Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The American drug war in Latin America
Drug trafficking between Mexico and America
Mexicos war on drugs lords weapons and drugs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The American drug war in Latin America
Victor Mendoza Eng 1 M - 6-8:30
Mexico War on Drugs.
The government of Mexico and its people have been on the news for the past several years. The issue of the topic for all this is comes to down to drug trade. The government had started a series of policies against drug trades that has been happening in the country and it has led to a lot of bloody results. From a series of numbers of arrests of drugs leaders and cartel members, to a sudden high rise in kidnappings and murders of politicians and innocent people, this war on drugs has turned out to be costly turn in both money and blood. The citizens of Mexico for a time seemed to have a civil war in their hands. With the history of politics of Mexico, mixed with
…show more content…
Police for one are still having several big issues in Mexico regarding in pay, equipment, and safety. Every year that I went to Mexico (from 2000-2011) I would visit small towns and saw no improvement with the local police in terms of arsenal, vehicles and technology. Police forces receives very little help from both the state and federal government (Sabeth, 55). With this of course will create much havoc in terms of security in the towns and municipalities. Many people across Mexico have lost faith in the local police as they are unable to calm down the violence in Mexico. In Juarez, a border town across EL Paso, Texas, local police became so distrusting that Mexican government have sent more than 2,000 army soldiers and federal police to kick out the local police and take over local law enforcement duties (Burnett). Many people in Juarez were happy that this occurred as they no longer trust their own local police force there. Just recently the disappearance of 43 students in Mexico was actually done by corrupt police from the orders of a corrupt mayor and his wife because he was afraid the students were going to interrupt her speech. She was quoted as saying they needed to be taught a lesson …show more content…
Linda Wertheimer asked Jason Beaubien (both of them from NPR news) questions and how Mexico stands 5 years after 2006. H states that Mexico is in a critical moment and that some people are not involved, they are still scared about this fight. That Calderon did have the right motives to go after the drug trafficking but all could have been handled differently. He would go on to state it that while some cities have it so bad, some other others would go on as normal. Death numbers are still to this point rising in an alarming rate. Still, Beaubein would go on to say that there is no clear sign of a winner. Both Mexico and the drug cartels had their share of wins and losses. Mexico is at a critical point as they have the chance to show the world they can stand and fight their own problems. Still situations are not at ease for them and it appears even with the new election of Pena as president, Mexico would still struggle with this war for years to come. Website of Aljareera even states that Mexico could be losing the
There was a long list of leaders/presidents in the Mexican revolution. Some of them were not qualified one bit and didn’t know what it took. The less ready or qualified you were the better chance you had of being killed or starting a war. The main man originally in this story was Porfirio Diaz; but as time passed you realized the bad decisions of other presidents. For instance Francisco Madero; he ran for office just to get someone else out. He should’ve known that without experience and a plan that he wasn’t going to do well. You need a plan to succeed as a president. War was the only option in the beginning but it wasn’t in the end. The Mexican revolution was an extremely bloody conflict between the people of Mexico and the presidents they had to live under.
A drug cartel is a combination of drug manufacturing and drug transportation organizations under one person’s leadership. While there is numerous drug cartels around the world the Mexican cartels have arguably more power than most in regards to territory and membership. This power has allowed them to have main control in not only Mexico but in the United States as well making them a key player in the drug trade. In 2006, the Mexican government challenged multiple drug cartels such as the Sinaloa cartel, The Los Zetas, and the Gulf cartel, beginning the Mexican Drug War. This war has gone on for the past ten years and is still continuing today, causing the death of 10,000 people a year on average. The Mexican Drug War is having a negative impact
The United States has no more important foreign relation ship than that of which it enjoys with Mexico, and vice versa. These two countries share interwoven societies and economies. Although there have been disagreements and turbulence between the two countries, which partnership is without these? The Strength of each country’s democracy is fundamental to the other’s. This relationship that the two countries share directly affects that lives of millions of Mexican and United States citizens everyday. Recently these two countries have become even more unified than ever before. Tackling issues such as Border Control, Countering Narcotics, Dealing with multiple Law enforcement agencies, Human Rights laws, trade and development, etc. There are many issues that they are mutually interested in and must deal with. Yet, there are some vast differences in which these two countries are run. There are also many similarities, which we must take into account. Both Democratic Governments have similar structures, containing a legislative, judicial, and executive branch. Yet, these structures are very different internally, containing specific duties that the other country’s branch may not have.
...t up. This group of young leaders believed that they could assume their proper role in Mexican politics once President Díaz announced publicly that Mexico was ready for democracy. Although the Mexican Constitution called for public election and other institutions of democracy, Díaz and his supporters used their political and economic resources to stay in power indefinitely.”
The lengths the drug cartels go to are insane and radical. They will do nearly anything to stay out of trouble and gain as much money as possible. Some people think that the United States are in trouble if we legalize marijuana, they have come to the conclusion that the cartels will do anything to take out the stores. Believe it or not there are some positives that the cartel brings to Mexico but you would have to be delusional to think that they outweigh the negatives. In conclusion violence, business industries, and political corruption brought by the Drug Cartels have all been effects on the economy of Mexico.
For the 71 years that the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) was in power, Mexico saw great political, social and economic upheaval. This can be seen in the evolution of the PRI party, whose reign over Mexican society came at the expense of true democracy. “A party designed for power, the PRI's mechanisms for success involved a combination of repressive measures. The party professed no specific ideology, enabling it to adapt to changing social, economic and political forces over time. It attached itself virtually all aspects of civil society, and in this way, it become the political extension and tool of the government.” In 2000, however, the PRI’s loss of its monopoly on political power and institutional corruption gave rise to inter-cartel violence that was created in the political void left after the PAN won the national presidential election. These conditions gave rise to the Zetas: a new type of cartel that changed the operational structure of previous drug cartels. The Zetas operate in a new militant structure associated with a higher brand of violence, which has led it to branch out beyond a traditional drug smuggling enterprise common under the PRI government. Simply put, the electoral defeat of the PRI in 2000 was supposed to usher in a more democratic era in Mexican politics. Instead, the PRI party’s defeat created a state of chaos that gave rise to inter-cartel violence and the birth of the Zetas cartel.
The history of political instability in Mexico and its need for revolution is very complex and dates back to the colonization of Mexico by the Spaniards in the 1500s. However, many aspects of the social situation of Mexico when the Revolution broke out can be attributed to the thirty-year dictatorship of President Porfrio Diaz, prior to 1911. The Revolution began in November of 1910 in an effort to overthrow the Diaz dictatorship. Under the Diaz presidency, a small minority of people, primarily relatives and friends, were in ...
The Mexican Revolution began November 20th, 1910. It is disputable that it extended up to two decades and seized more than 900,000 lives. This revolution, however, also ended dictatorship in Mexico and restored the rights of farm workers, or peons, and its citizens. Revolutions are often started because a large group of individuals want to see a change. These beings decided to be the change that they wanted to see and risked many things, including their lives. Francisco “Pancho” Villa and Emiliano Zapata are the main revolutionaries remembered. These figures of the revolution took on the responsibility that came with the title. Their main goal was to regain the rights the people deserved. The peons believed that they deserved the land that they labored on. These workers rose up in a vehement conflict against those opposing and oppressing them. The United States was also significantly affected by this war because anybody who did not want to fight left the country and migrated north. While the end of the revolution may be considered to be in the year of 1917 with the draft of a new constitution, the fighting did not culminate until the 1930’s.
Over the last several decades, violence has consumed and transformed Mexico. Since the rise of dozens of Mexican cartels, the Mexican government has constantly been fighting an ongoing war with these criminal organizations. The cartel organizations have a primary purpose of managing and controlling illegal drug trafficking operations in Central America and South America to the United States. Violence on a massive and brutal scale has emerged due to the nature of the illegal drug trade. Because the drug trade is vastly widespread, cartels are often fighting one another and competing in business. Mexican authorities count at least 12 major cartels, but also talk of an untold numbers of smaller splinter groups. (Taipei Times). Five cartels from Mexico have risen to become the extremely powerful amongst all the drug organizations operating in Mexico. The Guadalajara Cartel, the Sinaloa Cartel, the Tijuana Cartel, the Juarez Cartel, and the Gulf Cartel. These organizations, along with other distinguished Mexican cartels, have plagued Mexico with violence, terror, and fear due to the essence and nature of illegal drug trafficking.
The Mexican drug-trafficking cartels are said to have been established in the 1980s by a man named Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo, also known as “The Godfather”. With the help of Ernesto Fonseca Carrillo and Rafael Caro Quintero, Miguel started the Guadalajara Cartel, which is one of the first to have thrived from association with the Colombian cocaine trade. The two men who helped Miguel Gallardo establish the cartel were arrested, so Gallardo, the single leader of the cartel “was smart enough to privatize the Mexican drug trade by having it run by lesser-known bosses” (The Five Most Famous Drug Cartels”), that he often met with in Acapulco. Eventually Miguel was arrested as well which caused the split of the Guadalajara Cartel into the Sinaloa Cartel and the Tijuana Cartel.
McDermott, Jeremy. “US Targets Colombian Rebels as War against Terrorism Escalates.” Scottsman.com. February 10, 2002.
"For the commercial insurgency, border controls are perfunctory in "free trade" areas, and there is still a great demand for goods that are linked to smuggling" (PRISM Issue No 3). President Calderon's term in office has seen numerous arrests and significant cooperation with U.S. law enforcement, and intelligence activities, which has negated the freedom of movement the cartels once enjoyed. It has also prompted them to seek other venues to keep their revenue flowing. The arrests aren't without criticisms. Due to recent arrests of ...
...nstant economies. Mexico has been adapting to policies and other models to help improve the economy. Mexico is recently fighting against corruption to offer Fiscal Transparency to the prominent investors. The country continues working in lowering inflation rates. In the Human Development index Mexico demonstrated to be having good quality of education, with high percentage of adult literacy, taking the country to the 53 place of the HDI value. Neo-liberalism helped Mexico to reduce government intervention over the economy. Mexico is also working with NAFTA and Mercosur agreements to improve free trade status and reached a healthier the economy. Mexico still working to liberalize its trades with other countries, and expects to have positive in the next couple of years. Mexico has made the necessary decisions to create a better country for the future generations.
Across America, police have been involved in scandals and drugs. They are abusing the power that they have been given. The communities have begun not to trust the police because of their conduct toward the citizens. People have been beaten and harassed by the guys in blue. People in the communities have seen the police push individuals around and take things from individuals for no reason. People receive the wrong message. The public no longer can see a difference between the police and criminals.
In closing, Mexico has been completely corrupted by the whole Drug war. It seems as though the cartels have become such a powerhouse that the Mexican government cannot take the whole organization down. Mexico has encountered the problem of shutting down an organization as a whole, the techniques of a cartel are very complex and well thought out. A cartel will not have its leaders in one spot at a time, therefore if a “bust” is made, the whole cartel will not collapse. The Mexican government is using many efforts to put a halt to the cartels yet it seems as though the cartels are one step ahead of the government. Along with having many sites where deals go down, they also are very persuasive the the government officials to the point where they cannot say no to their offer, which in the end leads to a very corrupt government in the country of mexico.