Representation Without Reproduction By Peggy Phelan

573 Words2 Pages

In the first line of her 1993 essay titled ‘The Ontology of Performance: Representation without Reproduction’ Peggy Phelan writes that “performance’s only life is in the present”. She argues that once the live act is documented it ceased to be performance art as it ‘betrays the promise of its own ontology’, while being reproduced with the motive of wider circulation and prolonged life-span. She refers to the original purpose for which performance art was developed as a form, namely to resist commodification and escape the art market’s control and dictates. This argument highlights the first issue with performance documentation which is ideological. By using words such as ‘betrayal’, Phelan suggests there might be rules to working against the system, which in her view is one of the key characteristics of performance art. By succumbing to the pressures and the lure of the market, through the means of documentation available for circulation after the one-time-only event is finished, such performance in her eyes loses its ‘distinctive oppositional edge’. Another problem with documentation she …show more content…

The following essay will attempt to defend the usefulness of documentation in relation to performance art. Keeping Phelan’s critique and objections in mind, the essay will examine the relationship between the live act of performance and its documentation, by analysing different types of and motives behind recording performance pieces. Through discussion of practical, creative and political reasons and benefits of performance documentation, the essay intends to prove that despite Phelan’s primary thesis, documentation is a valuable, and often an essential part of performance

Open Document