Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of poverty on children research paper
The impact of poverty on children research paper
How the industrial revolution contributed to child labor
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of poverty on children research paper
During the early twentieth century -- and well throughout history -- , women and children were treated more as second class citizens when compared to wealthy, landowning males; the uncongenial treatment of women and children lead to crucial flaws within society: social wounds that consisted of dismal working conditions -- what Kelley, a United States social worker and reformer delivered a speech on at the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905 -- and the nonchalant passing by of inequalities. Kelley, like many great social reformers, utilizes the empowering rhetorical strategies within her speech to illustrate the magnitude of the dismal working conditions for children. The rhetorical …show more content…
strategies utilized -- logos, repetition, and pathos -- assist Kelley in her excursion by motivating her audience to fight against and mend the social wound. People tend to show a higher frequency of belief in an issue that is reinforced by numbers.
An instance of this trend is the amount of people receiving proper medical care and the rate of mortality within in country -- in countries such as Zimbabwe and South Africa. Kelley exercises the same method -- also known as logos -- mentioned prior in the beginning of her speech to assist her audience in realizing that there is a social wound prevalent within their society and how infected the wound is, “We have, in this country, two million children under the age of sixteen years who are earning their bread. The vary in age from six and seven years (in the cotton mills of Georgia) and eight, nine and ten years (in the coal-breakers of Pennsylvania, to fourteen, fifteen and sixteen years in more enlightened states” (Lines 1-7). Likewise to displaying problems in distribution of medical care in underdeveloped countries, Kelley utilizes numbers in order to demonstrate a social wound within society -- the magnitude of dismal working conditions for children. Kelley couples the current use of logos with the repetition of “years” in order to invoke a feeling of empathy from her audience. The utilization of repetition with the demonstration of logos amplifies the response from the audience, further drawing them closer to Kelley’s argument and to the social wound they’ve help inflict on society -- in which instills a sense of obligation to mend the social
wound. Mother’s, to get their children to listen, often need to repeat themselves in order for the child to listen and perform what needs to be done; drawing an audience to realise that they now have an obligation to fill and bring change within their fractured society. Similarly to a mother commanding her child, Kelley utilizes repetition in order to illustrate the magnitude of dismal working conditions for children and motivate her audience to clash against and mend this social wound prevalent within their fractured society. Kelley utilizes this strategy near the end of her speech, “The children makes our shoes in the shoe factories; they knit our stockings, our knitted underwear in the knitting factories, they spin and weave our cotton underwear in cotton mills” (Lines 66-69). The repetition of “our” motivates the audience to clash against and mend this social wound for the reason that the repetition makes the audience feel as if they had made these children create the clothes on their backs while they do nothing to resolve this issue. This guilt, coupled with the realization of the problem -- using logos -- makes the audience want to mend this social wound that they’ve let become infected. Kelley ultimates achieves her purpose of illustrating the magnitude of dismal working conditions and the motivation of her listeners in her speech by effectively utilizing logos -- coupled with the repetition of “years” to draw the audience closer to Kelley’s argument -- to assist the audience in recognizing that there is a wound within their fractured society and repetition to appeal to the audience pathos that invokes an guilt and an obligation to mend this social wound.
Alfred M Green wrote and presented a speech about encouraging the blacks that striving to enlist in the army is worth it. He includes historical and religious allusion, political diction, and juxtaposition. Although it's understandable that you don’t feel patriotic, Green argues that striving to enlist in the army is worth it because it will prove patriotism, and we will prove our argument of justice and equality because we deserve it. Also, we will fight to prevent those values from disappearing in the South. He wants his audience to feel motivated, encouraged, and inspired, to feel and want his audience to believe in the same values as him, to make a change which is to enlist in the army.
In Florence Kelley's speech to the people attending the NAWSA convention, she uses emotional appeal to motivate her audience to convince their male counterparts to legalize voting for women, and also to persuade the males to help put an end to child labor.
From the humble beginning of Social Work there have been many people who have tirelessly worked, fought, and dedicated their life advocating for the people in our world who are disadvantaged. Furthermore, many of these people have been women who not only were strong enough to fight for the rights of others, but also had to fight the forces whom thought that women where in some way second hand citizens themselves. These women were brave and determined enough to break out of the box that society placed them in, and stand up for the social injustices that they seen taking place, and try to make a difference. Of the many women from the early days of Social Work none fought harder for social reform than Grace Abbott. Grace Abbott spent her life fighting to enact legislation for the betterment of society as a whole. This work would eventually earn her the nickname “the mother of America’s forty-three million children.”
During the time of the Civil War, the United States was divided on many issues; one of the issues being the issue of slavery. The North was fighting against the heinous act of imprisoning someone for life for self-gain and the South was fighting to preserve this heinous act. The North needed all the warriors of freedom as possible, which is why Alfred M. Green gave a speech in Philadelphia in April 1861 to get his fellow African Americans to join the union and fight be the warriors of freedom that the North needed them to be in this fight against slavery. But, there is a problem in recruiting people to leave their lives and go fight in a gruesome war -- people fear for their lives. To avoid this fear and get African Americans to fight in this war, Green utilizes two unionizing rhetorical strategies in order to dismantle this fear
Ann Richards’s keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 1988 was extremely interesting to watch. I believe her speech was intended to be focused on the American family and also the American farmers. These two areas seemed to be very important to Mrs. Richards and she made a point to discuss both.
In Florence Kelley’s 1905 speech to the Philadelphia convention of the National American Women Suffrage Association, she accentuates the obligatory need to reform the working conditions for young children.
Joseph McCarthy was a man of many talents, oration being one that surpassed the majority of the rest. McCarthy’s ability to use motifs, tone, and repetition in a way that supported his message impeccably was one of the reasons he excelled at persuasion.
“Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.” This mantra from Margaret Mead is a somewhat humorous yet slightly satirical spin on how people tend to think of themselves as one-of-a-kind, irreplaceable human specimens. However, one English teacher from Wellesley High School takes this critique one step further with his polemic presentation at the school commencement. David McCullough, a Massachusetts English teacher, gave a seemingly somber sendoff to his graduates in 2012, with a speech that contained some unapologetically harsh sentiments. However, by looking past the outwardly dismal surface of the speech, the students can infer a more optimistic message. By incorporating devices of asyndeton, paradox, antimetabole, and anadiplosis, McCullough conveys to each student that even though none of them is unique, their commonality is not a fault they all have merit and should strive to view the world through a more selfless lens.
Rhetorical Analysis of Florence Kelley’s Speech Florence Kelley’s address to the National American Woman Suffrage Association (1905) touches upon both the social and political aspects of the need for reform regarding child labor laws. By revealing the shocking truth about how young children around the country work for long hours in inappropriate conditions, Kelley is able to emphasize the urgency of this situation. Simultaneously, she defends women’s suffrage by presenting the logical statement that there would be laws to prevent extreme child labor if women had the right to vote; more progress could be made if women and men worked together, starting with women’s right to vote. In her address to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, Florence Kelley establishes a dramatic tone and appeals to her audience’s emotions to persuade them to advocate for a reform of child labor laws by employing several rhetorical strategies. To begin, Kelley utilizes the audience’s sense of logic to generate answers to rhetorical questions such as, “If mothers and the teachers from Georgia could vote, would the Georgia Legislature have refused at every session for the last three years to stop the work in the mills of children under twelve years of age?” and “would the New Jersey Legislature have passed that shameful repeal bill enabling girls of fourteen years to work all night, if the mothers in New Jersey were enfranchised?”
After the success of antislavery movement in the early nineteenth century, activist women in the United States took another step toward claiming themselves a voice in politics. They were known as the suffragists. It took those women a lot of efforts and some decades to seek for the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment. In her essay “The Next Generation of Suffragists: Harriot Stanton Blatch and Grassroots Politics,” Ellen Carol Dubois notes some hardships American suffragists faced in order to achieve the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment. Along with that essay, the film Iron-Jawed Angels somehow helps to paint a vivid image of the obstacles in the fight for women’s suffrage. In the essay “Gender at Work: The Sexual Division of Labor during World War II,” Ruth Milkman highlights the segregation between men and women at works during wartime some decades after the success of women suffrage movement. Similarly, women in the Glamour Girls of 1943 were segregated by men that they could only do the jobs temporarily and would not able to go back to work once the war over. In other words, many American women did help to claim themselves a voice by voting and giving hands in World War II but they were not fully great enough to change the public eyes about women.
For several decades, most American women occupied a supportive, home oriented role within society, outside of the workplace. However, as the mid-twentieth century approached a gender role paradigm occurred. The sequence of the departure of men for war, the need to fill employment for a growing economy, a handful of critical legal cases, the Black Civil Rights movement seen and heard around the nation, all greatly influenced and demanded social change for human and women’s rights. This momentous period began a social movement known as feminism and introduced a coin phrase known in and outside of the workplace as the “wage-gap.”
The late nineteenth century was a critical time in reshaping the rights of women. Commonly this era is considered to be the beginning of what is know to western feminists as “first-wave feminism.” First-wave feminism predominately fought for legal rights such as suffrage, and property rights. A major hallmark of first-wave feminism is the concept of the “New Woman.” The phrase New Woman described educated, independent, career oriented women who stood in response to the idea of the “Cult of Domesticity,” that is the idea that women are meant to be domestic and submissive (Stevens 27). Though the concept of the New Woman was empowering to many, some women did not want to give up their roles as housewives. These women felt there was a great dignity in the lifestyle of the housewife, and that raising children was not a job to scoff at. Mary Freeman's short story “The Revolt of 'Mother',” tells the story of such a domestic woman, Sarah, who has no interest in leaving her position as mother, but still wishes to have her voice heard in the private sphere of her home. Freeman's “Revolt of Mother,” illustrates an alternative means of resistance for women who rejected the oppression of patriarchy without a withdrawal from the domestic lifestyle.
Fitzhugh calls the attention of his audience by showing how slaves have to be controlled by the rich and powerful leaders. As a pro-slavery activist, Fitzhugh tries to persuade his audience that higher people need to be in charge. He points out that “protection cannot be efficient without the power of control”, by doing this he shows his audience, abolitionist, that they can be in control. He affects the audience by giving them power and control over the weak. Not only does he state that slaves are weak, but he also states that the poor are considered weak. He includes this to make the weak live in fear and so his audience can gain power and protection. By the time this article came out white, rich people were angry that African Americans were
Society has long since considered women the lessor gender and one of the most highly debated topics in society through the years has been that of women’s equality. The debates began over the meaning between a man and woman’s morality and a woman’s rights and obligations in society. After the 19th Amendment was sanctioned around 1920, the ball started rolling on women’s suffrage. Modern times have brought about the union of these causes, but due to the differences between the genetic makeup and socio demographics, the battle over women’s equality issue still continues to exist. While men have always held the covenant role of the dominant sex, it was only since the end of the 19th century that the movement for women’s equality and the entitlement of women have become more prevalent. “The general consensus at the time was that men were more capable of dealing with the competitive work world they now found themselves thrust into. Women, it was assumed, were unable to handle the pressures outside of the home. They couldn’t vote, were discourages from working, and were excluded from politics. Their duty to society was raising moral children, passing on the values that were unjustly thrust upon them as society began to modernize” (America’s Job Exchange, 2013). Although there have been many improvements in the changes of women’s equality towards the lives of women’s freedom and rights in society, some liberals believe that women have a journey to go before they receive total equality. After WWII, women continued to progress in there crusade towards receiving equality in many areas such as pay and education, discrimination in employment, reproductive rights and later was followed by not only white women but women from other nationalities ...
President Obama’s Address to the nation was presented on January 5, 2016. His speech was shown on all of the major network stations. The main goal of his speech was to get the point across to the nation about the increasing problem of gun use. His speech really focused on the issue of gun control and if it would benefit the country. Overall, the biggest idea of his Address was that gun control is a large issue in the United States. The way to prevent deaths caused by firearms can be prevented in other ways than taking peoples guns away. The examples brought up in this Address really stood out to me. The use of personal, national, and global examples really made his speech stronger on the topic of effectiveness.