Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic colonialism in africa
Europe imperialism in africa
Europe imperialism in africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic colonialism in africa
In the 18th and 19th century, nations that conquered other nations should be obligated to offer a form of compensation to those countries. The countries that were subjected to imperial rule were being oppressed by their “mother country” and the people and their resources were exploited. Furthermore, the unity amongst various ethnic groups in Africa were destroyed. Therefore, reparations should be made to the denizens of Africa to repent for the damages inflicted upon them. Oppressing others under a person’s rule is morally unjust and compensations should be made as an act of condolence. There were many cases in which appointed leaders became oppressive tyrants whom abused their power and were extremely corrupted. They accepted bribes …show more content…
from people and tried people unfairly which lead to public unrest. Moreover, in countries like Nigeria, tribal leaders were imprisoned and subjected to cruel forms of punishment. A form of punishment that was used can be seen in Things Fall Apart as it was described that they “ate nothing throughout the day and the next. They were not even given any water…they began to talk about giving in” (Achebe 195). The Europeans starved their prisoners in order to force them into submission before releasing them. This served to induce fear into the people after seeing that the most influential and power men in their society are treated cruelly if they defy the Europeans. This form of oppression is erroneous and the oppressors need to rectify their past mistakes. There are numerous amounts of people that argue against having to owe reparations to former European colonies even though the European countries exploited the people and resources of Africa.
The Europeans claim that they helped industrialized many African nations and set up a form of government in which many nations in Africa still follow today. However, the truth is: “In the context of the economy, there were few attempts at industrializing the colonies…dependent on agriculture as the mainstay of their economy”(Nedge). In other words, not every colony controlled by the Europeans was industrialized; causing many African countries’ economy to remain stagnant. In addition, European constantly took raw materials and people from Africa, in which they had an abundance of, to fuel their growing empires. At the time, Europeans only cared about their own commercial and political interests in order to become more powerful in order to compete with other nations. As stated in “Britain’s African colonies”, “The West African coast was part of the elaborate network of transatlantic slave trade…not immune from the commercial interests of various European nations”(Nedge). The Europeans initiated the slave made which lead to the capture of many African people. Thus, it is only correct to compensate the losses that were caused by European
nations. The intervention of European nations into the affairs of various tribes in Africa destroyed the bonds that kept the people together. The arrival of the Europeans brought in many foreign beliefs, such as Christianity, which was forcibly integrated into the society. They Christian missionaries that came to Africa gradually won over converts which chiefly split the views of the tribe into two. Which leads to the statement: “He has put a knife on the things that held us together and we have fallen apart” (Achebe 176). Basically, the “white man” did not respect the traditions and cultures of the people of Africa which eventually led to the destruction of unity of the people in Africa. Therefore, imperial nations have to apologized for their actions of splitting apart groups of people with a form of compensation. Generally speaking, nations that were imperial colonizers owe remuneration to the people of the territories that they formerly conquered. The pain that was inflicted on the people as a result of the oppression they experienced, their own people and resources being exploited, and the unity of the people being crushed is far too vast and reparations shall be made.
Ta-Nehisi Coates, author of the article “The Case for Reparations” presents a powerful argument for reparations to black African American for a long time of horrendous injustice as slavery plus discrimination, violence, hosing policies, family incomes, hard work, education, and more took a place in black African American’s lives. He argues that paying such a right arrears is not only a matter of justice; however, it is important for American people to express how they treated black African Americans.
The colonization of Africa gave the Europeans more workers and workspace that boost them economically and financially. According to Document D, many African colonies exports very many resources such as cotton for fabrics and various foods for processing and meals. The help of African colonies was very beneficial to Europe. The economical growth can be proven with Document E, where the amount of exports from Africa grew from less than 5 million British pounds in 1854 to over 20 million in 1900. So the most beneficial part of the African colonies was the boost they gave Europe in economical
One of the main reasons Europeans colonized Africa was for their useful resources. There are countless assets in the African landscape that were wanted by other nations. The European countries had access to some of the worlds most needed resources such as cotton, oils, coal, gold, and diamonds because they controlled Africa. This is shown on a chart of African colonies and their exports. ("Selected African Colonies and Their Exports" 269). This shows how the European countries carefully selected the land they did, to get certain resources they needed or wanted to use to benefit from. Another chart from a book by Trevor Lloyd, (Lloyd, The British Empire), displays the large jump of exports to Africa from 1854 to 1900. What that means is once Great Britain established complete control of South Saharan Africa, they began to export the resources they found that they could use. These charts are proof of how the European's wanted resources, and that is one of the main reasons for the imperialization of Africa. Not only did the European nations want the continent's resources, but they had an equal hunger for power.
In “The Case for Reparations,” Ta-Nehisi Coates sets out a powerful argument for reparations to blacks for having to thrive through horrific inequity, including slavery, Jim Crowism, Northern violence and racist housing policies. By erecting a slave society, America erected the economic foundation for its great experiment in democracy. And Reparations would mean a revolution of the American consciousness, reconciling of our self-image as the great democratizer with the facts of our history. Paying such a moral debt is such a great matter of justice served rightfully to those who were suppressed from the fundamental roles, white supremacy played in American history.
The Europeans may have seemed like they only cared about the money but they also cared about helping too. The Europeans had a moral duty that they felt they needed to fulfill. In document F, the White Man’s Burden poem says “ Fill full the mouth of famine and bid the sickness cease.” The Europeans felt it was their moral duty to help those in famine and poverty, they also wanted these colonies and smaller countries to try and be like them. The Europeans did not only help Africa they also helped China and India. Their most important motivation for colonization of Africa was their moral duty to help smaller countries.
One reason, is the fact that the raw materials the Europeans took from Africa were unused. As stated in Lord Frederick Lugard's, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, "Who can deny the right of the hungry people of Europe to utilize the wasted bounties of nature..." Lugard shows that Europe had the right to take raw materials from Africa because they were unused. This means those who argue that European imperialism in Africa was not justified because the Europeans simply took raw materials, are obviously mistaken.
Reparations For 246 consecutive years, blacks have been kidnapped, whipped to death, mutilated, and raped. From 1619 to 1865, these generations of slave families were living as property rather than human beings. History would agree that the crimes done against these set of selected people do not compare to those of other races. Many people don’t know that there were sex slave farms that practiced a process known as “buck breaking”.
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
Reparations Although the talk of reparations of slavery has been in discussion for over a hundred years, it is beginning to heat up again. Within these discussions, the issue of the form of reparations has been evaluated and money has been an option several times. However, reparations in the form of money should not be obtained for several reasons. Firstly, it is not a solution to the problem, secondly monetary reparations have the ability to worsen discrimination, thirdly, who gets paid, and how is it regulated, and lastly, the money can be misused.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
Imagine you’re young, and alone. If your family was taken from you and suffered horribly for your freedom, would you want to be repaid in some form? In the article “The Case for Reparations” Ta-Nehisi Coates discusses a great deal of information about reparations, and if they should be given. Reparations are when a person or people make amends for the wrong they have done. Ta-Nehisi believes that from two hundred years of slavery, ninety years of Jim Crow laws, sixty years of separate but equal, and thirty five years of racist housing policy, that America is shackled. Only if we face the compounding moral debt can America be free. Until we face the reality of what happened together, we will always be bound by the lies that have been told.
In this paper I will argue that America should pay reparations to black communities that have suffered most from institutionalized racism. My view is not that reparations should be paid via checks mailed by the federal government, of an undeterminable sum, to families that are most eligible, but rather, through changes in policy. These policies would tackle racial inequality at it most obvious sources, the wage gap, the mistreatment of black Americans by our criminal justice system, quality of education, and the disparity in housing between black and white Americans.
Europeans saw Africa as being uncivilized and backwards, but they could become like the West with help. Africa was considered the “dark continent”, Europeans thought that the natives were below them and needed their “help” to become humanized and cultured (Jones). It was an attitude similar to orientalism, Africans had little chance to engage in a dialogue about their culture and heritage. Africa was a different and “other” land that was full of valuable resources to Europeans that the natives did not understand the value of. To the West, and many Europeans, Africa existed as a place full of resources to be taken.
During the “European scramble for Africa”, European nations unleashed horrors on Africa which included forced labor and unnecessary punishments. In response, Africa attempted to compromise, but many of the negotiations fell through. Africa then reacted by taking action. After this attempt failed, Africa succumbed to the European Powers’ commands.
An overwhelming majority of African nations has reclaimed their independence from their European mother countries. This did not stop the Europeans from leaving a permanent mark on the continent however. European colonialism has shaped modern-day Africa, a considerable amount for the worse, but also some for the better. Including these positive and negative effects, colonialism has also touched much of Africa’s history and culture especially in recent years.