Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about making school lunch better
Essay on nutritional school lunches
Nutrition at schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays about making school lunch better
School Lunch Having to eat school lunch is not the best. Eating school lunch is like eating in prison. People may think that eating off school campus is a bad idea but it's not. Although some students will come back late for school, they will have enough energy to get through the day. If they are to come back late then only the students that come back on time should be allowed to leave the second time. Many students ask their friends for their food during lunch because they don't get enough. They need to be provided with more food if they want students to be full during the day. Giving students seconds will be a good thing because the school won't have to throw out any food. Students will also be happy with the quantity of food they get.
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
For the majority of high school students having the option to go home for lunch or to go somewhere to eat would be the ultimate dream. High school students do not think about the dangers and worry that open campus lunch would cause for staff and parents. They do not think about the small sum of students who would spend that time doing drugs or making messes at local businesses. There would also be an amount of students who would not return, or they may be late returning to school due to traffic at fast food places. Faculty would also have the fret of an increase of car accidents caused from the limited time students would have to go wherever and get back before their next class. On the other hand, students would learn responsibilities and time management. Parents would be forced to give their children money to eat out. Along with the money on their school lunch accounts, or they would be apart of the free lunch school program. Schools cannot have open campus lunches
Every student in all grades were able to leave during the time a scheduled class did not occupy. (Saslow, Linda. “Schools split on “open campus” NYtimes.com). Open campus lunch is the allowance of high school students to leave off the premises to a local restaurant for the duration of lunch. School districts in America have opposed open campus lunch benefits due to common knowledge and concern for potential student endangerment. A reason why schools should change educational environment would be to accommodate what students’ need to create comfortable working conditions. Old school methods included the repetitive process of helping students through daily material every day of the week with one break. Off campus school lunch was an unknown factor to high schools back
But, if they do not like the food served, they won’t eat so they starve for the rest of the school day, which can lead to not focusing on class, feeling sick, and eating too much at dinner. The final reason our school should get a new lunch menu is because there are many problems with the food. For example, many students say the food is cold, fake, and disgusting. Students, Jordyn Gilbert and Leah Gelik, found mold on the lettuce in the salad.
According to the Journal of Law and Health schools that have not banned junk food have had an increase in students more excited to learn because of the sugar count unhealthy foods. Looking at the evidence regarding school lunches from the USDA (United States Department of Agriculture), students need equal grain and protein proportions to have a healthy daily diet, and over the course of 5 years schools that don't have a healthy lunch program have had their students overall GPA almost completely equivalent to the schools that have had the healthy lunch program. Although having tremendously unhealthy school lunches may not harm your GPA it can immensely harm your health. Lots of average students health are in danger just because of unhealthy school lunches, it is very necessary that schools realize that a healthy lunch program is always a beneficial option. Scientists have found that children who have healthier breakfast and lunch get better grades and have increased brain power. Some evidence points to unhealthy food but healthy food is always the answer in an effective school community. Sometimes unhealthy food is cheaper and tastes better but it can be very costly to your health especially as a
healthy than what is served at school. Alisha Farris describes in her article "What gets packed in a lunchbox can be just as unhealthy as what 's served at the cafeteria" a study conducted that compared student 's lunches from home with what is served at school. In the study, the conductors looked through 1,300 school and parent-packed lunches of pre-k and kindergarten students in three Virginia schools. They found that packed lunches contained more calories, fat, carbohydrates, sugar, vitamin C and iron. These lunches contained less protein, sodium, fiber, and other essential nutrients compared to the National School Lunch Program meals. Sixty-one percent of lunches from home also had deserts while school lunches had none. Snacks such as chips
The only way anyone would be allowed off campus is if they had a note from their parents or they called in with an exceptional reason, which is a custom rule in many schools around the nation. The part that is unfair is that no one is even allowed off campus at lunch. This is the part that many students object to and the reason the rule is so dreaded. Some say that they need closed campus for safety. In an article from the New York Times, Mr. Ivan Toper, the principal at White Plains High School, says, “the cafeteria was big enough to accommodate the students remaining on campus.” Mr. Toper goes on to say and, in this case, side with concerning parents, ''Your concerns with their safety against their need for freedom and responsibility.” Some big schools with huge safety issues may very well need the rule because of possible violence within the school and sometimes people come onto campus that aren't students. Another reason schools want to enforce the rule is to reduce car accidents during lunch. Many students are at the age where they can drive and some are still at a young age where they walk. If people who work and takes their cars or even walk to the nearest food stop, what makes people think students couldn't handle it? If anyone thinks that a closed campus rule would stop these people from being rebellious, they are highly mistaken. The morality of this is most people won't have school spirit even with closed campus; they'll be too busy dreading the fact that they have to stay at
We should not have longer school lunches. Longer school lunches has a great impact on everyone in school, it makes this issue worse. Students need what is best for them, which they already have. Short school lunches helps improve learning skills and lets students comprehend better. Our lunches are good as they are right now. We should not allow students to leave during school lunch.
One reason why we should have longer lunch is that students can catch up on any missed work. If a student missed a day of school they can
Sets up the students to the risk of starving since they have nothing else to eat. If they do take a lunch, there’s not hardly anything on their trays. Portion sizes are continuing to decrease and may seem like every school year it becomes worse. With all of the schools serving a healthier meal course for lunch should have been thought out a lot out more. So far none of this has worked out for anyone’s parents and students are not happy that there better off packing a lunch.
Unfortunately, a few won’t.” However, these possibilities are present every school day whether off campus lunch is an option or not. There is nothing holding kids back from leaving school whenever they want other than the consequences that they will face later on, so it shouldn’t be any different if an off campus lunch program is instituted. A main factor that is present alongside kids not returning to school is students getting hurt: “Regulating the safety of the students is one of the most important considerations a school must face on a day-to-day basis… the notion of letting kids leave the grounds for lunch is something that fills parents and educators alike with a strong sense of trepidation.” Nevertheless, school traffic would be just as busy, if not less busy, when students are leaving and returning for lunch than it is when going to or leaving school because it is only a small fraction of the student body that will meet all of the criteria and actually be able to drive. Students who do not meet certain criteria based on grades, attendance, and disciplinary records wouldn’t be able to participate in off campus lunch also lessening the number of students. If schools are concerned about having kids leave campus who are not allowed to, then a system of identification, or passes, for the students who qualify can be given to the students that have earned the
It is very unfair that students don’t have the right to get off campus lunch. They give us bad school lunches. Students get bored of being there here at school.
Why is this a problem? Cafeteria food is often cheap, bought in bulk, high in calories, malnutritious, and microwaved. Student polls and opinions prove this. Therefore, this leads to a suggestion: Healthier, tastier foods and a better, more advanced lunch system should be implemented. First of all, students aren’t motivated to eat unhealthy, not-tasty food.
Although schools could make it to where healthy foods are the only thing they eat during lunch, healthy foods won’t give as much nutrients as junk foods may. Students get regularly around 20 to 30 minutes to eat their lunch. There have been studies that found that students who get less than 20 minutes to eat their lunch, compared to students who got at least 25 minutes in lunch, got 13 percent less of their entrees and 12 percent less vegetables because they weren’t able to consume their whole lunch. If schools were to have longer lunch periods students would have more time to consume all of their food in order for them to make it through their day without falling asleep in class and being able to stay focused. Wouldn’t you want extra time to socialize with your friends after lunch? The time that students have during lunch to eat is rarely enough time to get their fruits, vegetables, grains, protein and dairy that they need to get them through the
It’s time to get rid of cafeteria food. The principal has a point about not eating outside of school,but eating outside school could give us better food,and also more decisions on what to eat.