Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ray bradbury style of writing
The veldt ray bradbury essay
Ray bradbury thesis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Metaphor is the Medicine
Acclaimed American author and screen writer of over 200 stories, Ray Bradbury, in his compilation of essays, Zen in the Art of Writing, endeavors to inspire would-be writers with personal anecdotes and advise from his own successful writing career. Bradbury adopts a kind and mentor-like tone to inspire and encourage the would-be-writers who read his book.
Ray Bradbury uses an elaborate metaphor to explain what the following essays will be about in his preface. “So that, one way or another, is what this book is all about. Taking your pinch of arsenic every morn so you can survive to sunset. Another pinch at sunset so that you can more-than-survive until dawn” (Bradbury XIII). In his metaphor the “pinch of arsenic” is writing. He claims
…show more content…
writing every day is the key to surviving every day. He explicitly states writing is not therapy later in the preface, but it is his way of dealing with the things life throws at him. Bradbury claims by writing one can deal better with the world around him/her. For his readers that already aspire to become authors this is already a self-evident fact. This section of the preface is aimed more at those readers who have yet to commit to Bradbury’s suggested writing-intensive lifestyle. Bradbury claims writing is a cure so those who are still on the fence might continue reading and come to agree with him. Bradbury uses a very casual tone and second-person pronouns throughout his essays to keep a friendly bond between himself and the reader. These bonds strengthen any claims he makes because people tend to take advice more willingly from a friend than from a stranger. It is this bond that helps to encourage the reader to try writing for his/herself which is Bradbury’s motive for writing these pieces. The first essay in the collection is “The Joy of Writing” written by Bradbury in 1973. This essay focuses on the two characteristics Bradbury believes every successful writer should have. These characteristics are “zest” and “gusto”. Both terms are vague when taken at face value. Bradbury elaborates with an extensive list of authors followed by “They all knew the joy of creating in large or small forms, in unlimited or restricted canvases” (Bradbury 3). Bradbury claims a writer must find joy in his/her work to make something great. He then carries his examples beyond the world of literature and into the world of art. “Look at El Greco’s elongation and tell me, if you can, that he had no joy in his work?” (Bradbury 4). The sheer quantity of his examples strengthens Bradbury’s logical appeal in his argument. He goes on to appeal to emotion by warning the reader “if you are writing without zest, without gusto, without love, without fun, you are only half a writer” (Bradbury 4). This quote could be used to summarize the entire essay. Bradbury claims the one thing writers must have is a love for writing and an ability to enjoy it. The rest of the essay consists of examples from Bradbury’s own writing experiences to encourage the reader to write about something he/she passionately loves or hates so the zest and gusto is apparent in the piece written. “… ideas lie everywhere, like apples fallen and melting in the grass for lack of wayfaring strangers with an eye and tongue for beauty, whether absurd, horrific, or genteel” (Bradbury 8). Since this essay comes first in the book it is reasonable to assume these are the most basic tools Bradbury believes a writer needs. “Run Fast, Stand Still, or The Thing at the Top of the Stairs, or New Ghosts from Old Minds” is the second essay in Bradbury’s compilation. This essay focuses on the source of inspiration in writers. Bradbury’s first piece of advice in this essay is this: “In quickness is truth. The faster you blurt, the more swiftly you write the more honest you are. In hesitation is thought. In delay comes the effort for a style, instead of leaping upon truth which is the only style worth dead falling or tiger-trapping” (Bradbury 13). Bradbury encourages his reader/writer to avoid the uncertainty in hesitation. Rapid-firing writing is how Bradbury claims truths are written. He continues the essay by explaining author mimicry. He claims young writer will often copy the style of their favorite authors for years before finding their own voice. Bradbury uses his own experience in this regard as an example. By telling the reader he has made the same mistake he transitions from chastising to understanding. It reassures the reader these errors are universal and not irrevocable. “I wrote at least a thousand words a day every day from the age of twelve on” (Bradbury 15). Several times throughout his essays Bradbury claims one must write regularly for a long time to become a good writer. While Bradbury meant for this to be encouraging, to convince his readers that anyone can become a good writer, instead he comes off as intimidating. Writing 1,000 words a day is an intimidating idea. Especially since Bradbury claims there will not a relevant story written for many years with this method. His method for story subjects is much less daunting. “… along through those years I began making lists of titles, to put down long lines of nouns” (Bradbury 17). Bradbury follows his example list of titles with the claim that they emerged from his subconscious. He contests these title lists, and their accompanying stories will help writers discover their own style and voice. He backs this claim with examples from his own list and their accompanying stories. These personal anecdotes are meant to encourage prospective writers to make their own lists and find their own successes. Essay three, “How to Keep and Feed A Muse”, is about motivation.
The entire essay follows an analogy about the ancient Greek goddesses, The Muses. Bradbury starts off with a series of rhetorical questions on the muse and what to do with her. His personification of the muse is rather abstract. he compares the muse first to the concept of love by using a modified Oscar Wilde poem. Then to the specks of light that float in one’s eye. Bradbury claims a muse is something that must be ignored to work. He continues the work by discussing what to feed a muse. “… We stuff ourselves with sounds, sights, smells, tastes, and textures of people, animals, landscapes, events, large and small” (Bradbury 33). Bradbury goes on to claim these sensations are what makes a muse grow. The essay continues with Bradbury’s assessment that every person has a muse because everyone sees and witnesses’ events differently. “… when a man talks from his heart, in his moment of truth, he speaks poetry” (Bradbury 34). The discussion of everyone’s personal muse concludes with a story about Bradbury’s dad and the poetry he has spoken. This whole section functions to encourage the reader and help him/her to consider his/her own
muse. A muse is fed on life and then on words. Bradbury continues this essay with a diet for the subconscious. He starts this diet with poetry. “Poetry expands the senses and keeps them in prime condition” (Bradbury 36). Bradbury claims poetry is essential because it keeps one in tune with their senses. His next element in this literary diet are books of essays. Bradbury encourages the reader to pick up books of essays on anything and everything. The last elements of the diet are short stories and novels. Essentially, Bradbury encourages one to read everything he/she can get his/her hands on. It is this well-rounded literary diet that feeds good authors. A slew of personal anecdotes and advice accompanies this advised diet to encourage the readers. The next essay, “Drunk and in Charge of a bicycle”, is where Bradbury makes the claim that most literary inspiration comes from childhood interests and fears. A clear majority of this essay revolves around personal anecdotes from Bradbury’s childhood that influenced his writing later. He urges readers to look within themselves and look back at their lives to find inspiration for stories. The next three essays are about Bradbury’s experience writing Fahrenheit 451, Dandelion Wine, and the Martian Chronicles. Each one is a personal story about the experiences without any claims or grandeur statements on the writing process. These three essays read more like chapters in a biography. “On the Shoulders of Giants” is the last essay discussed in this paper. This essay is about the “double revolution” that children began in the literary and art worlds. Throughout his essays Bradbury attests on multiple occasions that children and childhood are of vital importance to the creative process. In this essay he gives a hypothetical example of this. Bradbury claims that children spearheaded the surge of science fiction writing in libraries across the country and later the surge of fantasy art. In his book of essays Neil Gaiman writes on the same topic: “There are no bad authors for children, that children like and want to read and seek out, because every child is different” (Gaiman 7). Both Ray Bradbury and Neil Gaiman are fiction writers, but they are from separate times. Despite this they both recognize that children must be given the freedom to read what they want to read. Bradbury expands on this idea with his claims that from childhood comes the best inspiration to write about. Though these are only a few of the essays from Bradbury’s Compilation, Zen in the Art of Writing, they encompass the primary themes of the work. Ray Bradbury wrote these essays to inspire readers to go out and write and did so with his personal stories and friendly tone. Works Cited Bradbury, Ray. Zen in the Art of Writing. 1990. Gaiman, Neil. The View from the Cheap Seats. Harper Collins Publishers. 2016.
Vogler, Christopher. The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers. 2nd ed. Studio City: Michael Weise Productions, 1998.
As a child, Ray Bradbury loved to read fantasy novels. Inspired by his favorite writers, he longed to become a fantasy writer himself. Bradbury lived during the Great Depression with very little money, therefore he could not put himself through school. Instead, Bradbury went to the library every other day for ten years. During this time, he realized that he wanted to pursue his dream of becoming a writer. To get money, Bradbury started publishing his works in a newspaper. Because he wanted practice, he used several pseudonyms to make it look like he had several authors publishing their stories in his newspaper, but in fact, it was written entirely by Bradbury himself. “Bradbury uses [his] stories not only to entertain, but to cause readers to think about their own lives” (Clark, Tracy). He focused more on the message of his story than the popularity of it. “When ask...
What is an author’s muse? A muse can be influences from historical events, life events, or ideals. A Separate Peace written by John Knowles is a book written from his experiences and current events. He took these experiences and transferred them to his novel. Today many people appreciate his novel and its influences. John Knowles’ boarding school at Exeter, his life and experiences during World War II, and the characters’ guilt influenced his great work, A Separate Peace.
In this day and age, writing is being portrayed through various mediums, such as film and television. Some of those portrayals depict writing as both good and bad depending on the situation that is present. Authors such as, by E. Shelley Reid, Kevin Roozen, and Anne Lamott all write about important writing concepts that are being depicted in films, like Freedom Writers. The film Freedom Writers shows a positive and accurate portrayal of writing in the sense that the writers should have a connection to what they are writing about, writing is a form of communication, and that writing does not have to be perfect the first time.
Adler-Kassner, Lisa. “Taking Action to Change Stories.” The Activist WPA: Changing Stories about Writing and Writers. Logan, UT: Utah State, 2008.
Many people think that reading more can help them to think and develop before writing something. Others might think that they don’t need to read and or write that it can really help them to brainstorm things a lot quicker and to develop their own ideas immediately (right away). The author’s purpose of Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, is to understand the concepts, strategies and understandings of how to always read first and then start something. The importance of this essay is to understand and comprehend our reading and writing skills by brainstorming our ideas and thoughts a lot quicker. In other words, we must always try to read first before we can brainstorm some ideas and to think before we write something. There are many reasons why I chose Stephen King’s essay, Reading to Write, by many ways that reading can help you to comprehend, writing, can help you to evaluate and summarize things after reading a passage, if you read, it can help you to write things better and as you read, it can help you to think and evaluate of what to write about.
Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun. Literature and the Writing Process. Elizabeth McMahan, Susan X. Day, and Robert Funk. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice, 2002.
...s educational system on traditionalism that focuses on fluency, appreciation, and comprehension. King states, “no one can be as intellectually slothful as a really smart person” (138). As a whole we are “creatures of habit”, thus resisting changes in the traditional sphere of academics. King uses his spin on popular culture to engage future readers and inspire the next generation of writers. “Some of this book—perhaps too much—has been about how I learned to do it. Much of it has been about how you can do it better. The rest of it—and perhaps the best of it—is a permission slip: you can, you should, and if you're brave enough to start, you will.” (King 269-270). “On Writing” is a poignant, educated, and inspiring book, a book that is sure to help hundreds of struggling writers and will motivate others who may pick up the book not for inspiration, but mere curiosity.
"Ray Bradbury." Contemporary Authors Online. Detroit: Gale, 2012. Literature Resource Center. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
Although the greater picture is that reading is fundamental, the two authors have a few different messages that they seek to communicate to their audiences. “The Joy of Reading and Writing” depicts how reading serves as a mechanism to escape the preconceived notions that constrain several groups of people from establishing themselves and achieving success in their lifetimes. “Reading to Write,” on the other hand, offers a valuable advice to aspiring writers. The author suggests that one has to read, read, and read before he or she can become a writer. Moreover, he holds an interesting opinion concerning mediocre writing. He says, “Every book you pick has its own lesson or lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (p.221). Although these two essays differ in their contents and messages, the authors use the same rhetorical mode to write their essays. Both are process analyses, meaning that they develop their main argument and provide justification for it step by step. By employing this technique, the two authors create essays that are thoughtful, well supported, and easy to understand. In addition, Alexie and King both add a little personal touch to their writings as they include personal anecdotes. This has the effect of providing support for their arguments. Although the two essays have fairly different messages, the authors make use of anecdotes and structure their writing in a somewhat similar
It is fascinating to me to read the articles “Why I Write,” by George Orwell and Joan Didion. These authors touch on so many different topics for their reasons to writing. Their ideals are very much different, but their end results are the same, words on paper for people to read. Both authors made very descriptive points to how their minds wander on and off their writings while trying to write. They both often were writing about what they didn’t want to write about before they actually wrote what they wanted too. In George Orwell’s case, he wrote many things when he was young the he himself would laugh at today, or felt was unprofessional the but if he hadn’t done so he would not of been the writer he became. In Joan Didion’s case she would often be daydreaming about subjects that had nothing to do with what she intended on writing. Her style of writing in this article is actually more interesting because of this. Her mind wandering all over on many different subjects to how her writing came to her is very interesting for a person like me to read. My mind is also very restless on many different unneeded topics before I actually figure some sort of combined way to put words on to paper for people to read. Each author put down in their articles many ways of how there minds work while figuring out what they are going to write about. Both of the authors ended ...
and Other Greats : Lessons from the All-star Writer's Workshop. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006. Print.
In 1954 Bradbury was honored with an award from the National Institute of Arts and Letters for his contribution to American literature. In 1956 he collaborated with John Huston to create the screenplay for 'Moby Dick'. In addition to fiction Bradbury wrote 'Zen and the Art of Writing' and also published such dramas as 'The Anthem Sprinters’, 'The Wonderful Ice Cream Suit, The Pedestrian’, and volumes of poetry including 'When Elephants Last in the Dooryard Bloomed', 'Where Robot Mice & Robot Men Run Around in Robot Towns', and 'The Haunted Computer and the Android Pope'.
Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun. Literature and the Writing Process. Elizabeth McMahan, Susan X. Day, and Robert Funk. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice, 2002. 987-1042.
Vogler, Christopher. The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers. 3rd Ed. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions, 2007.