Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elizabethan England social structure
Elizabethan England social structure
Adnantages of the court systems uk
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elizabethan England social structure
Elizabethan England Government
In the late 1500s, there came period in time where the country of England had gone through an era called Elizabethan England. During this time, the ruler of England was Queen Elizabeth I. She's considered to be have been England's best monarch. During her reign, the government was described as a personal monarch. This is because Queen Elizabeth's personality played a role in determining the style, intensity, and efficiency of the government. The government of Elizabethan England was centralized, well organized, and very efficient.
The government, during this time, was known to be centralized. Being a monarchy, England was under one ruler, their monarch Queen Elizabeth I. Although she couldn't do everything
…show more content…
on her own, Queen Elizabeth was still a very powerful woman. "This is the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes," a quote from Queen Elizabeth when she was throned. She was in control of many different decisions dealing with her country. This included the country's religion, when parliament came to sit and what they discussed, if and when they went into war, education, their welfare, and even what food the people could eat and the clothes they could wear. Another one of her responsibilities was to choose the men who would help her govern. When it came to passing laws, no law could be passed without the consent of Queen Elizabeth. If anyone were to break these laws or disobey the Queen, they would be punished. It was against the law to disobey the Queen's orders, and the penalty was death. Even though Queen Elizabeth was the overall ruler of England, she governed her country with the help of two very important groups of people: the Privy Council and Parliament. The laws held in Elizabethan England were only able to with the approval and consent of the Queen. The Queen had the ability to make laws, such as the Royal Proclamations, but when passing other laws, she couldn't do it alone. To pass other laws, the Queen would have to create a bill and send it to Parliament. Parliament had consisted of the House of Lords and the House of Commons, or the Upper and Lower classes. In total, 438 laws had been passed. Out of all the laws, some considered the 1559 Queen Elizabeth's Second Act of Supremacy was the most important. It took away royal policy that was approved during Queen Mary's reign. Although the government was well centralized, it was also quite organized.
The Privy Council was a group of advisers for the Queen. Their main priority was to give numerous opinions to Queen Elizabeth, and she would decide on the situation at hand. They also were in charge of taking care of routine administrations, such as matters of religion, military, the Queen's security, economics, and the people's welfare. The Council had to deal with national and individual interests, issue proclamations in Queen Elizabeth's name, and supervise law and enforcement. While there was the Privy Council, there was also Parliament to help govern. Parliament was a group of representatives whose main purpose was to deal with financial matters, such as taxation and giving the Queen money. Parliament was also used for passing laws both private and public. Public laws applied to everyone while private laws only applied to certain individuals. Parliament could undo laws only if both houses, the Upper House and the Lower House, agreed with them three times and the Queen had also agreed. Parliament could also advise the Queen, though, she was never interested in hearing their advice. The Queen once said to Parliament, "Was I not born in this realm? Were my parents born in any foreign country? Is there any cause I should alienate myself from being careful over this country? Is not my kingdom …show more content…
here?" The efficiency of the government was quite incredible.
The Elizabethan England's judicial system, for instance, is made up of many different courts. The Great Session Courts, or the Assizes, and the Quarter Session Courts were the most important courts. The Great Session Courts were held twice a year for each county while the Quarter Session Courts were held four times a year. The Quarter Session Courts had dealt with most of the crimes, whereas, the Great Session Courts were known to give very harsh punishments. Other courts, such as Petty Session Courts, Manor Court, and town courts, took care of unimportant crimes. Civil cases were handled by many courts depending on the person's financial status. The wealthy was dealt with by the Star Chamber, one of the highest profile courts. The Court of Chancery handled criminal cases, and the Exchequer of Pleas took care of financial suits. The poor were dealt with by the Court of Requests, and religious and moral cases dealt with the Church Courts. Whoever committed high treasons or any other dangerous crimes were sentenced to death, which was usually issued to the
Queen. Apart from the government as a whole, there were also small local governments. These local governments were very important to the citizens in Elizabethan England. Royal representatives, such as Justices of Peace, Sheriffs, and Lords Lieutenant, were in every county. They made sure that the Queen's commands and laws were being enforced and obeyed. Other governments were responsible for many other issues. Regional governments were to oversee the parts of England that the Privy Council couldn't supervise. The Council of North was in charge of Northern England, and the Council of the Marches was in charge of Wales and some border counties. Owning land made a person powerful, causing them to have a major influence. It was a responsibility for them to govern their own land so they could aid the monarchy. In every city and town, there was its own government that was run by a mayor. Elizabethan England had a very well structured and well efficient government. Though the government system is quite complicated, it was well centralized. Queen Elizabeth I was a major contribution to the government, along with the Privy Council and Parliament. The organization and efficiency was a major responsibility for many working in the government. Having all the resources that she did, the Queen was able to make an incredible system that works very efficiently. "I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and a king of England too!" , a quote by Queen Elizabeth.
A1. England was run by a Parliament and per history had very limited involvement of the monarchy or direct rule by the king. As well as the colonial legislatures; members were elected by property-holding men and governors were given authority to make decisions on behalf of the king. This system our leadership and how it controls its people the reason many
Almost every society in the history of the world has had some form of a judicial court system, but there are obviously major differences in the various court systems. One of the most outlandish court systems has to belong to Salem, Massachusetts in the 1690’s. The court system of Salem, Massachusetts is so memorable because of the events of the Salem Witch Trials. When you compare the Salem courts from the 1690s to present-day America, it will become quite evident all the freedoms that you get today. The Salem courts from the late seventeenth century and the present-day American courts differ in the freedoms and privileges a person was given, public opinion, and religious bias.
Elizabeth I was the queen of England from 1558 to 1603. Elizabeth I had many qualities of an absolute ruler and these qualities helped her to make a stronger England. Among the areas that Elizabeth I had absolute power were, her total control of politics in her country, her complete ability to use the military to keep and increase her power, and her complete influence over the social and cultural situation of England.
Mortimer's work, Time Traveler's Guide to Elizabethan England , was written as a travel guide for the time traveler. Mortimer used the concept of time travel to achieve many things. He visits a time era from the past and compares it to our modern ideas. By applying the concept of time travel to tell a story; he makes it a unique and thought provoking read. Mortimer takes common misconceptions head on and gives an in-depth analysis of life in Elizabethan England.these range from the politics of the era to the bad smells Elizabethans were tolerant of.
Queen Elizabeth I was crowned queen of England when she as only 25 years old (Queen Elizabeth I - Biography). She became the third queen to rule England in her own right. The first was older cousin Lady Jane Grey who was voted out after nine days in office. Second, was older sister Queen Mary I who exacted anyone who disagreed with her beliefs involving religion. Both of them were disasters to the country (Queen Elizabeth - Facts). England was struggling with money, war, and religious strife but Queen Elizabeth I was ready to take that burden and return England back to its former
In February, 1587, Queen Elizabeth had ordered her cousin, Mary, Queen of Scotts, to her execution to eliminate all possibilities of any threats to her throne. This event would reflect the relentless violence and unforgiving punishments of the judicial system in Elizabethan Era. Criminals during Queen Elizabeth’s reign in England, known as the Elizabethan Era, were subject to harsh, violent punishments for their crimes. England was separated into two social classes, which were the nobility, and the commoners. Within each class, the punishments were defined by the class and type of crime that had been committed. Under the Tudor rule, the punishments dating back to the middle ages were revived. Such gruesome punishments were carried out to strike fear into the hearts of the English citizens and lower crime rate. There were a wide range of crimes that a person could be prosecuted for, and even included the act of witchcraft and alchemy. Of course, today the American court system would find prosecutions of witchcraft and alchemy ridiculous. However, in the Elizabethan Era, people accused of even the most petty of crimes would be immediately placed in prison to await their sentences, often resulting in death. Public executions were a common practice, and were often a form of entertainment for a crowd of spectators. Often considered as the “Golden Age” in English history, England’s court systems became an essential part of society because cruel punishments were severe enough to strike fear into English citizens as well as demonstrating the influence and power of Queen Elizabeth’s rule.
Criminals were not dealt with in private. They were displayed in towns and the middle of the marketplace for all the people to see. Many were witnessed by hundreds of people. Commoners treated punishment days as “exciting” days out("Elizabethan Crime and Punishment" 1). The crowds of people who gathered for the public punishments and executions could be considered twisted individuals. They relished these days. For example, theft resulted in public hanging for all of the people to watch. Often times crimes were falsely accused and the crowds knew it, but nothing could be done. Small crimes, such as stealing bird eggs would result in a death sentence. It was the terrible price starving people had to pay because the government made begging illegal("Elizabethan Crime and Punishment" 1). Many crimes resulted in brutal beatings. Beatings and executions were definitely not an issue, the only question was the type of beating a person would get or how they a would be executed("Elizabethan Crime and Punishment" 1). A lot of times the Upper class was exempt from punishment unless it was a serious crime. Unfortunately, the Commoners did not get that valuable treatment because they were almost always in trouble. With any evidence of relationships with evil spirits condemned a person to death by hanging, burning, or drowning. More punishments included: beheading, pressing, and the drunkard's cloak. The drunkard’s cloak was basically a big barrel
Parliament never desired a position where they could control England with full-fledged power. They simply wanted enough limitations on the king’s power that would guarantee the people certain rights that the king cannot take away, which juxtaposes the belief of divine right. Parliament tried numerous ways to create a structured administration where the king’s power was restricted and Parliament, including the people that they represented, was given a voice in government but their countless tries were futile and a disappointment. Preceding the Civil War and many times after it, Parliament tried to approach the king to present to him their ideas of how power should be distributed and used. They came up with laws and regulations to resolve political problems with the king, such as the Petition of Rights, Nineteen Propositions, and Grand Remonstrance. The king declined to acknowledge these laws as genuine laws. He either signed and disregarded it or he absolutely refused to bother himself with the minor complaints of Parliament. This eventually led to the conclusion that King Charles I was the type of man who could not be trusted with the legal promises he made to his people. The worries of Parliament were not seen as a major concern of his and he repudiated to consider any negotiations with whatever Parliament had to say. The king’s intractable ways caused Parliament to break away from his power before England became a place of political disaster.
The Elizabethan era was an era of art above all else. Elegance reflected in all areas of the peoples’ lives. From the entertainment and language to the churches and castles, beauty shone bright.There were many vents for artistic creativity during the Elizabethan era; countless instruments, painting, books, playwright, and last but not by any stretch the least, architecture. Elizabethan architecture has a vast amount of variety and personality, the buildings reflected the pride of both the inhabitants and the builders.
He had to make sure at all times that all rules or laws were followed and if not he had to make punishments for them. George was a king so whatever decision he made went, and nobody else could change his mind. Usually, Parliament is there to help guide the King and his decisions, but King George took many things upon himself numerous times without guidance from Parliament. King George had many disagreement with Parliament. The population in Great Britain at the time was fairly high, and George had many responsibilities. King George went through rough times as being King but always found a way through the problems. He took and controlled Great Britain through many battles and wars including the American Revolution. King George was the man behind the American Revolution, and the fighting between the colonists and the
Queen Elizabeth I was said to be one of the best rulers of England. Unlike rulers before her, she was a Protestant and not a Catholic. She was not stupid though. She did go to church and did everything that Catholics did to prevent getting her head cut off under the rules of her sister Mary. Elizabeth was very young when she came to rule. She was only 17 years old when her sister Mary died and she took over.
Many people, in England, believe that there has always been one queen to stand above the rest. That queen was Elizabeth the 1st. She has made many accomplishments during her reign. From a compromise about what religion England would follow to defeating the Spanish Armada.
Parliament was used to "manage the Crown's business (Loades 90)." The parliament was also used to pass bills and legislature, but each time a bill was presented, it was mandatory that it would go through each house at least three times. As the age of the Parliament became older, it's procedures grew "more sophisticated, and more strictly enforced." (Loades 92) The Parliament also became a place at which "provided a very good platform for a monarch who wanted to say something of particular
Generally, the English people had a great celebration when Charles II returned to the throne in May of 1660.1 Many believed that restoring the monarchy was the only way to secure constitutional rights. In fact, there was an expectation that bringing back the king would return life to the way it was before 1642 and the rule of Cromwell. Charles II was responsible for improving the government for the people. However, despite some achievements, the king was not very successful in creating a stronger and more effective monarchy. He was dependent on his advisors and other parts of the government from the very beginning of his reign. There were constant conflicts between the king and Parliament over religious issues. When Charles II finally did gain some independence, he still did not accomplish much to improve the monarchy. Overall, the government was very inconsistent during the 1660s and 1670s, and the people became disillusioned with the monarchy. The king did not hold all of the responsibility for what happened to the government, though. The people should have taken charge and worked for a change in the system. The rule of Charles II helped show the English citizens that they could not rely on the government so much, but they needed to take more of the power into their own hands and become more autonomous.
Queen Elizabeth the first was one of the first woman monarchs to rule alone in the history of Europe. Her character, the way she ruled, and even her gender transformed her country’s go...