Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of the holocaust
Theisis of schindlers list
The schindler's list analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of the holocaust
SCHINDLERS LIST
Schindler’s List was directed by Stephen Spielberg in 1993, Liam Neeson, Ben Kinglsey, And Ralph Fiennes were some of the top actors in this film. The film was filmed at several locations in Poland and in Jerusalem, Israel. Spielberg directed the movie to educate people on the Holocaust. He felt it was a story that needed to be told. Schindler’s List is a movie that follows the life of a Nazi by the name of Oskar Schindler in the span of 1939 to 1945, which was from the beginning of World War II to the end of the Nazi Schindler became famous by saving over 1000 Jews from death during the Holocaust. The film describes anguish and horror that The Jews encountered during this time in history. The movie also explores the
…show more content…
When the Jews had to leave their things at the station, they were told by the SS soldiers that they would be sent, but instead their belongings wen to a warehouse for the SS Economics and Administrative Main Office. They would make the Jews sort through the belongings and if there was a jeweler, he would have to evaluate the value of the jewelry. It was common for the SS to confiscate the belongings of the Jewish people. There is a scene where the Jews are all packed on a train and are dying for water because of the heat. Schindle ask for permission from Goeth to call out the fire brigade, to cool down the Jews and give them water to drink. Schindler made sure that all the wagons got sprinkled and even gave the person on charge of transport liquor and meat to give them water when the train stops at a station. Goeth told Schindler that it a cruelty to give them hope while they are on their way to death. Another humiliation that he Jews had to endure that was shown to us in the move was the die Gesundheitaktion that means health action. The purpose of this health action was to make room for new Plaszow workers, so they were going to separate the old and the ill. To do this process everyone had to run around completely naked it was very
On their way to the concentration camp, a German officer said, “’There are eighty of you in the car… If anyone is missing, you’ll all be shot like “dogs” ”’ (Wiesel 24). This shows that the Germans compared the Jews to dogs or animals, and that the German have no respect towards the Jews. Arrived at the concentration camp, the Jews were separated from their friends and family. The first thing of the wagon, a SS officer said, “’Men to the left! Women to the right!”’ (Wiesel 29). After the separation, Eliezer saw the crematories. There he saw “’a truck [that] drew close and unloaded its hold: small children, babies … thrown into the flames.” (Wiesel 32). This dehumanize the Jews, because they were able to smell and see other Jews burn in the flames. Later on the Jew were forced to leave their cloth behind and have been promise that they will received other cloth after a shower. However, they were force to work for the new cloth; they were forced to run naked, at midnight, in the cold. Being force to work for the cloth, by running in the cold of midnight is dehumanizing. At the camp, the Jews were not treated like human. They were force to do thing that was unhuman and that dehumanized
Jews, a religious group of people originating from Israel, have lived in Europe, including Germany, for about 1500 years (Carr; Shyovitz). As Jews moved away from Israel, agriculture was no longer their main form of breadwinning. They have become more educated and many acquired skilled professions. In Europe, Christians were not allowed to lend money and the Jews have become the main money lenders. The knowledge, skills, and money lending abilities that Jews possessed allowed them to become extremely prosperous. During 1000-1500, most Rulers in Europe were Christians, who disliked the Jews (Carr). Although they lived peacefully with their neighbors, Christians blamed
The movie starts out in a Jewish home, where a Jewish family is celebrating the Sabbath. Candles are lit while songs are sung, and when the Jews leave the house, the candles slowly burn out. The German forces have just defeated the Polish, and now the Jews are being forced out of their homes. They are reporting to the train station where they register their names, and then are shipped off to Krakow. In Krakow the Jews are gathered together in the ghetto where they are forced to live in overcrowded conditions. The Judenrat, a Jewish council, organizes the Jews into working groups according to their abilities. Oskar Schindler, a German business man, visits the ghetto to talk to Itzhak Stern, a Jew who owns a pot-making factory. Oskar and Itzhak make a deal in which Schindler will take over the factory but Stern will be the plant manager. The Jews are once again sorted according to their education and working ability, those who cannot work are sent to extermination camps while some of those who are able to, reported to Schindler’s factory. The Nazi’s decide that all of the Jews should be confined in forced labor camps. Schindler, who is now starting to feel some empathy and responsibility towards his workers, volunteers to confine his workers in his factory.
Everybody’s head had to get shaved. After everybody got to get concentration camps, they were forced to go into the hard labor immediately. They were awake early in the morning and had to work until they said stop working.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Steven Spielberg’s heart wrenching film ‘Schindler’s List’ hinges on protagonist, war-profiteer Oskar Schindler and his gradual revelation in which he realises the true horror faced by the Jews throughout WWII under the Nazi regime. Schindler at first is wholly indifferent to the suffering of the Jewish people, however as the film progresses we see his true nature revealed. He is not a cold and uncaring capitalist, but a compassionate gentle soul. Spielberg perfectly presents Oskar Schindler and his complicated and difficult journey in becoming the good Samaritan we see towards the end of the film, Spielberg does so in a way in which adds to the enjoyment and appreciation of the film experience overall.
When a Jewish girl living in Krakow under fabricated papers visits Schindler, and she asks that he hire her parents to work in his factory. He is furious with the girl and she runs from him, fearing for her life and her liberty. Schindler expresses his rage at Stern, whom he accuses of giving refuge to Jews in the "haven" of a factory. Schindler is not angry at the idea ...
feels he must turn his factory into a refuge for Jews. By doing so he
During the occupation of the Krakow Ghetto, Jews were being separated into “essential” and “non-essential” categories. Individuals selected for the “non-essential” category were to be shipped off to concentration camps. Originally completed by a Jewish accountant recruited by Schindler, “non-essential” workers were being designated as “essential” workers for Schindler’s business. Realizing he was unknowingly hiring unfit employees, Schindler berated the accountant for devising the plan and jeopardizing his profits. This incident is where Schindler is faced with his first ethical dilemma; by taking away the employment of unfit individuals, he is sentencing them to certain death, but if he allows them to remain, he is endangering future profits. By allowing the unqualified employees to stay, viewers can see a shift in his inner workings, and also a light is shown on his humanity. Furthermore, his reputation for forgiveness and mercy begins to bud, as does his slow separation from Nazi Party
From the first moment of Schindler's List to the very last, you will be amazed by the strength and resilience of the Jewish people during this horrendous time in their history. You will witness and feel their pain and horror in this very graphic, yet painfully true story. Steven Speilberg deserves all of the awards this film had brought him. It is a time in history we should never forget and pray that we will never witness again.
Schindler’s List had a great effect on me personally. I thought that Thomas Keneally did an excellent job in making the reader feel the events of the time. Perhaps what I found to be most interesting in Schindler’s List is a question of morality. I began asking myself the question, would I be as heroic as Oskar Schindler if I were in his shoes? I think that this is exactly what Keneally wanted us to do; he wanted us to look at ourselves and analyze what’s inside. Historically, I find Schindler’s List to be very important not only because it is tells of a shameful time in western civilization, but also because the events that took place in the novel occurred only yesterday. After all fifty years is almost nothing in historical terms. Perhaps the novel’s greatest strength is this feeling that the events that transpired in Schindler’s List are in fact modern history.
The pointless sadism of the other Nazis never occurred to him. But as the death toll and dangers grew, he became increasingly concerned with preserving the lives of his workers, going as far as to spend his entire fortune and risk his own life. He could keep nearly all his prisoners alive in his factory while also resisting the Nazi war effort by producing faulty shells. Schindler himself believes—ironically—in the opposite: that war brings out the worst in
This film was very successful in achieving that purpose. To being with, Spielberg had a clear goal of what emotions he had about the subject in this movie. He wanted it to be “an act of remembrance for the public record” and a legacy of Jewish culture that would benefit the community as a whole. Spielberg takes over three hours to accomplish his goal. He uses the time to focus on what individual, Oskar Schindler, and to show the Holocaust from Oskar’s perspective. Spielberg does not use trite appeals such as scenes of Hitler to conjure up fear in the audience. Instead, he approaches the subject matter in a very honest way. There is a sense of sincerity throughout the film. The immense amount of character development in Schindler’s List allows for Spielberg to very effectively communicate his feelings about the subject matter to the masses as was his
Granted, they are both about the Holocaust they capture the essence pretty well. The similarities of the movies are both are both saving the lives of Jews and follow Jews during the heart of the event and the liberation of the Jews at the end of the war. It is incredibly sad to think that this event happened and no one tried to put a stop to it especially the Germans who stood by and let it go on. Both movies are done in good taste and really give great scenes of what occurred and how they occurred. They both crafted an essence of how real all this was and how Germans would kill anyone that was not necessary to them. Like in the Pianist where they raid a house in the ghetto and threw a Jewish handicapped man out the window just because they believed he was useless to society. In Schindler’s List they started to pull the kids off the trains because again they did not believe that they could work and they had no point during this time. Both movies were great and depicted the time period perfectly. They differ in the essence of one follows a Jewish man on the run from persecution and is hiding throughout the movie while Schindler’s List follows a Nazi supporter trying to help the Jews survive persecution. It gave two different views on the Holocaust, which is something you do not really see much of nowadays. Most Holocaust movies are from the view of the Jewish on the run from the Germans. The black and white of the movie gave it an old
Some on the way the Jews are portrayed in how they are “...stereotypically greedy, weak, or feminized...” in some aspects (Wisniewski). There are also controversies surrounding the film. Some have “...critiqued for sentimentality, for turning the Holocaust into an entertainment, and Schindler, a Nazi, into a figure of sympathy.” (Mattia). Spielberg “...was also criticised for focusing on the 1,200 saved, rather than the six million murdered, for effectively deforming history and giving the Holocaust a 'happy ending'” (Mattia). Even other directors have criticized this film. The director of another Holocaust film, Claude Lanzmann, criticized the film “...for showing the Holocaust through the eyes of a German, for turning horror into Hollywood melodrama.” (Mattia). It is true that the film “...does struggle... with the ethical question of how to depict or represent a human catastrophe that continues to defy understanding or explanation.” (Mattia). Which is expected out of a film about the Holocaust. Though, this film is not only about the way the story is structured. The film “... works not only on the intellect but also on the heart, to affect, through artistic choices, an emotional response.” (Mattia). While the film has had some added criticisms in its near 25-year lifetime, the film has stood the test of time to be one of the greatest films
In most cases, when both a film version and book version appear of the same title, the book version is far superior. Think The Hobbit, the Harry Potter series, nearly every Stephen King novel. But in the case of Schindler’s List, by Thomas Keneally and film by Steven Spielberg, the film exceeds the book. Why? Because cinematic techniques and visual symbolism enabled Spielberg to make creative choices that would be impossible to achieve in book form.