Relationship Between Science And Reason To Faith And Religion

722 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How reason complements faith

"How do you see the relationship between science and reason to faith and religion? Are the two irreconcilable? Or can science and religion complement one another? Can faith be reasonable?"
There is a fine line between the relationship between science and reason to faith and religion. The Scientific method looks at the facts and evidence to back them up. However, reason to faith goes deeper. In science I can form a hypothesis and do experiments to prove if my hypothesis true or false. In Faith, I just simply believe in something or someone beyond myself. It 's something that cannot be proved or disproved. Like for example I had faith that I would pass my biology class and I did. I believe they can be reconcilable one day, as of yet it has …show more content…

Faith is the strong belief in someone or something. How would you even prove to someone what your faith is? It 's what you believe. It 's your opinion and your belief on the subject. Faith can be reasonable but it 's just like anyone 's idea or opinion it 's what you do or don’t think. For example: I have faith that I will pass this class with an A. I have that strong belief. How can someone prove me wrong? Just like I can 't prove if they will pass or not. Another example is I took a biology course last semester on the first test I made a B. But when I went ask the professor a question, some girl behind me asked me why I made a higher grade and got extra points and she didn’t. The professor then looked at my paper and said she made a mistake and took my extra points off and I failed my first test. I was devastated. But, I picked myself back up and worked hard to pass the course; and I did. I had faith that I would; but no one can prove or disprove how hard I worked to pass. I learned that with hard work and a little faith you can achieve greatness. I benefited very much and learned a valuable lesson. The medical field is very competitive. But with hard work, dedication and a little faith in yourself, it pays off. People can definitely utilize this, like I said Just work hard to achieve your goals; and always have faith that things will work out in the end for the best.
Both science and reason to faith can go hand in hand and can be reconcilable. It hasn’t been proven but then again it hasn’t been disproved either. So there is still hope. In the future there could be a solid explanation or experiment to everything. Faith and science can compliment each other very well. You have to have faith in something, faith in your experiments to work with the right variables perhaps. It 's about believe in something beyond your control. Rather than having solid scientific

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Jane Goodall's In The Forests Of Gombe

    1336 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are some theories that science cannot prove. Science explains all of the logical and natural things in life through observation and experimentation. Religion explains all of the spiritual and mystical things in life. Religion is the belief and worshipping of a supernatural force like God. Jane Goodall is an outlier in the science industry. She believes in God and is also a scientist. Most scientists are only agnostic or atheists. Scientists only have one viewpoint. They only think logically and try to prove the existence of things. Religious people believe in a higher power that created everything and control everything. Jane Goodall has the perfect philosophy. When science is the only “window” someone bases their life on, there are drawbacks because there are a lot of things science cannot explain, logically. When religion is the only “window” someone bases their life on, there are drawbacks because there are a lot of things religion cannot explain, spiritually. When a person bases their life on both science and religion, more mysteries are answered. When both science and religion is part of a person’s philosophy, there are no drawbacks because they either support each other’s claims, do not explain each other, or supports one but not the

    Read More

  • Summary Of Andy Crouch Delight In Creation

    266 Words  | 1 Pages

    Science and faith are generally viewed as two topics that do not intermingle. However, Andy Crouch’s work, Delight in Creation, suggests that there is an approach to both faith and science that allows support of scientists in the church community. There is an approach that can regard science as a career that can reflect the nature of God.

    Read More

  • A Prayer For Owen Meany

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    The other answer to the question is that faith is doubt. This basis relies on the fact that since there is so little proof, one must doubt therefore one must have faith.

    Read More

  • Religion And Science : The Scarlet Letter

    1374 Words  | 3 Pages

    As said by Yale professor of psychology and cognitive science, "Religion and science will always clash." Science and religion are both avenues to explain how life came into existence. However, science uses evidence collected by people to explain the phenomenon while religion is usually based off a belief in a greater power which is responsible for the creation of life. The characters Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth in Nathaniel Hawthorne 's novel, The Scarlet Letter, represent religion and science, respectively, compared to the real world debate between science and religion. Roger Chillingworth is a physician who is associated with science. (ch. 9; page 107) "...made [Roger Chillingworth] extensively acquainted with the medical science of the day... Skillful men, of the medical and chirurgical profession, were of rare occurrence in the colony...They seldom... partook of the religious zeal that brought other emigrants across the Atlantic." The people of the Puritan community traveled across the Atlantic for religious reasons, and because men affiliated with medical science did not tend to practice religion, they rarely inhabited this community. Chillingworth, falling under the category of "skillful men of the medical and chirurgical profession," would not be expected to reside in this community. The narrator through emphasizes this with his rhetorical questioning, "Why, with such a rank in the learned world, had he come hither? What could he, whose sphere was in great cities, be seeking in the wilderness?" These questions demonstrate that it was so strange for Chillingworth to appear in this community because of his association with science. Perhaps, the phrase "with such rank in the learned world" could yield the narra...

    Read More

  • Religious Faith vs Science and Reason

    1423 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, conflicts between faith and reason took the forms of religion and free thinking. In the times of the Old Regime, people like Copernicus and Galileo were often punished for having views that contradicted the beliefs of the church. The strict control of the church was severely weakened around the beginning of the nineteenth century when the Old Regime ended. As the church's control decreased, science and intellectual thinking seemed to advance. While the people in the world became more educated, the church worked harder to maintain its influential position in society and keep the Christian faith strong. In the mid-nineteenth century, the church's task to keep people's faith strong became much harder, due to theories published by free thinkers like Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, David Friedrich Strauss, and others. These men published controversial theories that hammered away at the foundation on which the Christian church was built. As the nineteenth century progressed, more doubts began to arise about the basic faiths of the Christian church.

    Read More

  • Compare and Contrast of Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins´s Points of View on Science and Religion

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    First, I will demonstrate Stephen Jay Gould’s argument against the overlapping between science and religion, which is as follows:

    Read More

  • What Really Happened to the Dinosaurs?

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    There's always been a dispute between science and religion. It's something that can't be helped, and they are the same in many ways.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Scientific Revolution

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.

    Read More

  • The Integration of Science and Religion

    3264 Words  | 7 Pages

    At first glance, many facets of science and religion seem to be in direct conflict with each other. Because of this, I have generally kept them confined to separate spheres in my life. I have always thought that science is based on reason and cold, hard facts and is, therefore, objective. New ideas have to be proven many times by different people to be accepted by the wider scientific community, data and observations are taken with extreme precision, and through journal publications and papers, scientists are held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work. All of these factors contributed to my view of science as objective and completely truthful. Religion, on the other hand, always seems fairly subjective. Each person has their own personal relationship with God, and even though people often worship as a larger community with common core beliefs, it is fine for one person’s understanding of the Bible and God to be different from another’s. Another reason that Christianity seems so subjective is that it is centered around God, but we cannot rationally prove that He actually exists (nor is obtaining this proof of great interest to most Christians). There are also more concrete clashes, such as Genesis versus the big bang theory, evolution versus creationism, and the finality of death versus the Resurrection that led me to separate science and religion in my life. Upon closer examination, though, many of these apparent differences between science and Christianity disappeared or could at least be reconciled. After studying them more in depth, science and Christianity both seem less rigid and inflexible. It is now clear that intertwined with the data, logic, and laws of scien...

    Read More

  • Definition Essay: Do We Have Faith?

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    To have faith you must trust someone or something and believe in it. When we sit down in a chair, we do not stare at it and think about whether it is going to hold us or not, we just plop down in the seat. That demonstrates faith, sitting in that chair without contemplating it, you have faith that it will hold you up. Dictionary.com defines faith as, “confidence or trust in a person or thing, and belief that is not based on proof.” Faith means having trust and believing in something that will help you as you go through life, and not worrying about the future.

    Read More

  • 1 Peter 1: 3-3

    854 Words  | 2 Pages

    Faith being fruit of the Spirit of God. Faith does not come by our own doing, but is a fruit produced by the Spirit and is an assurance to those that believe and hope in the Lord.   "Now faith is the substance (assurance) of things hoped for, the evidence of things not

    Read More

  • St. Augustine's Argumentative Analysis

    905 Words  | 2 Pages

    All throughout history, there have been countless controversies and arguments over a wide array of topics. One of the greatest controversies is the one on faith and reason. Within this argument, people are trying to distinguish if there is a clear-cut difference between both faith and reason. Some believe that both serve the same purpose while others seem to think that there is no relation between the two at all. Those who believe they are completely different, are adamant in that faith purely serves the purpose of an extension of religion, while reason takes on a more logical and pragmatic.

    Read More

  • Religion And Science Does Not Improve God By Amir D. Aczel

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    Science and Religion Working Hand in Hand “Science investigates; religion interprets. Science gives man knowledge, which is power; religion gives man wisdom, which is control. Science deals mainly with facts; religion deals mainly with values. The two are not rivals.” (Martin Luther King Jr).

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Science and Religion

    1381 Words  | 3 Pages

    First off, it is important to realize that religion and science have to be related in some way, even if it is not the way I mentioned before. If religion and science were completely incompatible, as many people argue, then all combinations between them would be logically excluded. That would mean that no one would be able to take a religious approach to a scientific experiment or vice versa. Not only does that occur, but it occurs rather commonly. Scientists often describe their experiments and writings in religious terms, just as religious believers support combinations of belief and doubt that are “far more reminiscent of what we would generally call a scientific approach to hypotheses and uncertainty.” That just proves that even though they are not the same, religion and science have to be related somehow.

    Read More

  • Reflection Paper About Faith

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    Some feel that scientist are atheists. Some scientists say we still believe in God. St. Thomas answers some questions about faith and science and why faith cannot be tested by the rules of science. In obj.4 he says, “ Because the object of science is something seen, whereas the object of faith is the unseen, as stated above”(258). What he is saying is science is something that has to be seen and proven whereas faith is something as unseen and relies solely on an individual 's beliefs. St. Thomas also says, “ In like manner it may happen that what is an object of vision or scientific knowledge for one man even in the state of wayfarer, is , for another man, an object of faith, because he does not know it by demonstration”(258). Meaning that what one person sees as scientific and fact, can appear to another man as just another sign of faith, faith has no bounds whereas science has boundaries and

    Read More

More about Relationship Between Science And Reason To Faith And Religion

Open Document