Religious Groups: Is It Beneficial Or Ethical?

to test these researched cures. Lastly, it's beneficial because since there's no donor a second party wouldn't have to go through a whole surgical processor which comes with its own set of complications.

Religious groups, however, have very different views since they believe that the destruction of a human embryo is equivalent to murder and that embryos should be valued as actual people.They also believe that god should solely be allowed to create human beings and that if humans try to play gods part it's a sin and it's against nature.Religious groups also believe that “personhood” starts at conception making the egg an living thing and the destruction of it is unnatural .They believe that it's unethical to kill one person, in this case,

the embryo in order to save and or extend a person's life. However, different religions have very different levels of tolerance when it comes to cloning. For example, Buddhists believe that the act of rebirth starts at or when the egg is fertilized.Judaists approve of therapeutic cloning and don’t view it as ethical issues but many are unsure of their opinions on reproductive cloning, mainly because the science is still relatively new. Christians believe in the bible which does not specifically talk about cloning. however, the idea of humans being created by god are brought up in scriptures. One of the important views of this topic is also the view of the biotechnology scientists, which is through the lens of beneficence. These scientists claim that they are benefitting our society by propelling the world’s progress in organ cloning.They believe that they can improve human life by providing organs that are genetic matches and that can be available.

When talking about human organ cloning it is inevitable to not talk about the ethical issues that come up.Firstly organ cloning does not naturally occur , when cloning an organ it is exposed to and at risk of having many mutations such as cancer due to the fact that the organs weren't programmed correctly.This could lead to all new diseases and genetic problems that we otherwise would not have in the first place.Secondly, another ethical issue is that if human clones have shorter life expectancy then it can be deduced that cloned organs will have the same problem .Therefore even though the cloned organ wouldn't be rejected by the and wouldn't need a second party surgery, every few years the organ would have to be replaced and all that could add up to being more expensive that just getting a donor organ transplant.

I personally believe that organ cloning should be legal all around the world and easily accessible unlike whole organism cloning.Even though as of right now the technology is very expensive ,the more research that is done the more likely people will have an easier time getting stem cell organs created to match their unique DNA sequence.Like most new scientific technologies it will have problems and be rocky at first but like anything else will improve and have fewer risks over the years.However, I don't think it should be used cosmetically in the sense that people shouldn't rely on muscle transplants to make them be stronger but used for actual medical needs and if the individual needs the organ because their life depends on it.