Rhetorical Analysis Of Japan's Nuclear Nightmare By Peter H. Brothers

795 Words2 Pages

Coral Speicher
ENG 102
Nickalus Rupert
16 February 2017 Peter H. Brothers’ “Japan’s Nuclear Nightmare”
Rhetorical Analysis Peter H. Brothers’ “Japans Nuclear Nightmare” compares the movie Godzilla to a devastating period in Japan’s history: The Atomic Age. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States destroyed Japan. In this article, Brothers wants to educate the audience and accomplishes this by using ethos and pathos. He uses ethos by appealing to ethics and to show right and wrong to the Japanese culture and community. He also uses the rhetoric of pathos to appeal to the audience’s emotions. Pathos is one of the easier ways to capture the audience and the author does that by using imagery and symbols. Brothers’ connects …show more content…

Brothers’ appeals to ethos when he says “Godzilla is a film that deserves to be taken seriously, but to accept what the movie is saying on its own terms one must understand its subtle anti-American tone and dissertation of destruction” (612). This appeals to ethos by telling us although the American’s caused massive destruction in Japan, it was evident that they did not fully understand the devastation of the Japanese that they had caused. However, the Japanese made subtle remarks at the American’s throughout the Godzilla movie. Remarks about the bombing and how they truly felt about Americans after we caused so much destruction in their country. “While it has been argued that there never would have been a Hiroshima had there never been a Pearl Harbor, what is also true is that without Hiroshima there would have never been a Godzilla” (613). This is also appealing to ethos, because there is so much logic in that one sentence, that sentence is a very true fact from Peter H. Brothers’ perspective on the relationship between the bombing and Godzilla. One of the last appeals he makes is also to ethos. “The terrible irony in all of this is that if Godzilla is indeed the representation of the dangers of man’s tampering with atomic and nuclear power, it has more recently surfaced in such places as Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and now in Fukushima, where at the time of this writing a possible nuclear-reactor meltdown threatens consequences beyond even the imagination of the men who brought such terrible fiction to life” (619). In this last appeal could maybe appeal to pathos also but it mostly appeals to ethos. Brothers uses logic when talking about how terrible it would be if Godzilla was really a movie based off something as terrible as the bombing in Japan. For someone to base a enjoyable movie off of something so

Open Document