Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american oral storytelling
Democracy definition quizlet
Native american oral storytelling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Native american oral storytelling
3.1.1 Conflict Resolution: Critique through ethnographic data
Realism and liberal peace are the most accepted paradigms within Conflict studies. Above I offer a critique of both perspectives constructed through dialogue with members of different tribal nations.
Liberal Peace Theory: “Democracies do not go to war against each other”
For Native Americans, these premise is macabre humor. Native Americans, historically, self-define their political structure as a “consensus democracy”; which means that the majority is not the decision-maker, but through participatory means members of the community reach an agreement that satisfies all of them. Additionally, Native Americans characterize themselves as Tribal Nations, since they mention possessing
…show more content…
The realist paradigm metaphorically, assumes that States are individuals acting in its own self-interest. Paradoxically, at the same time defines nation-states like political entities, as opposed to political beings.
As I previously explained, Native Americans self-define their communities as nations with a consensus democracy system. The “self-interest argument seems far-fetched under these contexts. George, a member of the Catawba nation- explained how the concept of conseus democracy operates at the individual and community level, and emphasized the lessons that could be learnt from it. She explained, that as members of a community Natives historically reached a consensus that satisfied as much as possible the members of the community. Therefore, he argued that the community members perceived that in the final outcome there is a part of them. However, he discussed that besides their tribal idenitity, other identities intersect, class, gender, profession, and so on. Since they had to reach a consensus, able to work on their favor, they could not simply decide based on their tribal identity, but consider something that also favors the intersection between their other identities. Which means, that their self-interest is group-oriented, as opposed to
…show more content…
They defend the importance of oral history, story-telling and sharing knowledge as part of their identity, means to resist assimilation policies and to bond with members of their own communities. Although the term narrative has different meaning for different tribes and different individuals, there are certain elements that are shared among Native Americans. This shared features of the term narrative do not operate as a list. Contrarily, the importance lies under the interconnections and linkages among them. The following re-definition of narratives emanated from the 12 interviews, afterwards it was sent to the 12 collaborators and re-constructed until the 12 of them reached a
Pages one to sixty- nine in Indian From The Inside: Native American Philosophy and Cultural Renewal by Dennis McPherson and J. Douglas Rabb, provides the beginning of an in-depth analysis of Native American cultural philosophy. It also states the ways in which western perspective has played a role in our understanding of Native American culture and similarities between Western culture and Native American culture. The section of reading can be divided into three lenses. The first section focus is on the theoretical understanding of self in respect to the space around us. The second section provides a historical background into the relationship between Native Americans and British colonial power. The last section focus is on the affiliation of otherworldliness that exist between
King, Thomas. “Let Me Entertain You. The Truth About Stories: A Native Narrative. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005. 61-89. Print.
Oral History and Oral Tradition was incredibly important for both tribes. They passed legends and historical stories on through speech, each story holding its own important moral or message. For example,
Discuss the distinctive qualities that define the way stories are told in Native American cultures. How do these differ from what you might have thought of as a traditional story?
Duane Champagne in Social Change and Cultural Continuity Among Native Nations explains that there has never been one definitive world view that comprises any one Native American culture, as there is no such thing as one “Native community” (2007:10). However, there are certain commonalities in the ways of seeing and experiencing the world that many Native communities and their religions seem to share.
Considering historical evidence, the notion: Native –Americans was not the first inhabitant of America is a complete false. For centuries, history kept accurate and vivid accounts of the first set of people who domiciled the western hemisphere. Judging by those records, below are the first set of Native-American people who inhabited America before the arrival of another human race; the Iroquois: The Iroquois of Native Americans was one of the tribes that lived in America before other people came. Based on historical evidence, it is believed that the Native Americans came from Asia way back during the Ice Age through a land bridge of the Bering Strait. When the Europeans first set foot in America, there were about 10 million Native Americans
In “The Truth about Stories”, Thomas King, demonstrate connection between the Native storytelling and the authentic world. He examines various themes in the stories such as; oppression, racism, identity and discrimination. He uses the creational stories and implies in to the world today and points out the racism and identity issues the Native people went through and are going through. The surroundings shape individuals’ life and a story plays vital roles. How one tells a story has huge impact on the listeners and readers. King uses sarcastic tone as he tells the current stories of Native people and his experiences. He points out to the events and incidents such as the government apologizing for the colonialism, however, words remains as they are and are not exchanged for actions. King continuously alerts the reader about taking actions towards change as people tend to be ignorant of what is going around them. At the end people give a simple reason that they were not aware of it. Thus, the author constantly reminds the readers that now they are aware of the issue so they do not have any reason to be ignorant.
Like many Americans I initially grouped all Native Americans into one melting pot. During the Haskell Indian Nations cultural day, on June 21,st 2010, the speakers talked about how different tribes are not the same; they have different beliefs...
Many people believe that Native Americans are a disadvantaged group of individuals in many ways. Culturally, in that many of the cultures of the various tribes across the Americas were taken from them by Europeans and their descendants. Socially, in that they are unlike other minorities in the United States because of their extra-constitutional status; and even medically, stemming from the general belief that Natives are at a higher risk for disease than other ethnicities due to tobacco and alcohol use, especially when used together (Falk, Hiller-Sturmhöfel, & Yi, 2006).
The colonization of civilizations has changed the world’s history forever. From the French, Spaniard, and down to the English, have changed cultures, traditions, religions, and livelihoods of other societies. The Native Americans, for example, were one of the many civilizations that were conquered by the English. The result was their ways of life based on nature changed into the more “civilized” ways of the colonists of the English people. Many Native Americans have lost their old ways and were pulled into the new “civilized” ways. Today only a small amount of Native American nations or tribes exist in remote areas surviving following their traditions. In the book Ceremony, a story of a man named Tayo, did not know himself and the world around him but in the end found out and opened his eyes to the truth. However the Ceremony’s main message is related not only to one man but also to everything and everyone in the world. It is a book with the message that the realization of oneself will open the eyes to see what is truth and false which will consequently turn to freedom.
Within Western academic culture the use of oral accounts has often been questioned or ridiculed. However, the tradition remains an important aspect of indigenous cultures, and Hogan emphasizes its significance. Although the main narrator of her novel Solar Storms is Angel, other narrators highlight sections with numerous oral accounts. These segments provide character histories and fill in the back-story, but they serve a larger purpose as well. Printed in italics and written from a first person point of view, as if someone was speaking the stories, these parts show the value and purpose that the oral tradition serves for indigenous people. Hogan confronts this issue directly in her short story “Meeting.” In an early scene a section of dialogue appears to be nothing more than rumor, but she corrects the reader stating, “It was not gossip. It was the history of our living.” While not all oral history sounds like gossip, Hogan points to the variety of function and meaning that the oral tradition encompasses. For her, its use is vital in the way indigenous people form meaning and memory in their
The oral tradition serves the important function of maintaining the people, several oral biographies that permeate every aspect of the believing individual's existence. From a Native American's educational experience, the oral tradition provides instruction in the culture and beliefs of the people, transmits a sense of self, kinship, and tribal 6 identity; helps establish a close relationship with nature; unifies tribal history; explains ambiguities and natural phenomena; and teaches maintenance of the ways of the group. In short, the oral tradition provides the Native American with a way of life; a sense of self. In a sense, they
They received the title “Native” because they are indigenous to North America; they were the first people inhibiting North America before European settlers arrived and claimed land. The European settlers made treaties of land cession with the Natives to legitimize their land seizure (Spector, 2009). As the White population grew, Native Americans were displaced and pushed westward. Due to the forced westward migration, Most American Indians live in the Western part of America. Today, the largest populations of Native Americans live in Oklahoma, Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Alaska (Spector, 2009).
They promote reconnecting with the land, their language, their idea of freedom, and their diet (in a way that does not rely on global capitalism) at a personal level. However, the arguments suffer somewhat in the approach, and how it attempts to define each of these things. The article is written not from the perspective of a particular tribe, or country, and indeed notes that each indigenous experience is different, but instead as a workbook that all indigenous people could follow across the world. However, when it comes to specific examples on how to do this they are inherently built on their own knowledge and come across as both vague and not fully appreciative.
In realism, states are seen as rational, unitary actors. Realists assume that the actions of a state are representative of the entire state’s population, disregarding political parties, individuals, or domestic conflict within the state (Goldstein & Pevehouse, 2010). Any action a state takes is in an effort to pursue national interest. National interest is “the interest of a state overall (as opposed to particular political parties or factions within the state)” (qtd. in Goldstein and Pevehouse, 2010, p. 355). If a state is rational, they are capable of performing cost-benefit analysis by weighing the cost against the benefit of each action. This assumes that all states have complete information when making choices (Goldstein & Pe...