Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research paper on the resurrection
Essays on the resurrection
Essays on the resurrection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research paper on the resurrection
Mary Pittman
Mr. Brink
Bible XII
8 February 2016
Resurrection Assignment Part 1: I read pages 105-144 for a total of 39 pages from The Reality of the Resurrection Tenney, Merrill C. "The Historical Evidences." The Reality of the Resurrection. New York: Harper & Row, 1963. 105-44. Print. Part 2: 1- People claim that Jesus did not die, so therefore did not resurrect, because you need to die to come back to life. So, many believe that he did not actually die, and that he just simply woke up from being unconscious. In the Bible, the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all claim, in different words, that Christ died or gave His spirit up. All four unanimously agreed of his physical death. Also, Roman soldiers were expert
…show more content…
The stones that sealed tombs were normally heavier than a ton and because of its weight it could only be moved by a force of several strong men. It could not have been moved by the woman who visited it, or a large group of everyday men (the disciples). Also an official government seal was placed over it. Not only would it have been impossible to remove the stone and steal the body, but illegal. In Luke 24:2, it even says the women found the stone moved away, and could not have moved it. If the disciples truly did move away the stone and steal Jesus’ body, how could they have fought off the skilled guards that were guarding the tomb? Then proceed to remove the stone weighing more than one ton without anyone noticing? Then carry Jesus’ body back to where they were staying without a trace or sound? Neither the women or the disciples could have moved that …show more content…
Jesus was tightly wrapped in these clothes. The Jewish custom of wrapping a dead body consists of bandaging tightly these clothes from the armpits to the ankles, then spices that acted like glue were placed between the folds to seal up the clothes. Then more cloth was wrapped around the head head, then chin and tied at the top of the head to secure the jaw. When the tomb was rolled away, and the body was no longer there, the grave clothes were left behind. What is strange is that the grave clothes did not move, and were lying like a body was still inside of them, but the body was not. No robbers could have unwrapped his body and then easily wrap them back into place without a body in them. They would have torn them off and left them lying everywhere, or just take the body with the cloth on it, but they did neither of those because the clothes were lying there perfectly untouched. Jesus’ resurrected body was obviously different than his previous one, since he could go through grave clothes without moving them. The disciples could not scientifically explain this because they were not advance in their scientific thinking at all. The answer is simply that this physical evidence that marks the resurrection happened in this world, but did not originate in
Interestingly, X-rays reveal that the mummy case of Paankhenamun does in fact contain a mummy inside dating back to the years of c. 945 – 715 B.C. The practice of mummification was the Egyptian people’s way of preserving the spirits of the Gods/Goddesses and royalty. The idea was that when these beings came back to life, they would be preserved and well prepared for their next lives. By the time of the New Kingdom, the Egyptians already had developed techniques of mummification, which were done under a priest’s supervision (Stokstad 114), and since Paankhenamun was the priest of Amun, he was most likely was in charge of these procedures.
The Shroud of Turin is probably one of the most unusual, profound, studied artifacts in the world. The Shroud is a linen cloth that contains the image of what appears to be a crucified man. Many people have speculated that it is the burial cloth of Jesus, while others speculate that it is an artistic painting. Over the years many test and studies have been conducted to prove once and for all if the Shroud of Turin is authentic or fake. Let’s look at different perspectives and outcomes of the testing and you decide for yourself what you think to be true.
Then came the soldiers, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him. But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they did not brake his legs: But one of the soldiers with a spear, pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water. (The Holy Bible, John. 19:32-34)
Luckily, none of the above is true. Because Jesus died on the cross and was raised to life three days later. Believers are forgiven from their sin and are given a new life. As Christians, our belief is not in vain because the resurrections is an actual event. Christ is not dead and our faith is not useless.
Millions of words have been written about the remarkable cloth preserved at Turin. More recently, most of these writings dealt with one basic question, was it the actual winding sheet of the crucified Christ, bearing an imprint of His body? Or was the whole thing a gigantic hoax? A fantastic forgery of the Middle Ages? Erudite men have lined up on both sides of that compelling query. Some of the facts about the Holy Shroud have something to do with the presence of human blood and other strong evidences of its authenticity, it intensified man's curiosity. The researcher himself was also puzzled and came up with this study. In the words of John Walsh, "the facts here have always been available in newspapers, books, documents and human memory, but they have been difficult to gather. I have sought them, off and on, for four years, finally visiting Europe in the search. But I have not set them down here in any effort to convince. Indeed, the reader must come to his own conclusion."(Walsh 1963, p: 1.) Being open minded to both parties the pros and cons plays an important part in conducting this research paper, as what authors Pickenett and Prince said " Undertaking this study with a completely open mind, being equally ready to affirm that the shroud was absurd fraud, or to recognize its authenticity, but gradually forced to agree, on every single point that its markings were exact."(Picknett & Prince 2000, p:5.). Thus, it was a test for scientist and experts to show how these evidences support the possibilities of its authenticity.
Meaning, the followers of Jesus were taken up, and the remains were of the unsaved individuals.
... Radiation could be one possible explanation. It is my belief, based on the evidence, that the Shroud either wrapped the body of Jesus or it was made by a forger who wanted to create the false belief that it wrapped the body of Jesus. If you are to believe that the Shroud is a forgery, you would have to accept the following facts. The forger made the Shroud by a method as yet unknown to modern science.
When other popular teachers died, their movement died with them. However, after the death of Jesus, his movement continued to build strength and grew rapidly. James, Peter, John and Paul, Jude and the writer of Hebrews were convinced of Jesus’ resurrection, they believed this with such conviction that they did not even try to defend or prove this. They stated it as fact. “In each narrative, names are given of those to whom the resin Christ presented himself (Barnett 130)”. This can be verified and proven true, based on eyewitnesses. After the death of Christ, the lives of the writers of the New Testament were radically changed. They traveled where they had not gone to reach out to people outside their comfort zone. They died in their challenge
The most common ancient Egyptian burial practice is the mummification process as depicted in source B. Mummification is a ritual that embalmers performed when a pharaoh died. Source B is a photograph of the canoptic jars which are a main component of the mummification process. The first step in the mummification process is the removal and preservation of most of the internal organs, such as the lungs, the stomach, the liver and intestines. These organs are then separately embalmed and placed into canoptic jars as source B reveals. These jars were often decorated with one of the four animal-headed sons of the god Horus. Each head is believed to be the protector of each organ within the jar and is dedicated to a specific deity. The preservation of the organs is significant as they allowed the dead person to breathe and eat in the afterlife. The internal organs were then wrapped and put into either the body or put in boxes instead of sitting in jars. Canoptic jars were still placed in the tomb but they were solid or empty and provided a symbolic purpose. In Tutankhamun’s tomb the canoptic jars were discovered in a shrine that was found in the treasury room of the tomb. Source B is useful is when understanding the mummification process.
"1 Corinthians 15:12 But If It Is Preached That Christ Has Been Raised from the Dead, How Can Some of You Say That There Is No Resurrection of the Dead?" 1 Corinthians 15:12 But If It Is Preached That Christ Has Been Raised from the Dead, How Can Some of You Say That There Is No Resurrection of the Dead? N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014.
In this paper, I will examine Jesus’ resurrection from the dead because, according to many scholars, there is no other event in the life of Jesus that is as significant. In order to better comprehend the magnitude of this event, I will begin by looking at what can be discerned from the Resurrection of Jesus. Then, I will explore the two different kinds of resurrection testimony that there are: the confessional tradition and narrative tradition. For the confessional tradition, I will look at a few examples including St. Paul’s confession in First Corinthians which is composed of four parts: Jesus’ death, the question of the empty tomb, the third day, and the witnesses. For the narrative tradition, I will briefly examine the two sources of information
Theologians have been stuck on this topic as well. Without the Resurrection, the Christian’s faith
Abstract The subject of whether the Shroud of Turin is over 2000 years old bit of material fabric that really served as an internment piece of clothing for Jesus Christ or a very genius work of forgery has been a dilemma for many religious figures and scientists. Several factors affected the clarity and difficulty of finding an answer for that question. One of these factors is physical factor that had great effect on the complexity of such case as the gaps, blood stains, contortions, and burnings throughout the shroud. These factors is also challenging scientists working on solving that issue as they have to relate the image of the face and body of Jesus Christ to those factors.
"Sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death." (James 1:15), or as Paul puts it in Romans 6:23 " the wages of sin is death". Christ never sinned, and therefore did not earn the wages of sin. Therefore God raised him from the dead "having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it." (Acts 2:24). The full story of Christ's death and resurrection can be found in Matthew 27 & 28, Mark 15 & 16, Luke 23 & 24, and John 18 - 21.
Thus, the art and architecture of Ancient Egypt stemmed directly from their religion. Egyptian theology, with its deified pharaohs and strange animal-headed gods, was complicated, but the most important belief was that survival after death depended upon the preservation of the body. This belief would influence the architectural design of the tomb, where the corpse was ultimately sealed (Silverman:142, 1997). Immortality was only for privileged royal and priestly beings (Stierlin:54, 1983).This implies that their tombs would be somewhat prestigious and not just and ordinary burial site. At the day of resurrection the Ka or soul would re-enter the dead body; this meant that it must be there, intact, ready for that moment. It followed logically, that 'once the corpse was embalmed or mummified, it must be preserved in an impregnable tomb.