Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transcendentalism theory
Transcendentalism theory
Transcendentalism analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transcendentalism theory
Transcendentalists believe that the human race is great, and everyone has something unique to offer to the world. Many times, those who have been tricked into conforming to society tend to shun those who reveal their unique qualities. I believe that instead of tolerating or simply accepting people’s differences, we should celebrate them. In this way, no one will feel like they are being tolerated, or that they are a burden to others and their peers are just being insincerely civil around them. Instead, they feel that they are being loved, as they should be.
Today’s world is so diverse in many ways. There are more than just racial, sexuality, gender, status, and religious differences. Each individual person is as unique as their thumbprint;
…show more content…
Especially young people, since they are susceptible to the opinions of others. Even those who seem super confident or even arrogant surely have insecurities. People who are valued and respected by their peers will feel better about themselves. They may not believe it at first because of their natural insecurities, but if you keep telling them over and over that they are beautiful, and you believe it, eventually they themselves will accept it as truth and gain self-respect.
We as a society tend to generalize individuals by giving them a label. It is easier to refer to another person as a jew, or as a jock, or as a white person, than it is to refer to them as Jessica or Reggie. Why is that? We do we always have to give people a label to talk about them? People should be referred to by their names and recognized for all aspects of their identity, not just the one part that may stand out most to you.
Not labeling people allows them to feel more rounded and personalized. Humans and their personalities are too complicated to be summed up in one word. There are so many aspects to a person’s personality. Trying to categorize a person based on one of those aspects is like trying to decide if a whale should be grouped with sea animals or mammals. A whale is both a mammal and a sea animal, and it doesn’t let anybody try to conform them to one
…show more content…
Sure, it is easier for us to refer to someone by one aspect, such as calling them a drama geek. However, that erases the rest of their identity if you only think of them that way. Such is the case for Rafe Goldberg from the novel Openly Straight by Bill Konigsberg. Rafe comes out as gay, and while he is accepted by his peers, he is just known around school as “that gay guy”. He can’t stand it, and he wishes for someone to like him for everything he is and not only consider his sexuality when they think of him. His solution to this dilemma is to start over at a new school and never come out to anybody, which works for a little while but eventually backfires when he falls in love with his new best friend. The lesson from this is that, while yes, you shouldn’t be labeled by one aspect of your identity, you also shouldn’t ever neglect that aspect because it is still a part of who you are. Every part of an individual is important in shaping them as a
name with it. This presents a problem because the people who have been labeled with such
“African american. 5’8. Female. Brown eyes”, I read the words off a passport only to realize that it belonged to me. I couldn’t get over the little girl that had no smile present at the time. I realized at that moment how much I changed from then to now. I still identify myself as “African american, 5'8. Female. Brown eyes”. Most importantly I know that I’m more than just descriptions in a small book. I would consider myself to be a woman who is sophisticated, intelligent, poised, and blessed. Many people can’t even come up with a list of adjectives to describe themselves, as a result they usually ask the people that are close to them to do so. Not knowing who you are other than what people tell
In this essay, I will compare the philosophies of transcendentalism and anti-transcendentalism through the writings of Thoreau and Emerson vs. Melville. In Thoreau’s excerpt of “Walden”, he tested the transcendentalist philosophy through experience. Emerson’s transcendental writing style is displayed in “Nature”. In Melville’s excerpt of Moby Dick, he exhibits anti-transcendentalism in his work.
Transcendentalism, a philosophy that began in the 19th century, advocates that humans are naturally good and all individuals have potential. In high school, developing into a unique and self-assured person can be a difficult task. Students feel the need to be accepted by their peers and standing out against the crowd can be difficult. Students should be exposed to transcendentalist ideas would be able to fight this battle and leave high school unscathed. Many argue that transcendentalist beliefs cause problems as students cannot think for themselves at a young age. However, students who do not think for themselves while in high school will never develop the ability to think for themselves. The morals and beliefs of a student should not be handed to them on a silver platter the way there are in realist teachings. Instead, they must discover and test their beliefs. Although some argue transcendentalism would cause students to rebel, students in high school should embrace transcendentalist ideas as students would be more likely to believe in their capabilities, rely less on the opinion of others, and find their own way of thinking.
Transcendentalism is based on the belief that institutions in the society corrupt an individual’s purity. Transcendentalists believe that people are at their best when they are truly independent and self-reliant. They also believe that from independence and self-reliance, a true community is formed. Even though Transcendentalism is not recognized, it still exists in the modern society. Though not clearly outspoken as in Emerson and Thoreau’s times, many people in today’s society still have transcendental beliefs. Transcendental ideals are found in songs, films, books and other works such as media and advertisements. One example is the song “Get up, Stand up,” by Bob Marley, it is found to be influenced and has inspiration of transcendental elements such as Solitude (individuality), self-reliance, non-conformism (anti-institution), anti-materialism, nature and spirituality.
Throughout the history of mankind there have been numerous cases in which people were victims of oppression or hate. Among these cases the sole reasoning behind this oppression or hate being based on the perception of others. History has shown that society is responsible for labeling groups of people, generally these labels are misleading.
Before I started cheering, both of my parents never knew how much goes into being a cheerleader. Though soccer was the sport I grew up playing, I ended up quitting to try out for cheerleading in seventh grade. I made the squad that year and I immediately became attached to cheerleading, though my parents did not know how to react exactly. Of course they were happy for me since it was something that I wanted to do, but it was not soccer. My dad did not consider cheerleading to be a sport in the beginning, claiming that “there is no team quality to cheering.” It was safe to say that he did not necessarily like that I quit soccer to take up cheering since he did not consider cheerleading to be a real sport. I have learned that going against tradition and conformity is difficult, but is worth it in the end.
Modern day transcendentalists are not easily found anymore in society. It is hard to pinpoint exactly what a transcendentalist is. By being your own self, following your own standards and being yourself, you become transcendental. By looking at the Robertsons’ way of life, they would make a tremendous example of modern day transcendentalists. Their religion, love of nature, and individualism create a transcendental lifestyle.
Such an encounter becomes a source of discomfort and momentarily a crisis of racial meaning. Without a racial identity, one is in danger of having no identity" (Michael Omi, Howard Winant, 12). It is obvious when we look at someone we try to get a sense of who they are. We categorize people within our society and place them by gender, ethnicity, race, religion, and even social class. Because one of the first things we utilize is race and gender it is questioned that without racial identity one is in danger of having no identity. Personally, I believe that this is true, for instance, within our society gender roles are very apparent. We utilize gender as a form of identity, because many people now are coming forward with wanting to change their identity there has been ann uproar to try to fight against equality for citizens that identify with a different gender. What is to be considered is the same uproar that is occurring with people who identify with a gender is also occurring with citizens that are identified solely on race. Within our different generations there has been an uprising in mixed races, a person can be
“The Transcendentalist adopts the whole connection of spiritual doctrine. He believes in miracle, in the perpetual openness of the human mind to new influx of light and power; he believes in inspiration, and in ecstasy.”(Emerson 196). These two lines written by Ralph Waldo Emerson exemplify the whole movement of transcendentalist writers and what they believed in. Though to the writers, transcendentalism was a fight for a belief, unknown to them they could have been fighting for the betterment of human health. The transcendentalist writings of Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson have directly affected the health of modern society through the idea of transcendental meditation. Through modern science, scientists have linked increases in health among individuals through the use of transcendental meditation.
Once we understand why we act in labeling people, we can work on eliminating the habit of labeling others. We can overcome it by promoting absolute approval, sympathy, and consideration. We can learn to observe and experience the world without judgment. We can remain detached from expectations and demands. We can learn to accept people as they are and will not cause them unnecessary pain.
Many people have theories and philosophies about life in general. There have been hundreds of thousands of books published by many different people on the ideas of people in the past and the present. Transcendentalism falls in amongst all of these ideas. There have been articles, essays, poems, and even books written about this subject. Transcendentalism has effected many people since the philosophy was first introduced. The idea was complex and hard to grasp for many commoners and therefore it was understood by few people, and some would think that the idea was not understood at all and that was part of the idea. Henry David Thoreau once stated about himself, “I should have told them at once that I was a transcendentalist. That would have been the shortest way of telling them that they would not understand my explanations” (Reuben 1).
In the unit “The Spirit of Individualism” there are two parts, “Celebrations of the self” and “The Dark side of Individualism” with pieces that present very different perspectives on human nature. “The Dark side of Individualism” portrays human nature as greedy, confused, easily caught up in fame, and addicted to wealth and possessions. In “Celebrations of the Self”, human nature is viewed in a more positive light. The characteristics shown are self reliance, independence, wisdom and selflessness. “The Dark side of Individualism” pieces are written in a more macabre tone, whereas “Celebrations of the Self” pieces have a more positive and uplifting tone to them. The generalizations of human nature are different because of the pieces in “The Dark side of Individualism” and “Celebrations of the Self” have entirely different views on life and human nature.
It arises issues because we tend to take value away from humans and allow ourselves to see them as just items. According to they essay” The Language of Prejudice” by Gordon Allport he describes why the usage of nouns are usually not a good way to describe people. They aren’t right because a “noun” abstracts from a concrete reality some one feature and assembles different concrete realities only with respect to this one feature,” (Allport, 218). He explains why we group people in different categories give each other names as easy way recognition of a certain group. Although we may see no harm in the labels we give each other are nouns that can be racist, stereotypical and demeaning. In result of the nouns we use they cause us classify and overlook all other features of a person making them seem incapable and
...can go through an entire lifetime and not really know how to define their own identity. In many cases people suffer through a great crisis to discover who they really are. If someone doesn?t know the meaning of their own identity, how can society apply a definition to the word? It leaves people to ponder whether or not there are some feelings and parts of life that simply cannot be explained. When defining the word identity scholars and common men alike must agree to disagree. It is a word so diverse in context that it is seemingly impossible to take it down to a simplified definition. There are some things in life that just aren?t meant to be completely understood, and one?s identity is among these things. Not until a person has a lived out their live could they sit down and tell you how their adventure has shaped them into the person they became in the end.