Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rush hour 2 analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rush hour 2 analysis
Review of Rush Hour 2
The author Jay Carr wrote a review on Rush Hour 2. He thought that this movie had a weak plot. There wasn't much point to the movie. A plus side to Rush Hour 2 was that it was action-filled, and was very thrilling to watch. Carr thought this movie to be the best of the sequels of the 2001 summer.
Carr wrote in his review that Chan and Tucker were unknown in how they worked together, and that nobody knew what they were capable of before the release of Rush Hour. Now people know what they have together, and they are able to rely upon each other, and are more comfortable with each other's work. Things are able to be ameliorating in this movie.
Carr also mentions that Chan is action-filled, and Tucker has the motor mouth, and is funny. Chan performs many stunts, and Tucker has his hilarious mouth going.
Carr noted that Rush Hour 2 was influenced by the movie Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. Zhang Ziyi plays the character who is a formidable fighter, and has the wonderful contrast of sweet girlish looks and brutal fighting.
Carr talked about the acting. He said how Zhang Ziyi her performance was described as explosive. He discussed how John Lone was a good evil mastermind. He mentioned Roselyn Sanchez was a plus as a government undercover operative.
Carr says that a second sequel, Rush Hour 3 could be expected after this.
There many things left out of this review that should have gotten mentioned. First thing, the directing. Jay Carr does not mention how well Brett Ratner does as a director. More could have been said in the area of how camera angles were taken care of. What kind of close-ups, or angles were used during the scenes should be discussed in this review.
The sound in this movie should also be mentioned. With the action in this movie, sound is very important. The sound is very important in every movie, but especially in this movie, because of the punching, kicking, and so forth. None of this is discussed.
Another thing missed in the review was special effects. Special effects are an important part of a movie, also. What can't be done while being filmed can be inserted by computer, and without that, it can be difficult to do some movies.
Lastly, I do concur with most of the opinions presented in the film. Spike lee did an amazing work getting first-hand
...m gave the film 4 out 5 stars, stating that the film “is what one might call dry”(Seaver). Although both reviewers point flaws on the film they do however admire the unique style used by Hamer.
Criticisms (Favourable): Very original, intelligent plot. Well-written characters that aren’t two dimensional and who make human decisions (David’s father, who may seem like a cruel man but who is really just doing what he was brought up to believe is right).
Overall, the score was beautiful and appropriate, adding suspense and mystery at all the right times. The sound effects added psychological flavor to the story without drawing too much attention to it.
role in telling us what to expect from the movie, and both do it to
My overall end thought after watching this movie was that movie production really has improved since 1980. Improvements other than ju...
10. Excellent Editing: There are many examples of extraordinary editing in the film, such as the brilliant summation of entire life of Kane's marriage in fifteen seconds.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
Rush Hour 2. Dir. Brett Ratner. Perf. Chris Tucker and Jackie Chan. New Line Cinema, 2001. Film.
was a spectacular film there were some things that I did not enjoy like, the
...r, this movie is lack of depth of storyline. The audiences can even predict what will happen in the next scenes. Moreover, the ending of this movie is too cheesy and irrational according to me. If only they change the ending to become more interesting and rational, I will give a four or five stars out of five. In spite of a lame twist ending, this movie is a perfect example to show that managers should be able to motivate and challenge their employee. It is important to remember that a happy employee means a productive employee.
...movie that I fell in love with. But most of all I love how the story line is a great overlap into the cinematically engaging movie. There is a great use of camera, timing, shots and story line that are portrayed in this movie without being too overwhelming. This allows the audience to relax during the movie and just take in the scenes as a story from reality. To this day, and even still doing this paper I still come to find different aspects of the movie that I missed the previous times I have watched it.
Finally the movie is a good movie. Actually this movie doesn’t need any improvement. The writer, actresses, and actors did their best. They tried to make a point and be a creative about it and that is exactly what they did. It is an amazing movie. I
Overall, the film isn’t half as epic as Emmerich’s previous. blockbusters or half as entertaining. The dialogues are about as interesting as watching paint dry and the bland characters have about as much depth as a puddle in the street! The storyline isn’t exactly. deep, introspective stuff, either.
I liked it quite a bit, though I do have some reservations about Nolan’s latest. Nolan’s take on this film follows three storylines, those of soldiers on the beach,