts that result in these predispositions either being amplified or nullified. Although, this boils down to the aged old debate on nature versus nurture, but personally I would
…show more content…
It is a known fact that many females that take part actively in male dominated sports and games does end up developing male-like attributes such as muscular growth, deepened voice. This development in male-like attributes can be credited to the heighten production of testosterone in the females. However, the 20thcentury coined term, the sensitive new aged guys, clearly also shows the swaying away from the traditional concepts of how the outlook and actions of a male should be. This group of males, like suggested by the passage might be the resultant of a new generation of youths brought up in a less traditional family or an overly protected family. In both cases, one involves allowing the child to explore his sexuality by self exploration and does not clamp down on the child as how it would have been in a traditional family, when he is taking part in what was previously deemed as “girly” activities such as playing with kitchen toy
Connell: Chapters 4 “Sex Differences & Gendered Bodies”: I found this entire chapter quite intriguing, but I really appreciate the way that Connell approaches the ways in which males and females differ and yet she also points out how there is no significant difference in brain anatomy and function between sexes. I found the statement by neuroscientist Lesley Rogers incredibly interesting, she states, “The brain does not choose neatly to be wither a female or a male type. In any aspect of brain function that we can measure there is considerable overlap between females and males” (p.52). This statement when paired with information about the affect social processes have on the body it is mind boggling to realize, as Connell states, “biology bends to the hurricane of social discipline” (p.55). It is unnerving to think that I am merely a product of my society. Not only has society shaped my beliefs, values, manners and religion, but it has also shaped my physical body? If I understand this correctly, it is incredibly disturbing.
The National Organization for Women’s 1966 Statement of Purpose was written by Betty Friedan, whose published book “The Feminist Mystique” in 1963 have made a big impact on American women at that time. This source is effective in using the rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos to convince the public to take action to help women can be treated more equally and can take part in any aspects of society, especially their privileges and responsibilities should be fair and equal in compare with men.
Women’s rights pioneer, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, in her speech, The Destructive Male, expresses her feelings about Women's suffrage in 1868, and brought to light the misconception that women are not equal to man and imply that men bring more destruction than restoration.
There are many different facets to the nature versus nurture argument that has been going on for decades. One of these, the influence of nature and nurture on gender roles and behaviors, is argued well by both Deborah Blum and Aaron Devor, both of whom believe that society plays a large role in determining gender. I, however, have a tendency to agree with Blum that biology and society both share responsibility for these behaviors. The real question is not whether gender expression is a result of nature or nurture, but how much of a role each of these plays.
Quite clearly, male sexual performance was a major key to being male. It was a man's sexual organs that made him different and superior to the woman. But maleness was somewhat fragile, and it was important for a man to keep demonstrating his maleness by action and thought, especially by sexual action. It was part of his duty to keep his female partners happy and satisfied, and unless he did so, he had failed as a man. (41)
An article entitled “How Boys Become Men,” written by Jon Katz was originally published in January, 1993 in Glamour, a magazine for young women. This article details the process of a boy growing into a man and mainly focus on the lesson boys learn that effect their adult lives. These lessons are about how to hold back emotions and never appeared sensitive. The author includes examples of his own experiences as a boy to convey to the reader the challenges of growing into a man. Through the various stories of young boys, the author is trying to prove that the men are insensitive because they had to learn to hide their feelings during the stage of growing up with other boys. The purpose of the author is to explain the women of the world, why men appear to be emotionalist and “macho.” The author’s main idea of this article is to explain why men are insensitive and to help women understand why men sometimes seem “remote” and “uncommunicative.”
context out of which a work of literature emerges molds the interpretation of gender in that work.
In “The Gender Blur: Where Does Biology End and Society Take Over?” Deborah Blum states that “gender roles of our culture reflect an underlying biology” (Blum 679). Maasik and Solomon argue that gender codes and behavior “are not the result of some sort of natural or biological destiny, but are instead politically motivated cultural constructions,” (620) raising the question whether gender behavior begins in culture or genetics. Although one may argue that gender roles begin in either nature or nurture, many believe that both culture and biology have an influence on the behavior.
Throughout thousands of years men were forced to be the tough guy in every situation. From the stories we were told at night to actually doing so in real life, men are suppose to be the ones who always act tough and do the stupidest of things. Some would say it is in their blood when they are born and others will say they are taught this due to parenting and or society itself. Many have their own thoughts upon this situation and two very different but similar pieces that portray this are the documentary The Mask You Live In and a reflection by Dave Barry “Guys vs. Men.”
I also like the part in the article where they talk about gender differences not being genetic, physiological or hormonal but “socially constructed”. I think it is interesting that gender is nothing that is born within us but is something that is,in a way, tough through media, society, colors, and everyday life. We do things daily that we believe only a certain gender can do and if we see someone of the opposite gender doing something that does not fit that “doing gender” idea we judge and critic them, not even know that what they may be doing is not even wrong it just different from how you may perceive the genders roles to
According to the textbook, David Sadker wrote “Gender Games.” His profession involves teaching at American University and the University of Arizona. He specializes in academic affairs. In his article, he challenges the “girls versus boys” controversy.
I am writing this letter in reference to the revisions I made in my rhetorical analysis essay over gender identity. The revisions fall into three major categories: content expansion over the essay’s exigency and ethos, mechanics throughout the essay, and content correction in the discussion over pathos and other areas.
...present powerful characters, while females represent unimportant characters. Unaware of the influence of society’s perception of the importance of sexes, literature and culture go unchanged. Although fairytales such as Sleeping Beauty produce charming entertainment for children, their remains a didactic message that lays hidden beneath the surface; teaching future generations to be submissive to the inequalities of their gender. Feminist critic the works of former literature, highlighting sexual discriminations, and broadcasting their own versions of former works, that paints a composite image of women’s oppression (Feminist Theory and Criticism). Women of the twenty-first century serge forward investigating, and highlighting the inequalities of their race in effort to organize a better social life for women of the future (Feminist Theory and Criticism).
Introduction: According to Watson the issue is gender inequality. She uses ethos when she mentions many of her stories along the years. For example, at the age eight she was confused for being called bossy all because she wanted to direct the plays they were going to perform for their parents. At the age of fourteen she started to be sexualized by certain elements of social media. By the age of fifteen her girlfriends started to drop out of sports because they did not want to appear muscly. Finally, at the age of eighteen her male friends were unable to express their feelings. In this speech she is proposing putting an end to gender inequality as the solution.
Regarding sex consumption, the biological and patriarchy perspectives clarified that men were naturally more sexual urges and sought for absolute power over women. Therefore, sex consumption was defined as highly catered to fulfil men’s needs and a means to prevent familial and societal disruption, though this statement had been objected by female bodies. Through sex consumption, men could regain and reinforce their masculinity and social status which might be unattainable in the outside real world. In respect of consumption of sport and sporting events, sports had historically reinforced, defined and discriminated as male activities. Women were discouraged or excluded from sporting events and relative consumption with supportive professional comments: sport was biologically harmful to reproductive abilities of females. In fact, increased female participation in sports is possibly a social threat on man’s masculinity; men are highly cherished to sports engagement in constructing their manliness, masculinities and solidarity with other males. In recent decades, the boundaries identifying male and female consumption culture and attitudes are progressively blurred in response to female roles in economic development and societal transformation. Lately, females are open to more employment and education opportunities. Many of them attain high education and