Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of microaggressions essay
Logos, ethos, pathos in argumentative arguments
Cognitive distortions flashcards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept of microaggressions essay
“The Coddling of the American Mind” is a persuasive article written by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt about the increased use of trigger warnings. As all persuasive writing does, the authors used logos, ethos, and, especially, pathos to convince their readers of how unnecessary and possibly harmful the use of trigger warnings can be. In “Coddling of the American Mind”, authors Lukianoff and Haidt try to sway their readers with facts and logic, or the rhetorical appeal known as logos. The most obvious use of logos is the list of Common Cognitive Distortions listed at the end of the article; this list provides helpful information for the reader, as well as makes the authors seem knowledgeable. Definitions for words such as “microaggression”
and “trigger warning” were also included in the article, which served the same purpose of informing readers who were unaware of those terms and making the authors seem more knowledgeable about the subject. Ethos, or the credibility appeal, was evident throughout the article because of the many names mentioned. Thomas Jefferson was among those names, and the authors picked a quote of his to conclude their article with: “This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.” Throughout the article, examples of microaggressions and trigger warnings are given, and the cases given validate Lukianoff and Haidt’s argument against trigger warnings. The last rhetorical appeal, pathos, is the one used the most subtly. In the first part of the article, the examples the authors give of microaggressions and trigger warnings are very petty, meaning that the reader will likely become annoyed with the concept of trigger warnings. Readers then move on to learn that those with anxiety disorders benefit from exposure to what gives them anxiety, which the authors use as proof for trigger warnings being unnecessary. When put together, these emotional appeals will make readers feel like they are doing people a service by rallying against trigger warnings, as the article has just shown them to be petty and unhelpful to those with anxiety. In “The Coddling of the American Mind”, the authors’ uses of the three Aristotelian Appeals created a persuasive yet informative article about the use of trigger warnings in college classes.
Eugene V. Debs, the United State’s most influential union leader and avid socialist gives light to many issues including presidency, systems of society, and most importantly the unemployed in his speech “The Issue”. Debs was imprisoned in the 1890s for illegally encouraging a railroad strike, he also was sentenced to 10 years for his discouragement to the United States’ involvement in World War I. Debs has been a remarkable figure in the socialist party and had influenced so many. In Eugene Debs’ speech, Debs’ uses rhetorical appeal to relate to and convince his audience of the “issues” in the United
American liberalism has deviated from its core values and constituents hence metamorphosing into a toxic disdainful movement. Emmett Rensin in his article in Vox dubbed “The Smug Style in American Liberalism” captures these observations perfectly. He notes that through the condescending notion of knowing has alienated the contemporary liberals from their core values that were deemed progressive in the past. The movement is currently cloaked as the “monopoly on reason” and has a “defensive sneer toward any person or movement outside its consensus” (Rensin). The article infuses rhetorical strategies that are critical in advancing the author’s core message to his target audience.
In the article “Do You Speak American?,” Robert MacNeil is trying to reach the american public, especially those who do not have a complete understanding of the ongoing changes that are happening to the English that is spoken throughout the United States. He uses a multitude of examples to prove this very fact. For one he wants to inform the people that one reason for this change is that average people now have more influence in the way language is spoken.Which to him is a good thing. He enjoys the new evolution that American English has undertaken. He believes that it is a step in the right direction. Another, example he uses are the changes different regions and/or group of people have made on the English language. He uses the different accents and dialect to show the growth and improvement that occurred. Even though, some linguist view these changes as wrong, MacNeil views them as necessary and as something that is unique to the United States. In essence, a necessary growth that only makes the United States grow into a better country. Thus, making it more diverse.
Manne’s begins her article discussing how trigger warnings are not meant to “enable — let alone encourage — students to skip these readings,” but rather to provide a simple warning in order to “prepare” for the material. To further support this idea, Manne also points out the idea that instead of encouraging students to skip readings, trigger warning simply prepare the student to “better manage their reaction.” On the other hand, Filipovic is strongly against using trigger warnings and states that there is actually harm in doing so. Filipovic states that not only do trigger warnings serve as a “literary spoiler” they also “skew students perceptions.” What she means by this is that it shifts the focus onto a single but theme that the professor has deemed
the usual folder. It determines the way we frame everything . . . the attitude
The Coddling of the American Mind, by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, is an article published by the Atlantic Journal about the negative effects trigger warnings and microaggressions have on students in college. Trigger warnings are disclaimers about any potential emotional response from a class or its material. (44) Microaggressions are words or actions that have no sinister intentions, but people take as such. (44) Greg Lukianoff is the president and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. (47) As the leader of the foundation, Greg Lukianoff has witnessed and fought many legal occasions of trigger warnings and microaggressions resulting in the masking of freedom of speech. Coauthor Jonathan Haidt is a professor at New
Werner Herzog’s documentary “From One Second to the Next” opens with stark white letters against a black background that states “Over 100,000 accidents a year involve drivers who are texting. The numbers are climbing sharply.” The next image we see is off Aurie, a young women who’s younger brother Xzavier was hit by a driver who was texting. She says “I had my brother in my hand then all of a sudden my hand was empty.” These two images and statements are powerful on their own, even without understanding the rhetoric behind them. However if one was to look at the mechanisms behind rhetoric you can understand just how powerful these statements can be.
In the article The Coddling of the American Mind by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, the authors go into great detail of describing the effects of trigger warnings. Using real world examples, Lukianoff and Haidt describes how college students are oversensitive and carried along the school year. The authors explain how this is a negative thing for the college students going into the work force in the future.
Many people do not recognize the strategies writers and speakers use to influence their audiences’ opinions. They believe that their opinions were constructed based solely on facts. Although establishing one’s own opinions based on facts is ideal, this is usually not the case. By means of the Aunt’s lessons in The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood argues that individuals use verbal techniques, such as word choice, tone, and repetition, to suppress others’ conflicting viewpoints and to promote their own. This is significant because it reveals how people can be manipulated into believing false or misleading information.
The usage of strategies in my interpretation statement was how Rushkoff used methods of persuasion, fear, and the aim of cognitive approach to show that looking toward the future was more beneficial than the present. The strategy I have used on writing this paper was connecting emotional feelings to readers and insert hesitations of their situation by texts that could associate with them. Before, my statement was about how Rushkoff used logical reasoning to prove his claim. Now, is a new thesis, “Throughout the article, he uses examples that people in modern society would be able to connect to through strategies of pathos, ethos and a cognitive angle. As an additional supportive strategy Rushkoff did, he establishes fear in certain types of
The reading for this week that I thought was very interesting was “The Coddling of the American Mind.” I thought this article was interesting because I did not realize this type of issue was happening at certain universities and colleges. I think that it is crazy how students at these universities will not take certain classes or will ask their professors to not talk about certain issues in class because they are offended by it or feel uncomfortable talking about it. College is supposed to be the time that allows us to be open and express our opinions. We should be able to talk about issues like racism and same sex marriage without being offended. People may not agree with your opinion, but we should not stop talking about those issues because
Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt claim in their article “The Coddling of the American Mind” that the “vindictive protectiveness” to protect the college students by avoiding “microaggression’ and the usage of ‘trigger warnings’ are not going to help the students adapt to ‘the world with potential offenses.’
In the story, The Glorious Whitewasher, Tom Sawyer uses two distinct strategies to deceive the other children into whitewashing the fence for him. First, Tom ignores the presence of Ben upon his arrival: ‘Tom went on whitewashing- paid no attention to the steamboat.’ While talking to Ben about the work he is doing Tom also does not acknowledge Ben directly but instead makes it appear that the whitewashing is more interesting. “‘O, come, now, you don’t mean to let on that you like it?’ The brush continued to move.” This persistent disregard of Ben while looking interested in his work causes Ben to marvel over the idea that whitewashing may just be fun. The second strategy Tom Sawyer uses is reverse psychology. Reverse psychology is when someone discusses the opposite of their needs to accomplish the outcome they really desire.
Rhetorical Analysis of the American Century The editorial article “The American Century” is published in LIFE magazine 17 February 1941, and its author is Henry Robinson Luce. Henry Robinson Luce was called “the most influential private citizen in the America of his day” (Robert). He published effective magazines such as Time, Life and Fortune, which are very famous until today. This article was written during the World War Two, and it discussed many realistic problems about America like how America treated the war.
Soni00sh. "Main Menu." Pop Studies and Rhetoric. WordPress, 03 Feb. 2012. Web. 04 Apr. 2014.