Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Saint Joan - GB Shaw critical analysis
Critical analysis of Saint Joan
Critical analysis of Saint Joan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Saint Joan - GB Shaw critical analysis
In the passage from the play “Saint Joan,” George Bernard Shaw utilizes a variety of rhetorical strategies in developing the Inquisitor’s powerful speech, aiming to convince the church court of Joan’s guilt for spreading heresy.
The Inquisitor commences in an austere tone, creating ethos to uphold his argument. His personal testimonies appeal to the audience, increasing his credibility as a speaker. The Inquisitor carefully weaves in phrases similar to his statement “If you had seen what I have seen of heresy” to make him seem all the more experienced on the topic he is discussing. His personal declaration that he has “seen this again and again” adequately uses repetition as a rhetorical strategy in developing ethos. With this, the Inquisitor
…show more content…
begins to sway his audience as any credible source would. He further backs his assertions with examples such as “the woman who quarrels with her clothes” leading to groups of following “men and women who refuse to wear any clothes at all.” Through this fear, the listeners are more likely to trust the speaker’s ostensibly true character, thus creating a trusting disposition. Additionally, the Inquisitor concentrates on swaying his audience through logos. This rhetorical strategy appeals to logic by providing consistency and clarity of his message and the logic of the reasons. The Inquisitor states, “for two hundred years the Holy Office has striven with these diabolical madnesses,” using deductive reasoning to stress that the situation at hand is nothing new to the church; thus, the jury should trust the Inquisitor’s judgement since he knows how to deal with it. In a derogatory tone, the Inquisitor states, “vain and ignorant persons…taking it upon themselves to be the interpreters of God’s will.” He says this to strengthen his argument, pointing out that the church is the only one allowed to interpret God’s will; therefore, heretics have overstepped the boundaries. Within this temper, the Inquisitor then plays with pathos, the emotional appeal of his audience members.
He means to convince them that condemning Joan is suitable in place of allowing her heresy to continue, inciting auxiliary fear with images of incest and polygamy. In pathos, the speaker commonly lays claim to qualities within the listener, relating to flattery. The Inquisitor does just this, calling his audience “merciful” and “holy.” This gains further trust within the speaker, assuring the clerics that the decision they make reflects upon them, as well as their services to God. The Inquisitor proceeds using hyperbole, the rhetorical strategy of over exaggeration: “we should forfeit our own hope of diving mercy were there one grain of malice against her in our hearts.” With this, he links the council to one another on an emotional level; playing on the concept that they have no malice, but must convict - willing to sacrifice their own divine mercy if they have any animosity toward Joan. The Inquisitor creates hostility against Joan, attempting to instill a sense of good versus evil within the clerics.
Rhetorical appeal in the Inquisitor's speech is exceptionally valuable. He does an admirable job applying ethos, logos, and pathos, as well as other literary terms, to shape a notably plausible argument. Joan, “pious” or not, is vigorously convicted through her opponent’s superb
dispute.
In the “180” movie Ray Comfort outstandingly used rhetorical appeal throughout his argument in a thorough way to further grasp his audience’s attention. He used pathos, ethos, and logos during the course of his dispute of abortion and the Holocaust. Comfort uses pathos more frequently than the other two appeals, to plea to the audience’s heart strings. An example of when pathos was used was when
Talbot uses powerful diction to get her message across in ways which normal writing and syntax could not achieve. Examples range from “...sneaky way of gaming the system” (223) and “...criticized as palaces of privilege” (229) and “...the contest for valedictorian offers a pleasing image of a purer meritocracy” (231). All of these following examples of powerful language depict to the reader the importance of the topic and to stress the author’s message. The rhetoric adds to stress certain points which are very critical in her message. Without the strong dialect the message could be weakened and even worse in the end it could be depicted wrong. On top of all the syntax and diction along with the rhetorical appeals brings the reader to the author’s overall message of needing to reward the best in a different way than normal but making sure that we still do reward
...n the author diminishing the strong persuasiveness afforded by the logos and ethos in his argument because of his excess of pathos and tone, which is perceived as condescending.
It is clear that he uses pathos as his most potent tool for persuasion. Be it a way to depict gruesome imagery, a way to supplement his call to action, or as an enhancement for both his ethos and logos arguments, his strategic use of pathos is what drove the letter’s meaning to the hearts of
John Proctor is, at first, willing to offer up a false confession that his life may be spared. Inevitably, John Proctor possesses that fateful attribute known to fall fatal to many human beings - pride. While he has, indeed, been ashamed of his many sins throughout his life, Proctor's soul still clings to his pride and his good name, however soiled it may have become. On the morning scheduled for his execution, Proctor wrestles with the realization that one more sin so heaped upon the rest in his life will make precious little difference in the end; "I cannot mount the gibbet like a saint. It is a fraud. I am not that man.... My honesty is broke... I am no good man. Nothing's spoiled by giving them this lie." (126) He attempts to calm his pride by telling himself that the other accused witches who will not give false testimony to save themselves from the gallows have every right to do so; they led lives free of blame. He, however, he tells himself, did no such thing; what right has he to hang among the righteous? "Let them that never lied die now to keep their souls. It is pretense for me, a vanity that will nor blind God nor keep my children out of the wind." (126) Thus the conviction first reached by John Proctor is to save his life rather than to throw it away in mock martyrdom.
In Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pathos, logos and ethos are evidently and effectively used to persuade the audience into believing Caesar was not ambitious and that he was an innocent man. Throughout the speech the citizens were easily persuaded, but Anthony’s intellectual speeches made the audience question and imagine what they have turned into. Anthony used these three rhetorical appeals to win back the citizens just like many people do today. The power of pathos, logos and ethos in a speech can change one mind in an instant and if successfully used can change a mind to be fully persuaded without confusion.
Giving a successful speech, in any language, is a difficult yet gratifying skill. Great speeches can be inspiring, compelling, and even revolutionary – indeed, these speeches are deliberate, succinct, engaging, and unforgettable. Two examples of such great speeches in both literature and in history are Mark Antony’s eulogy in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Robert F. Kennedy’s On the Death of Martin Luther King. Through the speakers’ use of parallel structure, caesuras, and personal references – three stylistic devices and techniques – not only were both speakers able to embellish their speeches; it also allowed each speaker to deliver an even more powerful speech. In these speeches, the use of repetition through the anaphoral and epiphoral structure in both speeches accentuates the purpose of the speech, while the use of caesuras adds texture and tone to the speech, and the use of personal references engages and stimulates the audience.
Through time it can be seen that the worls has a nature of repeating its history. We can learn a lot about reading Author Millers text the crucible as his own experience and setting of the troubling cold war has been reflected onto the characters of John Proctor and Giles Corey which give me a deeper understanding of them. Because of the parallel settings of Author Miller’s era, the 1950’s cold war, and the text’s setting the 1692 Salem witch hunt, I begin to question my own ideas of doing the right thing and if it came down to it, that I should always try to as good things will come of staying true.
It was not until 1919 that women had the right to vote. If it was not for the hard work, determination, and perseverance from Elizabeth Cady Stanton, women today still may not of had the privilege to vote. Because of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and her hard work, women are now treated equally in our society today.
Friar Lawrence’s, first entrance is alone, in act two, scene three. This is when we, as an audience get our initial impression of him; here he is introduced as a man who see’s good in all. “Virtue itself turns vice being misapplied and vice sometimes by action dignified “.
Even though The Crucible is not historically correct, nor is it a perfect allegory for anti-Communism, or as a faithful account of the Salem trials, it still stands out as a powerful and timeless depiction of how intolerance, hysteria, power and authority is able to tear a community apart. The most important of these is the nature of power, authority and its costly, and overwhelming results. “But you must understand, sir, that a person is either with this court or against it,” says Danforth conceitedly. With this antithesis, Miller sums up the attitude of the authorities towards the witch trials that if one goes against the judgement of the court they are essentially breaking their relationship with God. Like everyone else in Salem, Danforth draws a clear line to separate the world into black and white. The concurrent running of the “Crucible” image also captures the quintessence of the courtroom as Abigial stirs up trouble among the people that have good reputation and loving natures in society. In a theocratic government, everything and everyone belongs to either God or the Devil.
I will be analyzing the purpose, audience, and context of the situation in which he was writing in order to make his article persuasive and user-centered. Many people have heard of the rhetorical concepts of logos, ethos, and pathos even if they do not necessarily know what they fully mean they are most familiar with logos because of its biblical ties and love languages. I will provide examples of each during my analysis.
In this essay the five Rhetorical concepts will be defined, examples will be used from the movie The Outsiders directed by Francis Ford Cappola. Logos is an appeal to logic, and is a way of persuading an audience by reason. Ethos is an appeal to ethics, and it is a means of convincing someone of the character or credibility of the persuader. Pathos is an appeal to emotion, and is a way of convincing an audience of an argument by creating an emotional response. Telos is the end of a goal-oriented process, also an ultimate object or aim. Kairos is the opportune time and/or place, the right or appropriate time to say or do the right or appropriate thing.
In analyzing McBride’s essay the rhetorical devices found to be used were logos and pathos. First, it will be sho...
Ethos are considered a hit or miss when speaking to an audience. Usually, a writer or author will use himself or quote an individual when speaking on...