CONTENTS
PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1
Background 1
Statement of Purpose 1
Scope 2
Limitations 2
Methods of Research 2
CHAPTER 2 - FINDINGS 3…………………………………………………………3
Current Regulations 3
Current Expectations from customers 6
Reason Additional Regulations should be added 8
Future Potential 9
CHAPTER 3 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11
Conclusions 11
Recommendations 12
WORKS CITED 13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report will describe the history of government regulations and FTC. How that applied to Google search and personal privacy. The changes made from the settlement between Google and the FTC, the difference Google's practices and policies from before the settlement and after the settlement, and the current demands and expectations from current and vocal Google users. The report will also draw a conclusion from the findings and will determine if additional regulations are needed or if the regulations currently in place are sufficient.
GUYS PLS HELPS ME TO ADD YOUR PART CONCLUSION HERE.
The finding of this report are based on four different factors for different factor for analysis of personal data protection and personal data privacy. The first is current regulations, which ……
the second factor taken into the current expectation from customer…
the third factor discuss the reason additional regulations should be added.
REGULATION DATA PROTECTION AND PERSONAL DATA PRIVACY
Background
In today’s fast paced technology, search engines have become vastly popular use for people’s daily routines. A search engine is an information retrieval system that allows someone to search the...
... middle of paper ...
...f Espionage, Intelligence and Security (Vol. 2, pp. 143-144). Detroit: Gale. Retrieved from
Hillier, A., & Culhane, D. (2013). GIS Applications and Administrative Data to Support Community Change. In M. Weil (Ed.), The Handbook of Community Practice (2nd ed., pp. 827-844). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Retrieved from
Google Privacy Policy, http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html#information. See also
Google Privacy FAQ,< http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacy_faq.html.>
Google Privacy FAQ, id. at section 5.
Personal data are regulated by United Nations and urges States to implement effective measures to ensure t...
The personal connection Americans have with their phones, tablets, and computers; and the rising popularity of online shopping and social websites due to the massive influence the social media has on Americans, it is clear why this generation is called the Information Age, also known as Digital Age. With the Internet being a huge part of our lives, more and more personal data is being made available, because of our ever-increasing dependence and use of the Internet on our phones, tablets, and computers. Some corporations such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook; governments, and other third parties have been tracking our internet use and acquiring data in order to provide personalized services and advertisements for consumers. Many American such as Nicholas Carr who wrote the article “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty, With Real Dangers,” Anil Dagar who wrote the article “Internet, Economy and Privacy,” and Grace Nasri who wrote the article “Why Consumers are Increasingly Willing to Trade Data for Personalization,” believe that the continuing loss of personal privacy may lead us as a society to devalue the concept of privacy and see privacy as outdated and unimportant. Privacy is dead and corporations, governments, and third parties murdered it for their personal gain not for the interest of the public as they claim. There are more disadvantages than advantages on letting corporations, governments, and third parties track and acquire data to personalized services and advertisements for us.
Different people, cultures, and nations have a wide variety of expectations about how much privacy is entitled to or what constitutes an invasion of privacy. Privacy is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information. Personal privacy has been declining in the past year which is caused by today’s technological society. With the latest technology such as face scanners, data collecting, and highly advanced software’s, privacy can be compromised, which is exactly what is being done today and it is unconstitutionally intrusive.
The paper will deal with two aspects of the privacy-vs-security issue. The first one is concerned with general civil liberties, where privacy is understood to mean freedom to make personal (private) choices in our own homes, control our daily lives and decide with whom we share information that is of our concern – information about our emotions, attitudes, behavior and future decisions and events. The second aspect deals with the privacy vs. security on the internet. Since we live in a technological era, internet has become an inseparable part of our l...
The data protection act sets rules on how to process personal information that is held on a computer. The data protection act can benefit people by giving them certain rights and that every one that holds personal information must be open about how the information was obtained and used. I will show this in my report in many ways. Contents Page 1 - The principles of the data protection act Page 2 - How the principles will affect your company Page 3 - What your Company should do as a Result to the principles Page 4 - How Computer misuse can affect your company Page 5 - How to counter computer misuse Page 6 - Bibliography The Principles Of The Data Protection Act There are the eight main principles of the data protection act, your data must be: * Fairly and lawfully processed.
Part of the allure of the Internet has always been the anonymity it offers its users. As the Internet has grown however, causing capitalists and governments to enter the picture, the old rules are changing fast. E-commerce firms employ the latest technologies to track minute details on customer behavior. The FBI's Carnivore email-tracking system is being increasingly used to infringe on the privacy of netizens. Corporations now monitor their employees' web and email usage. In addition to these privacy infringements, Internet users are also having their use censored, as governments, corporations, and other institutions block access to certain sites. However, as technology can be used to wage war on personal freedoms, it can also be employed in the fight against censorship and invasion of privacy.
Google is the largest search engine across the globe, which has significantly transformed the use of the Internet as an information source. The influence of Google in Internet use as information source is evident in the fact that by June 2010, it accounted for more than 70 percent of total Internet searches in America. In addition to its success and profitability in the global market, Google is renowned as a highly ethical company as demonstrated in its corporate philosophy features. However, the firm’s behavior during the launch of its China-based search engine in 2006 generated huge skepticism from the United States government and several human rights organizations (Baker & Tang, p.2). Since the launch of Google’s Chinese search engine, the company complied with China’s censorship regulations by deciding to filter out terms that are considered politically sensitive. This decision attracted criticism from political leaders and human rights activists who accused Google of betraying its adopted ethical standards by ignoring the essence of freedom of expression and information access. As a result, Google faced a dilemma involving the clash between law and ethics. In the subsequent years, Google reacted to the dilemma by changing its rhetoric strategies in efforts to respond to the changing needs.
Nowadays, more people give away their personal information on social networks without realizing the potential threats. Under EU law, personal data is defined as ‘any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person.’ While under Article 8 ECHR, there is a fundamental right for the privacy of your life. The Directive 95/46/EC sets a landmark in the history of data protection within the EU. In January 2012 the Commission drafted a proposal for new rules regarding data protection in order to replace the Data Protection Directive. While Directive 95/46/EC will be replaced by the new regulation on data protection, a new directive will replace the ‘Framework Decision’. The proposed Directive on data protection, aims to harmonize the current data protection law in all Member States. Also, one of the Data Protection Regulation goals is to give people more control over their data and make sure that their information is being protected. The Commission proposed a regulation instead of a directive because a regulation is applicable to all Member States without the need for individual, national implementation. This essay is structured as followed. The first part of the essay provides explores the background of data protection, to give a better understanding of the subject. The second part will focus on the justification of the reformation of Directive 95/46/EC. The third part of the essay explains the proposed regulation from the Commission and the response of the European Parliament. The final part will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed regulation and will focus on the differences of the new ‘Directive’ with the ‘Framework Decision.’
At the beginning, the causes of the problem can be classified into three aspects: transferring personal data to others without consumers’ consent, lacking awareness on the protection of privacy and leaking the personal data unintentionally. The leakage of the personal data can be in the form of keeping and transmitting personal data insecurely and then stealing by crackers. There is no controversy on this cause- it is apparently a crime, hence, not discussed in this essay. One common torment of companies is that they are not renowned. Consumer personal information includi...
The world erupted in outrage following revelations by Edward Snowden regarding the extent of surveillance perform by the National Security Agency. Privacy becomes one of the hottest topic of 2013 and was chosen by the world’s most popular online dictionary, Dictionary.com, as the Word of the Year. However, the government is not the only one that conduct data gathering and surveillance. Employers often monitor their employees, and businesses collect data on theirs customer. The morality of these practices is a topic that generates heated debate.
Perhaps the founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, said it best when he claimed that privacy is no longer a “social norm.” Virtually everyone has a smart phone and everyone has social media. We continue to disclose private information willingly and the private information we’re not disclosing willingly is being extracted from our accounts anyway. Technology certainly makes these things possible. However, there is an urgent need to make laws and regulations to protect against the stuff we’re not personally disclosing. It’s unsettling to think we are living in 1984 in the 21st century.
As can be seen, from the information presented, the need for laws and restrictions concerning internet data collection is greatly needed. Moreover, the government can search private citizens data without warrant or cause. Also, companies are not only collecting internet user data but also selling it. The companies and agencies who commit such crimes should be fined or either closed down. In closing, the privacy and security of individuals on the internet should be upheld by the United States government.
Privacy is the condition where someone personal information can not be documented and be used by others (Parent, 1983). Privacy has been and continues to be a significant issue of concern for both current and prospective electronic commerce customers. The foll...
While much research into the specific causes and effects of different applications, sites, and devices is still needed there is sufficient evidence to support the research and weigh the consequences of the effect of technology on privacy. The issue of privacy walks a fine line between having freedoms and losing freedoms. “Siitis’s most crucial insight is that privacy can both support and undermine democracy.” (Morozov 2013) The focus for further development and research would be a probe into the personal desires of people to maintain their privacy and the consequences for those who did not.