Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Target market positioning strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Target market positioning strategy
Organizations will change the goods or services they provide, more often than others. This can be for many reasons such as social trends, competition, advances in technology and occasionally from accusations from pressure groups. Social trends give a broad indication of the society in that particular country, by analyzing previous economic data. Social trends will have an effect on the services or products that organizations provide, for example as technology advances in the car industry, and the public require a vehicle that is friendlier towards the environment. This will result in the organization needing to make the factory and the car itself more fuel efficient, and release less harmful gasses. All of these things lead to customer satisfaction, which in turn will lead to the customer expecting a better service. Eastgate Ford in Canada, for example, have included in their mission statement that their tradition of customer satisfaction has brought their customers back year after year. However having a high standard of service and product will spark a reaction from rival companies. Competition can also be good for the consumer as it can cause certain companies to begin lowering prices, in order to attract customers. It is important that the companies do not get into a price war, because the automobile market is somewhat an oligopoly, containing a few large competitors who can afford to lower prices more than smaller companies, due to larger profit margins. Therefore if the smaller companies cannot lower prices they will need to find a new product or service to meet consumer needs. If they can find this particular service then the small company could use heavy marketing to promote the USP (unique selling point). In order to find a USP the organization will need to partake in research and development, this can also be used to find more efficient ways to create goods and provide services, and from here it will create new ideas, innovation and give a competitive advantage to them.
Pressure groups are also a cause for the change of a product or service. Pressure groups can exert pressure onto an organization by seeking publicity, creating petitions, holding protests, and in extreme cases criminal activity, if they feel strongly against the actions of the organization. For example on 6th October last year, animal rights extremists dug up the grave of a relative of an employee of a medical research farm.
...tion. These examples vary from providing 401(k) to health and dental insurance benefits, to stock ownership, to assisting employees purchase new homes. The owner does not push their employees to sell. Instead he pushes workers towards being knowledgeable of the product and presenting a pleasant atmosphere. Convinced that the product will sell itself, the leader of Starbucks focuses his bottom line on his followers. Organizations which focus on the production and annual sales often only view labor (followers) in terms of a commodity. Therefore, in the long-run they may not be as successful. My recommendation is for an organization to focus on their labor force (followers) by recognizing contributions and talents, etc. By also adopting practices that help improve workers satisfaction and in the long run this will help them improve or maintain a healthy bottom line.
Pressure groups have certain responsibilities that they have to abide by when carrying out their duties which include basing their criticism on facts, hold peaceful and legal meetings, inform local authorities which includes the police prior to protesting, and most important responsibility is not to intimidate.
The consultant should develop scenarios showing what could happen to the company if the change is not implemented, and examine opportunities that could be exploited.
Organisational change has been defined as ‘the process of continually renewing an organization’s direction, structure, and capabilities to serve the ever-changing needs of external and internal customers’ (Moran and Brightman, 2001: 111). In order to survive in the era of rapid economic, companies will need to change. Instead of being simple and explicit, organisational change is complex, conceptual and continuous. As Pettigrew mentioned, “Empirically and theoretically, change and continuity need one another” (Pettigrew, 1987). Furthermore, based on Pettigrew’s research, change is best viewed as an emergent process (Pettigrew, 1985). There are many evidences throughout the years in which organizations implement changes as an ongoing process, rather than a one-time transformation.
The article discusses how organizations must change to survive in a competitive market. Companies must change how they gather information, implement the information, and support the employees that acquire the information.
The operational change within JLL was seen rationally from the organisations perspective as re-structuring the engineering team would result in cost saving and provide increased geographic coverage of engineering resources.
This essay explores pressure groups and their role in democracy and society. It also discusses how pressure groups use the media as a communication strategy to influence.
...can be key in improving customer sales. If a customer does not see the value of an organization's product, that customer may begin to shop for a competitor's product based only on price. Price is not the only competitive advantage an organization may have, but if it is not able to articulate the non-price value, it can significantly lower the organization's competitive advantage.
Notwithstanding these many achievements, some theorists argue that there is a conflicting relationship between TQM and innovation. On the one hand, Juran (1988) argues that given the fact that the whole ideology of TQM emphasises customer focus, this could prove to be beneficial as it encourages organisations to persistently examine customer wants and needs which leads to the organisations being innovative in regards to producing products that serve not only as a response to customer needs but also as a continual adaptation to the market’s changing needs. On the other hand, Slater and Naver (1998) refute this argument by stating that this customer focus premise could hinder innovation and instead it may contribute to the emergence of a “tyranny of the served markets” as organisations could end up focusing solely on incremental improvements on their products and services rather than attempting to create unique solutions. Simply put, one could argue that TQM could prove to be disastrous for innovation because in the constant attempt to respond to customer needs and expectations, organisations may lose sight of what their primary aim was and end up creating and developing uninspired and uncompetitive “me too” products that lack real
...llenging to the organization is undeniable thus the organizations really have to come out with competitive transformation strategies so that they are strong enough to compete with their business competitors (Tonono, 2008).
Robbins et al. (2011, p. 186), states ‘Change is an organizational reality and affects every part of a manager’s job’. Today’s wave of change primarily created by economic condition so change is now such a constant feature of organization life (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). Organizations need to be changed at one point or another in structure, technology or people. These changes are defined as organizational change (Robbins et al. 2011, p.18). Organizational change is important because changes can increase effectiveness and efficiency, the innovation of products, services as well as dealing with changes in external and internal forces (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). However, ‘the bottom line is that organizational change is difficult because management systems are design and people are rewarded for stability’ (Lawler, E.E. & Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11).
Like many organizations, over the last decade, external factors have accelerated the rate of organizational change. “The workplace is characterized by the frequent organizational change that accompanies business growth, innovation, globalization, complex regulations, competition, and evolving consumer tastes” (Cullen, Edwards, Casper, & Gue, 2014, p.269). However, a growing body of research on organizational change has shifted the focus from the antecedents for organizational to the antecedents of failed change and the challenges leader’s face with change planning, practices, and implementation and the role of employee behaviors, well-being and the overall affected trust and ethics as organizational behaviors impact employee’s adaptability
The group wants the individual to conform to their ideals and normative values and actions (Smelser, 1963). The group influence stresses conformity, or the adhering to the standards of the group, as a way to create a structural level of dominance and submission in a way. The group wants cohesiveness so that everyone in the group is following the same set of standards and will all act the same way (Smelser, 1963). Group influence can at times be beneficial, there are times when the individual should participate in actions that have been influenced by the group. These actions could include such things as: being polite, having table manners, using a proper greeting, doing homework, not being disrespectful in places of worship, and so forth. Group influence can
Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.
In order for businesses to be successful, they have to be proactively responding to the competitions and analyzing the changes in the market. They need to think strategically what type of benefits that they want to offer and the degree of “separability” between the company and the customers. This is the second key issue that the authors presented. Every organization needs...