Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Regional trade agreements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Regional trade agreements
Regional Trade Agreements vs. Global Trade Liberalization
There is much debate concerning regional trade agreements and global trade liberalization. Pros and cons can be found for each trade policy. After looking at several arguments for and against regional trade agreements, it seems that overall regional trade agreements are more beneficial when compared to global trade liberalization.
A regional trade agreement is “where member nations agree to impose lower barriers to trade within the group than trade with nonmember nations,” (Carbaugh, p 529). Regional trade agreements don’t affect each nations domestic policies, it only creates increased trade and relations among certain nations. This type of trading system complements multilateral trading.
Even though there are numerous positives to regional trade agreements, there are negatives as well. “Regional trading groups strengthen trade and the benefits thereof with groups but at the same time may serve to undermine free trade globally by implicitly and explicitly discriminating against trade with countries outside the groups (Colorado State University-Global Campus).” Carbaugh also notes this in his textbook, International Economics. He states that discrimination against other nations, not in the trade agreement, strays from the principles of normal trading relations, a major initiative of the World Trade Organization.
On the flip side, there are numerous positives that outweigh the negatives found with regional trade agreements. In the article, Regional trade agreements versus global trade liberalization: implications for a small island developing state, by Asafu-Adjave and Mahadevan, found that full trade liberalization created the best outcomes when it comes to r...
... middle of paper ...
...posed against non-member nations. While her study was unable to give a definite answer as to whether preferential trade agreements help or hurt un-associated countries, she did determine that goods having large deductions in preferential tariffs to participating countries impose the highest tariffs to non-participating countries.
Zeng, K. (2010). Multilateral versus bilateral and regional trade liberalization: explaining China's pursuit of free trade agreements (FTAs). Journal Of Contemporary China, 19(66), 635-652. doi:10.1080/10670564.2010.485400
Zeng discusses how China used the regional approach to trade liberalization by creating free trade agreements with their trading partners. This resulted in China experiencing greater influence in the Asia-pacific region. In addition, China’s choice to utilize FTAs created alternative bargaining over trade issues.
Secondly, the existence of merchant may maintain the stability in border areas (South-East). And the oversea trade is also an extremely part of the tribute system that can display China’s powerfulness. Lastly,the author calls for lax of business environment and tax policy with the expectation of trade
After a long period of isolationism, China and Japan were pressured to open trade and have foreign relations with the West in the nineteenth century. During the late 1800’s, the Industrial Revolution created a huge gap between the Western and Eastern powers, which left China and Japan in a military and technological disadvantage (Fruhstuck, Lecture). Initially, China and Japan closed their doors to the West because they were both self sustaining nations, did not like foreign influences, and believed that their society was superior to the West. They both tried to resist foreign influences by keeping their interaction with the West to a minimum, but they were no match for Western technology and eventually they each had to sign unequal treaties that favored the Western powers (Craig & Reischauer, 1978). However, China and Japan’s reactions to the treaties that forced them to open their trading ports for foreigners were very different; China rejected Westernization while Japan accepted it (Lockwood, 1956).
Germany, Great Britain, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia all claimed sole trading points to their selected “spheres of influence.” Some of these countries’ even claimed that the territory that lay within their spheres was their own. With the United States’ recent acquisition of the Philippines, they too were now an Asian power just 400 miles away from Mainland China. This closeness resulted in American businesses hoping to take advantage of China’s tremendous resources. The various spheres of influence, however, challenged their ambitions.
These countries should consider embracing free trade in order to fully benefit in many areas for their economy. There are several pros and cons to consider regarding free trade. Free trade fully removes any hassles of taxes and other government restrictions that limit international trading opportunities. Free trade vastly improves upon the economic wellbeing of all nations involved in international trading. Since free trade also allows each nation involved to specialize and create specific commodities, free trade can run efficiently and inexpensively compared to other complicated
Regional trade agreements have been prevalent since the early 1990s. A Regional trade agreement removes all barriers to trade and foreign investment, which means that poor economies are not allowed to use import tariffs to protect their growing industries or their farmers from floods of cheap imports. Free trade agreements also include additional rules on investment that pose a prospective threat to poor people’s access to public services. This clearly states that even though poor countries have the advantage of strength in numbers as compared to the rich economies and countries, the former are more likely to be pushed into accepting unreasonable demands of the richer economies. Therefore, it can be analyzed that a Regional Trade Agreement between equal partners can prove to be beneficial for both, but such an agreement between unequal partners ( rich and a poor economy) shall probably prove to be beneficial for the stronger economy.
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
Zhang, Jianhong, Arjen van Witteloostuijn, and J. Paul Elhorst. "China's Politics and Bilateral Trade Linkages." Asian Journal of Political Science 19.1 (2011): 25-47. Academic Search Premier. Web. 13 Dec. 2013.
The political force moved away from the painstakingly and time-consuming technique of multilateral tariff negotiations to smaller regional and bilateral provisions - the Regional Trade Agreement. In these arrangements; members accord preferential treatment , basically agreeing to liberalize the exchange of goods and services amongst each another giving regard to certain trade barriers. RTA is not the first-hand way of trade liberalization though. Initially, when multilateral trade discussions used to happen, two-sided and multiparty FTA”s filled the vacuum. There were restrictions from stringent and premeditated trade arrangements earlier, thus a lot of states are now moving towards freer trade for their own benefits.
Few governments will argue that the exchange of goods and services across international borders is a bad thing. However, the degree to which an international trading system is open may come into contest with a state’s ability to protect its interests. Free trade is often portrayed in a good light, with focus placed on the material benefits. Theoretically, free trade enables a distribution of resources across state lines. A country’s workforce may become more productive as it specializes in products that it has a comparative advantage. Free trade minimizes the chance that a market will have a surplus of one product and not enough of another. Arguably, comparative specialization leads to efficiency and growth.
Whereas China ushered in the 21st Century as member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and as an economic power, Japan entered the Asian Century with a stagnant economy. And as China transforms its economy into a ‘socialist market economy’ it is held that the attendant social, economic, and political transformations necessitate that its state controlled IRs system is decentralized and more so, it should be converge with international best practice IR sta...
Howe, Christopher, Y. Y. Kueh, and Robert F. Ash. China's Economic Reform: A Study with Documents. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.
International trading has had its delays and road blocks, which has created a number of problems for countries around the world. Countries, fighting with one another to get the better deal, create tariffs and taxes to maximize their profit. This fighting leads to bad relationships with competing countries, and the little producing countries get the short end of this stick. Regulations and organizations have been established to help everyone get the best deal, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), but not everyone wants help, especially from an organization that seems to help only the big countries and those they want to trade with. This paper will be discussing international trading with emphasis on national sovereignty, the World Trade Organization, and how the WTO impacts trading countries.
China’s economical strength comes from its international trades as the economy has grown to a rate of 10.3% in 2010. It has become the world’s largest exporter in the global economy. In the area of trade, three major strengths of China are 1) it is the single most important challenge for the European Union (EU) trade policy, 2) China is the second trade partner behind the U.S., and 3) it is the EU’s biggest source of imports by far with the dramatic increase in the EU-China trades over the recent years. The EU exports of goods to China were 113.1 billion Euros and in imports was 281.9 billion Euros in 2010. The service exports were 18 billion Euros and in imports were 13 billion Euros in 2009. China has also established trades with Australia. Recently, the two countries have been cooperating and assisting each other in industries such as agriculture, energy and minerals as they continue their free trade agreements (Jia Qinglin).
During the twentieth century, the world began to develop the idea of economic trade. Beginning in the 1960’s, the four Asian Tigers, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, demonstrated that a global economy, which was fueled by an import and export system with other countries, allowed the economy of the home country itself to flourish. Th...
We begin our study of free trade by understanding the four principles of individual decision making.... ... middle of paper ... ... Edge, Ken, “Free trade and Protection: advantages and disadvantages of free trade” NSW HSC online http://www.hsc.csu.edu.au/economics/global_economy/tut7/Tutorial7.html#more Accessed November 29, 2011. Net Aparijita, Sinha, “What are the disadvantages of free trade?