Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cross cultural communication challenges
How does gender impact communication
Cross cultural communication challenges
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cross cultural communication challenges
There has always been a debate about the differences in communication between males and females. In his essay, “No Detail Is Too Small for Girls Answering a Simple Question,” Tony Kornheiser believes that girls tend to give out more details and specificity about a subject (feminine style), whereas boys tend to be more straightforward and to the point (masculine style). The author uses examples of his daughter and son to compare the way they speak and the amount of facts they would give. By using them, the author shows the different styles of communication and their effects on listeners. Based on my experiences in a Model United Nations conference and Boy Scouts of America, I feel that the feminine style is more effective in communication. …show more content…
Details and specificities are key tools in communication.
Kornheiser mentions that women “…gather information and dispense it without discrimination…they are fascinated by the multiplicity of choices that they see” (Kornheiser 279). This feminine style of communication is very important in formal settings such as the Model United Nations Conference that I attended. In the conference, I observed people who give vast amounts of details and those who did not. Those who give specifics about their solutions tend to attract more delegates. They are also usually the leaders of the conference. This is because many of the delegates put trust onto those who appear to demonstrate more knowledge and understanding of their ideas. Delegates that give details gain attention and dominance. In the delegates’ eyes, people who are able to talk more have more potential. Communication is effective in this sense because the delegates are more persuaded and convinced by the person with the most thorough speech. There is no room for question or doubt since the person seems
reliable. On the other hand, those who are laconic and straight to the point tend to be followers, and fail to communicate properly. Kornheiser explains that boys, like his son, are “short and to the point” (279). This is not effective, however. I have observed a delegate who understands the wants of his country and the reasons why his ideas are better, yet his speech did not attract many delegates to him. Those who find his general ideas to be good still decide to find someone else since they feel that he is unreliable. In other words, they feel that his ideas may be useless since he did not give any unique or significant details. No one was fully convinced since his evidence is not credible. This idea was reinforced when I was in Boy Scouts. In order to advance to the Eagle Rank, all Boy Scouts must create and complete an Eagle Project planned solely by the person. My Eagle Project was to fix a part of a sidewalk in front of an elementary school. I quickly realized that these large-scale projects are not as easy as I thought. When I was presenting it in front of my counselor, I did not explain enough of the project in my speech. Although I was thorough, explaining what I want and how I would execute the project, the details were not specific enough. My counselor rejected it and found many flaws in the plan. He mentioned to me that I missed many important details such as how I am going to feed volunteers, or how I am going to buy these materials without a fundraiser. These aspects never crossed my mind. In that moment, I realized that my project would have failed miserably if I explained my plan to the volunteers with the same lack of detail as I did to my counselor. After putting more thought into it, I presented my project to the Troop and it turned out to be a success. All the volunteers were able to do their job correctly and properly. I was able to finish the project on time. For successful planning, people not only have to be leaders, but also effective communicators. Tony Kornheiser explains the general differences in talking between male and female. Between the two styles, however, the feminine style communicates the best. To convince and persuade, one needs specifics that others can trust and believe in.
Excellent communication skills can help an individual to further elaborate his or her thoughts, and which will allow their thoughts to be used in greater creations. In chapter 7, Class, Control, Language and Literacy, Finn speak about different types of languages, such as implicit language. Implicit language is “relying on shared knowledge, feelings and opinions when speaking to one another” (Attitude 82). In many families’ implicit language is spoken. Conversation spoken in an implicit language lacks detail that further explains the content of the conversation to an outsider. Within households, children are taught gender role tasked by their parents, but lack detail explanation; “language is either absent or implicit and context dependent when parents teach their children to do such things” (Attitude 115). Children are not given full detailed of how to perform a specific task when given, causing the task to be done
According to Tannen, differences in childhood can impact individual’s communication with each other in relationships. At a young age, children tend to play with other children who are the same gender as them. Both groups of genders have different ways of building a friendship. Tannen says that “Little girls create and maintain friendships by exchanging secrets” (276). It is important for girls to share secrets to get closer to one another and to have a mutual understanding unlike boys whose bonds are “based
Steven Pinker distinguishes the difference between talking to man and women. Pinker showed a lady that was comfortable talking to another lady and the lady became angry when her talking to a man, not women (Pinker 2007 .p112, 113). People used intricacies method to achieve their needs and emotion instead of saying what they need to say directly. (Pinker 2007 .p113) Furthermore, even in a sexual situation, people twist and turn around and turn around their words. For example, “would you like to come up and see my etching?” (Pinker 2007.p113) Moreover, people use a kind word to order something from someone else without making a demand to the receiver or using indirect speeches to avoid a problem that may happen by mistake. (Pinker, 2007
Overall, Hillary Rodham Clinton gave a convincing speech on women’s rights at the U.N. World Conference by using the key rhetorical techniques ethos, pathos, logos, and anaphora’s. The use of these techniques helped the audience believe in the cause of which Clinton was speaking about, sympathize for situations females were being put through, and working to strive towards equal rights for everyone. Clinton used the same stance throughout her speech and raised her voice at points in her speech that needed
Many people believe verbal communication to be a very powerful way of expressing oneself. Words gain there power when the volume is raised and lowered alternatively to make a point. Additionally, the influence of speech can manifest itself in a number of ways. It can be used to humiliate, to intimidate, to flirt and to threaten, all of which are integral and pragmatic strategies to win a power struggle.
In recent years, gender differences have already been one of the most controversial issues in various research. As an important communication tool of mankind, language is inevitably involved in controversies. However, Rachel Rafelman, a Canadian journalist and the author of “The Party Line” express her thought and opinion in her essay. She not only have some great points on what and how women and men are likely to talk, but also have different points on the talking environment. She comes up with facts and fit real and particle examples in her essay to make it understood. Whereas, Ronald Macaulay, a professor of linguistics and the author of “Sex Difference” uses words of novels to argue and promotes them as a cause of reinforce to men’s and women’s stereotypes in his essay. He argues through his whole as rebuttal and gives some examples to oppose the preconceived notion of sex differences. Over all, both Rafelman and Macaulay are the good writer but Rafelman is having upper to prove her essay better organized using her tones as per requirement.
The article “Women Talk Too Much” by Janet Homes is about whether or not women talk more than men; Holmes argued that males talk more than females in general, but the debate will continue in this topic for a long time. Holmes starts by asking the question “do women talk more that men?” the author shared sayings from different cultures about women talking too much, after that she go into her discussion. The purpose of the article was clearly to convince the reader that the title is 100% wrong. Homes uses statistics, researches and seminars to support her claim. The article was persuasive as she did a great job in presenting it very well, as she stated her claims early in the article.
Women communicate to establish or maintain relationships. They talk longer than men and spend more time on one subject to fully understand where each person is coming from. This is evident in the use of nonverbal cues to further build a connection, like touching one’s arm or engaging their audience by nodding. Women also use more emotional language than men, apparent in the compassionate, warm, and concerned word choice that women use. Clearly there are great differences in gender communication. One could argue it is the greatest difference between men and
Deborah Tannen is the author of the book You Just Don't Understand where she analyzes the different meanings of communication between men and women. Her research shows that women and men use the same words and phrases and yet can interpret and react to those same words and phrases differently. Tannen compares the two sexes to find men use their conversation as a type of competition or to preserve their independence. For example, men talk about their knowledge regarding sports, cars, women, exc. Meanwhile, women try to foster intimacy through communication. For instance, women often talk and relate on a personal level. Throughout Tannen's book she uses "cross-cultural communication" to describe the differences between the language of men and women. Tannen observed that, "For males, conversation is the way you negotiate your status in the group and keep people from pushing you around; you use talk to preserve your independence. Females, on the other hand, use conversation to negotiate closeness and intimacy; talk is the essence of intimacy, so being best friends means sitting and talking. For boys, activities, doing things together, are central. Just sitting and talking is not an essential part of friendship. They're friends with the boys they do things with" (Tannen 95).
...ind this to be a typical male trait. Our surveys and research found however, that these types of traits are normally associated with men within the business world. Through our research, we found that in a male dominated society, adapt to the male styles of communication. As we have previously stated, the styles of communication between genders differ greatly. Men tend to use conversation to obtain data whereas women use conversation to create connections. Through our research, we also came up with some solutions for bridging the communication gaps between males and females. To reduce miscommunication, males and females must learn to interpret the messages being sent to them. They must learn to understand the speakers' motives and background. In effective communication, one must realize the experiences of the speaker and listener, and work to create a common understanding of the messages being created. Males should try to understand the female need for connection whereas females need to understand the male need for data. If the two cultures can learn to combine their styles by offering information while creating a connection, the male and female communication gap will be bridged.
“Men come from Mars, Women came from Venus”. Is this quote true? Males and Females have a lot in common, but they are definitely not identical. They are different in many ways, one of them being the language used in face-to-face interaction. Men and Women have very different traits, which separate them from one another such as how assertive they are in conversations, their choice of vocabulary when speaking, and also how talkative they are. In this essay, I will seek to examine and explain the reasons behind these differences and critically analyse how they relate to my society.
Communication is an essential part of human life. People perceive things in a different way because of ethnic background differences, attitudes and beliefs, etc. These differences may affect our ability to communicate with our counterpart. Therefore, it is necessary to keep our mind open so that we can reduce the risk of communication breakdown. Men and women are different as everyone knows that. However, their differences are no just physiological and anatomical. Recent researches have concluded that there are remarkable differences between the two genders in the way their brains process information, language, emotion, cognition etc. Scientists have discovered the differences in the way men and women carry out mental functions like judging speed, estimating time, spatial visualization and positioning, mental calculation. Men and women are strikingly different not only in these tasks but also in the way their brains process language. This could account for the reason why there are overwhelmingly more male mathematicians, pilots, mechanical engineers, race car drivers and space scientists than females. On the other hand, there are areas in which women outperform men. Women are naturally endowed with better communication and verbal abilities. They are also effective than men in some of the tasks like emotional empathy, establishing human relations, carrying out pre-planned tasks and creative expressions (Kimura 1999).
In many cultures around the world, males are encouraged to be self-assertive and to be able to manage their emotions. Girls on the other hand are encouraged to be social in order to express concern for others and to control their assertiveness. Girls tend to develop faster than boys in their language development. Gender differences on short-term memory tasks focus on differences in strategy use and the difference in women’s adaptation to tasks that require efficient retention of sequences (Kimura, 1999). Males tend to prefer action...
These roles are guided by countless factors. Society’s norms, an individual’s culture and socioeconomic background all determine a person’s role in society. It is these factors that give our society a distinct selection of social identities that are practiced when we interact with one another. From my observation girls were very interactive and tend to be particularly more talkative. Females tend to trust and depend more on each other for support and displayed a wide variety of non-verbal communication, such as ‘hand gestures’ and ‘head
Communication plays a key role to a leader. To have communication skills is to have the ability to express oneself clearly to others. It is extremely important as...