Summary/Response Essay – “Shooting an Elephant” In the essay titled, “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, he explains the culture of where he worked in Burma. He explains “a small incident” that he had to confront, while he was a police officer in Burma. A small crowd wants an elephant, who escaped from its cage, dead. They want to stop the elephant’s treacherous deeds. These include: the elephant killed a man, killed a cow, and it destroyed someone’s hut. Orwell goes out with a gun in search of the elephant, but doesn’t intend to shoot the elephant. When he goes out in search for the elephant, who has supposedly gone crazy, a crowd of many people follow him. The crowd wants him to shoot the elephant. In this essay, Orwell was challenged …show more content…
with a conflict of choosing whether to shoot the elephant or not to shoot the elephant. Finally he shoots the elephant, to avoid looking like a fool in front of the crowd. Since the author was the narrator, in the essay, he argues on whether he should shoot the elephant.
The author’s main point was when Orwell was faced with a conflict of whether he should shoot the elephant. He could have chosen to shoot the elephant and please the crowd or he could have chosen not to shoot the elephant, despite the crowd’s jeering effects. I don’t agree that the Orwell should have shot the elephant, because the elephant didn’t know all that he was doing was wrong, because he is an animal, who has no free will. The only reason Orwell shot it was so he didn’t look a fool. He quotes at the end of the essay after he shot the elephant, “And afterwards I often wondered whether anyone understood that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool” …show more content…
(132). First, one of the strengths of the text I have chosen, “Shooting an Elephant,” include that it helps me to respond to the story accurately, since there is more information in the essay.
Second, one the weaknesses of the text I chose entail that this essay is longer than most essays, which makes it a little more difficult to make a shorter summary, but if I only include the essential parts of the essay, it will make the summary with more quality. The author includes logos, pathos and ethos. First, he includes logos (logic). He put it in the essay when Orwell shoots the elephant. He shoots the elephant when he was asked to do it, since it was his job. Second, Orwell adds pathos (emotion), when he shoots the elephant. Orwell shoots the elephant five times, which includes a lot of emotion, because the elephant dies, slowly and painfully. It didn’t die even after three shots right through its body. Third, Orwell incorporates ethos (credibility). In the essay, Orwell explains an incident of his own, while he was a Burmese police officer. Orwell didn’t shoot the elephant once, not even twice, … but five times, right through the elephant’s guts, which is not surprising to me that he had to shoot it so many times, because Orwell declared, “I took my rile, an old 44 Winchester and much too small to kill an elephant, but I though the noise might scare him”
(127). The issue is should Orwell have shot the elephant? There are two sides to this question. First, yes, Orwell should have shot the elephant because the elephant was making a mess. It killed a man, killed a cow and destroyed someone’s hut. Second, no, Orwell should not have shot the elephant because he made an appeal to the people (crowd) fallacy by only doing it to please the crowd that wanted the elephant dead. I don’t believe that Orwell should have shot the elephant. Was he afraid? Well, yes, he was afraid of being humiliated by the people later on, because they already didn’t like him. So, he shot the elephant in order that he won’t look like a fool. He even quoted in the essay, “I did not want to shoot him” (130). Unfortunately he knows that he has to shoot it. At the end of paragraph 7, he cites, “I had got to shoot the elephant. To come all that way, rifle in hand, with two thousand people marching at my heels, and do nothing – no, that was impossible” (130). So, Orwell shoots the elephant in order to avoid looking a fool in front of the Burmese crowd and to please them, instead of going by his own instincts. Work cited: Orwell, George. “Shooting and Elephant.” New York: (1936), pp. 127,130, 132.
In “Shooting an Elephant” George Orwell is the officer of the town in the time period of Imperialism. In the beginning of the story Orwell shows the readers that despite him being an officer, he didn’t have much credibility. Orwell states, “When a nimble Burman tripped me up on the football field and the referee looked the other way, the crowd yelled with hideous laughter.” (p. 229.) Orwell also describes further the hate the people had for him in the town and mentions that the people continuously treated him in a disrespectful manner. Throughout the story it is reported to Orwell
Every day, each individual will look back on decisions he or she have made and mature from those experiences. Though it takes time to realize these choices, the morals and knowledge obtained from them are priceless. In George Orwell’s nonfictional essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, a young Orwell was stationed in Burma for the British imperial forces, tasked to deal with an elephant who destroyed various parts of the village Moulmein while its owner was away. Backed by second thoughts and a crowd of thousands, he finds himself shooting the elephant and reflecting that it was not justified; however, it was a choice pushed by his duty and the people. Written with a fusion of his young and old self’s outlook on shooting the elephant, Orwell’s essay is a sensational read that captivates his audience and leaves them questioning his decision.
Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant.” Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays. Ed. Sonia Orwell. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1950. 3-12.
“Shooting an Elephant” focuses on society by pressure. In “Shooting an Elephant,” Orwell is pressured by the native people to shoot and kill the elephant, even though the elephant is no longer harmless. In the beginning of the essay, the natives repeatedly attack Orwell every day. When the elephant goes insane, the natives go to Orwell for help. The natives were constantly pressuring Orwell as he said, “For it is the condition of his rule that he shall spend his life in trying to impress the “natives,” and so in every crisis he has got to do what the “natives” expect of him” (Orwell par. 7). Orwell is pressured by society to do the opposite of what he feels is morally
When he finial find the elephant Orwell say “I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him.” But when he lays his eyes on the crowd he changes his stance to “but I did not want to shoot the elephant.”(Orwell 199). He felt guilty for shooting the elephant when he describe that the elephant worth more alive than dead, but despite the many reason not to shoot the elephant, he took a shot. Orwell describes “when I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the kick …I fired again into the same spot…I fired a third time. That was the shot that did it for him.”(199) the shooting of the elephant represent the Burma people trying to stay alive and over powering by the
Orwell shot the elephant not to save the people in the village but for his own benefits. Fearing what the people might think if he did not shoot it. In paragraph nine he weighs the options of shooting it or not. Reasoning if he did not shoot it and got trampled they would laugh at his defeat. Thankful that the coolie man got killed so he could shoot the elephant. The guilt would be easier to deal with since someone was killed. Shooting the elephant was not necessary, when he thinks about the owner who would be coming and how the elephant’s terror had ended already the only thing Orwell was thinking about was the people laughing.
The first text by George Orwell entitled, “Shooting an Elephant” shows how peer pressure greatly influenced him in making his final decision. While George made his way to where the elephant was spotted he stated, “I glanced round at the crowd that had followed me. I was an immense crowd, two thousand at the least and growing every minute.” (Orwell, Shooting an Elephant, page 1322) With two thousand people around wanting him to shoot and kill an “innocent looking” would be peer pressure to say the least. Orwell then states, “I did not want to shoot the elephant” (Orwell, Shooting an Elephant, page 1323) However, in the end, with the large crowd drooling over the excitement of seeing an elephant being shot, Orwell shot the elephant. Technically the elephant did go on a rampage, killing a man in the process, but now the elephant had calmed down. The reason the elephant was in suc...
The essay “Shooting an Elephant,” was written by George Orwell. Orwell was a British author best known for his essays and novels. In “Shooting an Elephant,” the title essay of his 1950 collection, Orwell is a British Police Officer in Lower Burma. After an elephant comes rampaging through the village in must, killing an Indian man, Orwell is looked upon to take care of the problem. The intense scene causes Orwell to make a crucial decision, reflecting on the vicious imperialism with the military in Burma during this time. The author portrays his feelings through the theme of the narrative with feelings such as, guilt, hate, and pressured.
George Orwell is a novel writer, born in India and have only spent five days there. Ida Mabel Limouzin, his mother, brought him and his sister too England while his father stayed in India. The novel Shooting an Elephant, that George wrote, took place in the bottom of Burma in the middle of Moulmein. The story is about George Orwell hesitating to kill an Elephant that has killed a man. All George planned to do was to test the elephant to see if it really meant any harm. George feels pressured by the crowd following him because they expect him to kill the elephant. He eventually made the decision to kill the elephant to make the mad crowd happy and plus he doesn’t want to fail at doing his job. Throughout the story George Orwell exert many Metaphor
A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.
In this story ,Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives presenting imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals. He is using the elephant as a symbol of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village. He uses a large and very powerful animal to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism.. In doing so he leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. Orwell?s moral values are challenged in many different ways, ironically enough while he too was the oppressor. He is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If he lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the...
...he elephant, and the elephant, who painfully dies, focuses the reader's attention on the suffering that imperialism causes for both parties. If the shooting was justified, Orwell's argument would have been immensely weakened.
In the last paragraph of Orwell’s essay, there had been two men that had feelings on the shooting of the elephant.
He describes, “I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro” (60). He is dealing with the internal conflicts of who he should align with: himself, the British, or the Burmese. If he were to acknowledge his beliefs and align with himself, he could be the start of an uprise. Surely, others would follow. He even confirms his “thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny” and says, “Ask any Anglo-Indian official, if you catch him off duty,” referring to the hatred of the English empire (58). By expressing his dislike for the British, Orwell is finally attempting to stand up for his beliefs. The fact that his character is unable to execute his beliefs, though, highlights him trying to not look foolish in the presence of others. Clearly, he is in an unbearable circle of self-deprecation and doubt. By the end of the narrative, Orwell’s character regrets his decision to shoot the elephant. This ultimately represents Orwell’s uncertainty as he goes through life. He, like all of us, is struggling to predict which path is the best for him to go down as he ventures through his existence. Because of this, his actions for shooting the elephant are justified. He is just trying to accomplish all that he can while simultaneously dealing with his own questions of identity. This allows Orwell to be seen as a humble individual who is just trying
Orwell?s extraordinary style is never displayed well than through ?Shooting an Elephant,? where he seemingly blends his style and subject into one. The story deals with a tame elephant that all of a sudden turns bad and kills a black Dravidian coolie Indian. A policeman kills this elephant through his conscience because the Indians socially pressurized him greatly. He justified himself as he had killed elephant as a revenge for coolie.