Raymond Finkelstein's Code Of Ethics In The Australian Media Industry

1376 Words3 Pages

Introduction
Raymond Finkelstein submitted the Finkelstein Inquiry to the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy on February 28, 2012. Finkelstein was charged with a responsibility to examine the Australia media industry and the regulations that governed the industry. Finkelstein undertook the task with the assistance of the Independent Media Inquiry from September 14, 2011, to the day of submission stated. The findings and recommendations of the Inquiry caused national and international debate. Finkelstein addressed critical issues that influence the media and the society in general. For instance, the Inquiry addressed issues such as the media and democracy, the regulation of the media and the structure and role of …show more content…

The codes of ethics also would incorporate aspects of public accountability and responsibility. Though the findings concerning the issues of fairness, impartiality and integrity were of great importance, different bodies, mainly media organizations felt that the move towards regulation would limit freedom and deter effective and free reporting. Apart from this, the Inquiry found less consensus on the enforcement of accountability after the implementation of the regulation. The existence of self-regulation mechanisms in the newspapers industry within the country posed a question of whether the Inquiry recommendation should be applied to the entirety of the media industry. The newspaper industry in Australia had well-established ethical codes that imposed obligations of accuracy, fairness and responsibility on the journalist and the newspaper before the Inquiry. However, findings of the report indicated that neither self-regulation nor external regulation of the media industry were not sufficient in the assurance of accountability (Finkelstein, 2012, p. …show more content…

The report posits that the media defends its adherence to certain standards using the readers and audience in general as the frame of reference. For instance, bias in reporting causes the passage of inaccurate information to the reader(s). Arguing against the claims of bias and inaccuracy, the media industry, for example, the News Limited used the audience as defense stating that such allegations were an insult to the public. However, in support of the Inquiry finding, Finkelstein argues that the public expects accurate and non-misleading information. Tiffen (2012) supports the argument by suggesting that though the public can interpret and make its mind, misleading and inaccurate information influences their thinking. The media has the responsibility to meet the expectations of the reader(s) or audience by delivering meaningful, accurate and impartial

Open Document