Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Experience writing an essay
Decision making essay reflection
Reflective practice essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Experience writing an essay
Reflective Writing a Paper In writing a paper I often start out full of ideas and methods of analysis about the topic or issue at hand. However, I find it tedious to have to connect those ideas; yet, I want my paper to be cohesive and organized. My rough draft paper often seems as if someone crumpled it up and threw it in a blender. I always know what I want to say and feel that I have a good development of ideas, but often struggle in drawing out my main points. The paper that I am revising is my analysis paper because it lacks an assertive thesis and an organized plan. These are important global revisions that need to be revised in order for my paper to truly be reader friendly. When I first got my analysis paper back I felt that the grade was justified because I thought that I had developed my ideas and analyzed them well while providing evidence and support for my claims. However, I also recognized immediately upon a quick glance over my paper that my claims were not clearly stated and therefore my readers were not sure what the point of my paper was. I was not sure how to go about fixing this problem until I heard the presentation in class about global revisions. The presenters talked about how important it is to make sure that your introduction and your conclusion are similar in that they discuss the same points because this means your paper stayed focused. Also, in order to keep my paper focused it should have a concise structure laid out and then followed. When it came down to it, my paper was lacking two major things: a thesis that incorporated and strongly stated what the purpose and main points of the paper were and a paragraph detailing the structure of my paper so that the reader could easily follow my ideas. Knowing what I had to do I then sat down to revise my paper. Thinking I knew exactly what needed to be done I told myself it would take a half hour flat. An hour later I was still staring at the computer screen trying to rationalize to myself the long new bolded areas. How did I ever get by without providing that information in the first place? I had some areas where I inserted whole new paragraphs and then other pages that I left completely the same. I feel that this is because I did not have too many local revisions to make nor did I need to further analyze or develop ideas. I just needed to forecast and make my ideas more understandable to the reader in the first place. The first thing I attacked was my thesis. As stated before it simply said, "McBride succeeds in connecting with her readers and providing a persuasive argument about the importance of women's work through the use of techniques such as logos and pathos." If I do say so myself this is a fine sentence, but too bad it's a lousy thesis sentence because it does not incorporate all of the ideas I then go on to discuss in my paper. As stated in a handout from class I needed to "Make my central question as precise, important, and engaging as possible. Without a focused claim, the rest of the essay will wander and not teach your readers much or provide any real insight." So, the way I revised my thesis then was to create a whole paragraph that narrowly discussed what McBride's purpose in writing her essay was and the rhetorical methods she used to express her ideas to the readers. I made it clear what her strategies were, why they were important and how they worked. I then made sure that those ideas were reinforced in my conclusion paragraph, which luckily somehow they were. You see, that proves that I knew what I was talking about all along, but all this commotion about revising has taught me how important it is to recreate my paper so that the reader can also easily comprehend and appreciate my ideas and analysis. Another aspect to writing that I found myself having to deal with was this concept of a paragraph that forecasted what I was going to talk about in my paper and how I was going to do so. I just couldn't believe that that was what I was really supposed to do. I thought that I must have misunderstood somehow because that seemed too simple and boring. I felt like it was a paragraph that only required me to fill in the blanks after the opening of "This paper is about." Even on the assignment sheet though it listed a forecasting paragraph, or partition, "that would delineate the steps I would follow in my argument." Well, I decided to take that requirement as a suggestion and went about my merry way only to find that without such a paragraph the reader is more easily lost and the structure to my paper is unknown. Well, so fine. The presentation about global revisions also talked about making sure each paragraph had a purpose and was consistent to my thesis. I can see now how a forecasting paragraph helps me to lay out the points that need to be accomplished in my paper so that it is easier for me to create paragraphs that do so and flow together. Basically, this came down to the addition of a whole new paragraph, but I found it actually quite easy to write. It is now my third paragraph and immediately acknowledges the rhetorical devices used. I then go through and discuss what each of those rhetorical devices was used to accomplish and what McBride longed for the reader to grasp as the purpose of her essay. I also continued my train of thought into the next paragraph by revising the topic sentence and reinforcing yet again the purpose of McBride's essay. I feel through this added paragraph that I better intertwine the rhetorical devices and the purpose of the author together because both are important and they belong together. The reason the author chose certain rhetorical devices to use in the first place in writing her essay was so that a certain purpose would be fulfilled and demonstrated to the reader. This paragraph helps me set up how I'm going to explain the author's purpose and prove it through analysis of her rhetorical strategies. With these two major problems fixed I read over the rest of my paper searching for more revisions that I could make. However, I felt satisfied. I was able to organize the shredded pieces of my paper together nicely simply by introducing my main ideas clearly right away and then diagramming how I was going to discuss them. This way, by the time the reader got to the middle and end of my essay where my development of ideas was solid they were right on target and able to understand what I was talking about. At first I had been dismayed that of all the aspects of writing and revising the thing I needed to work on was my thesis. It seemed so elementary; yet, I am keenly aware that it remains one of the most challenging and important parts of a paper. I found it comforting that mine now seemed more focused for the reader and delighted to be finished. I'm glad my paper doesn't seem like jumbled popcorn anymore.
Another revision technique that was suggested was “sentence outlining” which involves summarizing each paragraph of a writing into one overarching sentence in order to improve the cohesion of the piece (Harris 450). Introducing these techniques can allow readers to utilize revision in their own writing and form their own stance on its effectiveness. With revising the conclusion of a piece, Harris’ advise is to look ahead rather than to rephrase what has already been stated (Harris 454). Revision is expected to extend beyond the piece.
2. Your conclusion paragraph should be more detailed. Restate in just a few sentences the points that you made in your paper and what conclusions you have drawn from those points.
I have always had troubles writing the introduction of papers. The introduction is the base and sets the mood of the whole paper. I believe it is the most important paragraph in the paper. But once I develop the introductory paragraph, I find the rest of the paper easier to write. In order for me to better myself in writing introductory paragraphs, I just have to get more in touch with my creative side. After the rough draft, the students of the class would bring their papers to the course and would get into groups to peer review the papers. This would helpful to receive the views of our peers to help edit our assignment. After the peer review of the rough draft, the next step of the writing process was the revision. The revision was when we take the information and opinions from the groups and corporate them into our papers. Also, for the revision, you would offer work days for you to proof read our paper before we had to type our final copy. This was extremely beneficial for us to get your opinion on our paper d...
...es of the snowboard. Balancing the snowboard and riding on the rail, momentum keeps pushing on both of them down the rail. You may also see more torque when you are on the top of the mountain or hill and you are teetering on the edge. Putting more mass on the front of the snowboard will cause the front of the snowboard to droop downhill, therefore causing you to take off down the mountain.
Previous to this course, I had never been exposed to rhetoric, nor did I understand rhetoric and its influence the first time it was introduced to me. In addition to having limited exposure to rhetoric, this was my first real writing assignment for an AP course. The process I used to complete this essay is far different from the process I’ve developed throughout this school year. I allowed my anxiety to override my brain, resulting in me stressing myself throughout the whole writing process. Rather than accepting that I am good enough for an AP course, I doubted my writing skills and drove myself crazy by second-guessing every word and phrase I typed. I relentlessly researched rhetoric, vocabulary, and other writing knowledge, which would be beneficial for the future, but I let all of the writing skills I had not yet acquired prevent me from using the skills I did have to write a great essay. Now, I type everything I have to say about the essay topic and then review my work only fixing what needs to be fixed. At this point in time I had difficulty quoting text; I had to learn how to stop drop quoting and when to use brackets, commas, and ellipses. Looking back on this essay, I wish I had taken notes on the text, as it would have made analyzing structure far easier. I also wish I had asked for help when I felt unsure about rhetoric rather than trying to find answers
...ys that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and this is also displayed when a bat hits a ball. The bat exerts force on the ball, just as the ball exerts force on the bat. This force can sometimes even be enough to break the bat, like in the illustration below.
...every individual to consider the earth as a particle to do the analysis based on its orbital motion around a star.
Quantum Mechanics is a branch of physics that describes the structure and behavior of matter.
Einstein’s education, life experiences, and “freethinking ability contributed to his success and ability in his life.” Albert Einstein, to this day is still one of the most accomplished and respected mathematician/ inventor in the world. Einstein’s journey was one filled with challenges, discoveries, and many accomplishments. On March 14, 1879, Albert Einstein was born in Wurttemberg, Germany to Jewish parents Hermann, and Pauline Einstein. Shortly after Albert’s birth, his father and mother eagerly collected their personal belongings as well as their new baby boy and moved to the Kingdom of Munich, now Germany. Following his families move to Munich, in November of 1881 Einstein’s parents gave birth to a little girl, with such a delicate sweet face. They named her Maria, who was soon to become Albert’s new little angelic best friend.
Skydiving is an adrenaline-based sport with a fairly simple concept -- jump from a high place (usually out of a plane) from several thousand feet above sea level and hope and pray for a safe landing. This safe landing is often times achieved through the use of a device called a parachute, which enables the skydiver to reduce his speed to such a point that colliding with the earth will not be fatal.
An outbreak of theories and discussions of the possibility of building a quantum computer now permeates itself throughout the quantum fields of technology and research. It's roots can be traced back to 1981, when Richard Feynman noted that physicists always seem to run into computational problems when they try to simulate a system in which quantum mechanics would take place. The calculations involving the behavior of atoms, electrons, or photons, require an immense amount of time on today's computers. In 1985 in Oxford England the first description of how a quantum computer might work surfaced with David Deutsch's theories. The new device would not only be able to surpass today's computers in speed, but also could perform some logical operations that conventional ones couldn't.
Quantum mechanics was pioneered by Max Planck, who developed the formula E = hv—which is the base for much of the quantum mechanical field. Quantum theory (the origin of quantum mechanics), as described in Talking Tech, was, at its early core, a handful of theories and hypotheses regarding energy quantization and wave-particle duality (Rheingold and Levine). The book goes on to explain how this realm of science is basically an extension of physics attempting to derive a mathematical specification of how the entirety of the universe operates and behaves at the subatomic level. Conversely, it also describes how quantum theory also diverges from classical physics in that it stipulates that the only...
There are still limitations in classical cryptography, it is purely mathematical and information cannot be separated from its physical representation. In Classical physics, we use binary form to store and process the data. In the 1980s, C.Bennet, P.Benioff, R.Feynman and others observed that new and very powerful ways of information processing are possible with quantum mechanical systems. This gave birth to the concept of quantum computing.
While in Milan , Einstein wanted to continue his primary education, and in 1895 took his entrance exam to ETH in Zurich . His scores were not sufficient enough to allow him to enter the primary school, instead he went to a community school in the nearby city of Aarau . In 1896 he received his school certificate and enrolled ETH with intentions in becoming a mathematics or physics teacher. Einstein got average marks while in ETH and received his diploma in 1900, is GPA was 4.6 out of 6.0. Einstein eagerly applied to numerous Universities, looking for an assistantship but was denied to all of them. While looking for a school for higher education, Einstein gave up his German citizenship and applied for a Swiss one instead. He was given Swiss citizenship in 1901.
In the first steps of writing this essay, I was often found on the floor of my room, surrounded by books, (just in case I needed to define something any further) my laptop, an in progress timeline, various writing utensils, and the occasional scratch paper. A mistake I made was spending too much time on research, and not enough time on piecing together the essay, but it was not something out of my reach. Since I have a strong command of persuasion, I did not have to spend an extensive amount of time when it came to concluding each paragraph with pathos. The toughest part of composing this essay was concentrating on the thesis.