Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on king henry iv part 1
Henry v character analysis
Honor in Shakespeare Henry IV
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on king henry iv part 1
Renaissance Man movie assignment questions
This speech is about the choices being made and have been made by those in the play Henry V by William Shakespeare. From the men who stay at home and hide like cowards, to those who stand with pride fighting for their country, this speech is speaks out about how “… the choices we make dictate the life we lead” (Renaissance Man 1:29:56). In the speech King Henry claims that honour is something worth coveting, and those who covet gold before one’s own honour are not people worth having as brothers in battle. Those who do value material wealth over personal honour are given gold and allowed to flee form the upcoming battle. Henry then goes on to say that it is good that there is less people who fight for England in the upcoming battle, because “The fewer the men, the greater share of honour” (Shakespeare 4.3.24). Continuing this speech Henry talks about the how prideful those who survive this battle can be when they safely make it back home, they can boast about their battle scars and
…show more content…
make jealous the cowards who stayed behind in England. Donald memorizes King Henry’s speech because it seems like the speech was almost meant for Donald.
The soldiers who the speech was originally meant for and Donald’s own situation are very similar, soldiers who are about to fight for their country. The speech is for men who value their own honour rather than monetary wealth. Donald was apart of a gang before joining the army, however after seeing how a gang’s destructive activities led to the unintentional killing of Donald’s little sister, Donald “…decided that being part of a gang didn’t seem like such a good idea...” (Renaissance Man 35:11). So, Donald joined the military to protect rather than destroy, and proudly show proof of his actions like the soldiers of King Henry and “strip his sleeve and show his scars. And say, 'These wounds I had on Crispin's day'” (Shakespeare 4.3. 49 50). This speech from King Henry evoked such powerful emotions that Donald committed the words to
heart. The drill sergeant is so impressed that Donald can recite a passage from Shakespeare because the sergeant has no faith in Bill’s English teaching skills. The sergeant even told Bill that “I think your whole class thing is a bunch of bullshit” (Renaissance Man 48:40). So, imagine the shock the sergeant has when Donald, someone thought of as incredibly dumb and lacking basic English comprehension, shows that Bill can effectively teach someone like that. Bill through Donald demonstrates that the English classes can train the minds of the soldiers, and as Shakespeare put it the mind is an important thing for “All things are ready if our mind be so” (Shakespeare 4.3.73).
The period of the Renaissance changed a man's view of man. The Renaissance was a new life changing way for everyone in the middle ages for both men and women. A very important quote from the document “People saw themselves in a new way”. The build up of how the Renaissance started and this time is called the middle ages and was a period of time which stretched from 500 ce to about 1350 during the middle ages the Roman Catholic church and the Pope were primary players.For over 300 years Renaissance spread from Italy to Western Europe.The way it spread was like a car moving from place to place. The main question the document is asking is “How did Renaissance change man’s view of man “? One major key term in that question is Renaissance and “this means rebirth”. My main thesis is the way the renaissance has changed man’s view of man and
...e colonial leaders, by stating he is ready to die for his cause. This would make the members of the house introspective and look into their hearts to see if they are ready to die for their cause. Henry excites fear by stating he is so passionately ready to sacrifice for his country. This play towards pathos, or appealing to the audience’s emotions, is an effective way of trying to convince the House to go to war against Britain. This pathos combined with the logic of Henry’s speech, makes for a convincing argument. Logically taking the house step by step from stating that because he has an outlook on their situation, he should express it to them, to stating his argument before the House, to saying that lacking freedom is worse then death, then taking it full circle pronouncing he would prefer to be “give[n] death” then to have his freedom taken away by the British.
The key feature that Henry uses is that he never mentions the word 'lose.' Since that is a negative expression. Soon after he talks about his side winning, 'and if to live, the fewer men, the greater share of honour.' This signifies that if they win the battle and live, Henry's soldiers will have extra honour because they had fewer men to begin with. Within Henry's sentence there is a lot of rhythm and balance.
In the Shakespearean play, Henry IV part I, Hotspur and Hal are portrayed as valiant soldiers. They are not afraid of a good battle or of even dying in a fight. On the other hand, the fearful Falstaff is putting up a performance. He is pretending to be intrepid like Hal and Hotspur, when in truth he is just a coward, to gain the same type of honor Hotspur and Hal have.
During the Renaissance, people were dedicated to studying human works. They would observe from real life to gain inspiration, new ideas, and to try to recreate the world as they saw it in their art. New techniques such as scientific and atmospheric perspective were created, changing art forever. Artists would use their skills to create works for patrons, from the Church, various guilds, and other religious orders. During the High Renaissance, Julius II commissioned Raphael to decorate the Vatican Palace. The first of the rooms he decorated was The “Room of the Signature”, where he painted The School of Athens. Originally, this room housed Julius II’s personal library, but later on it would be the room where papal documents were signed. In 1508, Raphael began painting four frescoes that represented theology, philosophy, law, and the arts. As stated in Janson’s History of Art Volume II, This fresco “represents a summation of High Renaissance humanism, for it attempts to represent the unity of knowledge in one grand scheme.” Raphael’s The School of Athens is a prime example of humanistic art, as evidenced by the subject of the art itself, the classical elements in the piece, and it’s scientific and illusionistic rendering.
Henry is trying to tell Bates that the King is not responsible for whatever happens to a soldier at war just because he has sent him, and uses the example above to illustrate this.
Frederick Henry grew up in America and in his early twenties, he decided to go to Europe and fight in the Italian army. Henry’s decision in the first place, showed courage and bravery. Fighting for another country over making a living in your own goes above and beyond what is remotely asked for. Even in my wildest dreams, I would probably not even think about fighting for my own country, let alone a foreign country. Times were tough, especially when the start of the winter came. With that winter came “permanent rain and with the rain came the cholera. But it was checked and in the end and only seven thousand died of it in the army.” (4) In the army, people die, and it is not the nicest place. Frederick Henry chose to enter this world and this portrays bravery.
For my analytical essay I've chosen the Renaissance art movement. I choose this movement because it played such a monumental part in European history. Basically, the Renaissance, also known as the rebirth, was a cultural movement that started an artistic transformation and started the scientific revolution. This time period also links the transition from the end of the Middle Ages to the beginning of the Modern Age. The Renaissance started in Italy in the 14th century and spread to northern Europe by the 16th century.
In Henry IV, Part One Shakespeare revels in the opportunity to suggest the idiosyncracy of character through his command of a wide range of both verse and prose. As a result the play is full of rich and different character parts (Wells 141). Two in particular, Falstaff and Hotspur, hold diverse beliefs concerning the main theme of the drama, honor. In Shakespeare’s time, honor was defined as the special virtues which distinguish those of the nobility in the exercise of their vocation–gallantry in combat with a worthy foe, adherence to the accepted code of arms, and individual loyalty to friends, family, and comrades in arms (Prior 14). Throughout the play, honor plays an important role in differentiating characters, yet, ultimately the reader ponders what place can honor have in a world in which subjects rebel against a usurper king whom they placed in office, the prince plays at robbery with a dissolute knight, and the contending parties in government seem guided by "policy" rather than "principle"? (Prior 14). The reader is invited to think about the concept of honor in a variety of contexts as it pertains to the different views of Falstaff and Hotspur. The pursuit of honor is Hotspur’s chief motivation and goal, yet his obsessive commitment becomes dangerous as the quest for honor blinds him from all else. Falstaff’s concept of honor directly contrasts that of Hotspur: to Falstaff, honor is rejected due to its limitations of life and seen as empty and valueless. To Hotspur, honor is more important than life itself, and his blind pursuit of honor ultimately drives him to his death. While he stands for images and ideals, Falstaff hacks at the meaning of honor until he has stripped it to almo...
Through high moral character Henry established credibility with the audience through creating a setting that aroused feelings in the people at the convention in order to convince them they had to fight for more than just peace. The goal Henry had when he spoke about war was to be honest with the crowd and point out that they needed to do something now or they would lose not just what he loved, but what they also loved. Henry said “If we wish to be free, if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending.and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight!”. In this quote, the tactic of ethics is apparent in that Henry wanted to achieve a personal level of connection with the audience and establish his credibility. By relating losing the war it also meant the loss of their feelings of comfort and contentment from the privileges they had worked hard on to achieve.
In Shakespeare’s play Henry IV Part I, the concept of honor plays a key role in the actions different individuals throughout the play. Honor is a broad word that encompasses various definitions and varies from person to person. Thus, it is no surprise that the main characters also perceive honor in their own specific ways. However, the key aspect of the variability lies within the distinction of class. However, each character perceives honor differently, which in turn leads them to very different courses of action. Three particular individuals who take honor into account differently throughout the play are Prince Hal, Hotspur, and Falstaff. For Hotspur, honor relates to feelings of duty on the battlefield and reputation, while Hal believes
The word Renaissance in French implies the notion of “rebirth” or “reformation “ This period within the context of history was characterized as the period of European Civilization immediately following the era of the middle ages. This period mostly relates to a large extent, the growth and propagative phenomena of artistic and intellectual erudition, presently used by artistic scholars and philosophers decipher and recover ancient learning as well as standards of Greece and Rome. The Renaissance era to many transcended beyond a period of simply intellectual movement, it was to them equally a period of cultural rediscovery which imparted some sort of deeper understanding making it one of the most significant eras in universal history. Believed to have been restricted to Italy, the Renaissance era occurred during the late 15th century, this great movement made an advanced and significant difference in the world we have come to know today as well as the world of the past. The Renaissance era is significant not just simply because it is one of the world’s most known events, but because it is a movement that has benefited and contributed intellectual developments to today’s notion of western civilization.
During the Renaissance, the works of artists and politicians such as Michelangelo, Machiavelli, Alberti, and Brunelleschi triggered new perspectives in understanding arts, politics, and literatures in relation to Catholic and classical values. As a result, the Renaissance played a bigger role in defining the advantages and disadvantages of Catholicism and classical values during this time period.
Falstaff’s honor speech does not imply cowardice, rather it exemplifies the contrast between himself and King Henry IV. In King Henry IV part one, act 5, Fallstaff explains why honor is not an ideal he strives for. He says that honor drives him to battle and asks, if he dies for honor, what is the reward? Honor will not assist him if he is wounded, it is nothing but air, a word. It is only achievable through death, and it is useless to the dead. Therefore, in the upcoming battle Falstaff will not, as characters in heroic plays had done for centuries, sacrifice himself for love of country. He will instead look out for his own self interest, and attempt to earn acclaim from the actions of others.
This is shown when Henry is wounded from a mortar shell and Rinaldi informs him that he will receive a medal, “[y]ou will be decorated…[b]ecause you are gravely wounded. They say if you can prove you did any heroic act you can get the silver. Otherwise it will be the bronze” (pg 55). Henry is hence awarded a medal of bravery, despite having done nothing heroic during the battle. Hemingway illustrates the corruption in the war as it takes advantage of its men by rewarding as well as honouring them with medals regardless of whether their acts are heroic or not. Moreover, the war influences individuals to change their moral values which is illustrated when an Italian-American solider, Ettore Moretti boasts and flaunts about his medals, war wounds as well as the promotion that he is about to obtain. Ettore further encourages Henry to join the American army, since it will compensate him much more than the Italian army. Moretti’s moral values are shown in his reasoning for joining the American army since he would rather serve in an army that pays him more for his services. Henry’s own experiences of the Great War changes his perspectives and attitudes, leaving him to feel lonely, disgusted as well as disconnected for participating in a warfare that destroys and kills countless of innocent people.