Mountains are significant when calling a person a scapegoat because, in the early days, villages used mountains to throw goats off the cliffs. They used goats for a perfect sacrifice due to them being innocent, helpless animals. The people in the villages would put all their anger and hatred on that goat, then perfectly sacrifice that goat by throwing it off a cliff. Marie Antoinette, an easy mark, has been called a scapegoat because she is used because of her power, young age. A scapegoat is a person who keeps on getting blamed for the actions and mistakes of others. Scapegoats are people who are usually young and can not defend themselves or people who are in the lower class of others that can be an easy target. Someone who can represent …show more content…
a scapegoat could be someone who grows up in a family that gets continuously blamed for actions that they did not do. Their family’s description for what people call them are people “who cannot be "wrong”, meaning they will blame their children for their mistakes and bad actions (Matthew 1). This can produce a hardship for a child’s life that they will reach a point in their life that they can not handle this hatred shed across them. This could relate to the earlier days because they used goats as a perfect sacrifice knowing that they are not capable of handling the intense hatred being thrown on them. Therefore, the goat would get to the maximum limit that it could handle, then finally reach the point to run off a cliff. This can be literal or it can be metaphorical when talking in the sense of reaching maximum limitation towards the hatred of others. People who experience this profound time in their life can say it was their time in their life where they“reach a tipping point”(Hunt 2). Meaning they can not resist the pain meaning sometimes this can risk them taking their own life or this can lead to other side effects to this profound hardships of the intensive pain. Marie Antoinette was the fifteenth and the second to last child of Maria Theresa, the Empress of Austria and the Holy Roman Emperor of Francis 1.
Since Marie was born into a high-class family, this would also make her noble. Later on, Marie Antoinette married this fine gentleman named Louis the sixteenth. Louis the sixteenth was also indeed wealthy which kept Marie still noble. Marie was expected to “perform as a lady of the French royal family”(Marie Antoinette biography). However, we soon later found out that Marie Antoinette became”vivacious, outgoing, and bold, a social butterfly who loved gambling, parting, and extravagant fashions”(Marie Antoinette biography). As a result, this made the people in France turn away from Marie, and she soon became hated. The flaw that came to her was”courage is going to fail me”(Marie Antoinette biography). This means that she does not believe that courage will be by her side and that she will not be able to reach the top as she was before. Since she started gambling this lead to her courage to be failed. People started to hate her which led her to be remembered for,” being overthrown by French revolutionaries and being publicly guillotined after the abolition of the monarchy”(Life of the Week: Marie Antoinette). This is significant because this was her falling action also known as her downfall. Her climax was that she was noble and highly respected, but now she became hated and she was executed by her own people. As a result, she had a …show more content…
flaw which was that courage was going to fail her which shows she is a tragic hero. She started off noble and high, then realized she had a flaw which was her courage.This meant that she would not be able to rise back up to her old self of being the noble, high person that she was before. Success throughout a person’s life is key when dealing with either someone being a tragic hero or not. Marie Antoinette grew up in a wealthy family which led her early childhood to start off as being successful. Later on, she was presented to the public "as a youthful goddess of beauty and virtues"(Barker 2). And who also was the "bride of the Dauphin"( Barker 2 ). With this huge encounter of her being the bride of the Dauphin and being known as the goddess of the youthful and virtues; this was significant to her success. The Dauphin was Louis the sixteenth which made her success rate replenish greatly. She was said to be the one who "entered the heavens, as the bride of Hercules: Born high above all ordinary thrones, to her belongs all the radiance of Divinity"(Barker 2). As a result, people saw her as the peak of the gods, that they should honor her. This huge power led her to not only fame but also for leading her to her success. Her success was not for her wealth, but it was also for how much people respected her and looked upon her. She became so wealthy that she became a huge gambler, and went and bought the most elegant fashion statements out there yet. Later on, she became passionate when she saw suffering in the world. Her biggest phrase was"let them eat cake." Which was a huge line that later became famous. She realized that people who were not as wealthy as she was suffering through the real world by starving. So that phrase "let them eat cake" meant to give bread to the poor. Then again, this was a strike to the public, making them honor her more and more. As a result, her early childhood made her a success that true reason why she was so respected/honor now in her adulthood. Therefore, this makes her a true target for being a tragic hero. Marie Antoinette did not have a downfall but instead to turn out to be flawless.
The reason for this statement was because of how young she was. Marie Antoinette was young when she was introduced to this powerful wealth in her family. She was presented to the public "as a youthful goddess of beauty and virtues"(Barker 2). Since she was young she was in the youthful stage in her life. This means that people respected her so much due to her being young and so powerful to their society. Therefore, people also thought that she entered the heavens, as the bride of Hercules: Born high above all ordinary thrones, to her belongs all the radiance of Divinity"(Barker 2). Yes, she lived in the "luxurious lifestyle," but that does not mean that she is not innocent (Ferris & Young 1). See people jump to conclusions that a person who has all the money is immediately guilty. But in reality, people need to see the bigger picture when it comes to a fourteen-year-old young woman. She was receiving "hatred of the people for the queen is provided by the Diamond Necklace Affair"(Barker 4). People directly targeted this young woman for actions because they knew that they could not target someone who was a nobody. So instead they target Marie due to her wealth. They knew if they targeted her that the whole public would know and that the public would agree. Therefore, her luxurious lifestyle would crumble by false information. But everybody saw her as "a young girl asleep in her comfortable bed,
her long, straight blond hair tousled and her face peaceful and innocent"(Ferris & Young 1). Therefore, people saw her as an innocent girl that they can easily choose to target her and to make her life crumbled. As a result, a tragic hero is someone who has a higher ranked life but than later on in his/her life has a flaw. And then a scapegoat is someone who is an easy target that everybody can put their hatred on. As a result, Marie Antoinette did not have a flaw but instead was receiving hatred from others. Because she was young and innocent, Marie Antionette can easily be described as a scapegoat and not as a tragic hero. Since Marie Antoinette was not a person who had a flaw, she became to be a perfect scapegoat. A scapegoat is someone was is an easy target that others put their hatred directly on that individual. Marie Antoinette was in her youth age that people discovered that she was young and innocent. Innocent meaning in the case that she was young, therefore she could not defend herself from others. There were times in her life that people put direct hatred on her because they could not put it on anybody else. Marie Antoinette grew up in a powerful, wealthy family which led to her being a scapegoat. She was introduced to power and wealth at such a young age that she got carried away by her wealth. She became a big gambler that always blew her money right down the drain. She also bought the most elegant fashions out there yet that no one could ever avoid. But then again, people saw her a goddess of the youth and virtue, so why would they put all their hatred on her? The answer is because she was so young that people knew that they could blame someone with that much known to their society that people would believe that statement which can lead to someone’s life to crumble. Therefore, that is exactly what happened to Marie Antoinette’s life because people released information about her that was not true which led to her life to crumble.
Why is it that we as human beings feel the need to blame someone for every negative situation, which occurs? If we really look at the situation with any great depth, we may discover that an almost endless amount of things may be 'blamed' for the tragedy blaming an individual is pointless - only fate can really be blamed.
Scapegoat is defined as one that bears the blame for others or one that is the object of irrational behavior. Even though in retrospect the scapegoat has in some way failed in their own goals, we use scapegoats because it’s easy. When we don’t succeed in a particular goal or feel we are going to embarrass ourselves the person we blame is the person we assume to be the weakest. The weakest person is usually different from the norm and not the most popular they dance to their own beat.
...ult to choose her growing environment, and also she was influenced by Louis XVI, as I mentioned above. Marie Antoinette was just viewed as a traitor, because she support Austria instead. She will definitely support her brother, because he was her family. French people couldn't forgave her. After she married, she need time to get use to her new life, but her husband didn't stop her to spend that much money, because he himself did that too, so their behaviors slowly became a cause of French Revolution.
...asy scapegoat because nobody ever knew what the Arabs were doing with their money, which made the explanation hard to prove for or against. In reality, these steep market fluctuations weren’t the cause of mysterious money moving in the Middle East but only a scapegoat as the Wall Street bankers often had no idea what moved the markets.
Some of them could have even been used as scapegoats. Yet how does one become a scapegoat? Could someone out there have that much hatred and anger to blame one person for the faults of many? Is the need for blame significant? Does desire lead to hatred and evil?
The last years of Marie Antoinette’s life was written as a tragedy. She was taken as a
I wonder why. Maybe because “scapegoating” speaks to the paranoia in all of us: the anti-immigrant or the anti-minority, the bigot or the conformist—the side of us that fear change because we have gotten too comfortable in our own little world. Maybe because it also speaks to our self-denial, to stick to such ideology that somebody else is responsible for our failure and misfortune, instead of facing our own individual responsibility and moral obligation. I truly do not understand such ideology; however, one thing I have fully understood—the society makes it seem as if embracing change can be pretty
Although, There is child who is locked up in a closet like room, and everyone knows that the child is there suffering. The reasoning behind the knowledge and unwillingness to help the child, “...They all understand that their happiness, the beauty of their city... depend wholly on this child’s abominable misery.” Although this child is suffering the society as a whole depends on it’s misery. Just like with the three children the society maintains peace through a scapegoat. In Mcdonald’s article expresses that a scapegoat is chosen at random and everyone unites against it. McDonald summarizes the idea of mimetic violence and scapegoating,” While mimetic violence divides each against each, scapegoating violence unites all against one. Thus the destruction of the scapegoat produces a genuinely unifying experience… Ultimately this ritualized violence becomes the basis for religion, mythology, kingship, and the establishment of those differences in a role that are so essential to bring about internal peace.” Based on the text that this mimetic or ritualized violence turns into religion, mythology, etc, it suggests that it has happened throughout human history and will continue to do so. Again this mimetic violence eventually leads to
When lies are taken as the truth by scapegoating it can kill innocent people and have adverse effects on the other community members.
Scapegoats appear abundant in the world today. Political parties and businesses consistently seem to find a person or small group that takes the blame for serious issues. This can cause problems and arguments that sometimes lead to something serious like wars. Scapegoats are just a way of passing blame off of oneself and on to others, just so reputations can remain intact. This sort of attitude shows how lethargic the world has become, where people don’t even take responsibility for their actions. Many people from older generations complain about how all the new generations become too comatose and unwilling to take on their own actions and indiscretions. With attitudes like this, peace will never be found and will inevitably lead to conflict. Something must be done to stem the flow of scapegoats which have been utilized far too much over time.
Other than the main theme of tradition, Jackson portrays the idea of scapegoating through choosing of one towns member to be stoned for the wellbeing of the town, mainly as a sacrifice for better weather for the next harvest. “A wrong is undressed when retribution overtakes its redresser.” (Poe 226) Poe shows the scapegoating through Montresor from the form of revenge to make amends for his troubled past, and that Fortunato was the scapegoat. World War 2, the mass genocide of Jews under Hitler’s regime is the ultimate description of what scapegoating truly is and that “The Lottery” is a perfect correlation of WW2’s scapegoat with the Jews, but in a smaller, very smaller form. That although the selection and murdering of the town a folk once a year could be for the next harvest, or it could be for the gods for grace of the sins of the town. Why does this type of activity or the quest of the removal of fear, regret, and sin is always used by humans, and is always used by the last resort, maybe not always in killing, but in public shaming? It seems that the people that organize and use this tool have a form of deception lased around the implementation of
Scapegoating is really a thing because for example in the “Crucible” by…..when Reverend Parris went into to woods and walked up on Mary Warren and the girls dancing around a fire then finds Mary Warren
In fact, many aristocrats and other members of the royal family did not find her common blood and strange customs to be in any way unique or charming. She was gossiped endlessly about. It didn't help that she was extremely interested in democratic philosophy and enlightenment, two concepts that were used by revolutionaries later on in history.
than ourselves, we try to find a scapegoat to get us out of the mess
When something went wrong during the French Revolution, the people in charge always tried to find a scapegoat. Many times women were used as their scapegoat.