Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character study of the crucible by Arthur Miller
Analysis of the Crucible by Arthur Miller
Character study of the crucible by Arthur Miller
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character study of the crucible by Arthur Miller
A play in which relationship between a male and female is a significant factor is the Crucible by Arthur Miller. Set within a puritan community-based upon the ten commandments, Salem, 1692, This is an allegory for exploring the impact of McCarthyism on cold war America. Arthur Miller conveys the nature of the relationship and discusses how techniques such as conflict and retribution to represent the central concerns which enhance our understanding of the play as a whole. Vengeance is explored throughout Arthur Miller's tale of individual conscience and social tyranny, The Crucible. It takes a journey through a small community where gossip, hysteria, and simple misunderstanding spreads like a plague across the town of Salem: Until no one is …show more content…
safe from accusation. A man who has committed the sin of adultery with a girl, Abigail Williams and is forced to prove to his wife and to himself that he is a good man, which leads him to ruin. Arthur Miller uses characterization to convey the relationship between a male and female which helps us understand the central concern.
This is suggested through John Procter's sympathetic role as the tragic hero, who is in conflict with his own desires "I will cut off my hand before I ever reach for you again". Referring to his adultery with Abigail Williams. John Procter is a straight-forward man of common sense and is impatient with foolishness with others. This leads him into conflict with people who have a different view such as Reverend Parris who enrages honest men like John Procter. " In my house? In my house, Thomas? They will topple me with this" these words reveal to us a man who only cares about himself. He considers any dissension from his views as an attack on him personally and the church and the court itself " This is a clear attack upon the court". Parris also represents an anxious man with little self-confidence which is revealed by Stage directions, " nervously moves." However, a character who represents society is reverend John Hale who shows himself to be more rational and conscientious by considering the evidence. Even though this is a different a stance he had, to begin with as he represented himself as a self-regarding …show more content…
figure. Furthermore, Arthur Miller explores the theme of relationship, conveyed by John Proctor and his wife, Elisabeth Proctor. This is represented throughout the second act were their attitude to one another is formal. For example, "Are you well today?" from John Proctor and Elizabeth is blunter with short answers such as " I am " or "Aye". This suggests a distance between them as it's not a typical profile for a married couple. Later on, their relationship becomes more prominent, revealed by Reverend Hales question. "Adultery , John" this collection is significant that the single commandment John Proctor can't recall is the one of which he is guilty of having broken. Arthur Miller injects a sense of place within this act by exploring the values of the puritans. For example, they were expected to know the ten commandments shown by Reverend Hale, "Do you know your ten commandments". The central concerns are evident throughout the climax of the Crucible as Arthur Miller emphasized that every decision John Proctor has made throughout the play has led him down the path to the tragic but unavoidable ending.
For example, "I-I think I cannot" and," These are my friends, their wives are also accused". Despite being given a chance to give up and offered his wife's life, Proctor cannot back down. He feels a responsibility towards his neighbors because his sin of adultery has caused these events. Such choices are what lead him to the climax where he refuses to give up his name, " I have given you my soul; leave me my name!" this suggests that names are the essence of a person which must be held on to by any individual who wishes to maintain a sense of his own selfhood. Also, is conveying the concerns of the people of Salem, caring about their names more that their
lives. As the play as a whole, Arthur Miller has given us a glimpse of the outcome when the central concerns, vengeance, and hysteria, goes wild through a relationship between a male and a female.
Although women were beginning to work the same jobs as men, their wages were drastically different, with men being paid a lot more for the same job. More women started to go to university in order to gain the qualifications that would enable them to do the jobs that men did. Some parts of the play reflect the feminist issues that were happening at the time the story was written. In 'The Crucible' the issues surrounding the time of when the play was written was McCarthyism. Arthur Miller was interested not only in the Salem witch trials, but also the more current affairs of the USA.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible utilizes a fictional account of the Salem Witch Trials to expose the mob mentality associated with the Red Scare of the 1950’s and the sometimes overzealous fight against communism in America. By references to the events that took place in the Witch Trials, the playwright successfully portrays society’s behavior at its tyrannical worst, exposing fraud, faulty logic, vindictiveness, zealotry, and evil (Brater). Arthur Miller creates a parallel between the societal events of mass in the 1600’s and those in the 1950’s. In both instances, leaders use the fear of the masses for their personal gain. Abigail, the lead character in the play, and Senator Joseph McCarthy are both able to generate a groundswell that takes on a life of its own and ruins the lives of others. Arthur Miller created this analogy in order to expose Senator McCarthy and his anti-Communist propaganda by creating an analogy to the ferocity of the Salem Witch Trials. The Salem Witch Trials and the Red Scare fed on the anxiety of the general public. The Salem Witch Trials magnified society’s ability to influence the judicial system. As the hysteria regarding the existence of witches swelled, innocent individuals were executed. McCarthyism also demonstrated society’s ability to influence the judicial system. As the hysteria regarding the threat of communism in America swelled, innocent individuals were jailed, blacklisted, deported, and fired from their jobs. The Crucible first staged in 1953, was meant to raise awareness of the effect that fear can have on human behavior and judgment. The play illustrates how Abigail’s intent to avoid punishment by accusing others of culturally deviant activity led to mass hysteria. Senator McCar...
Proctor’s prideful personality does not let him baptize his third son because he dislikes Reverend Parris (168, l. 516-520). Proctor withholds his affair with Abigail because of his pride, he was unable to confess it until his wife was accused. Before he confessed he stated that “a man will not cast away his good name,” this statement suggest that a man has a lot of pride in his name and therefore his confession must be true (189, l. 845-847). In addition, after confessing to witchcraft Proctor takes pride in his name and refuses to have his name nailed in the door of the church showing everyone that he confessed to witchcraft (207, l. 894-897). “You will not use me! I am no Sarah Good or Tituba, I am John Proctor! You will not use me!,” Proctor beliefs he is better than Sarah good and Tituba hence he would not sign his name (207, l. 899-701). Towards the end, Proctor thinks better of his action and rips the signed paper after declaring, “Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang! How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name!” (207, l. 725-730). Proctor compares himself with the brave people that are about to hang and takes pride in his name by refusing to keep on lying and ripping the paper with his signature; he bravely accepted death with the thought that his name is not tainted by
Arthur Miller’s political allegory of McCarthyism, in the form of The Crucible, has been adapted into a faithful companion to the play that is able to incorporate the emotions and atmosphere that may not have been available to some in the play. Miller’s screenplay is very faithful to the book, having many of the same lines and situations the character in the play experience. Because of this, we are able to make an active connection to the play, thus expanding our understanding of the play. Lead by Daniel Day-Lewis, The Crucible’s plot is portrayed by a solid cast, who, for the most part, are able to engross the viewer into the story. The film contains many captivating scenes that exemplify hysteria meant to be depicted in the play, that demands the viewers attention while also immersing them in emotions. The film adaptation of The Crucible is a well produced version of the play that not only serves as a companion to the play, but an entertaining and though provoking experience.
The Rebel. The Caregiver. The Innocent. In the form of a contentious play, Arthur Miller’s, “The Crucible” parallels both the Salem Witch Hunts of 1692 and Senator Joseph McCarthy’s “Red” (Communist) hunts of 1950, exploring societal inconsistencies in character and practice. Kohlberg’s Moral Development Theory, a model interested in moral reasoning and cognitive development, as well as Jungian Archetypes, further reveal universal themes and human nature displayed in The Crucible’s female characters. Throughout the novel, Arthur Miller uses the role and treatment of women to convey the integral theme of human tendency in the presence of corruption and the unknown. Specifically, through archetypes and moral development, Abigail, Elizabeth and Mary Warren are employed to expose humanity’s contrasting movement
Reverend Parris is the character that initiates the hysteria of the Salem witch trials, in a community where authorities wasted no time minding the business of it's citizens, what should have been seen as teen frivolity was blown into one of the ugliest moments in American History. Parris sparks this by firstly acting on his own paranoia, which the reader would find in the introduction 'he believed he was being persecuted where ever he went';, and calling Reverend Hale in an attempt for self-preservation '….if you trafficked with spirits in the forest I must know it now, for surely my enemies will, and they will ruin me with it.'; This statement says a lot about the character of Reverend Parris: a greedy, power hungry man who is more concerned with his own reputation than the souls of his niece and daughter. He always acts on fear, a fear that he will lose his position of power in the community. Parris does not want the trials to end as a fraud because the scandal of having a lying daughter and niece would end his career in Salem.
Also important to the play is how Arthur Miller depicts how one selfish, evil person like Abigail Williams can bring others down and make others follow her to commit evil acts. These evil acts affect even the most honest people in the town like John and Elizabeth Proctor, and Rebecca Nurse who cannot fight the accusations made against them by those following Abigail. Those following Abigail are considered to be holy men that are full of honesty and justice, but the play shows that even those who are thought to be respectable and right, like people of government or community leaders can bring death to innocent people if they are driven by something wrong. II. Plot: The plot begins with the inciting incident where Rev. Parris finds his niece Abigail Williams and his daughter Betty along with his slave Tituba doing some dance in the forest.
...h, his wife, does not want to admit her husband’s deceit, proctor is accused of lying to the court. When Proctor confesses his sin of lechery he feels better and his internal guilt is freed. This is different to the end of the play where he signed the confession to witchcraft. He later rips it up as could not live with himself if he were to allow Abigail to get away with her lies, through confessing to something he did not do. In ripping up the confession he is also able to keep his good name which he says at the end is all he has left, his name, and he does not want to give it away.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a play that discusses many issues and spurs contemplation within the reader. While reading this play, because of the controversy of many issues detailed within, it is difficult for one not to take a look at one’s own morals and determine what one would do if placed in a similar situation. The key issues discussed within this play, the effects of hysteria, marital betrayal, and the murderous powers of lies, are portrayed intriguingly and effectively. The lessons that can be learned from The Crucible are still quite applicable today.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
In the Crucible, by Arthur Miller, men and women are treated unequally due to gender roles during this time period. In the play they are treated differently, And woman would be accused of something they didn’t do just because they weren’t “normal”.
The reputation of a person is very important to their standing in the community, and especially in a religious community. In the play the Crucible, Arthur Miller shows the importance of social standing by religious beliefs and contemporary social dynamics. Therefore, the play was based off of a historical context, witchcraft, some characters represent as a scapegoat while others act as an antithesis of being a witch to meet the society’s standards.
The crucible, written by Arthur Miller, is about the Salem witch trials and how people react to hysteria created from the fear of witches. In the play, after hysteria breaks out, the Salem government starts persecute and hang people it believes are witches. This prompts people to start to accusing people of witchcraft. Some people who accuse others of committing witchcraft are Abigail Williams and Thomas Putnam. They do not accuse people of witchcraft to stop witchcraft, but for personal gain or to hurt others. Thomas Putnam, one of the many characters who takes advantage of the witch trials, is able to use the fear of witches to bend the court to his will. Hysteria causes people to believe claims that are clearly false. This allows Putnam to persecute his enemies. He and many other are able to get away with this because hysteria driven persecutions are not run like regular courts and the fact that witchcraft is an invisible crime allows evidence to be made up. The theme of The Crucible is when any persecution is driven by fear and people can and will manipulate the system so they can gain and hurt another.
Vengeance is the main theme of The Crucible. The people of the town of Salem were not united, but instead, distrusted and disliked each other. During the court trials, the girls started accusing certain people that they didn't like of dealing with witchcraft. For example, Abigail Williams couldn't forget John Proctor even though their affair was over. She believed that if his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, was out of the way, Abigail and John would be together again. Therefore, she told everyone that Elizabeth's spirit was trying to kill her and accused Elizabeth of being a witch.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is a play that was first performed in 1953 in the United States of America in the midst of the persecution of alleged communists during the era of McCarthyism. Although the play explicitly addresses the Salem which hunt, many find that the play is an analogy to McCarthyism due to the striking similarities in which the people behaved. Miller highlight the different groups of characters in order to reveal overlying ideas of the play such as: Self preservation, power, and hypocrisy.