Evaluation process provide a planned method in assessing the interventions and applications of a proposal and recognizes the advantages and disadvantages involved in executing the plan. All the aspects of the EBP are intended toward achievement of one goal- quality patient outcomes. This section describes the justification of the approaches used in data collection, outcome measures, and strategic interventions to decrease any barriers to the execution of the project to decrease the use of restrictive interventions in behavioral unit. To assess the outcome measures, it is important to revisit the PICOT question and evaluate the expected outcome.
Rationale for the methods used to collect outcome data
Two methods will be used to evaluate staff members and clients attitude regarding violence and application of nonrestrictive interventions. The first method is use of questionnaires to verify the practicality of the application of six core strategies to decrease the incidence of restrictive intervention. Collected Qualitative data will give a conceptual
…show more content…
They are collective, methodical approach and interventions that are applicable within the unit. Data collection will help to recognize needs, advantages and disadvantages within the unit and provide evaluation as needed. A decrease in the occurrences of restrictive interventions in the inpatient adolescent behavioral health unit within a two-month period is the goal. Ongoing training for staff members and frequent review of goals, facilities’ policies and procedures should be given to bring positive outcomes. Some other factors could be leadership training, review, prevention tools, patient involvement and therapeutic environment. Leadership is the core element in seclusion and restraint reduction.
Implications for practice and future
The small study was done to determine how often particpants were exposed to lateral violence. This voluntary study was a web based study to allow anonymoty and consisted of a pretest then an educational session followed by a post test, with a three month follow up survey. The pre-intervention survey showed that staff was seeing lateral violence weekly and post intervention showed a decrease in behaviors to monthly. This shows that education can have a positive impact on decreasing incidents of lateral violence.
Juvenile solitary confinement is a way to punish poor behavior in the United States juvenile prison system. However after long term negative side effects that isolation can cause in teens, the General public has been in support of isolation alternatives. In this paper I will be discussing the state by state solitary confinement rules and regulations, how rehabilitation and therapeutic services can be a healthy option as an alternative to confinement and how our nation’s youth don’t always have to feel that segregation is the only form of discipline.
Every school, psychiatric unit should always make an effort to prevent the need for restraint and seclusion. Everyone has their own opinion on how they feel about these two issues and what the laws should be set on. School policies on seclusion and restraint will always differ from the psychiatric unit’s policy since they are two different environments and may deal with different clientele. There have been many laws that have been set and also changed throughout the years regarding how you should and shouldn’t restrain a patient or student because you could eventually seriously injure them. It can also be bad to seclude a student or patient because they could do multiple things to hurt themselves when they are being secluded.
It has been found that violent behavior that is equally displayed amongst men and women (Wray, Hoyt, & Gerstle, 2013). According to research, the reasons that men and women become perpetrators are similar (Wray et al., 2013). It has been stated that if a counselor wants to reduce recidivism, one should focus on dyadic intervention (Wray et al., 2013). The psychoeducational group can help members to learn signs of aggression that they display to and what things can be done to correct the
This literature review is focusing on discussing the effects of seclusion and restraints on treatment consequences of patients in mental health area. Seclusion and Restraint are used for controlling the behavioral patterns of the mentally ill patients in different surroundings consisting of psychiatric management facilities and hospitals (Kentley, 2009). Over past decade, comprehensible consensus has come out that seclusion and restraints are secure interventions of last alternative and application of those interventions should and can be diminished significantly (Knight, 2011). However, recent studies indicated that it is traumatic for patients experiencing or witnessing restraint and seclusion traumatic; patients can feel high levels of anxiety, fear, and anger once aware that restraint is going to take place, sometimes it could resulting in an exacerbation of patient’s mental status (Stewart et al, 2010). Due to the humanitarian, ethical, and legal issues which could lead to, seclusion and restraints are known as the most controversial management strategies (Holmes, Kennedy & Perron, 2004). Previous studies and researches could not analyze this topic adequately; thus, further researches and studies related to the effects and risk managements of using seclusions and restrains will be discussed in below.
Violence risk assessment can be defined as the process of evaluating individuals to (i) characterise the likelihood that they will commit acts of violence and (ii) develop interventions to manage or reduce that likelihood (Hart, 1998). This definition makes it clear that the process of risk assessment is not only concerned with the measurement of the likelihood of risk, but is also directly linked to risk reduction strategies. Importantly, risk assessment is defined as a ‘process’, which is further clarified by the English Care Program Approach (CPA; Department of Health, 1990), which states: “Risk assessment is not a one-off event, but an on-going process of assessment, review, and reassessment.” Violence risk assessment therefore can be seen as more than just the prediction of future violence, but also involving the development of strategies to reduce or manage that risk.
Sullivan, Ann, et al. “Reducing Restraints: Alternative to Restraints On An Inpatient Psychiatric Service-Utilizing Safe And Effective Methods To Evaluate And Treat The Violent Patient.” Psychiatric Quarterly 76.1 (2005): 51-65. Academic Search Premier. Web. 7 Dec. 2013.
Assaults in the healthcare setting are recognized as a growing problem. In considering the violence and aggression in mental health units, the larger issue of violence and aggression in mainstream culture must not be ignored. It has been observed that physical attack in a mental health unit setting appear to be happening more frequently while the attacks include patient-to patient and patient-to-staff aggressive behavior. Most commonly, reporting of aggressive behavior toward healthcare staff is noted; however, it cannot be completely explained by patient characteristics or staff member behaviors (Foster, Bowers, & Nijman, 2006). To improve patient control of aggression and violence, an organization must better define the management and reporting of this behavior, identify appropriate management programs and training, and evaluate the frequency and precipitants.
...(2004). Applying the principles of effective intervention to juvenile correctional programs. Corrections Today, 66(7), 26-29. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.proxy-library.ashford.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=4bd9d7f2-8ac5-42c6-a100-a2443eda9cbf@sessionmgr4002&vid=1&hid=4213
The Family-Centered approach to care is important to the delivery of behavioral health services for children and adolescents because it involves the families in their natural environments and allows the families to make decisions about their care. It promotes home and community based care by creating an equal partnership with the family to ensure optimal delivery of care at all levels (Brewer, McPherson, Magrab, & Hutchins, 1989). For children with special health care needs, such as mental or developmental disorders, coordinating care between all services and people can help to introduce flexible and reasonable ways of providing the maximum amount of care to children and families (Brewer, McPherson, Magrab, & Hutchins, 1989).
When it comes to young children being in different settings from a self-contained to an inclusion to a resource room, I don’t honestly think at this young age they notice a real difference. I see the students doing this as part of their daily routine when in an inclusion room going to a resource room then back to their inclusion classroom. Children who are in a self-contained classroom and are with mainstreamed into an inclusion classroom may or may not like it, depends on the child. I have seen both scenarios and I have learned that some children do resist change.
The author makes the assumption that the reader understands the core concepts in traditional family therapy and that whilst many writers influenced the development of family therapy, the major models were primarily structural family therapy, strategic family therapy, and Murray Bowen (Flaskas, 2010). Four powerful theories evolved to form the backbone of family therapy – general systems theory, cybernetics, communications theory and ecological theory. These were the major initial paradigms and this has been considered as first order family therapy where the therapist was viewed as pure observer and the understanding that a person’s behaviour is not determined only by one’s internal world, but acknowledges that the social context is a primary determinant. This shift in thinking has been illustrated as movement from autonomous self to relational self (Olsen et al, 1980; Rasheed et al, 2011).
Howell, James C., ed. Guide for Implementing the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious Violent and Chronic Juvenile Off
The program will aim to measure its performance and will assess for service capacity, flexibility and delivery of services. The clinic will provide client questionnaire cards after every consultation in order to better assess for client satisfaction. The client questionnaire will focus on quality of service, recommendations, and treatment satisfaction. The questionnaires will be reviewed weekly and be look upon as an important tool for client input and overall program improvement. Internally the team along with the supporting staff will conduct a self assessment by using the Behavioral Health Integration Capacity Assessment (BHICA) that is aim at measuring service delivery and will help evaluate the program’s ability to implement integrated
Anecdotal Notes Before Intervention • Adam has a habit of getting distracted by objects at this desk. He especially likes chewing and sucking on his pencil, erasers, and markers. He also doodles, both on paper and his skin. Moving his supplies away does not solve the issue because then he starts playing with his shoes or talking to a peer. • Adam becomes frustrated when he is not called on, despite raising his hand.